A quick check of the diaries to see if this obvious question was already asked post NH, I find (in addition to the fact that it doesn't seem to have been) the news that Trippi is out of Dean's campaign!
Whoa. I guess that factors in, huh? But how?
PS: I like Trippi. I liked Hart and Jerry Brown. But I think that while Trippi built Dean, he's not so hot at handling frontrunner status. Put another way, Trippi is a great thinker in the area of participatory democracy, but that alone may not win a campaign because it's about building support, not winning the extended debate which is "a campaign". I think that it may have been better to get Trippi to stay (even as "CEO") and merely have him defer some strategy decisions to new consultants, but maybe Trippi's style could not accomodate that.
Candidates are in alphabetical order. It's fine if you are unsure... you can change your prediction later. :)
PPS: the abcnews.com article calls Trippi's position "Campaign CEO"... shouldn't that be "Campaign COO" leaving the CEO position to Dean? I ask this a little ironically since I think the proliferation of the CEO title beyond corporations is a bit disgusting. I feel about it the way some people feel about the term "meme". (I love the term "meme" by the way)