Daily Kos

MI-07: GOP Rep. Schwarz: "Theocracy" Coming to America?

Mon Sep 04, 2006 at 03:35:59 PM PDT

Adapted from a post at Walberg Watch.

On August 8th, while all attention was on the Lieberman-Lamont race in Connecticut, a tough primary battle ended as McCain-style moderate Congressman Joe Schwarz was defeated for nomination in Michigan's 7th District. His opponent, former State Rep. Tim Walberg, ran a negative campaign claiming Schwarz was a "liberal," largely backed by the Club for Growth, Right to Life, and the Minuteman PAC.

Following his loss, Schwarz has been largely silent about his plans for the future. However, it's becoming increasingly clear what he does not intend to do:

Some harsh criticism in the extended entry...


WASHINGTON -- In the wake of his loss in the primary last month, U.S. Rep. Joe Schwarz says he won't endorse or vote for the Republican pastor who defeated him and accused "right-wing intimidators" of running moderates like himself out of the party.

That's right. Joe Schwarz-- a prominent Republican from Battle Creek, who served in Michigan's legislature for years, served Michigan's 7th District in Congress, and even ran for governor in 2002-- will not vote for his party's nominee, Tim Walberg.

The Detroit News article continues:


    "The far right, the religious right are driving moderates out of the party. In the end, that can only hurt because it takes a critical mass to have a successful party," Schwarz said in his first extensive interview since losing the Aug. 8 primary to Tim Walberg.

    The Battle Creek physician said several friends told him they plan to leave the party after watching him be hammered on social issues and then lose in spite of endorsements by establishment Republicans including President Bush and Saul Anuzis, chairman of the Michigan Republican Party.

    Schwarz said he could see circumstances under which he would join them.

...


Schwarz accused Walberg of running a "character assassination" campaign, which was aided by a series of "moral absolutist" votes on the U.S. House floor in mid-July -- three weeks before the primary.

Schwarz, who supports stem cell research and keeping abortion legal, was repeatedly criticized during the primary for his "anti-life" positions. His problems became even worse as he opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment-- although he opposes same-sex marriage, he doesn't support amending the Constitution. Although his positions had merit, the primary turned negative very quickly, with Tim Walberg constantly on the attack.

But in this interview with the Detroit News, Schwarz blames the religious right alone for his defeat and the current state of the GOP.

While Schwarz has had some harsh criticism of Tim Walberg and the religious right before, this is the closest he's come publicly to switching parties. But just when you thought his criticism couldn't be more harsh, you read this:


    Schwarz decried the growing role religion is playing in politics.

    Schwarz, who at 68 hasn't ruled out running for elective office in the future, said, "There are people out there who believe that that this country should be a theocracy."


(Emphasis added)

It's a rather stunning statement from a Republican in Congress, don't you think? Since being elected, Schwarz has been far from progressive in the House, but could be counted on to think for himself from time to time. Tim Walberg, on the other hand, represents only the interests of the religious right and Club for Growth, not those of the 7th District.

The race also earns the attention of political reporter Jack Lessenberry in a column for the Toledo Blade. The relevant portion:


Now, Mr. Schwarz is returning the favor. "I've lost elections before, and after each one I could invite my opponent out for a beer. Not this time. I can't endorse Walberg. His campaign tactics were reprehensible, consisting of one lie and mischaracterization after another."

During the race, Mr. Walberg painted Mr. Schwarz, a Vietnam veteran, former CIA agent, and strong supporter of the Iraq War, as a liberal who was far too left-wing for the district.

The congressman, who is also a medical doctor, complained that virtually all his opponent's money came from not only out of the district but out of state, mainly from the shadowy Club for Growth, which funded a smear campaign against him.

Whether he will endorse the Democratic nominee, 50-year-old organic farmer Sharon Renier, is unclear. Two years ago, she lost to Mr. Schwarz, 58 percent to 36 percent, but had no money. The district, which includes Hillsdale and Lenawee Counties, is mainly Republican -- but voted for Bill Clinton twice. Any Democrat is a long shot ... yet keep an eye on this one.


(Emphasis added)

The Democratic nominee for the district is Sharon Renier. Renier managed 36 percent against Joe Schwarz in 2004 with almost no money and no media attention. In a district that went 45 percent for John Kerry, she'll perform much better against the far-right conservative Tim Walberg. Could she win in a stunning upset?

Contribute
Volunteer

Tags: MI-07, Tim Walberg, Joe Schwarz, Sharon Renier, House, 2006 elections (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 14 comments

  •  Out of fairness... (15+ / 0-)

    Schwarz didn't actually say that theocracy was coming to America, as the title suggests. Still, it's a stunning attack on the Religious Right by a fairly conservative Republican.

    Now, on to November!

    Walberg Watch - MI-07's Radical Conservative Tim Walberg

    by Lenawee Liberal on Mon Sep 04, 2006 at 03:25:08 PM PDT

  •  Not liking the bed they made? (12+ / 0-)

    These "moderates" in the GOP have lived high on the hog since 1994 while their party courted and abetted the so-called religious right. He stood by while members of his party made a mockery of the separation of church and state and openly decried the very foundations upon which this country is built. Where was his comdemnation then? Now that he lost to one of the people his party groveled in front of, he's suddenly upset.

    I despise the autocrats who want to turn this country into a theocracy based upon one bizarre interpetation of the Bible, but they're autocrats so I don't blame them for acting like it. I have a special disgust when it comes to collaborators who stand by and say nothing as long as they get some, too. Well, he certainly got his, didn't he?

    The Democratic Party: Always ready to bring a knife to a gun fight.

    by Splicer on Mon Sep 04, 2006 at 03:37:01 PM PDT

    •  I just have to wonder how well Schwarz served his (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      MHB, Splicer, alwaysquestion

      constituents if they opted for Walberg and his smear campaign. Is the MI-07 that 'born-again'? It's not a bad strategy to nominate a loony candidate if you want the opposing party to win in November.

    •  Exactly -- (5+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      DaleA, Splicer, alwaysquestion, Lovo, possum

      Where have these "sensible" Republicans been for the past 25 years? Could it be that their lust for power outweighed their concern for the national welfare? Could it be that they never thought they would have to live in the world they helped create?

      There's a saying where I come from: Don't shit where you eat.

    •  "And it may come to pass (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      DaleA, Splicer, alwaysquestion, possum

      that the greatest tragedy of our time will not be the words and deeds of the children of darkness, but the silence and apathy of the children of light."

                        -- Martin Luther King, Jr.

      Not that this guy is a "child of light" or anything; but now that the "children of darkness" have taken away his meal ticket, all of a sudden he's indignant.

      Fuckhead.

  •  Now, if Schwarz was younger, he would be an (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    DaleA, alwaysquestion

    unusual Dem candidate.

    Basically his statements as a Congressman place him around the spectrum of being good on abortion and stem cell research, and lousy on a lot of things.

    But rest assured, the old guard of the Michigan Republican party is close to falling.

    Ehlers and Knollenberg is probably close to retirement. Ehlers has a safe district but it'll elect a more conservative Republican to replace him. Knollenberg has a purple district.

    And the Conservative fanatics will drive more of those social moderate Republicans away.

    And that creates the awkward mix of people on our side.

    "Our country right or wrong. When right, to be kept right; when wrong, to be put right" - Carl Schurz

    by RBH on Mon Sep 04, 2006 at 03:42:56 PM PDT

  •  I think this is the beginning of the end for them (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    MHB, alwaysquestion

    If this particular upset had happened in 2002, a year when Republicans were increasing in popularity, an observer could have been moved to say that the trend was generally to the right for both the party and the country. But in a year where Republicans are crying foul about being called "Republican," this is a case of the wolves devouring each other.  In their quest to be "righter than thou" they are now ratcheting to the right so fast the American public can't follow them.  If Renier isn't a complete moron she can scoop this asshole.

    "There he goes again! Who's laughing now, betch?" -- Jimmy Carter

    by slippytoad on Mon Sep 04, 2006 at 03:52:53 PM PDT

  •  I've Heard Speculation (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    DaleA, Heiuan, alwaysquestion, DWG

    That that was a major reason Bush went to campaign for him.  That most of Schwarz enemies in his CD were Bush supporters anyway, and Schwarz's hadn't carried the ball well enough for Bush against Kerry.

    Talk about political payback?  Maybe that's why some GOP candidates out there don't want Bush around during a primary?  Can you blame them?  Look at Connecticut.

    I agree with Schwarz.  He's more in that Jerry Ford mold of a Republican.  You may agree with him, but he's a decent guy, win or lose.  People like him must be having a hard time staying in the party now.

    Well, much like the GOP did in 70's and 80's, and got our problem, our southern Democrats off our hands, its time we reached out for those moderate to flaming 'liberal' Republicans out there, and invite them to join the party of sanity.  What did they call them, Reagan Democrats?  We could call them 'Sane Republicans'.

  •  More "Party Purging" by the Reds (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    DaleA, Heiuan, alwaysquestion

    See, when the Democrats vote for Ned Lamont in the primary, it's a bunch of nutcases with a single issue driving a poor centrist out of office. But when the Republicans do it, it's just...ignored?

    The inevitable result of any theocratic movement -- monopower movements, too -- is that having raised the mantle of purity to a normative concept of moral and political tenets, those in said movement then start to fight about who is the one true correct interpreter of the sacred scrolls. Religious sectarianism is as universal as religion itself, which is reason no. 412 why religion has to be left out of politics. You think Sunnis and Shia's are bad, I am not keen on having wars between different breeds of evangelicals, either.

    Call me any ugly name you choose --
    The steel of freedom does not stain.
    -- Langston Hughes

    by TheCrank on Mon Sep 04, 2006 at 04:44:53 PM PDT

  •  Hm curious could he be a candidate for our side (0+ / 0-)

    in 08? Or is he just to Conservative for us? I mean he did win in the general in 04 with 58% so i'm wondering...

    Rebuild America. Obama 08!

    by dieharddemocrat on Tue Sep 05, 2006 at 01:35:03 PM PDT

    •  Stranger things have happened... (0+ / 0-)

      And Matt Ferguson at MichiganLiberal.com had said that in 2004 (an open seat election) he had apparently considered running as a Democrat. But if I were to bet any money on it, I'd say he'll stay a Republican, or maybe run as an independent.

      Joe Schwarz is a John McCain conservative (and even ran McCain's successful Michigan primary campaign in 2000), which means he has moments of independent thought, but for the most part is much more conservative than I'd like.

      If there's a major Democratic wind this year and MI-07 goes for Sharon Renier, then he could argue (with some merit) that Walberg and the party extremists lost the seat, and he was coming back as a moderate Republican to win it back. If that happens, I'd say he'd still have the advantage in this district, even if Renier was an incumbent.

      If Walberg wins (which most "experts" say will happen), he might come back with a primary challenge of his own. It'd actually be kind of funny, in a way.

      Walberg Watch - MI-07's Radical Conservative Tim Walberg

      by Lenawee Liberal on Tue Sep 05, 2006 at 05:38:09 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  It is happening in CO-5 (0+ / 0-)

    Joel Hefley, the retiring incumbent, recently said that the Republican nominee, Doug Lamborn, had run a "sleazy and dishonest campaign" and that he would not support him against Jay Fawcett http://fawcett4congress.com.

    Fawcett headquarters are across the street from the County Republican headquarter.  Until this weekend, there was no Lamborn sign on the exterior of the building. The primary was August 5th. Now there is a small, awkwardly placed sign.

    Perhaps the residents of Fort Dobson are waking up.  Welcome to Realityville, y'all.

    The constitution does not provide for first and second class citizens - Wendell Wilkie

    by ms badger on Tue Sep 05, 2006 at 03:19:55 PM PDT

Permalink | 14 comments