Daily Kos

9/11/06: No TV for Me. None at All.

Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 05:07:04 PM PDT

Like many other Kossacks, I'm furious over ABC's decision to air the so-called documentary, "The Path to 9/11."

But what you expect from a network whose parent, Walt Disney Corporation, foisted on us the appalling Britney Spears, who later became a pint-sized shill for George W. Bush and his war. Who can forget the gum-smacking Britney's reply to Tucker Carlson?

Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision he makes and should just support that, you know, and be faithful in what happens.

But "The Path to 9/11" or, for that matter, Disney, is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. The broadcast and cable networks have sucked up to George W. Bush since the attacks, enforcing an American-style lese majeste. It's wrong to criticize the leader who, no less of an authority than General Jerry Boykin said, was appointed by God.

And guess what? There's another kiss-up festival coming up on the calender. Right now, the networks are putting the finishing touches on their five-year retrospective on the September 11 attacks. One thing is for certain: they'll once again portray Mr. 38 Percent Approval as a hero. How many times will we be subjected to footage of the president standing in the WTC rubble talking through that damn bullhorn?

Diary Time Out

< rant >Why is it that Beltway Democrats still haven't gotten it through their skulls that George Bush politicized a national tragedy. Shortly after the attacks, the Republican National Committee hawked pictures of Bush on 9/11 as a fund-raising scheme. That, right there, should have clued them to what they were up against and the kind of bad faith this administration was displaying. Instead of acting like the so-called leaders of the so-called opposition, Tom Daschle and Dick Gephardt should have retaliated by blaming the president for allowing the attacks to happen on his watch. If al-Queda hit us during a Gore presidency, you can be damn sure that's exactly what the Republicans would have done. Then again, the squirrels that raid my bird feeders have better error-learning skills than your average Washington-based Democratic consultant. < /rant >

Diary Time Back In

The 9/11 retrospectives will, no doubt, gloss over the fact that George W. Bush (a) ignored specific warnings of an al-Queda attack, (b) sat there for eight minutes reading a children's book after being told the first plane hit the tower, (c) flew around the country like a scared rabbit for most of that day, (d) used the attacks to expand executive branch power and launch a war of choice against Iraq--both of which were in the works from the day Team Bush took office, (e) dropped the ball on catching Osama bin Laden at Tora Bora, (f) squandered our post-9/11 international standing by flouting international law, and (g) made this country less secure thanks to the Iraq fiasco.

Fact is, this administration has failed in almost every respect, and couldn't win a debate on the merits on any issue of public. However, it does have one card left to play: the 9/11 card. For the third election cycle in a row, Karl Rove's strategy can be expressed in three words: scare "security moms."

And speaking of security moms--and dads--it's time for all of them to take their brains out of cold storage. Five years is long enough to trust blilndly, like Britney, in a reckless and immature president. It's time for them to wake up to the mess this president has made of this country--after all, their kids are going to pick up after him--and the lies he's told to cover it up. Starting with the biggest Big Lie of them all--namely, that Iraq was linked to 9/11. With the fifth anniversary of the attacks coming on, Team Bush will be flinging the "Iraq-9/11" B.S. by the metric ton, hoping enough of it will stick.

I want no part of this upcoming farce. I refuse to be a party to the networks continuing to enable George W. Bush and his nest of war hawks to play the 9/11 card. So it's no TV for me this September 11. None whatsoever.

There are plenty of other things I can do with the time that otherwise would be spent watching talking heads play to emotion and administration figures play to fear--and becoming infuriated with what I see. I can take a walk. Read a thick book. Clean out my office. Cook a meal. Listen to some music. Get some extra sleep. And focus on fighting back against the right wing. I'm going to need all the energy I can muster.

Tags: 9-11, MSM, George W. Bush, security moms, Iraq, national security (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 35 comments

  •  what about the other 364 days? (8+ / 0-)

    Why stop with 9/11?  Just kill your television altogether.  You will feel a lot better, and you'll be better-informed, by getting your news from the internet instead of TV.

    Hawkish on impeachment.

    by clyde on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 04:54:40 PM PDT

  •  I watch about 4 minutes of tv a week anyway (4+ / 0-)

    No loss.

    Whackos get their info thru the Christian right. We'll bring them out to vote against something and make sure the public lets the whole thing slip past them.

    by chemsmith on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 05:10:46 PM PDT

  •  Good for you ~ you'll have more time to (4+ / 0-)

    do other things, like get some real news online, go for a walk, or to the beach, or read a book or talk to other people.

    I gave up tv last January and I have NOT missed it. I think I would go crazy if I were to watch the blatant politicizing of a tragic day, once more time.

    It is heinous that they so dishonor the dead this way, but can we expect from an administration that allowed American citizens to die as millions watched on tv, and then their bodies to rot for days and days?

    Speak your truth quietly, and listen to others, even the dull and ignorant, they too have their story - Max Ehrmann

    by Catrina on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 05:13:30 PM PDT

  •  IMHO, your items (b) and (c) are minor compared (2+ / 0-)

    to the other Bush offenses you list and possibly even distract from fully appreciating them.

    The 9/11 retrospectives will, no doubt, gloss over the fact that George W. Bush (a) ignored specific warnings of an al-Queda attack, (b) sat there for eight minutes reading a children's book after being told the first plane hit the tower, © flew around the country like a scared rabbit for most of that day, (d) used the attacks to expand executive branch power and launch a war of choice against Iraq--both of which were in the works from the day Team Bush took office, (e) dropped the ball on catching Osama bin Laden at Tora Bora, (f) squandered our post-9/11 international standing by flouting international law, and (g) made this country less secure thanks to the Iraq fiasco.

    Michael Moore made a big deal out of the 8 minutes and the flying, but it's quite possible the Secret Service directs the President to sit tight for a few minutes while they assess the possibility of immediate threat and plan the next move, etc.

    The other examples of neglect you cite were managed with cool deliberation under conditions of calm.

    "Conservatism... is basically a public relations campaign aimed at persuading [people] to lay down their capacity for rational thought." -= Phil Agre

    by suburi on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 05:20:42 PM PDT

    •  Good point (4+ / 0-)

      The "Pet Goat" incident was more symbolic, especially with that clueless expression Bush wore while reading.

      Replete with "misstatements" and elisions and retracted and redacted and revoked assertions.--Carl Bernstein on HRC's record.

      by Dump Terry McAuliffe on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 05:22:18 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Yes, but seriously... (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Dump Terry McAuliffe

        what expression would YOU wear on your face while simultaneously reading a children's book while mentally reeling from the ramifications of what an SS agent had just whispered in your ear about planes hitting the WTC?

        Personally, I'd be reading in a dull monotone with a glazed, slack-jawed look, occasionally drifting off into silence and forgetting to turn the page.

        I'm no fan of Bush, but THAT was not his defining moment and I have a bit of a peeve about people poking fun at him about that incident.  There are so many more ridicule-worthy moments that define him.  A catalog full, if chronicled.

        But this is tangental to your great diary.  Keep up the good work.  I'm out of here for the day...

        "Conservatism... is basically a public relations campaign aimed at persuading [people] to lay down their capacity for rational thought." -= Phil Agre

        by suburi on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 05:28:19 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  No. You get the fuck out of the room (5+ / 0-)

          and deal with your national responsibilities.

          Immediately.

          "Don't have nobody to call my own; please, please bring me a dream."

          by MrSandman on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 06:04:50 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  You're way too kind (5+ / 0-)

          So what did the Commander in Chief do with the knowledge that the United States was under attack?

          He did nothing.

          Bush did not say one word. He did not ask Card any questions. He did not give any orders. He did not know who (or which country) was attacking, whether there would be more attacks, what military plans had been taken, what military actions should be taken—indeed, he knew virtually nothing about what was going on outside the room. He just sat there. Bush later recalled: “There was no time for discussion or anything.” [Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism—From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, pp. 83-84] Even stranger, as one newspaper put it, although the nation was under terrorist attack, “for some reason, Secret Service agents [did] not bustle him away.” [Globe and Mail, 9/12/01]

          He's just a weird, arrogant man with not a bit of curiosity about his world. Reports vary, but it's clear he knew the WTC had been hit well before he went to his photo op. I don't give him any credit for his stupefied reaction. You may have sat there with a glazed expression (so may have I) but you didn't presume to run for president.

          Evidence points to  the fact that when the country was attacked the president spend the day saying "Oh, fuck, what do I do now" while Cheney made the big decisions.

          http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/...

          Greed makes a really shitty foundation for a civilization to build itself upon.

          by Red Bean on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 06:29:34 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  I barely watch TV anyway (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Dump Terry McAuliffe

    So I guess a personal "boycott" by me is wasted.  At most, Sunday nights at 7 PM, hangin' with Lisa, Maggie, Apu....

    "It's only in books that the officers of the detective force are superior to the weakness of making a mistake." (Wilkie Collins, The Moonstone)

    by chingchongchinaman on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 05:32:58 PM PDT

  •  Why would anyone want to relive that day? (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Dump Terry McAuliffe, MrSandman

    I certainly don't consider rehashing 911 as entertainment.

    •  For many, it's a disaster movie to the next power (5+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      linnie, suzq, MrSandman, Inland, dougymi

      As chingchongchinaman noted downthread, these programs are aimed at those who were not personally affected. Some of the loudest cheerleaders for war suffered nothing in the 9/11 attacks (except perhaps a short-lived loss of business because people stayed home) but used them as an excuse for their country to kick someone's ass. Anyone's ass.

      Replete with "misstatements" and elisions and retracted and redacted and revoked assertions.--Carl Bernstein on HRC's record.

      by Dump Terry McAuliffe on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 05:47:36 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  An ex-GF of mine in NYC (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Dump Terry McAuliffe, MrSandman

        reminded me of that the other day when we were chatting about this online. She used almost the very same words that you did just now.  kinda eerie.

        A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' Douglas Adams

        by dougymi on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 05:51:23 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  I think there is a really perverse element there (3+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Dump Terry McAuliffe, ChiGirl88, cfk

        I was not personally affected, but I happened to be home sick that day and was watching the Today show when it happened.  Though I do not know a single person who was killed or a single person who even knows someone who was killed, I was moved as were most Americans.  But I am not ready to see movies about it.  I may never be.

        •  I have no desire to see a 9/11 movie (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          linnie

          Almost inevitably, such a movie will end up biased, sanitized, exaggerated, fact-challenged, or all of the above.

          Replete with "misstatements" and elisions and retracted and redacted and revoked assertions.--Carl Bernstein on HRC's record.

          by Dump Terry McAuliffe on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 06:18:03 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  I resent it when people say "We have to remember" (0+ / 0-)

            I am not an idiot who needs to be reminded over and over and over about what happened that day. I will never forget, but I resent people trying to cram it down my throat all the time.

  •  It's for people who were not directly affected... (5+ / 0-)

    ...by it to exploit it to use against political enemies.  You can fill in the names from there.

    "It's only in books that the officers of the detective force are superior to the weakness of making a mistake." (Wilkie Collins, The Moonstone)

    by chingchongchinaman on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 05:38:50 PM PDT

  •  I think the only thing I would watch (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Dump Terry McAuliffe

    would be a replay of the news as it was broadcast that very day.  MSNBC is doing that in the morning.

    Only, I don't want to do that now.  In five years, my oldest kid will be 11 and my youngest, 8.  They'll be old enough to understand and be curious about what happened.  Then, I will pop the tape of that wonderful French documentary (yes, I'll still have my VCR, thank you very much) and we'll see if we can catch some of that live rebroadcast.  It would be interesting for them to see how a nation responded that day.  Particularly in the context of what we know now.

    Do I need movies for that?  No.  Too much primary material around that I don't need secondary re-enactments.

    This year, I'll hold my kids close and we'll read the one book about the towers that brings me to tears everytime I open the pages.  I'm weeping just thinking about it.

    The Man Who Walked Between the Towers by Mordicai Gerstein

    If you have young kids, I highly recommend this book.  It tells the story of one of my happy childhood memories.  I always watched the Today Show before school.  And one morning, in 1977, some guy walked a tightrope between the twin towers before they officially opened.  I visited them, years later and this book captures the spirit of those buildings better than any I've seen.

    •  I grew up 10 miles from the WTC (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      cfk, trashablanca

      As a kid growing up in New Jersey, I could see the (then under-construction) towers out of my bedroom window. My wife worked in the WTC area before she married me. And as luck would have it, we were in Connecticut the night of September 10 and had planned to spend the next day in Manhattan. After the towers fell, we cut short our trip and drove home to Michigan. As we crossed the Tappan Zee Bridge, my wife said she could smell the burning wreckage.

      Those are some more reasons why I don't need to be lectured on terrorism by Mr. 38 Percent, let along bile-spewing sycophants like Rush Limbaugh.

      Replete with "misstatements" and elisions and retracted and redacted and revoked assertions.--Carl Bernstein on HRC's record.

      by Dump Terry McAuliffe on Thu Sep 07, 2006 at 06:49:27 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Permalink | 35 comments