The National Journal takes a look at the Democratic candidates for the 2008 nomination, and puts Dodd, Biden, and Vilsack ahead of Wesley Clark.
See the link here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/...
The top three are easy, although you could argue about the specific ordering of candidates.
The most striking thing (to me), however, was the placement of Wesley Clark at #8. This seemed like a very strange thing, given that Clark was a legitimate 2004 candidate, and has been working hard the last two years on a variety of issues.
I suspect that given all the Wesley Clark support to be found among a certain subset of the Daily Kos community, that this article is sure to engender some serious reaction.
UPDATE: This is not the National Review, but the National Journal. Thanks for the commenter who pointed out this mistake.
What do YOU think is going on here? Or, do you think it's a legitimate ranking for a candidate who has not yet declared and has never held elective office?