Skip to main content

We have to stop the Bu$h Administration from further psy-ops, invective and provocation toward a war against Iran.

I saw more trumped up 'evidence' on a CNN slideshow of Iranian guns & artillery with a baggy-pockets-professor, quasi-military analyst saying over and over, "That's from Iran," "The Iranians made that," etc., etc.

Even our own military is stumped: An army stuffed shirt said we don't know how it got there (into Iraq). Maybe Russia sold it to them. But, could it be we're planting shit? Did the administration finally figure out that they should have planted WMD's in Iraq to 'prove' Saddam was out of control? That must have been a pretty humbling moment for Mr. Hubris himself, Dick Cheney.

Well, Jim Fallows chimes in with an article in The Atlantic.

I think he's actually urging that DEms pass a resolution that says No Expansion of this Iraq War into Iran. You'll have to parse it for yourself, but I would love to see the Senatorial Yeas and Nays etched into a greasy leather parchment that we can wrap around Bush, Cheney and the Republicans when we go to a real war of the Election of 2008. It's going to be pretty colorful.

Herewith, James Fallows:

If we could trust the Administration’s ability to judge America’s rational self-interest, there would be no need to constrain its threatening gestures toward Iran. Everyone would understand that this was part of the negotiation process; no one would worry that the Administration would finally take a step as self-destructive as beginning or inviting a war.

But no one can any longer trust the Administration to recognize and defend America’s rational self-interest — not when the President says he will carry out a policy even if opposed by everyone except his wife and dog, not when the Vice President refuses to concede any mistake or misjudgment in the handling of Iraq. According to the constitutional chain of command, those two men literally have the power to order a strike that would be disastrous for their nation. The Congress has no official way to prevent them from doing so — it is interesting, and alarming, to think that in practice the safety valve might be the professional military, trained to revere the chain of command but faced with what its members would recognize as ruinous instructions.

What the Congress can do is draw the line. It can say that war with Iran is anathema to the interests of the United States and contrary to the will of its elected representatives. And it should do that now.

Originally posted to ezdidit on Mon Feb 05, 2007 at 06:15 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  15% tips are irresponsible. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    cotterperson, eojidla

    No tips please--just press recommend. I'd like to bump a few people off of there for not addressing a

    FUCKING MATTER OF LIFE AND DEATH !!!

    (moral compass:-7.63,-6.21) (world view: 9,1)

    by ezdidit on Mon Feb 05, 2007 at 06:14:13 AM PST

  •  I don't think there's any doubt he's ... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ezdidit

    suggesting such a resolution.  Anyway, thanks for the diary.  I would probably otherwise have missed this new piece by Fallows.

    "Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither liberty nor security." -Ben Franklin

    by leevank on Mon Feb 05, 2007 at 06:36:29 AM PST

  •  No better advice than that. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ezdidit, james risser

    Draw the line now, provide the constraints the president must adhere to before he can wage another war. This is such a dangerous time for the middle east and our own future as the leader of the free world. Like us, the world is waiting out the next two years while America wakes up to the harm this administration has done to world peace on the pretext of fighting a war on terrorism.

    These contraints must come from the Senate.

  •  An Iran resolution would also not be subject (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ezdidit

    to any false argument regarding 'supporting the troops.'

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site