Skip to main content

"Fear of death has the highest correlation with being conservative"  says scholar and author Frank Sulloway.

Many recent studies prove that the fear of death drives people to demonize those who hold different world views or beliefs about life and death. Tragically, most people are willing to sacrifice themselves in war to preserve their nation’s or religion’s particular symbols of immortality in a desperate attempt to achieve a sense of mastery over death. On a lesser scale, people can be – and are – manipulated using pseudo fears that elicit the same psychological reaction(s).  Thus the title of this message: Psychology and Politics.

There are many studies, and many government-funded ones after 9/11, that delve into the psychology of politics.  See below for details and a link to a fascinating video clip.

Studies that identify characteristics which differentiate between liberal and conservative ideologies:

  • Three books by George Lakoff: Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think; Metaphors We Live By; and Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate--The Essential Guide for Progressives.
  • Other books by Jost (Political Psychology: Key Readings (Key Readings in Social Psychology)), Kruglansky (The Psychology of Closed Mindedness (Essays in Socialpsychology)) and Sulloway (Born to Rebel) provide in-depth research useful to identify distinguishing characteristics of conservative and liberal personalities.
  • The Origins of Ethic Strife, Mind and Human Interaction, Vol 7, #4, 1996, Robert W. Firestone.
  • In the Wake of 9/11: The Psychology of Terror, Pysczynski, Solomon, Greenberg.
Consider these examples from a NY Times article by Patricia Cohen:
  • Most liberals think about morality in terms of two categories: how someone's welfare is affected, and whether it is fair.  Conservatives, by contrast, broden that definition to include loyalty, respect for authority, and purity or sanctity.
  • There is a whole dimension to human experience best described as divinity or sacredness that conservatives are more attuned to.
  • Offices and bedrooms of conservatives tended to be neat and contain cleaning supplies, calendars, postage stamps and sports-related posters; bold-colored, cluttered rooms with art supplies, lots of books, jazz CDs and travel documents tended to belong to Democrats.
Thinking cynically, this is wonderful material for political strategists.  It's already been done by Karl Rowe many times over.  But imagine what they could do with a presidential campaign budget and these new targeting tidbits.  They could slice and dice messages that would inflame religious fervor, patriotism, fear of terrorism, and loyalty to either enlist the conservatives or provoke the liberals (depending on who the consultant was working for).  And they could match their voter and cable channel databases against consumer purchasers of jazz CDs, members of book clubs, etc. to further enable accurate demographic targeting.

I wasn't always this cynical.  I used to be a believer, particularly in Democrats and their social consciousness.  But dirty politics has bred dirty politicians on both sides making them indistinguishable in their infighting and fundraising; only in their positioning are they different -- they are still Democrats and Republicans with major differences in beliefs and wants and an inability to compromise for the common good.

When people are fearful or exasperated, they forget that we're all just like one another.  They forget that if other people have different colored skins or religious practices that, nevertheless, they are human and have human desires and aspirations, that they're fragile, hurting, have a limited life span - that they're just like us.

As psychologist Robert Firestone said in his interview with Fred Branfman, "It's madness to be rigid: to define God in your own terms in a way that excludes other people's beliefs.  It's madness to think that our way is right and everybody else is wrong.  It's even the definition of insanity where you think everybody's wrong and you're right."

Click to see the 5-minute video clip from the interview.

It's time to remember that we're all the same.  It's time to teach it in our schools and secondary media (like movies and commentaries) and from our pulpits and bully pulpits.  It's time to teach people a world view full of complexities yet that we're all the same, that to be at odds about belief systems and to be defensive is criminal when it leads to destroying other people.  This I believe and this I hope will happen when we get a different administration.

Originally posted to expolitico on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 02:55 PM PST.

Also republished by Psychology of Conservatives and Liberals.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Nice thoughts and this sence of (0+ / 0-)

    being Humans first and colour, race, gender, religion or whatever next may only come about if some Extraterrestrial visits earth and there is live coverage all over the world.  Short of that, I'm not very optimistic.  I guess I not very optimistic am I?

  •  two of my favorite subjects. (0+ / 0-)

    It's not cynical for political strategists to research such things either.  I think it's completely necessary to be honest.  We are after all talking about people, in groups.  To ignore the psychological impacts and ramifications of how they act?  I don't see how a politico could NOT consider this stuff required reading.

    •  But it's a candidate's responsibility to . . . (0+ / 0-)

      I agree that it's a consultant's responsibility to research and propose whatever he/she thinks will do the job he was hired for.  

      But it is the candidate's responsibility to select from those choices that which he thinks will get the job done AND reflect his ethics.

      When Bush senior was presesnted with the Willie Horton ads by Lee Atwater, instead of saying "Thanks Lee but I can't ethically let ads like that happen under my banner," he let them happen.

  •  Subject (0+ / 0-)
    ... to recommendation.

    Why does this diary have so few comments?
    Guess the front page is not cluttered enough.

    Very nice diary, expolitico.  You deserve many more readers.

  •  NO CHRISTIAN CAN BE A (0+ / 0-)

    Republican Being a Christian is doing the Christian thing. Talking about it don't cont for shit; at no time do Christian hide the truth; Christian do not Lie Christian do not kill. A psychologist can not analyze a republican For all republican lie and a lie can not be analyzed so there fore I think your diary stinks. The Christian statement is to show some of there lies  

    Republican IGNORANCE is excelled only by their STUPIDITY

    by roxnev on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 04:39:00 PM PST

  •  I rec'd yours, expolitico... (0+ / 0-)

    Excellent work, and I'm posting one of my own right now, focusing on charisma...

    I've been working on it since Sunday, and I plan to start an ongoing 'Psycholo-Kos' diary series - check it out.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site