Bush is once again looking for someone to shield him from accountablilty for Iraq war.
Bush wants someone to run his wars? What's wrong with running them himself? After all he is "the decider." We have a Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to debate policy and do photo-ops and a Secretary of Defense to order the troops into combat. What are we looking for here -- another general to ignore or another general to blame for the consequences of ignoring the generals? Sounds to me like we have a president who wants to go down in history as a "decider" but doesn't want to be accountable to history for his decisions. Wanna be another Truman, Mr. Bush? Then the buck has to stop at your desk. Stop looking for a scapegoat and do your job!