Skip to main content

While we in the blogosphere are all over this USA firing story, the MSM's refusal to go beneath the surface has left most of the public with a vague idea that something sleazy might have happened, but probably not criminal.  The high profile of the Duke lacrosse players case provides us the perfect opportunity to frame the USA scandal in a way that most people can easily understand and relate to. Below is an opinion piece I have written tying these themes together.


[Note - original diary from 4/13, updated diary published 4/15]

This past week all charges were dropped in the rape case against the Duke lacrosse players.  Reports claimed that the prosecutor in the case was motivated by a desire to get African-American votes.  And so he abused the power of his office and did enormous harm to three young men.  This was a clear example of abusing the power that prosecutors have to completely disrupt the lives of innocent people.

Another very clear example, though it received far less coverage, was the case of Georgia Thompson, until last year, a purchasing agent for the state of Wisconsin.  She was tried and convicted of favoring a political contributor to the Democratic governor in awarding a contract.  The judge on the case also made the extraordinary decision that she should immediately begin serving her sentence because she had no likelihood of winning an appeal.  This case was used in the run-up to the 2006 elections to try to damage the governor in his reelection bid.

Funny thing about this contract though.  It went to the low bidder.  The other comparable bid was from an out-of-state company.  There was no evidence, or even claim that she received anything in the deal.  She was hired by the previous (Republican) administration and there was no evidence that she was connected to the governor in any way other than being a state employee.  And yet this 56 year old woman was told, "Go to jail.  Go directly to jail."

This past week her case was reviewed on appeal by a three judge panel.  Two of the judges were Republicans, appointed by Reagan and Ford*, and the other a Democrat appointed by Clinton.  At the completion of oral arguments they determined that the evidence against her was "beyond thin" and ordered that she be released from prison immediately - in 20 minutes flat they righted this horrible wrong that had been done to her.  She lost her job, her home, and is thousands of dollars in debt from lawyer costs.  All this in addition to spending several months in prison.  This is another stark reminder of the danger posed by prosecutors who abuse the power of their position and public trust.

This, at it's core, is what the US Attorneys firing scandal is about.  What DA Mike Nifong attempted on a selfish, personal level, Karl Rove has tried to orchestrate on a national level.  It now appears that the US Attorney who prosecuted the case, Steven M. Biskupic, did so to get back in the good graces of the president at whose pleasure he serves.  He had failed to find any "there there" regarding Republican claims of voter fraud, and needed this case to prove himself a "loyal Bushie." And it has just been reported that he was on one of the earlier lists of US Attorneys to be fired.  And so he upended the life of an innocent public servant - not even a politician, just someone who could be used to smear one.  And then, in a move both hypocritical and ironic, during closing arguments Mr. Biskupic called Ms. Thompson a liar.

This scenario has been played out across the country.  It has been mostly targeted at local and state candidates.  A statistical analysis of the cases investigated by the Bush US Attorneys shows some very disturbing trends.  There is no question that the US Attorneys who weren't fired were doing the political bidding of Bush and Rove.  This is all part of Karl Rove's plan to create a permanent Republican majority.

Well America got a taste of what that might look like between 2002 and 2006.  It looked a whole lot like rubber-stamped dictatorship. The outrage that is currently being felt towards Mr. Nifong should be directed towards Mr. Rove many times over in terms of numbers of innocent lives disrupted purely for political gain.

 * - originally listed as a Bush 41 appointee, corrected by Kossack Nick Blas in comments.

             * * * * * *    U P D A T E    * * * * * * *

Late last night I sent this to everyone in my email contacts list.  This morning I had a reply from a lady I know who is generally non-political.  But, she has a son in college and is mid-fiftyish herself.  She thanked me for informing her about the Thompson case and promised to forward the email to her contacts.  I'm also sending it to a variety of newspapers.  I figure it's kind of long for a letter to the editor, but at least the framing might open a few eyes which still remain skeptical that this is more than just a flubbed personnel matter.

Originally posted to kbman on Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 11:17 PM PDT.


Is this scandal, finally, going to sink bu$h / rove inc?

18%14 votes
10%8 votes
57%43 votes
13%10 votes

| 75 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site