Skip to main content

I just participated in what was clearly a telephone push poll favoring Hillary Clinton and bashing John Edwards and Barack Obama. It began objectively enough, but toward the end, there was a section where they read statements that "could be said" about a given candidate and asked how they affected my view of the candidate, and all the statements about Edwards and Obama were negative, while all the statements about Clinton were positive! (Some rough paraphrases: "John Edwards chose not to run for another Senate term because he didn't think he could win, abandoning the fight in Congress against the administration"..."Barack Obama failed to vote in favor of abortion rights nine times as a state senator"..."Hillary Clinton was born into a middle class home where she learned the value of hard work and frugality")

The company running the poll was "PSA Interviewing" and when I asked the caller if he knew who the client was, he said, "Well, we've been calling this the 'Hillary Clinton survey' so maybe it's her."

Could it really be the Clinton campaign? Is there a way to find out? Has anyone else gotten this poll? Here's a similar experience reported on My Left Wing.

Whether this poll is being financed by the Clinton campaign or not -- indeed, whether a given push poll is a GOP attack on a Democrat or vice versa, or is an example of the terrible tragedy of "Dem on Dem violence" -- such tactics are reprehensible and anti-democratic. Fortunately, they're also the kind of abuses that the blogosphere seems tailor-made to smack down. Can we shine some light on this?

Appended at 4pm pst, 5/5/2007:

I just wanted to pull in the finding of one of the commenters below that PSA Interviewing is part of Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates (PSB), and that Penn is Mark Penn, Hillary Clinton's chief pollster.

I also want to echo the question posed by other commenters: Was this really a push poll, or only research into possible future lines of attack? I didn't consider this possiblity when I wrote the original entry. Thinking it over, I still lean toward the former, though I'm less sure now. Here are all the details I can remember that might bear on this question:

  1. They asked for my preferences among the big three candidates at both the start and the end of the poll.
  1. As near as I can recall, there was no positive content on Edwards and Obama (unless you count statements like "Edwards has said he will raise new taxes" as positive, which I did!) and nothing negative about Clinton.
  1. After getting my preference among the big three (Edwards) they then asked me if it was possible I might change my mind and I said yes. I wonder if the rest of the poll would have gone differently if I had said no?

If anyone can think of any crucial details that might help to clarify what this poll was really about, ask away and I'll try to dredge up the answers from my memory.

Originally posted to tenorslowworm on Sat May 05, 2007 at 02:39 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site