Skip to main content

What would you say if a bill that had attracted a majority of House members as cosponsors was prevented from reaching the floor? Doesn't sound very democratic, does it? But that's just what happened to the election integrity bill (H.R. 550 in the 109th Congress, successor to H.R. 2239 in the 108th Congress) proposed by Rep. Rush Holt (D, NJ-12). Both 550 and 2239 were bottled up in the Committee on House Administration by the Republican chairs, Rep. Bob Ney of Ohio (now in jail for conspiracy as a result of the Abramoff scandal), and then Rep. Vernon Ehlers of Michigan. However, as Barbara Boxer said, "elections have consequences" and Holt's H.R. 811-110 finally hit the floor last week. In a comment, Nathaniel Ament Stone said here yesterday that the bill has been scheduled for debate today soon. This is very big news.

H.R. 811 has attracted a "pro", a "pro-but-amend", and a "con" group. I've done my best to collect the arguments on the dKosopedia H.R. 811-110 page. Everyone loves the fact that H.R. 811 promotes paper ballots and audits. Some are were worried by the fact that it makes the original version of the bill made the President-appointed Election Assistance Commission permanent, others wish that its audit requirements were stronger, and still others wish that it moved farther toward hand-marked hand-counted paper ballots. Those worries have led some to propose that the bill be amended, while others want it to be scrapped.

There are several strategic questions involved:

(1) Is it possible that even though the bill explicitly is meant to act as a floor, not a ceiling, for election integrity, in practice its passage will remove the impetus for stronger bills?

(2) Could the possibility that the bill will override stronger state election integrity legislation outweigh its positive effect on states where election integrity is weak?

I personally am a pro-but-amend fan of H.R. 811. But I urge everyone to read the discussion at H.R. 811-110 and leave your comments here. Also, if anyone is actually able to watch the debate, I would love it if you could blog your reactions here.

If you're interested in election integrity questions, consider joining the Yahoo! election integrity and reform listserv. There are many more listservs as well, but this one has a special emphasis on Daily Kos diaries.

Please also visit the dKosopedia Voting Rights page for an overview of election integrity issues. That page contains a box that lets you see all diaries with an "election integrity" or "voting rights" tag.

The dKosopedia Election integrity timeline also gives you a quick view of what's going on, and what has been going on for the last few years.

See also my diary A Tour Through the Election Integrity Landscape (Part 1). Sorry, no Part 2 yet, but I'm hoping that when I write it, it will have positive news to report.

Update [2007-5-18 11:12:13 by AlanF]: See clammyc's recommended diary for a reminder of why we need to address election integrity in the first place.

Update [2007-5-18 14:22:15 by AlanF]:: I really like VotersUnite's "Essential Revisions", which I found via smkngman's comment. So I think a succinct description of my position is "pro-amend, with the amendments favored by VotersUnite". Thanks to smkngman for the link, and to zappini for his comment in that direction. When I contact my rep, I'll send him a link to the VotersUnite revision page.

Originally posted to AlanF on Fri May 18, 2007 at 07:02 AM PDT.


How much did you know about H.R. 811 before reading this diary?

28%6 votes
23%5 votes
19%4 votes
9%2 votes
19%4 votes

| 21 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site