Skip to main content

a review by Aaron Barlow
crossposted from theePluribus Media Journal

A good reporter is also a good historian. And a good news organization understands and cherishes its past. It should be no surprise, then, that a book credited to "Reporters of the Associated Press" would be well written, well researched, and based on the best possible documentation. Breaking News: How the Associated Press Has Covered War, Peace, and Everything Else, based in part on the AP' s own files, is all that.  Published by the Princeton Architectural Press, it' s an imposing book, laid out with the care of a coffee-table book of photography (another field of AP strength) prepared for an upscale market. Unlike the average coffee-table book, however, this one is meant for reading as well as looking.

Add to that a foreword by David Halberstamand what a read it is!

Each of the dozen sections of the book focuses on a different aspect of AP coverage and mission over the century and a half (and more) since its founding. Only war gets two chapters - and the foreword.

For those of us involved in citizen journalism, this is a particularly important book.  We tend to focus on the failures of the news media and on the frustrations that result in contemporary discourse.  Breaking News balances out our skewed views, showing just how important - and how powerful - real professional news gathering can be. The Associated Press is not perfect - and it doesn' t claim to be in this book, pointing out failures and successes with equanimity - but it has been awfully damned good.

If you don' t believe that (and many of us outside of professionalism don't, reflecting our frustrations over the past few years with the commercial news media), spend some time with this book. It may change your mind.

Halberstam' s Foreword focuses on his memories of the AP in the early years of the Vietnam War, when Peter Arnett, Mal Browne, and Horst Faas were the Saigon bureau.  This is an appropriate lead-in to the first of the two chapters on war, both of which are written by Richard Pyle, himself an AP reporter (then bureau chief) in Saigon at the height of the war.

Though Pyle picks up where Halberstam leaves off, he quickly takes us back to the first major war covered by the AP, the American Civil War.  From there, he leads us through to World War I and beyond, finishing with the Spanish Civil War and the eve of World War II.  A war correspondent himself for two decades, Pyle clearly identifies with the initiative and bravery of his predecessors, and makes a point of naming those who died while covering war.

The next chapter, by Frances Mears, follows a pattern similar to the earlier chapter (and one repeated throughout the book), starting with the O.J. Simpson trial and moving back to other great trials covered by the organization, including that of John Wilkes Booth' s alleged co-conspirators, that of Lizzie Bordon (accused of killing her parents), Sacco and Vanzetti (of a payroll robbery - but more for being anarchists), John Scopes (the ' monkey' trial over evolution in the classroom), and more - all the way up to Michael Jackson.

In the third chapter, focus shifts to questions of access to information, something as important to contemporary bloggers and citizen journalists as ever to professional organizations like the AP.  But, as Nancy Benac shows, the AP has always put its money where its mouth is, vigorously pursuing the rights of the public and the press even though:

AP's long role in pushing for open access to government information has not been without controversy and debate within the company itself. In 1956, General Manager Frank Starzel wrote to a newspaper editor that free-press issues had to be pursued, but with restraint: "The public is a suspicious breed, understandably and rightly so, and The Associated Press has fostered confidence in its news reporting over the years by not itself becoming unnecessarily a subject of controversial action." He went on to say, however, that AP had never hesitated to act decisively against  "news suppression," adding that, "The only question that is involved in that field is one of method."(104)

Though it is true that the AP has an exemplary record of fighting "news suppression," it was also one of the news organizations that fell down on the job in reporting government claims during the run-up to the Iraq war. As former Time editor and CNN chairman Walter Isaacson said to Bill Moyers for his PBS show Bill Moyers' Journal, only the "people at Knight Ridder were calling the colonels and the lieutenants and the people in the CIA and finding out, ya know, that intelligence is not very good. We should've all been doing that." The AP should have been, too - something that has hurt its reputation since, even though the AP has proven to be one of the best and most consistent sources of information from Iraq, following its own tradition and working outside of the "green zone" to get stories not filtered by American and Iraqi authorities. In fact, one of its photographers, Bilal Hussein, remains in US detention: "Military officials say that Hussein was being held for 'imperative reasons of security.' " The AP, however, claims that, through "an internal review of his work [it] did not find anything to indicate inappropriate contact with insurgents, and any evidence against him should be brought to the Iraqi criminal justice system." Once more, the organization is standing fast behind its employee.

Other chapters cover aviation, sports, elections, civil rights, foreign correspondents, photographs, disasters, and the White House. Each is illuminating, showing the depth and complexity of the AP' s work - though also pointing out dangers like allowing the desire to be first to sometimes outweigh journalistic restraint. The ideas of "breaking" and  "scoop" drive the AP as much as they do any in the field, leading to small-minded attempts at one-upmanship such as the incident in 1970 when, as the first news organization to be aware of Apollo 13's "Houston, we have a problem," an AP employee was sent to surreptitiously inform only the AP people at a party attended by newspeople from all over, getting the AP reporters back to work while leaving everyone else in the dark.

Though, as the book shows, there's much more to the AP than reporting on war, it is war (one could argue) that gave the organization its first prominence and that continues to be the area where seasoned professionals will shine in ways that amateurs can rarely match. Today, few foreigners in Iraq are willing to step outside of the "green zone." The AP, with its own Iraqi employees plus veteran outsiders, does just that regularly. In fact:

By the end of 2006, four of AP's Iraqi staff members had lost their lives covering the war. Ismail Taher Mohsin, a former soldier hired as an AP driver, was killed by gunmen in his car on September 2, 2004. On April 25, 2005, AP Television News cameraman Saleh Ibrahim was killed when a gunfight broke out after an explosion in the north city of Mosul.* On December 12, 2006, another APTN cameraman, Aswan Ahmed Lutfallah, was killed in Mosul, when insurgents saw him filming a clash between them and police, and shot him to death. Less than a month later, the body of cameraman Ahmed Hadi Naji** was found in a Baghdad mosque, a week after he had gone missing on his way to work.

The deaths of Mohsin, Lutfallah, and Naji at the hands of murderers reflect a hazard that had not existed for AP war correspondents who risked their lives to report from beachheads, jungles, deserts, the icy mountains of Korea, the villages of Vietnam. But in a time of terrorism, any street corner can become a combat zone; anyone a casualty of war.  (253)

Those of us who were in New York or Washington, DC on 9/11 know this last point quite personally. However, there is a real difference between being an "innocent" civilian caught up in horrific events and someone who runs towards them. Perhaps Pyle, who placed the above passage at the end of his second chapter on the AP in war, wanted to temper his obvious pride in and respect for his fallen AP comrades. But the fact remains, as this chapter shows so well, that the good reporter runs risks few of the rest of us would countenance.

As we who are involved in the citizen journalism movement carve out our own place within the universe of news gathering and analysis, we need to remember that there are things the professionals will do that we amateurs would not consider. There are stories we can "break" and reportage we can provide on a par with the professionals. But few of us are willing to risk our lives or even our careers for a story in the way a professional will.

Yes, the professionals of journalism have failed us in many ways over the past two decades. But their role remains viable and vital - and, for the most part, they have served American society well over the past century and a half. Just how well is made clear in this book, which deserves to be close to hand for every citizen journalist. As we criticize the commercial news media, we need to recognize its importance. Breaking Newscan help make sure we never forget that.

Fact-check notes

*AP's site andTownNews give the date as April 23rd, 2005.

** Ahmed Hadi Naji'sdeath occurred on 5 January 2007.

About the Author:  Aaron Barlow teaches English at CUNY -- Brooklyn branch and, on weekends, runs his store/gallery, Shakespeare's Sister, in Brooklyn, NY. The author of The DVD Revolution: Movies, Culture, and Technology (Praeger, 2005)and The Rise of the Blogosphere (Praeger, 2007) -- reviewed here, he is a board member and citizen journalist for ePluribus Media.

ePluribus Contributors: jenn718, Carol White, cho and  roxy

If you like what ePMedia's been doing with research, reviews and interviews, please consider donating to help with our efforts.

Originally posted to ePluribus Media on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 06:33 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  The Commercial News Media... (14+ / 0-)

    ...aren't necessarily bad--though they have been limited and limiting over the past decades.

    And I do admire what the best of journalists do.

    I just wish so many in journalism would stop thinking they are better than we are.  

    Sure, we may not jump into danger, but amateur reporting can be as significant as that done by the professionals.

  •  Amen to that thought (7+ / 0-)

    It's as those some reporters think we are idiots and would never be able to comprehend at their level.  Frustrating.

    Thanks, Aaron, it's good to see documentation of good reporting and maybe it should be a handbook for up and coming journalists.  Maybe - just maybe - the quality of reporting might pick up.

  •  There's an awful lot of really really good work (5+ / 0-)

    being done out there.

    This weekend for example, over 800 journalists are in Phoenix attending the 30th anniversary of the Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE) 's work on the murder of Don Bolles of The Arizona Republic, who was investigating land fraud (an a perpetual source of scandal in Arizona... think Rep. Renzi).

    And over 2000 journalists have lost their lives covering wars and conflicts since WWII.

  •  The Amateur Threat (5+ / 0-)

    The amateur, one whose acts are motivated by amare(love) rather than profit, will always pose a severe threat to those who act to profit from that action.  This holds true no matter what the profession and it just makes economic sense.

    Citizen journalists are the illegal immigrant workforce of the Economy of Journalism.  We do vital work for nuthin' or next to nuthin' and are viewed with suspicion and revulsion by the ruling majority. Some have even argued that we do the jobs that mainstream journalists will not or cannot do.
    Sound familiar?

    By our acts, will we drive down wages, make their jobs redundant and unnecessary? Knowing that the bottom line is that the voracious American appetite prefers cheap goods over quality goods, regardless of their source, it is reasonable for journalists to view citizen journalism with suspicion. They can see a possibility in the competitive, capitalistic marketplace that their work will be devalued and replaced with poorly sourced, opinionated commentary which appeals to the lowest common denominator of the masses.

    That said, I believe that we DO provide a vital function that augments rather than competes with mainstream journalism. Quality citizen journalism is neither poorly sourced nor opinionated and is a necessary component in democracy.  But we must admit that we DO threaten their livelihood as we produce work that continues to excel in sourcing and content. For free. I don't think that they can ever be expected to like that fact.

  •  I'm Not Interested in Anything Pre Gingrich (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Cho, yoduuuh do or do not, bunny99

    I don't think the history of any business before that time has any relevance at all any more. It feels like a whole new planet for all types of institutions beginning sometime between Gingrich and Bush the Dimmer.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 07:10:59 AM PDT

    •  Please...'Bush the First' and 'Bush the Worst'... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Sorry, but 'Bush the Dimmer' is just plain weak. But I do sort of agree with your point, although I think the election of Reagan was the real turning point.

  •  For Free (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Cho, wanderindiana, nowness, AaronBa

    Well, personally I don't think that working for free is the hallmark of honest or good journalism; I think honest and good journalism are the hallmarks. I love to eat, etc., etc. so I am a big supporter of getting paid too.

    I agree with what Barlow says in his book, The Rise of the Blogosphere and Al Gore in The Assault on Reason, that a key role of the blogosphere, which is not met by professional journals, is the opportuntiy for citizens in to engage in meaningful policy discussion and debate.

  •  No corporate funding is important (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Cho, AaronBa, scoff0165, fayeforcure

    What I think is important is that news be funded by the consumer without corporate funding.  I listen to Pacifica KPFK in Los Angeles throughout the day and after doing so for about a year I was unable to listen to almost anything else because I felt as though what I was being fed by commercial media was not important or a lie. There is a very big difference.  

    I knew someone who picked up an international edition of Time or Newsweek and noticed the difference between the U. S. and international versions and wanted to subscribe to it.  It is not possible to subscribe to it while living in the U. S.  The rest of the world would not tolerate the stupidity present in the U. S. media.  

  •  That's fascinating (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Cho, AaronBa, truong son traveler

    I found something out that is less important but revealing, nonetheless I think.

    AARP the magazine is published for "senior" citizens, defined as the over '50's. Well, it turns out that if you join AARP and are between 50 and 60 years old you get one version of the magazine, and there are two other versions. Another for the 50 to 60 crowd; and then one for the oldies. A bit strange if you ask me.

  •  Glad this got rescued. (0+ / 0-)

    Sadly, I think it might've been the 'Breaking News' in the title that kept more people from reading it... there's been a lot of entirely unwarranted 'Breaking' diaries around here lately, and I think it's turning people off.

    Good book review, though, and I think it's fantastic for any news reporting organization to do some introspective self-analysis, even if it might be in the guise of self-promotion (I can't help suspecting profit motives when a corporation's involved, sorry).

    No more war profits = No more war! - ImpeachKingBushII

    by KiaRioGrl79 on Sun Jun 10, 2007 at 09:10:39 AM PDT

  •  They serve their masters. (0+ / 0-)

    The Golden Rule....Those who have the gold make the rules.

    Thanks so much for this diary/book review!

    To a philosopher all news, as it is called, is gossip, and they who edit it and read it are old women over their tea.

    Henry David Thoreau (1817-62), U.S. philosopher, author, naturalist. Walden, "Where I Lived, and What I Lived For" (1854).

    Between what matters and what seems to matter, how should the world we know judge wisely?
    E. C. Bentley (1875-1956), British novelist, journalist. Opening words of Trent's Last Case (1912).

    News is what a chap who doesn't care much about anything wants to read. And it's only news until he's read it. After that it's dead.

    Evelyn Waugh (1903-66), British novelist. Corker, in Scoop, bk. 1, ch. 5, sct. 1 (1938).

    The greatest felony in the news business today is to be behind, or to miss a big story. So speed and quantity substitute for thoroughness and quality, for accuracy and context. The pressure to compete, the fear somebody else will make the splash first, creates a frenzied environment in which a blizzard of information is presented and serious questions may not be raised.

    Carl Bernstein (b. 1944), U.S. journalist. Guardian (London, 3 June 1992).

    The Columbia Dictionary of Quotations is licensed from Columbia University Press. Copyright © 1993, 1995 by Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site