Skip to main content

According to the land of Weather-tainment, it turns out that we can stop imagining the kind of "huge, negative catastrophe" that "completely defies logic" surrounding climate change science. Instead, we can expect a mere temperature spike not unlike that of around 1920 and 1975.

Oh, and let's not forget: climate scientists not funded by the George C Marshall Institute, the Cato Institute, the Heritage Foundation or the Heartland Institute don't really know how to measure how fast Greenland is melting (it's the rate of ice loss I tell you! Greenland is massive - it can spare some water!).  

Poor deniers - DiCaprio is out to get them and "professional blackballers" are using facts to debunk their theories.

A DeSmogBlog Dispatch.

I've been watching  for a while now, and they have just unleashed a very strange new front for the global warming denier movement.

AccuWeather's very professionally done video blog section, "Headline Earth," is touting itself as providing "an unbias look at the global warming debate." And to prove how unbias they really are, they provide none other than Pat Michaels as their featured interview.

And who will they be airing on their next episode? None other thanDr. Fred Singer.

Unbias? Global warming debate? Pat Michaels? Fred Singer? AccuWeather? The whole thing seems a little befuddling. We will do some research on this latest front and report on what we find.

A DeSmogBlog Dispatch.

Originally posted to Desmogblog on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 12:19 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Interesting (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    pb, Floja Roja, Lisa Lockwood

    Good job and keep it up.  (by the way, it's 'unbiased')  ;-)

    i am jack's complete lack of surprise -- fight club

    by bustacap on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 12:19:12 PM PDT

  •  Eliot Abrams of AccuWeather is a Leipzig Signator (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:


    Abrams is Accuweather's "Chief Metereologist."

  •  Accuweather (7+ / 0-)

    Republicans (mostly, though I know of a number of Democrats who work there. Don't know or care if they are deniers or not because their job is to forecast the weather not provide climate change projections).

    Their Global Warming Blog (which has a disclaimer that says they're not really part of Accuweather) is interesting if you don't wade into the comments. However more then a few of their top meteorologists are deniers (many of them come from the old school, which they share with Dr. Lindzen and Dr. William Gray, among others).

    It should also be noted that they contributed to former Senator Santorum's campaigns, who made several attempts to privatize the weather service in 2005. His bill never left committee, thankfully.

  •  IIRC, Accuweather was also (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    badger, pattyp, Ellicatt, cville townie

    trying at one point, via Rick Santorum, to keep the National Weather Service from providing weather data to the public for free, so they could ultimately profit.  Don't remember the details, but I did delete from my bookmarks & replaced it with NOAA's site.

    "Conservative principles" are marketing props used by the Conservative Movement to achieve political power, not actual beliefs. -Glenn Greenwald

    by latts on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 12:26:34 PM PDT

  •  Right-Wing Weather Channel (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    "Our forecasts are always wrong!"

    Middle Class Mother-F!cking Warrior

    by bink on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 12:29:10 PM PDT

    •  Yup. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      And always entertaining in their scrambles to back themselves up.

    •  Actually not too accu (0+ / 0-)

      (in)-AccuWeather has a history of some really embarrassing forecast errors. They do not have, and cannot possibly have the resources NOAA/NWS do for numerical modeling and severe weather prediction, and in their bluster in trying to screw up NWS through Santorum they apparently didn't bother to check their data against peers like all good scientists do.

      Supposedly DHS relying on them (which was partly a holdover from Tom Ridge's days there, since he wanted to throw pork to his buddies in PA) was yet another problem for FEMA in the days before Katrina, as DHS and FEMA weren't even looking at the same forecasts and some people in DHS had no idea Louisiana was going to get hit.

  •  I know someone who interviewed there (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    a few years ago for a position. There are a group of brothers that own it. Two of them are very hard core GOP supporters. There is a large picture of one of them with Dick Cheney or Bush, I can remember which, outside the office of their president. (One of those fundraiser type pictures.)The third brother is apparently a hard core liberal. Which must make for some fun meetings.

    There was also a controvery a couple of years back when Rick Santorum was trying to take away things that NOAA was doing and providing free so that Accuweather could make more money. His bill did not pass. They were big contributors to his campaign. (They are based in PA.)

  •  I Used To Use AccuWeather (0+ / 0-)

    On the net, but ditched it after looking into the Santorum pay for news deal.

    From what I've heard, this new development is being sponsored by those anti-warming folks.  They approached AW and formatted its current feature on warming.  

    Looks like another example of the right wing boys trying to manipulate all things media.  Now, they're even trying to slant the weather to the right.

    And, as noted, they do have a history of getting the weather wrong a lot.

  •  But wait--there's more (4+ / 0-)

    AOl just had an article on how great global warming will be for Greenland--more codfish harvests owing to melting ice.  And northern Canada  will soon become the tourist mecca for its fine weather and incredible harvests due to a long growing season.  Aren't we happy we have global warming?    

    To God: Please stop talking to George Bush. Too much is being lost in translation.

    by miriam on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 12:55:20 PM PDT

    •  That''s great news! (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      cosette, Floja Roja

      Except for the fact that there aren't many codfish left, and melted permafrost muskeg isn't especially scenic, probably won't smell real good and will breed even more hellacious mosquitos.

      There is no more New Frontier - we have got to make it here - Henley/Frey

      by badger on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 01:23:59 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Re Michaels (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Snarcalita, FishOutofWater

    On your link to him perhaps you could remind us of his testimony to Inhofe's EPW hearing wherein he claimed that models overpredicted the temperature rise by 300%, showing a plot from Jim Hansen's 1988 paper. He of course conveniently did not point out that the comparison was to a worst case scenario and that the observations were almost right on (a bit above actually) the expected scenario, and that he conveniently erased the other scenarios from the plot he showed. You might ask your readers if they think that was an honest mistake. You might also ask us if we would buy a used car from such a man.

  •  No one watches (0+ / 0-)

    We should be more concerned about confronting deniers who are actually watched!

    But don't worry, President Gore will demolish these bozos.

    I'm a linguist, licensed to use words any way I want to!

    by MakeChessNotWar on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 03:11:39 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site