Skip to main content

The North Carolina Bar Disciplinary Committee ruled on Dist. Atty Nifong today, and, of course, disbarred him.  Why?  Part of their rationale was that the justice system must be trusted to be honest.  When the charges were announced, he was in the middle of an election, and he sensationalized the case to give him a political advantage.  The whole country understands that this is wrong.  If they don't understand the DOJ controversy as well, maybe we're not explaining it as well as we could.

Many people understand the Nifong case on a gut level, but not the Gonzales/Rove/Bush DOJ case, even though they have similar elements.

The bar committee in the Nifong case said it was a distortion of the justice system to use a prosecution to further a political career.  The system goes off-track, and that is an abuse of power which much be punished.

How many times worse is what is happening in the federal justice system? Immigration judges hired based on political party.  Civil rights section attorneys pushed out if they are Democrats, to be replaced by Christian white men.  A plan sent down from the top political levels, to use the Justice Department along with 18 or 19 other agencies, the power of criminal justice and the full executive branch, on behalf of a political party.

When your wingnut friends ask you, why can't we use the government for political purposes, isn't that why we were elected.... point to Nifong.  I promise you, they wanted him disbarred.  They just don't understand the principles, and that's where you come in.

Originally posted to Hootenanny on Sat Jun 16, 2007 at 04:00 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site