Skip to main content

With so much going on in Land Politics, I've decided to start filing semi-regular reports on the issue like I do on the trade issue, since (like the trade issue) few - if any - cover it in a comprehensive way. Land Politics, as I have written many times before, has the potential to break apart the traditional Republican coalition all over America - but only if Democrats seize the opportunity.

As you can see from today's report, all sorts of new progressive coalitions are being forged between unions, sportsmen and conservationists. At the same time, Land Politics is forcing Republicans to decide whether to side with their oil and gas industry donors, or with traditionally conservative voters who put them into office. Though these issues may seem far under the radar of the headline-grabbing topics of celebrity- and Washington-obsessed national news, they are hugely important in the day-to-day lives of millions of Americans. The party that gets out in front of these issues is the party that is going to solidify a number of so-called "swing" states for the long-haul.


UNION-SPORTSMEN ALLIANCE LAUNCHED: The AFL-CIO is now promoting a new organization known as the Union Sportsmen's Alliance backed by 21 unions and the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership (TRCP). The goal of the new group is "to boost the TRCP's long-standing dedication to guaranteeing access for hunters and anglers, conserving fish and wildlife habitat and increasing funding for conservation."

SPORTSMEN-CONSERVATION COALITION BACKS NEW MINING LAW: The Grand Junction Sentinel reports that "a coalition of sportsmen's groups -- including the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, Trout Unlimited and the National Wildlife Federation -- last week announced they are supporting legislation in Congress to change [an] 1872 mining comply with modern environmental rules, give federal officials more authority to reject mining applications and impose an 8 percent royalty on mining operations to fund mine clean up."  


DEMS STALL WHITE HOUSE PUSH TO DRILL ON ROAN PLATEAU: The Associated Press reports that  "energy companies would be barred from tapping natural gas on federal land atop Colorado's scenic Roan Plateau under an energy bill that passed the House" last week. The provision was inserted by Colorado Democratic Reps. Mark Udall and John Salazar. In the event that Udall-Salazar amendment does not become law, the Denver Post reports that Bush Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne "has agreed to give state officials more time to comment on the Bureau of Land Management's plan to allow drilling on Colorado's Roan Plateau." The Bush administration only agreed to this delay after Colorado Sen. Ken Salazar (D) put a hold on BLM Director nominee James Caswell. Meanwhile, the Rocky Mountain News reports that Republican Secretary of State Mike Coffman "abruptly backed away today from plans to chair a lobbying group that will campaign for drilling on the Roan Plateau." Coffman had agreed to become chairman of the pro-drilling group but pulled out 45 minutes after being questioned about it by the Rocky Mountain News. He nonetheless lashed out with typical Fox News-style talking points, saying, "Senator (Ken) Salazar, Governor (Bill) Ritter and others feel a need to throw a bone to radical environmentalists, and Roan Plateau is that bone."

QUESTIONS ARISE ABOUT LOCAL CONTROL OVER DRILLING REGULATION: The Grand Junction Sentinel reports that after the Grand Junction City Council approved stringent new rules on energy development, proponents of better regulation are working to have those rules adopted throughout Mesa County. However, serious "local control" questions remain "about how much power Mesa County would have if it placed regulations on the industry that are stricter than those prescribed by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission." That said, the Sentinel's editorial board has previously noted that because of a recent Colorado Supreme Court ruling, "Mesa County has substantially greater authority over oil and gas drilling within its borders than it did just a few months ago." Specifically, the court upheld counties' right to "stablish requirements that exceeded state standards -- such as the minimum distance a drill rig must be from a home." This is precisely what proponents for better regulation want Mesa County to enact: Regulations to "stipulate that natural gas wells be placed at least 1,000 feet from homes and require energy companies to obtain county permits before drilling." Not surprisingly, the efforts got only "a lukewarm reception" from Mesa County's Republican-dominated county commission.

ANOTHER OIL COMPANY PICKS UP AND LEAVES ITS MESS BEHIND: The Rocky Mountain News reports that "A Texas company drilling for natural gas near an area where an underground nuclear test took place in 1969 has sold its operations, leaving a string of environmental violations." Presco Inc. "sold all its property and gas wells near the Project Rulison site in Garfield County to Noble Energy Production Inc. on May 8" - the same day "the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission cited the company for eight violations." Back in 2005, the Denver Post reported that Republicans in the Colorado legislature killed an "oil-and-gas bill that could have forced companies to pay more for harming private property where they drill."


TESTER SLAMS OUT-OF-STATE 'TROPHY PROPERTY' BINGE: In an op-ed for the Missoulian, freshman U.S. Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT) says he has "a problem with folks from other places buying up agricultural land, fencing it off and locking it up forever." He notes that right now, "out-of-state developers are buying up large ranches across our state with plans to subdivide them and sell lots as 'trophy properties.'" He says the land then becomes "available only to an exclusive club of elite and blocked to the workaday Montanan who pays his dues to the state and understands the Western value of sharing the landscape with fellow Montanans...What used to be traditional hunting and fishing grounds for generations are fast becoming off limits for ordinary Montanans looking to put some meat and fish on the table."


LAND TAX EXEMPTION BEING ABUSED BY MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: The Wall Street Journal publishes an expose on how Texas tax exemption laws originally geared to help farmers is now being exploited by multinational corporations not even in the agriculture industry. "The state's agricultural exemption, which dates back to 1966, was intended to benefit full-time farmers and ranchers," the Journal reports. "But as voter referendums have loosened the exemption's requirements over the years -- over the objections of municipal and school-district officials who have lost revenue -- it has been used by dozens of corporations that stick a few cows or birdhouses around their offices." Today, companies like Dell simply put a few cows on their giant corporate campuses, and get to avoid tens of thousands of dollars in taxes.


GOV CRITICIZES NEW SENATOR ON LAND/WATER ISSUES: The Associated Press reports that Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal (D) says newly appointed Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso (R) "has been tepid so far in his support of two landmark pieces of environmental legislation that Sen. Craig Thomas was pushing before his death." Shortly before his death, Thomas had introduced legislation to protect more than 400 miles of the Snake River and its headwaters under the federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. Thomas had also said he intended to introduce legislation to prevent further energy development in the Wyoming Range. Since succeeding Thomas, however, Barrasso has been noncommittal on whether he will continue to carry Thomas' environmental measures in the Senate.

Cross-posted from Working Assets

Originally posted to davidsirota on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 08:30 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I Tend To Be A Little More Liberal (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    then the people I live around. But if somebody on the left wants to win here (Southern Illinois) they need to deal with two issues. Guns and trade. Let them know that the good they produce will be sold on an equal footing and that they can hunt on the weekends we'd win a lot more votes.

    "It is not enough to win, all others must lose," Sun Tzu.

    by webranding on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 08:33:08 AM PDT

  •  While I don't agree with you on trade (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bronte17, webranding

    this is a move the Democratic party has needed for a long time.  Many of us are sportsmen and would love to be able to take a role without having our rights of gun ownership/hunting being questioned.  Thanks for publicizing this.

  •  Thanks David (0+ / 0-)

    As an avid union member and fisherman these are two important issues for me.
    Having travelled a lot outside this country, I see how a strong economy and a stronger middle class helps the environment (compare Costa Rica and Ecuador, Ecuador is significantly poorer and there is little wildlife and protection for natural places).
    Furthermore, its a quality of life issue, if there are no salmon in the streams, I am not a happy camper.
    And finally, I'd hate if we became like Europe where all the good streams are private and only the rich can fish.

    Check out

    by IvyTodd on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 08:38:48 AM PDT

    •  Agreed 110% (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Of my 37 co-workers I think 36 could be called liberal. The one that isn't is to the far right of Bush. But he is an avid fisher. On the environment and global warming he is to the left of me. And I am working on him on the other points.

      "It is not enough to win, all others must lose," Sun Tzu.

      by webranding on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 08:42:07 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Here in Northern California (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    badger, bronte17, webranding

    Cal Trout has been working for a long time to preserve habitat.  And when you're talking about trout habitat you are, of course, talking about trees, since it is the trees that help prevent the bed elevation and mass wasting caused by flash run off.  Trees also shade the streams, keeping the water cool enough to support trout.

    There has been a long-standing alliance between Cal Trout, the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and forest protection groups like the Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC) and the Sierra Club.

    Getting unions into the mix is much more difficult, since their members -- Operating Engineers, for example -- get their livelihood from grading, roadbuilding and (some of them) from logging.  Still, EPIC and the Sierra Club recently joined with the United Steelworkers to fight Tom Delay/Abramoff/Pombo buddy Charles Hurwitz over that rate of logging Hurwitz was pushing on the lands he controls through Pacific Lumber.  The issue was sustainable jobs.

    In that case, none of the jobs at issue were Steelworker jobs, but the Steelworkers were delivering pay back for Hurwitz's union busting at one of his other holdings, Kaiser Aluminum.

    And visiting environmental payback for union busting is one of the most fruitful ways to join (at least temporarily) unions, anti-development conservationists, and anti-toxics work.

    As a toxics lawyer, I have been approached by the local plumbers union, trying to find environmental hooks they can use against the local pulp mill.  The union is interested because the mill has been hiring non-union contractors to do plumbing work at the plant.

    Usually, it is the unions that approach environmentalists on selected issues.  It would behoove the environmentalists -- when struggling against a developer, logging company or polluter to check the company's record on union issues, and then approach unions to get their support in the struggle.

    This aggression will not stand, man.

    by kaleidescope on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 08:44:47 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site