Skip to main content

Bill McKibben, who's run the Step It Up! efforts to draw attention to the climate crisis has urged people to support carbon emission reductions of 80% by 2050. That people are paying attention, that Congress is starting to pay attention and take early steps, is encouraging. Before an Inconvenient Truth came out and a great many committed activist organizations laid the groundwork for awareness, not even that much would be possible.

But it isn't enough. For one thing, it's not quite enough to get the job done. For another, I'm concerned that it won't even sustain people's interest long enough to mobilize for better legislation and industrial solutions once they see that 'something' has been passed.

2050 is a long ways away. In terms of my own timescale, I'll be 75 then. I'll be shaking my cane at the young whippersnappers who won't get off my lawn. (Not that I'd have a lawn. Very ecologically unsound. Can I suggest a nice, friendly, native plant landscaping, instead?)

The teens and 20 year olds involved in these campaigns will be around retirement age, and when you're their age, 40 years old seems incomprehensibly distant. The people who are passing these laws today will be long dead by 2050. (Unless we have incredible leaps in cryonic storage, which is exactly the sort of wild and crazy thing that comes to mind as being possible over long time periods.)

Considering the amount of technological change that's happened just in my lifetime, I think encouraging people to deal with it on a scale like that creates a favorable climate for those who say we should do nothing, because surely we'll figure it out by then.

Yet we don't have until 2050, and we can't afford for the public at large to think that we do. We are in the time of consequences. Of worsening weather. Of bad droughts that could get much worse. Now.

A person might be tempted to despair. Because the situation is dreadful. End of civilization as we know it. But, and this is the somewhat cliche good news, we have the technology to fix it if we would only employ the will to use it. Consider again the question of despair:

... Oates points to Emily Dickinson as a prime example of the "poetics of despair" with its "keenly heightened inwardness." It's true enough that Dickinson eloquently describes despair -- sometimes passionately, sometimes chillingly dispassionately. But the substance of her poetry has to be reconciled with the sheer, incontrovertible fact of her poems.

In other words: Emily Dickinson did not despair; she wrote. And she kept writing even when no one seemed particularly interested in publishing her poems. You can't despair and write 1,775 poems. You can't despair and write one poem. The act of writing -- because it is an act, and a choice to act rather than to give up and do nothing -- is a rejection of despair.

Had Dickinson withdrawn into the indulgent inwardness of despair, as Oates suggests, then we wouldn't be talking about her now. She would never have written anything. That, of course, would have been a sin. ...

It's because I know what sort of relationship with writing most people have that I can promise you something: It would be much easier for you to have a measurable, positive impact on our climate crisis than to write 1,775 good poems about despair. Or even one. Unless you were a literature major. But you see what I mean.

Now, there are helpful proposals in the Energy Bill and people are thinking about cap and trade carbon markets that might even be implemented. That's nice, but it isn't going to be enough. In desperation, some people have proposed widespread chemical release to counter certain effects of global warming, but that just sounds very, very dodgy. Other technical fixes have been proposed, many will be tried. As the CEO of Duke Energy says, "There is no silver bullet here, ... What we need is more like silver buckshot, a lot of things working together." He's hoping one of those buckshot attempts will be nuclear energy. Erm, ahem.

Though I don't really want to talk about wonky engineering fixes. Not that there's anything wrong with that. It's just that there are plenty of low tech, high concept fixes for our current predicament that we could bring about just by taking better care of our soil.

Consider, for example, that one of the things we can do to combat climate change is one of the first things human beings had to learn how to do in order to create permanent settlements. We could, in part, farm our way out of this mess:

... In addition, we have to remember that photosynthesis by plants and the decay of biomass into soil organic matter is the primary link in the functioning of the global carbon cycle. To the extent that land is desertified, or agricultural lands have bare soil not covered by living and decaying plants, then the carbon cycle is broken, and annual emissions of carbon dioxide from decaying biomass and burning of fossil fuels can’t help but be in excess of the normal fixing of carbon in soils through photosynthesis and decay.

... Climate change, biodiversity loss and desertification are all one issue, and need to be addressed as such to realize success in any area. The planned grazing of livestock on perennial grasslands is the single most powerful tool we have to restore ecosystem health and functioning to our agricultural lands.

... There is this prevailing idea that soil can only form very slowly, taking a thousand years to build an inch of topsoil. Through Keyline soil building, developed by P.A. Yeomans in Australia, and other methods that we are currently using, we can build topsoil very quickly. And soil fertility is the key to everything. Essentially, human agriculture has destroyed an enormous quantity of organic matter over the last thousands of years and especially industrialized agriculture in the last 50 years at an accelerated rate. The soil organic matter lost and its conversion into carbon dioxide is perhaps an equal contributor to the burning of fossil fuels to climate change.

... Everyday people can have can have a tremendous impact on carbon emissions and carbon sequestration in soil. The key to doing this on any sort of meaningful scale is the planned grazing of livestock on perennial grasslands. So the first thing that we can do is to start eating the food grown by grass farmers. We can support these farmers by buying their products, which in turn stimulates the local economies. We can support them through our purchase of "Carbon Sinks," the Carbon Farmers of America-version of carbon credits, to offset our personal, family, or business carbon dioxide emissions.  ...

The Carbon Farmers of America assert that, "[i]f the American people were to restore the soil fertility of the Great Plains that we have destroyed in the last 150 years, atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide would be reduced to near pre-industrial levels." Though we could to the Carbon Farmers one better, because we've been disturbing the carbon balance for a very long time all around the world. The ability of our ecosystems to store carbon in solid form is being significantly underused. Consider further that carefully planned agricultural and horticultural techniques, careful attention to increasing organic matter and harvesting rain water, can turn a salt flat into productive farmland. You can re-green a desert, if the soil is given the right attention.

The only problem with that technology, something that requires skill and understanding, if not sophisticated equipment, is that it's supposedly inefficient. It can't be done by one person atop a grand machine, managing hundreds of acres in a day. And it's axiomatic in modern commerce that the best thing is always the thing that takes the fewest people. Yet the technologies and the chemicals we use to grow our food are disrupting the planet's ability to support life, certainly, the kind of life we're used to. Though not just because of carbon emissions. In agriculture, nitrogen is key, and we release quite a bit of it:

... I  call it the biggest global change that nobody has ever heard of, Weiss said at the spring event. The planet has never seen this much nitrogen at any time. Human activity now releases 125 million metric tons of nitrogen from agricultural activities and fossil fuel combustion a year, compared to 113 million metric tons annually from natural sources, according to a 2007 United Nations report called Human Alteration of the Nitrogen Cycle.

In 1860, the U.N. report noted, there was virtually no release from human activity. The consequences of this spike, the report added, are profound.

Not only is this glut of nitrogen disrupting ecosystems, polluting waters and harming human health, but its a silent partner, along with carbon dioxide, in changing the Earths climate. ...

The Earth Policy Institute lays out more information about the waste of nitrogen, saying that the Mississippi drains 1.6 million tons of nitrogen from agricultural runoff into the Gulf of Mexico, where it causes enormous dead zones, and that yearly, worldwide nitrogen fertilizer use is somewhere around 145 million tons. As of 2002, the US adds 12 million tons of nitrogen fertilizer to its soil. And we could stop doing that, too, if our farming techniques kept more nutrients in the soil instead of wastefully letting them wash away.

And you, yes you, could perhaps do something about this next time you go to the grocery store. You could, for example ...

  • Buy organic food
  • Buy pasture-raised, grass-fed meat, or ask your grocer to stock it
  • Buy locally grown food

If we weren't talking about food, I'd feel like Bush telling us to go shopping after 9/11 so the terrorists wouldn't win. Except that we aren't talking about new clothes and a big screen television. We're talking about something you have to have every day. Something you have to buy, or grow. And hey, there's a thought. Maybe you, personally, don't want to farm. But not only are there far worse jobs, I've talked to a lot of farmers who really like what they do. So consider calling your Senators and asking them to support generous funding for beginning farmer programs in the upcoming Senate version of the Farm Bill.

I'm not just promoting altruism here, though. It could eventually pay off directly for you. As Dan Imhoff notes in the book Food Fight, between 1985 and 2000, the price of fresh fruits and vegetables has gone up 38%. Thirty eight percent. In the same time, the price of soft drinks, which depend on plentiful supplies of diabetes-causing wholesome corn syrup, have dropped by 23%. The only way to push that ratio back the other way is to have more, and more diverse, farms.

... The population of U.S. agriculture is poised to make a dramatic change - half of all current farmers are likely to retire in the next decade. U.S. farmers over age 55 control more than half the farmland, while the number of entry-level farmers replacing them has fallen by 30 percent since 1987 and now makes up only 10 percent of farmers and ranchers.

Absent a new generation of beginners, that land will concentrate in large farms, causing the permanent loss of opportunity for family farms, ranches, and rural communities and squandering the chance to shift to a more sustainable system of agriculture. ...

So, see, not just shopping, either. And not just technology. We need people to solve this problem. We need all the tools at our disposal, and there are a lot of them available.

Answers could be right under our feet.

Originally posted to natasha on Wed Aug 15, 2007 at 08:17 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tips for the soil geek? (12+ / 0-)

    Come on, everybody loves soil. You know you want to :)

    •  Too late to tip, but I thank you (0+ / 0-)

      for this fine diary.  We must get Congress and state legislatures to educate themselves on soil science and agriculture.  The information here, and the links gives me some hope that reason and science can let us get ourselves out of the mess we have made.

      Patriotism may be the last refuge of scoundrels, but religion is assuredly the first.

      by StrayCat on Fri Aug 17, 2007 at 08:06:11 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I'm just going to jump to your action items (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    natasha, abbeysbooks

    and ask a few questions.

    First, I know there are a lot of reasons to buy organic food, but is global warming one of them?  How does the use of pesticides contribute to global warming?

    Second, I'm curious -- how often do folks here eat meat?  My understanding is that until the mid-20th century, meat dinners were less common.  I think there's a lot of room between all-carnivorous diets and all-vegetarian diets to move American eating habits slightly away from meat without asking everyone to become a full-on vegetarian.

  •  Excellent diary, Natasha (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    natasha, abbeysbooks

    Quicker minds than I need to think of an advertising campaign or slogan to counter all those years of hearing the wonders of "corn-fed beef". I am thinking about a strongly worded email to everyone I know in the food industry and the food press. I need to hit the sack or I could pack a lot of energy into this comment.

    "And tell me how does god choose whose prayers does he refuse?" Tom Waits

    by madaprn on Wed Aug 15, 2007 at 08:36:20 PM PDT

  •  By 2050! Gimme a break! (0+ / 0-)

    Anyone who has been tortured, remains tortured. Primo Levi The Drowned and the Saved

    by abbeysbooks on Wed Aug 15, 2007 at 08:39:04 PM PDT

  •  I have been following for years Ruth Stout's (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    natasha, lemming22

    method of gardening. This link gives a pretty good summary of her method.

    A couple of her books were left in the house we bought and they are terrific.  I just throw all my organics (peels, coffee grounds, pickle juice, eggshells etc.) into my garden beds and the soil quality continues to be fantastic.  It takes a little getting used to the idea of not "composting" in a pile, but it works.  Everyone should read her books.  I also lightly bury bones, fish carcasses etc. in the garden beds.  I have had no major problems with rodents or animals.  Our neighbors dog used to be a problem when I would just throw stuff on top of the beds, but now that I cover it with a light layer of mulch or dirt, no problems.  

  •  You mean you're actually encouraging (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    pkbarbiedoll, Unique Material

    know-nothing gardeners like me who dream of farming to get into farming?  :)  I never thought of it in quite this way somehow: that we're losing the old generation of farmers and somebody has to.  All you hear is how impossibly hard it is.

    •  Um, sure (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      renaissance grrrl, StrayCat

      If that's what you want to do, consider it. It isn't my thing, but some people really, really dig it, and it'd be great if more of them could make a living at it. I'll be the one thanking you while enjoying your produce from the comfort of my urban postage stamp room.

      There are extension and transition programs, albeit fairly limited at present, that can help out. Additional efforts, still small but better than nothing, are present in even the House version of the Farm Bill. You may want to look into it. Also, there are groups in both Seattle and Detroit who do distributed urban farming; using yard space to farm on all over a city. The Detroit group, Greening of Detroit, has iirc around 50 acres under cultivation.

    •  It Is Hard (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      pkbarbiedoll

      The hardest part is affording the land if you don't have any.

      Co-Op baby. It's gotta be the new wave or we'll all drown.

      I'm the person your mother warned you about.

      by Unique Material on Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 11:24:59 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  A year or so ago... (3+ / 0-)

    I googled buffalo meat and found a local provider in St. Paul.  We pay just over $3 per pound, it's lean, it tastes just like beef and it's much more eco-friendly.

    This year we raised (LOADS of) tomatoes at a community garden plot.

    Think globally, act locally.

    --Congrats on making Diary Rescue!  

    We need to change the wind.

    by Naniboujou on Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 09:17:30 PM PDT

  •  victory gardens (3+ / 0-)

    20 million of them. We did it in 1944, I think we can pull it off again 60 years later. Let's practice corporate disobedience, and grow our own food. Hydroponics, gray water irrigation systems, neighborhood co-ops, lots of new ideas in the last 60 years.

  •  I'm Sorry I Missed This the First Time (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    natasha, pkbarbiedoll

    Yeah. I'm a soil geek.

    Sosueme.

    No, poetry won't cure the environment of our poisons, but if it raises awareness and helps the poet to vent, it's served its purpose.

    Then the poet can go out and get busy.

    I'm the person your mother warned you about.

    by Unique Material on Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 11:23:50 PM PDT

  •  Have you looked into biochar or terra preta? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    natasha

    There's a lot of info on the web, and some research being done. It seems like a good way to enrich soil, produce energy and sequester carbon (lots) all at the same time.

    I'm no soil expert, so my judgment is far from authoritative, but it certainly looks interesting.

    There is no more New Frontier - we have got to make it here - Henley/Frey

    by badger on Fri Aug 17, 2007 at 12:30:32 AM PDT

  •  Excellent diary (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    natasha

    Sorry I missed the chance to recommend.  Video was especially interesting to me.
    thanks!

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site