Skip to main content

Don't hold your breath waiting for a drawdown of U.S. forces.  By this fall, the number of U.S. troops in Iraq is set to increase to 171,000, according to Army Lieutenant General Carter Ham, the director of operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Lt. Gen. Ham (for those unfamiliar with military ranks, a lieutenant general wears three stars and is the equivalent of a Navy vice-admiral) says that the deployment of troops into Iraq will overlap the planned rotation of forces out, causing what MSNBC describes as a "temporary surge in U.S. forces."

The additional troops would represent an increase of 9,000 troops over those already present.  The original "surge," as revealed by the administration to CNN in January 2007, called for 20,000 more soldiers in Iraq.  That number crept up in March, as General David Petraeus asked for additional increments totalling about 7,600 soldiers, and eventually reached some 30,000 new troops by the first week of July, according to the BBC.  

This new "temporary" surge means that by the fall, the surge forces will have nearly doubled in size, and will bring the total number of U.S. soldiers to about the same level as was present in Vietnam in late 1965 ... the year that Tom Lehrer noted that LBJ was "practicing escalatio on the Vietnamese."

The more things change ...

The slippery slope of escalation, once described by a young military officer (well, okay, it was me) as "feeding the troops into the meat grinder very slowly, in the hope that no one would notice right away," is once again finding a home in an American land war in Asia.  

Originally posted to Califlander on Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 04:09 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  It ain't over 'til (6+ / 0-)

    ... it's over.  Which means not until this administration leaves office, at the earliest.

    Tips, comments, and expressions of outrage are all welcome here.

  •  At least we haven't match the 'Nam peak...yet (0+ / 0-)

    AFAIK US Peak Vietnam War was just under 600K troops, fortunately I think that's unattainable by the administration without a very substantial draft effort.  I'm sure there are more than 450K gun crazy lunatics that heavily support the war, unfortunately I doubt any of them are willing to go to Iraq.

    "Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done, and why. Then do it." - LL

    by demotarian on Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 04:16:17 PM PDT

  •  TBI - PTSD (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Califlander

    <center>The first air tonight, 8-16-07, on ABC News. The second was supposed to:

    Road to Recovery:

    It has been six months since we first told the story of two soldiers struggling to recover from traumatic brain injuries, caused by roadside bombs in Iraq. Tonight, Bob Woodruff checks in with those soldiers and takes a look at their long road to recovery.

    Sharing A Bond - Vets with TBI

    War on the Brain: Understanding TBIs

    Bob Woodruff Talks to Soldiers and Families Enduring the Long Road to Recovery

    Mental BattleField

    Treating the Psychologically Wounded in Iraq

    Jay White helps soldiers cope with what they see on the front lines.

    </center>

    If they were sent to fight, they are too few. If they were sent to die, they are too many!

    by jimstaro on Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 04:53:09 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site