Skip to main content

Back in the 1990's, a core group of the  neocon movement sat down to create their ideal vision of the 21st Century: the country under a permanent Republican majority and the world under an American  hegemony. Called the "Project for a New American Century" or PNAC for short, it was a road map basically designed to cement the rule of rich white corporate males forever - draped in a lot of flowery language about freedom, democracy, and free enterprise. They felt America's miltary muscle as the Last Superpower combined with neocon principles were an unbeatable combination.

They've achieved a few goals; getting rid of Saddam and grabbing Iraq for military bases to dominate the Middle East is the big one. They've installed their hand-picked front man in the White House not once but twice, auctioned off the Federal government to corporate interests, packed the Supreme Court with neo-monarchists, subverted the 4th estate, and given the theo-cons a seat at the table. Not bad, eh?

(more)

They came up with a plan and they've been relentless about carrying it out. The 'moral clarity' they profess translates into an adamantine refusal to compromise with either the real world, the constitution, or the rule of law in the pursuit of their objectives. Look at the names in the Wikipedia entry, and it's a who's who of the administration, media talking heads, and inside the beltway culture. Look at their plans, and everything that's happened since the 1990's becomes clear.

One of the great weaknesses of the Democratic Party is they have no comparable vision to guide them, no structure to shape their opposition on, no road map to the future that is as all-encompassing as PNAC and all the other tenets of the neocon movement. They've ridden the New Deal into the ground and stood by as the Republicans have done their best to cover it over with dirt and piss on the grave.

To be fair, Democrats, Liberals,  etc. are somewhat handicapped by their belief in a reality-based worldview, a desire for consistency, and a reluctance to realize they are dealing with a take-no-prisoners mindset. Those who do get called rabid lambs or worse; they risk getting officially shunned like M***O*, the organization that can't be named.

Right now the Democratic Party seems to be somewhat energized by the idea that Iraq has become such a clusterf**k for the GOP, they can ride that puppy all the way to the White House in 2008. Maybe they'll even throw in Health Care for everyone. What they haven't yet done is come up with anything more substantial than Not Being Bush for a plan. If anyone is working on a Democratic alternative to PNAC, it has yet to surface or be embraced by the party. Worse, if they do get to the White House - and the Republicans are doing what they can now to steal the election again - January 21, 2009 whichever Democrat is sitting in the Oval Office will own the Iraq War, possibly the Iran War, and every other problem in the world - and the Republicans will be attacking from all directions to keep them from doing anything effective. It would be awfully nice to have a plan laid out like a road map ahead of time - else the Democrats will end up going around in circles fighting the battle of day while they lose sight of overall war. Make no mistake about it either, it is a war of competing world views and the most clearly articulated one starts with a huge tactical advantage.

Well, this has turned into a rather long intro into my original intent, which was to come up with a set of questions designed to bring some focus into developing that long term strategy. They are rather like a set of poll questions. If I had time, facilities, and money, I'd actually try using them in a real poll to get an idea of real-world concerns from outside the beltway, and maybe as a set of test questions to evaluate politicians and candidates. None of them are terribly technical. I've tried to keep them to a Yes-No format (or undecided/don't know). They are intended to gauge emotional reaction as much as anything. I don't pretend they're complete. To be really useful, they'd have to be accompanied by a set of questions designed to elucidate the demographics of the person answering them. I'm putting them up here to stimulate some discussion. Feel free to criticize - and to improve on them. (BTW Kevin Drum has a couple of really pertinent posts on polls today, here and here.)

The Republicans have done a masterful job of concealing their agenda from the public (with a lot of help from the press.) These questions are intended to make the listener think about where we've come from in this New American Century, and where we're going. So, here they are, some simple Yes or No questions to gauge end-user satisfaction. I've tried to group them into loose categories that should be obvious from the subjects. The first set refers to conditions on  January 1, 2000 for a comparison. Enjoy!

Compared with where things were:

  1. Do you think the country is on the right track?
  1. Do you think the country is safer from terrorists?
  1. Do you think our borders are more secure?
  1. Do you think the military is in better shape?
  1. Do you think the country is better prepared for a major natural disaster?
  1. Do you feel safer?
  1. Do you think the U.S. is more admired by the rest of the world?
  1. Do you think the U.S. is more respected by the rest of the world?
  1. Do you think the U.S. is a better example for the rest of the world?
  1. Do you think the Middle East is more stable?
  1. Do you think the Federal government is more accountable?
  1. Do you think the Federal government is doing a better job?
  1. Do you think moral and ethical standards in Federal government are higher?
  1. Do you think the Federal government can be trusted to protect you from crime?
  1. Do you think the Federal government can be trusted to protect your civil rights?
  1. Do you think the Federal government can be trusted to respect your privacy?
  1. Do you think the office of the President has enough power?
  1. Do you think the Congress has enough power?
  1. Do you think the Courts have enough power?
  1. Do you think private citizens have enough power?
  1. Do you think we need to cut more Federal government regulations?
  1. Do you think the size of the Federal government has gotten smaller?
  1. Do you think the Federal budget is on the right track?
  1. Do you think the economy is on the right track?
  1. Do you think the government is dealing more fairly with corporations?
  1. Do you think the government is dealing more fairly with private citizens?
  1. Do you think the middle class is better off?
  1. Do you think the poor are better off?
  1. Do you think the rich are better off?
  1. Do you think you are better off?
  1. Do you think the Bush tax cuts have helped the economy?
  1. Do you think the Bush tax cuts have helped you?
  1. Do you think we need to cut taxes more?
  1. Do you think employment prospects for the country are better?
  1. Do you think your job is more secure?
  1. Do you think the national health care situation is better?
  1. Do you think your own health care situation is better?
  1. Do you think Social Security is more secure?
  1. Do you think the environment is in better shape?
  1. Do you think Global Warming is being addressed sufficiently?
  1. Do you think our country's energy policy is in better shape?
  1. Do you think our nation's schools have improved?
  1. Do you think your local schools have improved?
  1. Do you think our country is more unified?
  1. Do you think you are happier?

Looking To The Future:

  1. Do you think the U.S. will still be a world leader?
  1. Do you think the U.S. will still be a military superpower?
  1. Do you think the threat of terrorism will be reduced?
  1. Do you think the Middle East will be more stable?
  1. Do you think we will have to go to war with Iran?
  1. Do you think we will have to go to war with China?
  1. Do you think more countries will get nuclear weapons?
  1. Do you think the Federal budget will be balanced?
  1. Do you think the U.S. economy will be strong?
  1. Do you think the U.S. dollar will be strong?
  1. Do you think we will need to make the Bush tax cuts permanent?
  1. Do you think we will need to repeal the estate tax?
  1. Do you think your children will be able to get a good education?
  1. Do you think you'll be able to send your kids to college?
  1. Do you think your children will be able to find good jobs?
  1. Do you think the national health care situation will have been fixed?
  1. Do you think Social Security will be able to keep paying benefits?
  1. Do you think the U.S. will have all the energy it needs?
  1. Do you think Global Warming will have been stopped?
  1. Do you think the environment will be in better shape?

Here's some bonus questions that I just felt like throwing in.

  1. If the President announced tomorrow that Iran was an imminent threat to U.S. interests and needed to be attacked immediately, would you believe him?
  1. If the President said he was ordering an attack without waiting for  Congressional approval, would you support him?
  1. Do you think anyone would be able to stop the President if he decided to launch an attack?

Bonus Bonus question:

The Lifeboat test - based on a number of old movies, tv show dramas, and short stories. Great one to ask at parties. Here's the scenario:

You are aboard a cruise ship that has struck an iceberg from those melting Greenland glaciers, and it is sinking. There will be no outside rescue; since the government privatized the Coast Guard to Blackwater, rescues are on a pre-paid cash basis only. BUT...

The ship's lifeboats are all stocked with enough food and water to get a full load of people to safety. They may be a little hungry and thirsty by the time they do so - but they should all be able to reach safe harbor IF:

  1. Everybody cooperates.
  1. No boatload makes too many collective mistakes.

There may be storms, sharks, even pirates along the way - so there are no guarantees - but your odds are still pretty good with the right mix of people. There are two boats left. Each has one seat still free. You have less than a minute to choose. Boat number 1 contains all of the current Republican candidates for President. Boat number 2 contains all of the current Democratic candidates for President. Here's the question:

Which boat are YOU going to get into? Why?

(If you think this last question is a little too flip, well think of it this way. When you go into a voting booth and make your choices, the consequences aren't all that different from the lifeboat test above.)

Originally posted to xaxnar on Wed Sep 26, 2007 at 05:20 PM PDT.

Poll

Looking over these questions, I

50%4 votes
0%0 votes
25%2 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
12%1 votes
0%0 votes
12%1 votes

| 8 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar! (4+ / 0-)

    I have 2 cats to feed, so please be generous. (Blatant cat-pandering appeal.)

    "No special skill, no standard attitude, no technology, and no organization - no matter how valuable - can safely replace thought itself."

    by xaxnar on Wed Sep 26, 2007 at 05:14:32 PM PDT

  •  known about that for a long time (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    corvo, xaxnar, testvet6778

    good info though.

    Don't fight it son. Confess quickly! If you hold out too long you could jeopardize your credit rating. --Brazil (1985)

    by hypersphere01 on Wed Sep 26, 2007 at 05:19:39 PM PDT

  •  I'd go into the Republican lifeboat, (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    xaxnar, nathguy, Owllwoman

    scuttle it for the good of humanity, then take my chances with the cold water, sharks, and any nearby lifeboats.

    We don't have time for short-term thinking.

    by Compound F on Wed Sep 26, 2007 at 05:20:25 PM PDT

  •  NO (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    xaxnar, Owllwoman

    to questions 1 - 68

    The future's here, we are it, we are on our own.

    by OCMIHOP on Wed Sep 26, 2007 at 05:23:14 PM PDT

  •  You left out the oil grab (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    corvo, xaxnar, dantyrant

    so the US controls the Planet Earth and the Space above it. I would certainly hope the Dems. would not have such a plan, its just evil. No where in their plans are the people ever considered.

    "Though the Mills of the Gods grind slowly,Yet they grind exceeding small."

    by Owllwoman on Wed Sep 26, 2007 at 05:27:07 PM PDT

    •  The (almost) funny thing is, the whole PNAC oil (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      corvo

      strategy might be faulty because of an assumption that no one in the west even bothered to question, because it seemed so obvious.

      Have a look at William Engdahl's new article on peak oil which seems to be popping up everywhere. Here's a link from the Asia Times: Link.

      An entirely alternative theory of oil formation has existed since the early 1950s in Russia, almost unknown to the West. It claims that the conventional US biological-origins theory is an unscientific absurdity that is unprovable. They point to the fact that Western geologists have repeatedly predicted finite oil over the past century, only then to find more, lots more.

      Not only has this alternative explanation of the origins of oil and gas existed in theory, the emergence of Russia as the world's largest oil and natural-gas producer has been based on the application of the theory in practice. This has geopolitical consequences of staggering magnitude.

      In other words, the Russians seemed to acknowledge long ago that the whole idea that oil is pulverized and compressed dinosaur meat might indeed be quackery, and developed an independent theory of how oil is produced deep underground. I don't know the details, but if their theories are scientifically correct, it means that everything we believed about oil and where it comes from is wrong, and thus this whole oil-grab of a war might have been unnecessary to securing future reserves.

      I'd love to learn more about this if anyone has any links...

      •  Alternatively, (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        dantyrant

        If they intended to grab Iraq's oil, the mess they made has actually cut production - and may make it terribly expensive to get it flowing again. Not that they have a problem with oil at $80 a barrel as long as they are the ones pumping it....

        "No special skill, no standard attitude, no technology, and no organization - no matter how valuable - can safely replace thought itself."

        by xaxnar on Wed Sep 26, 2007 at 05:47:05 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Tommy Gold had done work on Cosmological oil (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        dantyrant

        tommy gold

        real serious guy,

        he pointed out that the presence of helium in natural gas means it has a
        primordial nature or that it comes from cosmology.

        his work is quite plausible,

        of course if there is more oil, then we have to worrry about
        global warming

        George Bush i sLiving proof of the axiom "Never send a boy to do a man's job" E -2.25 S -4.10

        by nathguy on Wed Sep 26, 2007 at 06:01:49 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  For all of their rhetoric about Freedom, they're (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    corvo, xaxnar

    a bunch of thugs. Political gangsters, if you will, who - as you point out - seek only to ensure the dominance of there kind in perpetuity by whatever means necessary.

    Lest anyone actually fall victim to their 'lofty idealism', some lines in the PNAC publications absolutely blow away the facade of the 'virtue' that they claim to be defending. In particular, I found this particular excerpt very interesting:

    And advanced forms of biological warfare that can "target" specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.  

    Has anyone actually READ their seminal report "Rebuilding America's Defenses"? It's full of good bits like that.

    •  It's an American tradition. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      corvo, dantyrant

      Sara Robinson over at Orcinus is working through a series of posts on the book "Albion's Seed." It traces the roots of what is happening in American politics back to 4 different groups that came to America from England at the time of the colonies. Here's her take on one group, the Cavaliers.

      Among Cavaliers and corporatists, there is no morality beyond might makes right. There is no law -- and no honor -- beyond their own desire to expand their own sphere of power. There is no equality, no justice, and no universal freedom as we understand it. Theirs is the ancient plantation mentality we Americans have spent over 220 hard, bloody years trying to put behind us. It's an outdated social system that has no place in a modern technological society -- yet, in almost every detail, it's the very world our new corporate royalists want to drag us back to.

      In the back of their minds, they're just Virginia gentlemen, taking the liberties such gentlemen have always rightfully enjoyed at the expense of others. It's true that we owe a handful of Cavalier gentlemen a tremendous debt for so clearly articulating the principles of American liberty during the Revolution. But we should also remember that when these first men asserted their God-given right to life, liberty, and happiness, they had no intention of sharing those blessings with anyone else.

      This as much as anything explains how these people can bloviate on at length about Freedom while carrying out the most incredible atrocities.

      "No special skill, no standard attitude, no technology, and no organization - no matter how valuable - can safely replace thought itself."

      by xaxnar on Wed Sep 26, 2007 at 05:44:17 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Quite right... (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        corvo, xaxnar

        They want their tribute payments, and the free-market reforms that are curiously well funded give more and more power to the oligarchs of the American power structure, because American power is wielded by those with financial leverage.

        Conspiracy theorists love to harp on David Rockefeller, but there's good reason for all of us to watch him, for example. It's not just that he's chair of Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, and any number of other such 'secretive' organizations.  But he also is thought to own part of the Federal Reserve and Exxon-Mobil too, which are perhaps just as worrying.

        The Rockefeller family hasn't lost influence in America since the days of the Standard Oil Trust - there's evidence to suggest that their influence is still just as strong.

        The truth is, American history has been taught to us as a bunch of different opposing movements duking it out, but rarely is the class war emphasized. I believe the class war is the common thread that runs through American history - the battle between the people and the plutocrats.

  •  You left out THEIR point of view, them and (0+ / 0-)

    their friends.

    They should be seen more in public and politely asked to explain, defend, and maybe even apologize.

    They are the most dangerous people in the country, those NeoCons, according to William Polk (Google him)(co-author with McGovern of Out of Iraq........and someone who said in 1962 in a speech ath the War College that Vietnam was lost already but no, the military was just too eager to go over there..........)

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site