Daily Kos

Worst Nightmare? McCain/Lieberman '08?

Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 05:53:18 PM PDT

The more and more I talk with friends and think about the 2008, the more I think its the democrat's to lose. People are going to be looking back on an extremely unpopular and unsuccessful republican administration and will be asked by the likes of Romney/McCain/Rudy to give them another four years to right the ship. Romney's flaws are obvious, being mormon and his inconsistent stances on important nut job issues. Rudy is a joke if you ask me, both in the primary and the general, he has WAY too many skeletons. Even McCain doesn't seem like much, all things considered. He might be the media's darling, but his insane support for sending MORE troops into the Maw would immediately lose him the moderate support the media claims McCain owns. Then I started thinking...

How likely is a possible McCain and Lieberman ticket and how successful would it be. I'm a bit young and hardly a presidential historian, but I can't think of a single instance of a two party ticket. Regardless of how disgusting I find the two of them, the draw of such a ticket as obvious, a "genuine" attempt at bipartisanship. Now, while most of us consider Lieberman to be a DINO, he still is considered a democrat by the population at large. The sort of momentum and draw of a two party ticket could be deadly, drawing moderates and the apathetic into the fold. We are remember the rumors about Kerry trying to get McCain on the ticket, but that was never reaslistic, there were too many genuine ideological differences between the two, but the more McCain and Lieberman go around preaching their new troop infusion, the more and more feasible this sort of a ticket has appeared to me. Am I being paranoid? Would this ever happen? Would it work? Has this already been diaried? Do I need to stop drinking coffee? You decide!

Poll

This ticket is...

14%20 votes
43%59 votes
18%25 votes
13%18 votes
7%10 votes
2%4 votes

| 136 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Joe Lieberman, John McCain, 2008 Elections (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 46 comments

  •  Too wishy/washy (0+ / 0-)

    With a noodle like Lieberman as VP, you need someone who's really take-charge and dynamic, and not flirting with weather-vanity like McCain does.

    An actual solid conservative who's not a loony, like I hear the GOP Warner is, would do much better.

    Probably a real winner would have been Jeb Bush - fortunately that dynasty seems unlikely, which is one of the few silver linings of how badly George W. is running things.

    "Think. It ain't illegal yet." - George Clinton

    by jbeach on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 05:53:06 PM PDT

    •  McCain/Bush (0+ / 0-)

      If I were McCain, I'd watch my back, who I went hunting with and definitely stay out of small planes.

      If we have to account for our lives when we die, then is God being an investment banker, rather than being generous?

      by grada3784 on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:42:48 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  McCain/Lieberman '08? (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    blueteam, lecsmith, mattes, Nulwee, klnb1019

    Bring it on!

    Both of those Bozos are too compromised at this point to be a credible threat. They would lose...big

    "If impeachment is off the table, so is democracy." -teacherken

    by offgrid on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 05:54:18 PM PDT

  •  Two politicians (5+ / 0-)

    without a base.

    •  thats a very good point... (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      cartwrightdale

      they both are viewed as 'moderates' but that has come at the price of having no really strong base of supporters, at least passionate supporters.

      Georgetown University College Democrats Blog: http://democrats.georgetown.edu

      by The Hunter Gracchus GU Dems on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 05:56:06 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  my guess would be a solid 20-25% (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      MO Blue

      taking from both sides. Probably a bit more from the moderate pubs who feel a bit disenfranchised right now. I don't think they'll do that well on the Democratic side, dependent on who the nominee is.  If it's Hillary, they might do better, but we'll have to see how that pans out.

      A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' Douglas Adams

      by dougymi on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:12:07 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Well, since the republicans are (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    incertus, ctsteve, kaye, DBunn

    pushing Hilary, I think we need to push McCain/Lieberman...wonderful ticket. Made in heaven.

    Will the elite be happy living behind gated communities in the potential meltdown? Peace now. -7.00, -2.92

    by mattes on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 05:59:53 PM PDT

  •  two flip floppers! (0+ / 0-)

    they were for it, before they were against it!
    or is it the other way around?
    yuck, these two together is nothing but slimy!

  •  Heh (0+ / 0-)

    If Lieberman is trying to ensure that he won't get re-elected in 2012, no matter what party line he runs on, this might happen.

    Saint McCain + Last Honest Man = utter electoral failure.

    "The perfect is the enemy of the good." -Voltaire

    by PsiFighter37 on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:01:05 PM PDT

  •  probable (0+ / 0-)

    Well, they seem to be best friends in DC these days, so I think it is very likely that McCain will get the nomination (cause the GOP loves organization and money in their primaries) and I think that it is very possible that he will pick Lieberman as his VP.  This is a very weak ticket, however, because they will be closely tied to Bush and the Iraq War.

    •  McCain will NOT be the Rpublican Nominee (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      MO Blue

      McCain/Lieberman could very well be the "UNITY TICKET" and when all you need is 34% to win anything is possible.

      Hell, 30% still think Bush is doing wonderful in Iraq.

      http://dumpjoe.com/

      by ctkeith on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:09:21 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I Think The McCain/Lieberman Unity Ticket (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        zeke L, ActivistGuy

        is the way it is going to play out. Before Lieberman's win in CT, I would have said no way. Now I'm not so sure. Seems too many people and the media are more than willing to believe whatever lies these two throw out.

        No courage = No $$$ for Dems

        by MO Blue on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:31:59 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  the media (3+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          ActivistGuy, MO Blue, bernardpliers

          is what does it.

          they have a vested interest in peddling this BS.  pretending these guys are "independents" or "mavericks" when they're in bed with K street every bit as big as any decades-long incumbents.  it's all part of the inside the beltway bubble.

          unfortunately there is still a significant majority of americans who don't examine the propaganda coming from the LAME (lazy-ass media empires).

          l'audace! l'audace! toujours l'audace!

          by zeke L on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 08:04:04 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  Why is this a two party ticket? (5+ / 0-)

    Oh yeah

    The Republican Party and the Party of One

    I long for the good old days where church was the place where we sang hymns and slept. (After Paula Poundstone)

    by captainlaser on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:05:44 PM PDT

  •  Um everything you say is true... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    dufffbeer, california keefer

    and they could be a formidable force to run against...if only no war in Iraq ever existed. These are two most pro-war, pro-escalation, and pro-Bush poddles you can find, and a ticket composing both of them would be asking the voters to vote for a Cheney/Cheney 2008 ticket.

    To say such a ticket is doomed to failure is an understatement...  

    "People place their hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution. They don't put their hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible." --J.R.

    by michael1104 on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:06:20 PM PDT

  •  Excuse me (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    markymarx

    before I answer I have to step out for a quick lobotomy.

    The longer I live, the clearer I perceive how unmatchable a compliment one pays when he says of a man "he has the courage to utter his convictions." Mark Twain

    by Persiflage on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:07:07 PM PDT

  •  Media love them (5+ / 0-)

    And most people think they are centrists.

    I tried to explain how evil they were to some friends of mine.

    When the stupid idea of sending more troops came up, I explained to them (very military savy folk) the following:

    Gen Abizaid, CENTCOM commander, was againts.

    American Enterprise Institute, Washington rich guy club, was for it.

    Who did these two people use in their decision making process?

    They all said they were wrong on THIS decision, but they still liked them.

    There is so much propoganda on these people making them into something they are not, that it is a good chance they could win. It will be framed in the 'both/parties' are evil frame, the military-industrial complex will pump millions into it, and without a strategy to stop it, could be a threat.

    just a thought.

  •  after seeing them together today (2+ / 0-)

    a light went on....of COURSE, that's the plan.

    Don't think it will work however.  McCain's health is in question and who will want to listen to Joe whine on a regular basis?

    thanks for putting this out there...

    If we cannot elect this man, we don't deserve him.

    by lisastar on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:10:34 PM PDT

  •  I think we need to encourage Tom Tancredo (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    TrueBlueMajority, DBunn

    to run as a 3rd party candidate.

    How? Give President Bush an immigration package bill with amnesty provisions included. Mild enough amnesty that he signs rather than vetos the bill.

    Tancredo goes apeshit and 2008 is over.

    Just as soon as the Ossetia war broke out, Dubya canceled a trip to Atlanta . . .

    by Bill White on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:14:22 PM PDT

  •  You're John McCain (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    kaye, california keefer

    -- and you've somehow scrambled your way to the Republican nomination.  On the way you've recanted every principle you ever held dear so as not to offend the Republican right.  The right is still deeply suspicious of you.

    So why would you now want to run with Lieberman as your VP candidate?  Lieberman who, repugnant though he is to Democrats, has a very, very liberal voting record on domestic issues?  Lieberman who is Jewish (pro-Israel is one thing; I think the right remains very unhappy with non-Christians -- no, make that non-Protestants).  Lieberman who would infuriate the right and the left, while the "middle" doesn't seem to like him either.  He certainly didn't set the world on fire when he ran for the Democratic nomination.  He did get reelected in CN, but surely he owed that to CN voters' long familiarity with him.  What would Lieberman do for you?

    Besides, he's such a downer.

    •  lieberman would drive off the religious right (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      kaye, DiesIrae, Nulwee

      A jew with the keys to the kingdom of heaven on earth?  no friggin way...

      dobson would prefer to jump off a cliff.

      A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' Douglas Adams

      by dougymi on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:17:33 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  He actually owes his "re-election" (0+ / 0-)

      to republicans, almost none of whom voted for the republican candidate.

      Lieberman and McCain?

      You can't come up with two more boring guys.  And McCain is prickly and gets snippy, while Lieberman lies down (before all-might repubs like Cheney) or gets smartalecky and looks like an ass during debates.

      McCain has kissed so much ass that he thinks they'll hand it to him.  And Lieberman obviously can't fathom why anyone who didn't hate America woulnd't vote for him.  He thought he "deserved" to be re-elected and sold himself out to keep a seat he promised to leave after 18 years even if it meant telling his own party to fuck off and going it alone.

      Two annoying imperious and desperate men.  Not scary at all unless someone gives them the keys.

      "Balance" does not mean giving the same weight to a lie as you do to the truth.

      by delphine on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 07:47:17 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •   I would vote that ticket (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    DBunn

    If by some miracle Iraq turned around. But, their support of the Iraq debacle will be an albatross around both of their necks. If the GOP deserts Mccain because of his "liberal" social values and sore loser Mccain joins sore loser lieberman in forming another "third party", they could be the loser party. They would get strong support from the 11 % that will still be supporting this war in 08.

    Patriotism consists not in waving the flag, but in striving that our country shall be righteous as well as strong. ~James Bryce

    by california keefer on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:15:43 PM PDT

  •  Nope. The fundies will not want a Jewish VP. (0+ / 0-)

    Hell, they can't even accept the Mormons.

  •  The Media loves them, so the they win (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    dufffbeer

    The media has a story about all politicians, and they never never let go of it.

    McCain will be the Straight Talker till he changes every opinion at least 5 times.

    Bush is resolute.

    Al Gore invented the internet.

    Guiliani is America's Mayor.

    Lieberman is the Great Bipartisan Centrist.

    John Edwards has nice hair.

    •  the media USED to love them (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      DBunn

      the "surge" is changing this, I think. everyone, including the media, knows surge=escalation=CYA-til-2008.

      I admire McCain for his enormous sacrifice for our nation as a POW, but he is dead wrong on the most important issue of our time.

  •  Believe or not, I was daydreaming about this a (0+ / 0-)

    few weeks back; or maybe I should call it "daynightmaring." When I thought about having to live with these two unbearably self-regarding characters running the country, I seriously daydreamed about leaving the country.

    Corporate Media: Republicans are their base.

    by lecsmith on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:37:12 PM PDT

  •  I watch C-SPAN and I saw these old crustaceans (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    rmx2630

    nipping at the air with their pincers, sidelighting  the Bush war agenda with stink bombs at the American Enterprise Institute. I hope they choke on their soup, Fredo.

    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -Thomas Jefferson

    by ezdidit on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:37:34 PM PDT

  •  A dream ticket!! (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    incertus, DBunn

    If you're a Dem, who want a better future, actually, just a future, for this country!!

    Those two together would be all that is need to reach critical mass and set off an explosion of shit not even witnessed under Bu$hitCo, and there's mountains of shit there!

    You don't negotiate with fascists, you defeat them in the name of democracy. --Ambr. Joe Wilson

    by FightTheFuture on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:45:22 PM PDT

  •  Lieberman's Just A Senator (0+ / 0-)

    no hope for President even as a GOP

    Plus, he knows what crapped out means, which will help him explain his condition on the morning of November 5 - PBCliberal

    by Nulwee on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 06:46:39 PM PDT

  •  Worst nightmare would be Dick Cheney/Zell Miller (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    delphine, EuroPerspective
  •  I would love (0+ / 0-)

    to go up against that ticket. We would clean their clocks so badly it's not even funny.

    I want to die like my grandfather, peacefully in my sleep, not screaming in terror like his passengers.

    by incertus on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 07:03:54 PM PDT

    •  I agree (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      incertus, dufffbeer

      Can you see Al Gore or John Edwards debating either of these fuckwads?

      Wesley Clark crushing Lieberman head to head?  

      Obama v. McCain?  McCain would go home crying.

      Puhleeze.  These guys aren't a nightmare except for the fact that they actually have a vote in the Senate right now.

      "Balance" does not mean giving the same weight to a lie as you do to the truth.

      by delphine on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 07:43:21 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Remember that Kerry offered veep spot to McCain (0+ / 0-)

    And McCain turned it down.

    (I just like bringing that up to annoy all the Kerry apologists out there hehehe)

  •  Yes! (0+ / 0-)

    As long as they run on the GOP ticket.  Any Democrat out there could beat these two horribly unappealing slugs.

    "Truck Stop Women," a New Film By Phil Gramm and John McCain.

    by bink on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 07:06:26 PM PDT

  •  Schwarzenegger (0+ / 0-)

    After watching Ahnold's political comeback over the past two years and the adulatory crowds at his second inauguration today, I'd say the's the one candidate the Republicans have who could recapture the Reagan mantle and give a Democratic candidate a hard time. Of course there's that little issue with the Constitutional bar to his election. (Time for another Bush signing statement?)

    Seriously, Schwarzenegger has been doing everything right lately in the precise ways that Bush hasn't. He'd drive the religious right mad, which is another point in his favor. I'm almost sorry he can't run.

    •  Actually (0+ / 0-)

      I was thinking about ASwipe this a.m. as they mentioned he was sworn in for a second term.

      He actually did everything WRONG and his approval rating was in the toilet.  

      His opponent squandered a good opportunity by being a milquetoast who didn't actually have many ads or say much of anything.

      Because when he started running, it looked like Ahnie's days were numbered.  

      Then the dems bashed the shit out of one another, spoonfeeding the repukes' ads.

      But really what Gropenfuhrer did was - stopped doing anything.  He shut the fuck up the last 6 months before the election.  No more pissing off the unions or kissing up to bush or making crass jokes.  No more promising to "take it to the people" (i.e., spend a lot of money putting stuff on ballots because you suck at working with the legislature.)

      And all the dems had was "we don't suck up to bush like he does".  So all he had to say to win was:

      Silence.  Silence got him a second term.

      "Balance" does not mean giving the same weight to a lie as you do to the truth.

      by delphine on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 07:41:16 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  The last time there was... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    zeke L

    ...a two party ticket was when Abrham Lincoln ran for re-election.  His running mate that year was Andrew Johnson, an anti-slavery Democrat.

    That said, I'm not sure your idea would work out that well for McCain.  If he wins the nomination, he'll need to put a real right-winger on the ticket next to him to appease the Republican base.

    Yes, Lieberman is more conservative than we'd like, but he's also more liberal than many of the national Republicans would care for.

  •  just FUGLY (0+ / 0-)

    No one would be able to look at them.  Fucking Ugly -- FUGLY.

    Seriously, that would just be the ugliest pair of nasty old white guys ever.  

  •  *Worst Nightmare?* (0+ / 0-)

    More like a wet dream. LOL.

    I was born a millworker's daughter.....

    by cackyp on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 09:28:23 PM PDT

Permalink | 46 comments