Daily Kos

Congratulations to Al Gore

Fri Oct 12, 2007 at 07:48:15 PM PDT

Congratulations to Al Gore.

I don’t care what any of the bitter assholes on Fox News, at The Wall Street Journal, or anywhere else say.  He deserves the Nobel Peace Prize that he won today.

Anyone who thinks that global warming isn’t an issue of world peace (and international security) is a fool.  Think, for a minute, about the drastic impact that the major environmental changes caused by global warming, if it remains unchecked, will have on humanity – the changing of "temperate" zones where certain kinds of food can be grown, the massive streams of refugees as certain low lying regions flood, the spread of once rare diseases into new areas.  

Now, think about the economic and political turmoil that will stem from those things.  It has already been said that global warming is the biggest threat to humanity since nuclear war.  So too is it the biggest threat to peace and stability.

By speaking out on global warming, by educating the public and creating a greater demand for action and change, Al Gore is engaging in a tremendous effort to guarantee peace and prosperity, if not in the present, then in future generations.  Regardless of what happens, our children and grandchildren will look back on this, and realize that the Nobel Prize committee made the right decision today.

My only regret is that former Vice-President Gore no longer seems to think that running for office is worthwhile.  It’s entirely understandable, given the outcome in 2000, the extremely "negative" nature of U.S. politics, and the fact that the mainstream media in this country, for whatever reason, seems to hate his guts.  But, it is regrettable.  

Al Gore was the first person I ever voted for.  In the years since, events have not only confirmed that I made the right decision, but also made me increasingly proud to have made that decision.  I don’t know anyone who voted for Gore in 2000 who now wishes they voted for Bush.  Gore, more than anyone else, has the knowledge, the experience, the ability, and the character to lead the country out of the quagmire we are sinking into.  

Were Gore to run today, he would likely have some of the same appeal to the country that Richard Nixon had in 1968 – the "experienced hand" from an era of "peace and prosperity" returning to "lead the country out of a time of turmoil."  As such, 2008 is probably the best chance Al Gore will ever have at winning the presidency.  It is probably the time in which the people of this country would be the most receptive to the idea of a "Gore" White House.  But, sadly, it isn’t going to happen.  Because, in thirty years of Republican dominance of American politics, the system has become so nasty, and so negative, that the best of our leaders are chewed up, spit out, and rendered forever cynical of the American electoral system.

We are left, instead, with fear mongering and intellectual mediocrity.  We are left, instead, with a country where the harshness and pandering of a Rudy Giuliani, or the intellectual emptiness and Hollywood "glamour" of a Fred Thompson, are considered the "qualities of leadership" that a major party should seek to put forward in an important election.  We are left, instead, with a country where the most important question in a presidential election seems not to be whether the person is the most intelligent and most capable of the job, but whether they "make a show" of their religious beliefs, or whether they’re the kind of person you’d "want to have a beer with."  The result of such a system is the mess that we have been living in for the past seven years.

Al Gore’s Nobel Prize is a moment of redemption and saneness in an increasingly insane world.  

If only I had confidence that it could last.

Poll

Was Al Gore the right person to award a Nobel Peace Prize to?

89%62 votes
5%4 votes
4%3 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes

| 69 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Al Gore, Nobel Prize, global warming (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 32 comments

  •  Tip Jar (15+ / 0-)

    Yes, I know this has probably been diaried a billion times today.

    I don't care.  I wanted to write this.  I needed to write this.  So, I wrote it anyway.

    If you liked what I had to say, please leave a tip.

  •  Just saw Al... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    JekyllnHyde, Panda

    on C-Span, and now Dr. Dean is on.

    The lesson of that history is that you must not despair, that if you are right, and you persist, things will change. -Howard Zinn

    by blueyedace2 on Fri Oct 12, 2007 at 08:17:49 PM PDT

    •  I wish I could see him speak in person... (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      JekyllnHyde, Panda, blueyedace2

      ...some day.  But, it has yet to happen.  I wish the same thing about John Edwards.

      I did, however, get to see Howard Dean speak in person.  He gave a speech at Gettysburg College, where he dropped by after giving a speech at Penn State University.  I was in my senior year, it was during the 2004 election, and he was out drumming up support for Kerry.

      It was an aswome night.  He stayed at the college to have dinner with the professors, and a select group of students (including me).  I got his autograph, and am keeping it in a frame.  It's in storage right now, but, as soon as I can find gainful employment, and move into an apartment of my own, it's going up on my wall.

      •  Ever see Feingold? (4+ / 0-)

        I go to pretty much every listening session I can get to, and he knocks my socks off every time.

        The lesson of that history is that you must not despair, that if you are right, and you persist, things will change. -Howard Zinn

        by blueyedace2 on Fri Oct 12, 2007 at 08:25:02 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Nope. Live in central-PA... (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Panda, blueyedace2

          ...and don't get very many chances to see prominant Democrats speak.

          Almost got a chance to see Bob Casey Jr. speak in person.  In 2005, as part of the Gettysburg College Democrats guest lecutre series, I arranged for him to come give a speech on campus.

          Unfortunately, that was before he decided to run for Senate.  After he decided, speaking at Gettysburg no longer made as much sense, as it would have been his "first speech" since declaring.  His campaign staff kept trying to argue with him not to do it, and, eventually he cancelled - a mere two days before he was scheduled to come.

          The whole thing left me with a rather bitter taste in regard to Casey's campaign people.  When I talked to them, they made  it abundently clear to me that he still wanted to meet his commitment at Gettysburg, but that "they didn't want him to come."  I also felt they were rather rude and condescending in their attitudes towards me.

          Water under the bridge now, though, I guess.

        •  Feingold is one of my favorites! (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Panda

          I have never seen him in person, and I live very near Wisconsin (St.Paul, Minnesota). I contribute to the Feingold Patriot Fund once in while. He is a real leader.

    •  'Nuther Span Junkie here (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      blueyedace2, WayneNight

      I'm currently watching cspan's Presidential Libraries series. LBJ
      Randi Rhodes is a Spanner too. ;)

      Saw Dean in person a couple of times...electrifying, nothing even barely resembling the MSM bull about him.  To this day I'm mystified by the sudden loss in Iowa.
       

      •  Yeah, I think the msm... (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Panda, blueyedace2

        ...creates a distorted image of a lot of people.

        Someone once told me that, when Jessie Jackson ran for president, the news would take clips of him and air them "out of context" in ways that made him seem a lot more shrill than he really is.

        •  They sure did a number on Howard Dean. (4+ / 0-)

          The Dean Scream was really a fabrication of a directional microphone. The microphone blocks out background noise and records only the voice of the person speaking directly into it. It made Dean sound as if he was raising the level of his voice for no apparent reason. The room was actually quite loud. The media understood this, but played the audio all the same.

          •  Yeah. A friend of mine... (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Panda

            ...was actually there for that speech, and he confirms that, in person, the scream wasn't anything at all what the msm made it seem like.

            It seems the press and beltway pundits seem to think that America shouldn't have a president who's energetic, and who tries to rally his supporters.

            •  That is why you and I are here tonight. (3+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              Panda, WayneNight, DixieDishrag

              On one level, this is a little chat. On another level, we are developing the liberal sound machine that Dean badly needed after Iowa. Between the blogospere, Air America Radio, Nova M radio, An Inconvenient Truth, K.O. and others we will be able amplify the truth until the msm is forced to reconcile with it.

              •  I wish I had DailyKos in 2000 (3+ / 0-)

                Yes, the vast majority of U.S. citizens (and even the vast majority of Democrats) don't come here.  But, for those of us who do, it's a massive help in cutting through some of the bullshit that's out there, and in helping to create a Dem/liberal narrative.

                I was 18 years old during the 2000 election, and a senior at a predominantly Republican High School in a predominantly Republican area.  The noise machine was so loud that I actually "bought into" much of the crap that they smeared Gore with - the "internet" lie, ect.

                I didn't find out the "truth" about those things until years after it was too late.  I'd like to think that, had DailyKos been around, I would have acutally known them for the election.

              •  Agreed, in part (0+ / 0-)

                I agree that we need to speak out when the MSM won't. But I want a wider audience for what we're saying. I would love to see DK have a wider audience. You see, talking heads are one thing. A community speaking is very powerful. People listen to communities for a variety of reasons, including the dreaded argumentum ad populum. People listen to people, but it works even better when it is interactive. I don't have the answer on how to get more interaction, but I know it is sorely needed.

                Vote with your conscience, O Progressive, for there are many Conservatives who will vote without one.

                by MahFellaMerkins on Sat Oct 13, 2007 at 08:49:20 AM PDT

                [ Parent ]

  •  Please Mr. Gore, we need you..... (6+ / 0-)

    Take a look at todays article on Al Gore winning the Nobel Peace Prize on MSNBC on the web.  There is a little survey/vote. When you see the results it should shock some of you to see that if Al Gore where to throw his hat in the ring with the current democratic candidates, he wins in a landslide...No competition at all.  It's a karma thing babe. I mean, he did win the Presidency, (while Jeb Bush and his idiot brother sat laughing down in Florida at all of those people trying to read the "CHADS" on the voting cards, when the fix was in, the deals were done, and good old dad, called in his favors with the Supreme Idiots Supreme Court.

    Hey, isn't there any precedent for perhaps, "removing a president from office" because he is, you know, OUT OF HIS MIND? INSANE? IN BANANA LAND? I guess unless we impeach him, we just have to live with a certifiable, delusional crazy man who really really truly believes he is Truman/Churchill/Junior Jesus. Sometimes I picture him gleefully looking at the big RED BUTTON (the one with the Nukes) saying to himself over and over, "I am the decider"    Why doesn't the constitution have a note that says something like: If it appears that the President is out of his mind, then Congress can send in 10 qualified Doctors, to check it out....?

    Mr. Gore, we need you. This election is the most important one in the past 100 years.  Please take your rightful place.  It belongs to you.

    Badabing

    'Course I'm respectable. I'm old. Politicians, ugly buildings and whores all get respectable if they last long enough. Noah Cross, Chinatown

    by Badabing on Fri Oct 12, 2007 at 08:22:00 PM PDT

  •  PS To: Please Mr. Gore we need you... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    MahFellaMerkins, WayneNight

    Could somebody here on Kos please do an identical survey/vote?  If you added Al Gore's name to the current list of Democratic candidates who would you vote for?  I just don't know how to set something like that up, but I would appreciate it if someone did.  I think it would be very interesting to see the people who blog here, their own reactions, and what it might tell the world, what it might say to Mr. Gore.

    Thanks so much.

    Badabing

    'Course I'm respectable. I'm old. Politicians, ugly buildings and whores all get respectable if they last long enough. Noah Cross, Chinatown

    by Badabing on Fri Oct 12, 2007 at 08:27:19 PM PDT

  •  The Nobel Prize committee has a track record (0+ / 0-)

    of recognizing people so damn late in the game it often does little good. Whatever good they achieve by nominating and now awarding Gore, they generally negate by being extremely late with recognizing the obvious. A brief flicker of signs of intelligent life should not obscure the general trend of the Nobel Prize Committee being an institution that has failed society. Someone can look up the actual number, but I recall that those who track these things record something like 165 current on going "hot conflicts" in the world. Which likely does not include some of the active repressions in secretive societies like China and North Korea. There may be a "Peace" Prize, but yet there is less and less peace. In a pass-fail system, the Nobel Peace Prize flunks. IMO, the choice of Gore is the exception that proves the rule. The Nobel Peace Prize has long since passed the point of diminishing returns, and Gore could probably provide more leadership by just refusing to accept it. But, good scout that he is, he's passing the prize money along to the benefit of the cause. The list of institutions that have reached the state of end-stage terminal decay is simply astonishing, including the US Supreme Court. IMO, it would have been better for Gore to have accepted the presidency, and turned down the Nobel Peace Prize. But Gore's career, unfortunately, seems to be caught up in a Bermuda Triangle dominated by Murphy's Law. Unfortunately, it is the US that ends up being the loser. In closing, the cynic in me can not help but notice the statistical correlation between those that get awarded Peace Prizes and their home locations in third-world countries.

Permalink | 32 comments