Skip to main content

So Wayne Barrett and the Village Voice have delivered a bombshell only no one seems to be interested? David Shuster (aka Keith Olbermann) covered it on Countdown last night (10/25) but in today's NYTimes or Washington Post? Nada.

Here's the scoop: Barrett got ahold of accounts of Giuliani's testimony to the 911 Commission, testimony that was to have been kept secret until after the 2008 elections, though no one has explained why. The substance of Giuliani's testimony, however, reveals why he would have wanted it hidden away. It seems that Rudy the Terrorist Slayer is no such thing.

Here are the two leading paragraph's of Barrett's story:

In a recent broadside deriding the Clinton administration's response to Al Qaeda, Rudy Giuliani told an audience at Pat Robertson's Regent University: "Bin Laden declared war on us. We didn't hear it. I thought it was pretty clear at the time, but a lot of people didn't see it, couldn't see it." Other tenets of his standard stump speech include the assertion that he's been "studying terrorism" for more than 30 years, and that "the thing that distinguishes me on terrorism is that I have more experience in dealing with it" than the other presidential candidates.

However, in private testimony before the 9/11 Commission in 2004, Rudy gave a very different version of how much he knew about terrorism when the World Trade Center was attacked. That testimony isn't scheduled to be released publicly until after the 2008 presidential election, but the Voice has obtained a copy of it. And it reveals a New York mayor who was anything but an "expert on terrorism."

Ok, so does this sort of "dirt" matter to those of us fervently working to ensure that a Democrat occupies the White House for the next 8 years?  And if it does, how best to make use of it? I'm no expert on electoral politics, so all I can do is ask whether it would be best to try to knock Giuliani out of his top spot in the GOP race now (lots of pundits are betting there will be no revolt of the religious right, when push comes to shove) or better to wait and use it against him in the general election. Perhaps the wisdom of the Kos community can weigh in here.

It might also be useful to discover exactly who decided that 911 testimony would remain secret until after the 08 elections. Was this "rule" general to everyone's testimony or just to some folks'? Whose interests are served by such procedures?

Clearly someone associated with the commission thought such secrecy might be harmful to the republic (and a specific Republican) since he/she leaked it to Barrett.  What else is lurking in all that testimony?

Originally posted to naknak on Fri Oct 26, 2007 at 09:55 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site