Skip to main content

John Bolton has his panties in a knot because of Syria and North Korea: The leader to Bolton’s article in today’s Wall Street Journal reads:

So Pyongyang was helping Syria build a reactor? Must be time for more concessions.

http://online.wsj.com/...

Bolton opens up with the usual unfactual accusation (the code words with diclaimer: Facts about–albeit still incompletely. . .):

Facts about Israel's Sept. 6 raid on a suspected nuclear facility in Syria continue to emerge -- albeit still incompletely, especially regarding the involvement of the Democratic People's Republic of (North) Korea.

He even goes on to accuse the Bush administration of shameful concessions to North Korea:

The concessions continue to flow in essentially only one direction, crossing repeated "red lines" Washington had drawn.

These include: (1) the humiliating U.S. collapse on North Korea's access to international financial markets; (2) accepting a mere "freeze" of Yongbyon (misleadingly called "disablement" by the administration) rather than real dismantlement; (3) failing to ensure enforcement of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1718's sanctions, imposed after Pyongyang's nuclear test; and (4) the State Department's palpable hunger to remove North Korea from the list of state sponsors of terrorism and the Trading With the Enemy Act's prohibitions, and re-establish full diplomatic relations.

Woe! Gnashing angst! Concession after concession after concession! And, oh God! Diplomacy! Bolton even tosses in an insulting criticism from the left:

Even critics from the left now worry that State is conceding far more than it should.

And slaps Condoleeza Rice:

Our current Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, and other partisans of the six-party talks respond to all internal administration complaints or criticisms by asking, "What is your alternative? What would you have us do otherwise, risk war on the Peninsula?"

Our "current" Secretary of State, Mr. Bolton? Is that a hint of something dark and foreboding and subterranean afoot? Something of the odeur of Monsieur Cheney? Who never asks such sissified questions? Nay! No questions from he who only barks out commands.

He, Bolton, almost pleads with Bush to draw "a deep line in the sand." Ah, the longing for a manly man with a heavy and pendulous, a penetrom de libramentum, if not of liberation, to flop out like a bomb from an attack plane, tracing "a deep line in the sand." I doubt that Senor Bush is so endowed.

My goodness! Mr. Bolton is even concerned about:

Third, consider the severely negative effect these repeated concessions have on our relations with Japan and South Korea.

Whatever happened to the hearty unilateralism of the past, Mr. Bolton? Wouldn’t these present day actions of multilateral cooperation threaten the position of the "unitary executive"?

Bolton, apparently, has not yet totally lost hope. He closes his article with:

For President Bush, I can only hope he re-reads his first term speeches on North Korea.

Yes, the good old days when Bolton was ranging free to throw things in rage and kill initiatives on arms controls, abuse women in Russian hotels, require strange things from wives, the good old days.

This timely article also serves to promote Bolton’s book: Surrender Is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations, out next week from Simon & Schuster/Threshold Editions.

Shades of Tom DeLay’s Book, No Retreat, No Surrender. How did that book ever sell, by the way?

Originally posted to Karen Hedwig Backman on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 09:10 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site