Skip to main content

I’m not an economist. Bonddad’s charts usually make my eyeballs spin. But I have a fairly good memory and I recall some Administration talk going on before and after the last election that scared me at the time because it seemed to me to be a conservative economic pipe-dream and a way to exploit people’s ignorance for some short-term political and economic gain, kind of a Stalinesque economic experiment. Now it seems the termites have come home to roost.

The particular Administration talk was about the concept of the "Ownership Society":

"...if you own something, you have a vital stake in the future of our country. The more ownership there is in America, the more vitality there is in America, and the more people have a vital stake in the future of this country."
-President George W. Bush, June 17, 2004

Do you recall Bush’s great push for privatized Social Security? This was only one aspect of the Ownership Society concept. Home ownership for "the poor and disadvantaged" was another key part of it. The White House’s policy paper on OS is still posted on it’s web site:

Fact Sheet: America's Ownership Society

One of the key elements of OS was to push for individual home ownership for the poor. Here’s the Bush-thought on this topic from the policy paper:

Expanding Homeownership. The President believes that homeownership is the cornerstone of America's vibrant communities and benefits individual families by building stability and long-term financial security. In June 2002, President Bush issued America's Homeownership Challenge to the real estate and mortgage finance industries to encourage them to join the effort to close the gap that exists between the homeownership rates of minorities and non-minorities. The President also announced the goal of increasing the number of minority homeowners by at least 5.5 million families before the end of the decade. Under his leadership, the overall U.S. homeownership rate in the second quarter of 2004 was at an all time high of 69.2 percent. Minority homeownership set a new record of 51 percent in the second quarter, up 0.2 percentage point from the first quarter and up 2.1 percentage points from a year ago. President Bush's initiative to dismantle the barriers to homeownership includes: * American Dream Downpayment Initiative, which provides down payment assistance to approximately 40,000 low-income families; * Affordable Housing. The President has proposed the Single-Family Affordable Housing Tax Credit, which would increase the supply of affordable homes; * Helping Families Help Themselves. The President has proposed increasing support for the Self-Help Homeownership Opportunities Program; and * Simplifying Homebuying and Increasing Education. The President and HUD want to empower homebuyers by simplifying the home buying process so consumers can better understand and benefit from cost savings. The President also wants to expand financial education efforts so that families can understand what they need to do to become homeowners.

At the time I first heard about this it was creepy to me. How many winks and nods and backroom deals came from HUD and the white house to various mortgage brokers and the likes of CountryWide and CitiFinancial to go for broke and round up as many poor suckers as they could find. It was good for the economy to have many new homeowners. It was not well thought-out what the consequences would be when disadvantaged people with marginal financial skills faced the realities of mortgage/taxes/insurance/repairs. I remember well the culture shock I experienced 20 years ago when as a many-years renter I purchased my first home and when things went wrong I had no landlord to call to fix things.

When we look at the go-for-broke hard sell of tricky mortgage packages and gotcha  adjustable rates, weren’t the Bushies cheerleading all this on and creating a climate for financial institutions to exploit the poor and lower-middle class? Seems so to me.

So now, who is losing their homes in the mortgage melt-down? All the new homeowners of the past few years. They are victimized over and over, tricked into impossible loans, charged phony and inflated fees, charged even more phony fees in foreclosure, scammed over again in desperate attempts to refinance, traumatized by the enormity of their financial ruin, and their credit is destroyed.

Thanks George! Uniter not divider, Decider, and now Great Provider.

Originally posted to western star on Sat Nov 10, 2007 at 05:11 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tips? (14+ / 0-)

    You cannot live on hope alone, but without it life is not worth living. - Harvey Milk

    by western star on Sat Nov 10, 2007 at 05:10:15 PM PST

  •  Bush's Ownership Society (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    western star

    Was horseshit.  It's all those property-rights nuts, who think that the only thing the Constitution is about is property.

    None of them have the intelligence to actually READ the Bill of Rights, and see that the real protected item in the Constitution is, over, and over, and over, and over again, human dignity.  That is what the right to think freely, to speak freely, to be secure in one's home and possessions, to be afforded the right to face one's accusers, to be afforded a speedy trial with adequate representation, to be free of self-incrimination (which by the way also means to be free of torture), to be free to protect oneself and to be free of coercion in a time of military crisis . . . all of these spoke to the indignities which the Founders had variously suffered under tyrants.  They sought to restore Human Dignity in the Constitution, and they even made a pair of amendments making clear that anything they'd failed to mention was STILL A RIGHT.

    That's what galls me to no end when Scalia (who befits his name as he's a fucking Gila Monster), claims there is no "right to privacy" in the Constitution.  Apparently he's too goddamn stupid to read Amendment 9:

    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    In other words, if we didn't happen to include a right, you've still got it.  They undoubtedly foresaw a time, hundreds of years later, when a plated invertebrate like Scalia would slither into the Supreme Court and try to use butt-headed literalism to deny others their right to be left alone and unmolested by the government.

    One last time: Human Dignity.  Not property.  Anyone who thinks the Constitution and the freedoms listed therein are about property rights is a shit-for-brains who can't read and should be mocked mercilessly.  Honestly these guys are too stupid to live.  Ownership is what feudal societies centered around.  Dignity is what free societies are based on.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site