Skip to main content

Administration of Torture
A Documentary Record from Washington to Abu Ghraib and Beyond
Jameel Jaffer and Amrit Singh
Columbia University Press
New York, 2007

America's Disappeared
Secret Imprisonment, Detainees, and the "War on Terror.
Edited by Rachel Meeropol
Seven Stories Press
New York, 2005

Administration of Torture is a big book. The page size is larger in both height and width than the standard and it's more than 400 pages long. You'll notice you're carrying it around.  I dwell on its size not because size is an important thing to know in discussing books in general, but because when a book this size represents only a small fraction of the torture-related documents one of the most secretive administrations in our nation's history has been willing to release, it says something about the extent to which that administration has tortured and has developed a bureaucracy of torture.

An extended introduction and a timeline provide the context, but the bulk of the ACLU-compiled book is devoted to government documents, stretching chronologically from the January 25, 2002:

Memorandum from White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales to President George W. Bush recommending that al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners not be extended the protections of the Third Geneva Convention.

to the August 24, 2005:

Sworn statement of Lt. Gen. Randall Schmidt discussing interrogation methods employed at Guantanamo.

(In the book, documents are not ordered chronologically.)

The documents, many of them heavily redacted, testify to the bureaucratization of torture under the Bush administration, with few detainees named - instead, most are anonymous, often dehumanized (intentionally so) figures. A striking series of emails and memos show the FBI's ongoing (and losing) struggle with the military over appropriate techniques:

The FBI voiced misgivings about the overall coercive nature and possible illegality of elements of this plan. The FBI also voiced its strong objections regarding the efficacy of a fear-based approach.

The FBI offered in writing an alternative interrogation approach based on  long term rapport-building.

FBI emails also offer some of the only glimpses of humanity in any of the documents, speaking to the frustration of their struggle with the military:

yesterday, however, we were surprised to read an article in stars and stripes, in which gen miller is quoted as saying that he believes in the rapport-building approach. this is not what he was saying at gitmo when i was there. [redacted] and i did cart wheels. the battles fought in gitmo while gen miller he was there are on the record.

The evidence of those battles included in this book points to the implacable will of the Bush administration to institute torture as a common practice, that they did so over sustained objection from a key law-enforcement agency. Witness statements and autopsy reports reveal the routine nature of brutality at Guantanamo and elsewhere, the accounts having so many common features that there can be no credible claim of torture being done only by a few bad apples.

On a couple of occassions I [FBI employee] entered interview rooms to find a detainee chained hand and foot in a fetal position to the floor with no chair food or water. Most times they had urinated or defacated on themselves and had been left there for 18 24 hours or more. On one occassion, the air conditioning had been turned down so far and the temperature was so cold in the room, that the barefooted detainee was shaking with cold. When I asked the MP's what was going on, I was told that interrogators from the day prior had ordered this treatment, and the detainee was not to be moved. On another occassion, the A/C had been turned off, making the temperature in the unventilated room probably well over 100 degrees. The detainee was almost unconscious on the floor, with a pile of hair next to him. He had apparently been literally pulling his own hair out throughout the night. On another occassion, not only was the temperature unbearably hot but extremely loud rap music was being played in the room, and had been since the day before with the detainee chained hand and foot in the fetal position on the tile floor.

The nature of these government documents is that few detainees are given the opportunity to speak for themselves. For that reason, as important a record of what our government has become under George W. Bush as this book provides, I want to turn briefly to America's Disappeared, a small volume put together by the Center for Constitutional Rights. In addition to essays on subjects such as the development of Guantanamo and the legal status of prisoners there, "the road to Abu Ghraib," and rendition, America's Disappeared contains statements from several people detained as suspected terrorists and people detained while fighting deportation.

Maher Arar:

I am not a terrorist. I am not a member of al Qaeda and I do not know anyone who belongs to this group. All I know about al Qaeda is what I have seen in the media. I have never been to Afghanistan. I have never been anywhere near Afghanistan and I do not have any desire to ever go to Afghanistan.
--snip--
If I did not answer quickly enough, he would point to a metal chair in the corner and ask, "Do you want me to use this?" I did not know then what that chair was for. I learned later it was used to torture people. I asked him what he wanted to hear. I was terrified, and I did not want to be tortured. I would say anything to avoid torture. This lasted for four hours. There was no violence, only threats this day. At about 1 o'clock in the morning, the guards came to take me to my cell downstairs.
--snip--
The cable is a black electrical cable, about two inches thick. They hit me with it everywhere on my body. They mostly aimed for my palms, but sometimes missed and hit my wrists. They were sore and red for three weeks. They also struck me on my hips, and lower back. Interrogators constantly threatened me with the metal chair, tire, and electric shocks.

The ways the Bush administration has perverted the functions of government, the notion of justice, and humanity itself defy comprehension and will doubtless require decades of study to be fully documented, and years if not decades of steady, patient undoing of damage. These books take a valuable part in that grueling but necessary work. But they sure aren't fun to read.

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 02:57 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Torture (14+ / 0-)

    and its rationalization are what we must fight. This is obscenity. We must make the United States decent again.

    I could have been a soldier... I had got part of it learned; I knew more about retreating than the man that invented retreating. --Mark Twain

    by NogodsnomastersMary on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 02:57:12 PM PST

  •  A big fat book on US torture... (9+ / 0-)

    ...yet we (Democrats and Progressives) will not take the necessary steps to bring law and order back to our government and country. In that sense, Al Qaeda has won.

    -7.5 -7.28, What's a guy gotta do to get impeached around here?

    by Blueslide on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 03:05:55 PM PST

    •  We have lost. BushCheney has ... something ... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      kurt

      ... but Al Qaeda has not won.

      The principal stated aims of al-Qaeda are to drive Americans and American influence out of all Muslim nations, especially Saudi Arabia; destroy Israel; and topple pro-Western dictatorships around the Middle East. Bin Laden has also said that he wishes to unite all Muslims and establish, by force if necessary, an Islamic nation adhering to the rule of the first Caliphs.

      The NeoConMen wanted exemption from the rule of law all along (along with hundreds of billions more for their business interests in the mass-murder industry).  The bombings of 9/11/2001 only allowed Cheney to assume the presidency, and through Cheney the NeoConMen to seize our government.  The NeoConMen needed, used, and continue to use Al Qaeda, but Al Qaeda have not won, nor have they really had any direct influence on American affairs.

      Bush and Cheney are WAR CRIMINALS. What part of "Aggressive War is a war crime" and "Torture is a crime against humanity" can you argue against?

      by Yellow Canary on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 04:42:21 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Well, AQ has set very lofty goals... (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        kurt

        ...but part of their mission must be to deny us our way of life, our government and likely our humanity. I never thought I would see people at high levels of our society advocating the use of torture.

        -7.5 -7.28, What's a guy gotta do to get impeached around here?

        by Blueslide on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 05:59:51 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Why? Why "must be"? (0+ / 0-)

          "but part of their mission must be to deny us our way of life, our government and likely our humanity."

          I'm no expert, and one should be somewhat cautious about making generalizations, but it seems to me they would be quite satisfied if we simply left them alone.  What you identify as their mission is a very good definition of the BushCheney mission enacted against Iraq (which, of course, had nothing to do with Al Qaeda -- Saddam Hussein was an ardent political enemy of religious extremism, and had the means to enforce his will).

          Bush and Cheney are WAR CRIMINALS. What part of "Aggressive War is a war crime" and "Torture is a crime against humanity" can you argue against?

          by Yellow Canary on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 07:59:45 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  Because the ... (0+ / 0-)

            ...shit they say is the same as what Bush says. Haters of a feather flock together. They are reflections in the mirror. I would agree that most Iraqis and most muslims would be happy if we left them alone but I think AQ is not most muslims.

            I am no expert either, I only know what I read. In that light you're right I should not be so confident in my statement. Please tell me how AQ would happily leave free people alone and I will gladly change my mind.

            -7.5 -7.28, What's a guy gotta do to get impeached around here?

            by Blueslide on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 07:02:16 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  They won't leave free people alone ... (0+ / 0-)

              ... Destroying Israel is one of their stated goals.  However, Israel has little, if anything, to do with, as you stated, their desire to "deny us our way of life, our government and likely our humanity" (emphasis added by me).

              This may be splitting hairs, but AQ leaders have said that they don't want to destroy the US.  They want to ride Arab lands of US forces, and they want to destroy Israel.  I, for one, think that "our humanity" is tied in to that, but I also think it is important to understand clearly what it is the AQ is fighting for.

              Bush and Cheney are WAR CRIMINALS. What part of "Aggressive War is a war crime" and "Torture is a crime against humanity" can you argue against?

              by Yellow Canary on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 07:53:53 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

              •  I trust AQ... (0+ / 0-)

                ...as much as I trust neocons. I think the goals you are listing are their first goals, not their ultimate goals.

                I'm not big on violent, authoritarian organizations directed by their manipulated religious voodoo. Their aspirations likely have no ends and their methods have no limits.

                -7.5 -7.28, What's a guy gotta do to get impeached around here?

                by Blueslide on Wed Nov 21, 2007 at 10:25:03 AM PST

                [ Parent ]

                •  Agree with your caution, but ... (0+ / 0-)

                  ... NeoConMen have NUKES, and the richest, most completely developed army ever assembled by man.  All in all, I'm a lot more worried about what the NeoConMen are doing to my life, my happiness, and my liberty than what AQ is doing.

                  Bush and Cheney are WAR CRIMINALS. What part of "Aggressive War is a war crime" and "Torture is a crime against humanity" can you argue against?

                  by Yellow Canary on Wed Nov 21, 2007 at 03:26:34 PM PST

                  [ Parent ]

  •  Wow...those books sound harrowing... (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    jfdunphy, cfk, possum, leonard145b

    ...but important to read. Thanks for the heads-up and reviews.

  •  I hate America (5+ / 0-)

    Not the country I grew up in - no, for that I'm convinced, having lived in other countries around the world, that we have a wonderful society filled with beauty and opportunity and abundance - but the country as it has been defined by Bush, Cheney, Addington, Yoo and the rest of the rubberstamping enablers.

    They conceive of America as something twisted and vicious - a torturing regime that bombs and annihilates anything in its path, a country that dominates all others through brute force and extracts the planet's resources exclusively for its own use.

    Because politics and media work the way they do, this reality has caused a great number of my fellow citizens that they should cheer and celebrate this development. It is alarming and it is a reason to support anyone and anything acting to reverse this horrible course of action we are following.

    Every day's another chance to stick it to The Man. - dls.

    by The Raven on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 03:10:23 PM PST

    •  wow (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      possum, JG in MD

      Bush has been a disaster but I sure don't see this country being as horrible as you put it. I can't believe that you'd stay in a place you despise so much.
      I can't stand the course we've been put on but I still love my country. I hope things improve enough that you too can go back to enjoying it too.

      •  Title is too strong (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        kurt, edsbrooklyn

        I know that. Read carefully - I love America, just not the one they are designing. I want the country I grew up in to come back.

        Every day's another chance to stick it to The Man. - dls.

        by The Raven on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 03:46:52 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  Um ... We fund a torture-loving, war-crime ... (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        skrekk, ezdidit

        ... committing elected government.  Our military is occupying a foreign country that was not and could not have been a threat to our security.  Our military is occupying this country in order for our oil companies to steal their oil.  We destroyed a nation.  And one should here note that Iraq had nothing to do with the bombings on 9/11/2001, which were planned, funded, and carried out for the most part by Saudi Arabians trained in Afghanistan.

        And we continue to commit state-sponsored torture every minute of every hour of every day.

        My life is not horrible -- America remains a placid place to live -- but the horror inflicted on millions of people with my money (and yours), by my countrymen (and yours) is ... deeply wrong.

        What do you propose we can do to make things "improve"?

        Bush and Cheney are WAR CRIMINALS. What part of "Aggressive War is a war crime" and "Torture is a crime against humanity" can you argue against?

        by Yellow Canary on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 04:50:57 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  well put (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Yellow Canary

          and to answer your question, I believe there is no single thing we could do that would be more beneficial and more liberating than to get off of our insane addiction to foreign oil. I don't buy for a second that the reason we're in Iraq is to "steal their oil". If that was the reason, we'd already be stealing it. Truth is, we can't "steal" oil, as a government. The big oil companies are stealing from all of us, and the sooner we stop handing them and the OPEC scumbags a trillion dollars per year, the better - and the cleaner - and the safer - we'll be.

    •  America is NOT King George (0+ / 0-)

      You are hating a generalization.

      Dana Curtis Kincaid Ad Astra per Aspera! http://www.angrytoyrobot.blogspot.com The enemy is not man, the enemy is stupidity.

      by angrytoyrobot on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 04:03:32 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  The "ticking time bomb" scenario (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kurt, possum, Mas Gaviota, JG in MD

    I really do believe that a lot of the so-called torture proponents, in our government but also among us "24"-watchin' regular joes, really had their hearts in the right place.  It's not about a desire to be evil, or to do physical harm, but a panic-fueled belief that another 9/11 was right around the corner, and that we'd regret "not doing enough" more than we'd regret breaking the Geneva conventions.  That's why even our own party's presumptive nominee, Hillary Clinton, has said she believes in executive power of torture in the "ticking time bomb" scenario, where the risks of doing nothing outweigh the risks of doing anything possible.  

    Personally, I'm with John McCain on this one -- we must codify, in public and without "signing statements", a strict torture-free policy for all prisoner treatments, in the U.S. or outside of it, whether our enemies support torture or not, whether there's a "ticking time bomb" or not.  But that view puts me, and probably most of you, in a very, very slim minority.

    Turtles, turtles, turtles all the way down.

    by cartwrightdale on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 03:12:11 PM PST

    •  I think you are right in the minority part. It is (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      johnfire, kurt, Neon Mama

      really sad at the number of people who seem to think that as long as it is someone who looks like an Arab, it is ok to torture them if it will keep us safer.

      What they don't realize is that it does not make us safer but instead just creates more people that hate us.

      While I love the American I was born into and grew old in, I have to say this is no longer representative of that country. That America or it's citizens would not even be discussing torturing as an option, let alone being guilty of committing torture.

      The real scary part is the number of people who think that it is OK.

      I can not think of any time that our nation needed our elected officials to stand up and restore the rule of Law and the Constitution for our nation and not just impeach but actually charge, convict and punish those responsible with the strongest punishment allowed for war crimes.

      I would really like to know if there are any good men and women left in our governmental offices.

      by eaglecries on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 04:23:19 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  I think Hillary's dance around torture involves (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      skrekk, kurt, ezdidit

      what was done in her husband's administration. I read that Richard Clark said rendition was started under Clinton.

      To me the ticking time bomb is not a likely case and seems to be just a scare tactic. Whenever anyone mentions the ticking time bomb, I think any terrorist who knows about a real one ready to go off within the next day or so would probably be willing to give up his/her life so that it would go off - or would plainly lie and send the CIA or whoever off on wild goose chases - until the bomb goes off.

      There are far more experts in our intelligence services that say torture does not work than those who favor torture aka "enhanced interrogations."

      I think if Cheney along with his sidekick Addington were impeached, then many of the present policies would cease.  

    •  It was codified. And Illegal. That's why ... (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      skrekk, kurt, Neon Mama

      ... CheneyAddington invented the legal fiction of "Enemy Combatants" -- they created a class of humans with no rights -- not the rights of prisoners, not the rights of soldiers, not the rights of citizens.  This legal netherworld is housed, deliberately, outside the jurisdiction of the US courts -- these humans have no legal rights whatsoever.  It's a loophole, but murder (and torture) by loophole is a sub-specialty of the OVP.

      Bush and Cheney are WAR CRIMINALS. What part of "Aggressive War is a war crime" and "Torture is a crime against humanity" can you argue against?

      by Yellow Canary on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 05:03:54 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Torture is the best example (10+ / 0-)

    that absolute power absolutely corrupts.  When you don't feel constrained by the norms, laws and oversight that govern the rest of the civilized world, you have absolute power over that person.  Combine that with the corrupting influence of arrogance and ignorance and spineless fear and torture was inevitable.  

    There will be a special place in hell for some of these folks. Maybe they can share a crevice with Pol Pot.

    "Mr. President, I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed." General Buck Turgidson

    by muledriver on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 03:19:57 PM PST

  •  I remember watching "Missing", (6+ / 0-)

    a film by Costa-Gavras, back in 1982. I was so glad that I didn't live in a country that would pull someone off of the street and make them disappear. America was better than that. We wouldn't torture, of that I was certain. Those days are gone. We are a country like that. I wish this country would wake up and realize it.

    You can't kill your way to security, and you can't lead through scaring people. - Bruce Springsteen

    by kitebro on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 03:26:23 PM PST

  •  If it is OK, I will put your diary addy (0+ / 0-)

    in Bookflurries...on Tuesday for this holiday week only...then back to Wednesdays.

    Thank you for a good review which is heart-rending.

    I certainly hope we are not in the slim majority of those who would object.  I really believe that most Americans would object if the news media had ever bothered to really tell the truth.  

    Join us at Bookflurries: Bookchat Wednesday evenings 8 PM EST

    by cfk on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 03:47:00 PM PST

  •  I'm in the middle (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Yellow Canary

    of reading the first of those,  to add to your library

    Torture and Democracy

    (Not read yet, but on order for myself)

    and

    Crimes of War What the Public Should Know Revised Edition: What the Public Should Know

    A good background reader on the laws of war and torture

  •  Hamilton on torture (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kurt, ezdidit

    Maybe someone in the Bush administration should have read what cannabis-advocate Alexander Hamilton said about such practices:

    in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution.

    http://www.yale.edu/...

    Regardless of the stated purposes and/or successes or lack thereof of any of these techniques, in either case those practices are a repudiation of American values. Typical Republican.

    "The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government." Thomas Jefferson

    by Androgyne on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 05:53:55 PM PST

  •  Impeach now! (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    jfdunphy, ezdidit

    The hungry judges soon the sentence sign, And wretches hang, that jurymen may dine.

    by magnetics on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 06:46:18 PM PST

  •  US + USSR (0+ / 0-)

    Although I watched it happen, I am still shocked at the speed at which the United States became the USSR. Although I am not an overly religious man, I pray every day that we will find our way back to put this insanity behind us. It would also be nice if the war criminals in the current government would be brought to justice, but I am not holding my breath.

    •  That's what I tell people: "Those evil COMMIES! (0+ / 0-)

      They spied on their own people, arrested them for nothing, sent them to gulags from which few returned. Why does all this sound familiar?" This gambit never works, so I continue with another tack: "Recall how the GIPPER constantly railed against the evil, evil, evil Commies? Have we not become that which we said we hated? And by doing so, we have BETRAYED THE GIPPER!!!!" That never works, either, but I enjoy saying it.

  •  We almost got Rummy in France. How long (0+ / 0-)

    will we have to wait before one of our own "homeland" war criminals are tried?

    Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything. --- Frank Dane

    by Memory Corrupted on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 10:00:25 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site