Skip to main content

I am a football fan.  I grew up in a football family.  My dad was an assistant coach with the high school football team and I attended more scrimmages and football games than I can count.  This is one reason why I'm so appalled at reading this article (h/t Linda Hirshman at TPMCafe):

At Jets Game, a Halftime Ritual of Harassment

But first, a word from our sponsors...

   Feminisms is a series of weekly feminist diaries. My fellow feminists and I decided to start our own for several purposes: we wanted a place to chat with each other, we felt it was important to both share our own stories and learn from others’, and we hoped to introduce to the community a better understanding of what feminism is about.

   Needless to say, we expect disagreements to arise. We have all had different experiences in life, so while we share the same labels, we don’t necessarily share the same definitions. Hopefully, we can all be patient and civil with each other, and remember that, ultimately, we’re all on the same side.

Back to our story...

Here's the ritual, described by the New York Times:

At halftime of the Jets’ home game against the Pittsburgh Steelers on Sunday, several hundred men lined one of Giants Stadium’s two pedestrian ramps at Gate D. Three deep in some areas, they whistled and jumped up and down. Then they began an obscenity-laced chant, demanding that the few women in the gathering expose their breasts.

When one woman appeared to be on the verge of obliging, the hooting and hollering intensified. But then she walked away, and plastic beer bottles and spit went flying. Boos swept through the crowd of unsatisfied men.

Wait, it gets worse...

He wanted more from the alternative halftime show that, according to many fans, has been a staple at Jets home games for years.


Throughout halftime, about 10 security guards in yellow jackets stood near the bottom of the circular, multilevel ramp, located beyond the stadium’s concourse of concession stands and restrooms. Another guard later said they were not permitted to do anything about the chants at Gate D because of free speech laws. Yet when a reporter tried to interview two security guards after halftime, he was detained in a holding room, threatened with arrest and asked to hand over his tape recorder.

(emphasis mine) Wow.  It's a free speech issue!  It's not institutionalized sexual harrassment or anything.  In my opinion this is just a continuation of the societal trend that treats a woman's body as a public commodity that exists for men's pleasure.  It's Girls Gone Wild world.

I think it is a form of intimidation when you can not freely move around without being afraid.  When people wolf whistle or throw out comments, I don't personally find it flattering.  I find it scary and intimidating.  Walking down a public street while being a woman (or walking in a football stadium or the streets of New Orleans) is not an invitation.  I don't doubt that there are some people who are truly exhibitionist and love the attention, but they are a minority.  Women are given conflicting messages - that it is empowering and good to show our bodies and that if we are raped it's our own faults for being so slutty or drunk or whatever.

If you feel moved to express your opinion, here is the contact information (below).

Contact info for the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority:

Contact info for the New York Jets (they have a feedback form).  They also have a blog, and an article condemning the behavior of a "minority" of fans (no mention of the behavior of security turning a blind eye for years).  It's interesting that it takes a newspaper article to address behavior that has gone on for years.

My letter to the Jets:

I have read the article "At Jets Game, a Halftime Ritual of Harassment" at the New York Times and the Jets' response to that article.  I think it is good that the Jets will address the behavior at Gate D highlighted in the article.  I take issue however that this behavior was allowed to continue for years and it was not addressed until a newspaper article was written about it.  The Jets response also did not mention the behavior of security who allowed it to continue.  They have an obligation to protect the right of women to attend a football game without harassment.

As a football fan and a woman I am very disappointed in your response.  What will the Jets do to assure their female fans that they are welcome to attend the games?  It seems like assuring that fans, both male and female, can attend a game free of humiliation and harassment is a minimum requirement.

My letter to the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority (game security):

I just finished reading an article in yesterday's New York Times "At Jets Game, A Halftime Ritual of Harassment."   I was troubled by the behavior detailed in this article, but also the behavior of the game security.  It is not just a "free speech issue."  All fans, male and female alike, have the right to attend games free of humiliation and harassment.  It is the obligation of your organization to make sure that people can safely enjoy the games.  The Jets' website says that this behavior will be addressed.  Why did it take an article in the New York Times to end this practice which continued for years?

Originally posted to Unstable Isotope on Wed Nov 21, 2007 at 07:00 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site