Skip to main content

The Washington Post broke the story this morning- Barack Obama's political action committee, Hopefund, has been handing out money to political candidates in the early primary states of New Hampshire, Iowa, and South Carolina. Some of these candidates have endorsed Obama.

FEC laws are clear on the subject- leadership PACs are all fine, well, and good, but they can't be used to subsidize the PAC owner's campaign. If they could, campaign contribution and expenditure limits could be easily circumvented.

So let's examine Barack Obama's contributions to candidates during this 2008 election cycle and see if there are any indications that his use of this leadership PAC is anything other than what a leadership PAC should be- a vehicle for promoting the election of Democratic candidates. Follow me...

Here is the opensecrets.org report on activity in Barack Obama's Hopefund PAC.  It shows $59,000 contributed to candidates for federal office. The Washington Post article indicates that total political contributions by Hopefund for the 2008 cycle amount to $180,000, so there's another $121,000 in contributions to local and state candidates.

So who are the federal candidates?

Here are the US House candidates who received Barack's PAC's money:

  1. Altmire, Jason (D-PA)  $5,000
  1. Bean, Melissa (D-IL)  $5,000
  1. Boswell, Leonard L (D-IA)  $5,000
  1. Braley, Bruce (D-IA)  $5,000
  1. Carney, Chris (D-PA)  $5,000
  1. Giffords, Gabrielle (D-AZ)  $5,000
  1. Hodes, Paul W (D-NH)  $5,000
  1. Johnson, Hank (D-GA)  $5,000
  1. Loebsack, David (D-IA)  $5,000
  1. Murphy, Patrick J (D-PA)  $4,000
  1. Rodriguez, Ciro D (D-TX)  $5,000
  1. Shea-Porter, Carol (D-NH)  $5,000
  1. Spencer, Selden (D-IA)  $2,500

This diaryearlier today examined the issue and concluded that 68% of the contributions were going to the 54% of the states having early (Feb 5 or before) primaries. The eyeball analysis was that, hey, 68% isn't that much different from 54%, no big deal. It's hard to tell without the raw numbers. the 68% number is from the Hillary Clinton campaign press release on this issue.

Maybe an examination of the contributions to Federal office seekers will allow us a more rigorous analysis. Let's start with the US House seats. There are 435 members of the House, and the following total number of seats for the pre-Feb. 5 states (New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada, South Carolina) of 16 seats, as follows:

  1. New Hampshire 2 seats
  1. Iowa  5 seats
  1. Nevada  3 seats
  1. South Carolina  6 seats

So, assuming that Barack was just spreading good democratic cheer randomly, regardless of whether the state had an early primary or not, we would expect 16/435, or about 3.7%, of the 13 recipients listed above to be from these small early states, right?

Oh, dear.  It's doesn't look too good. Six of the thirteen candidates are from the 3.7% of the House seats which represent these four early states.

Well, eyeball tests are tricky things. Let's whip out the old chi-square test.

   6    |    7
 ____|_______
         |
  16   |   419

Let's see. One degree of freedom, and chi-squared is equal to...48.8, with an associated probability of.... 0.000

For you laypersons, that's roughly equivalent to no chance in hell. Plug the numbers into the calculator in the link above if you think I'm bullshitting you.

Sorry, Barack. This one doesn't pass the smell test. The probability that these contributions were assigned without regard to their locations in early primary states is too small to measure.  Hillary shut her HillPAC leadership PAC contributions to Federal office seekers down for the 2008 cycle. No contributions to candidates for Federal office. Don't get up on your high horse about the new politics if you can't at least follow her example.

Originally posted to campskunk on Mon Nov 26, 2007 at 06:59 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site