Daily Kos

Krugman consistent with the corruption theme today

Mon Nov 05, 2007 at 07:08:41 AM PDT

In keeping with the theme of dengre's excellent diary today currently sitting on top of the Rec List, I want to point out Krugman's column today in the Times.  Somebody will eventually do it and I don't think they have yet.  It deals with what he refers to as The Question.

Krugman, currently on his book tour, thinks that the end of right-wing dominance in our political system is near.  Yet, as he says that, he quickly gets asked The Question.

"How can you be optimistic about the prospects for progressive change, when big money has so much influence on politics?"

Its a good question, Krugman says, so much so that he's dubbed it The Question.  I know it is certainly My Question too.  And, according to the excellent analyses in dengre's diary, it is an important one with implications that may shape the next election and the political future of our country for the next generation.  So, what's Krugman's answer?

He cites a Democracy Corp poll for providing much of his optimism.

Democracy Corps asked those who believe America is on the wrong track to choose phrases that best described their views of what’s gone wrong. The most commonly chosen were "Big businesses get whatever they want in Washington" and "Leaders have forgotten the middle class."

So much, by the way, for pundits who claim that Americans don’t care about economic inequality.

Yes... so much for those pundits.  After all of this time, I guess those pundits really don't know what they are talking about.  Who would have guessed that?  (Ok... that was one of those sarcastic questions like who could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center? Or, who could have anticipated the breach of the levees?)

Anyway, Krugman then goes on to address the theme that has so many of us pulling out our hair here - and the main point of dengre's diary, of course.  The Democratic Party is not acting on this issue leaving those of us on all sides of the spectrum to start concluding they are too influenced, as well.  The one Democrat who stands to get hit the hardest by that.... your Presidential front-runner, naturally.

Fears of betrayal are often focused on Hillary Clinton. Some people who raise The Question cite an article in The Nation from last summer, which suggested that Hillary Clinton’s commitment to change is suspect.

Hillary supporters may bash the question, but that doesn't make it go away.  It is the single biggest thing holding me back from supporting her.  I like things about Hillary.  She is smart.  She is effective.  She is intense.  I think her heart is in the right place and she would run an effective government that this country so badly needs.  But, I can't help but worry that she will not adequately be able to address the biggest problems this nation faces because she is influenced by big money - no matter her ridiculous proteststations to the contrary.  I need to hear Hillary come out much stronger on the role of money in politics.  Even if she makes a statement that says she supports getting big money out of politics even though she needs to raise big money in this election because this is the climate and these are the rules now, I would be ok with it.  

I am not alone in this, obviously.

... I’d be reassured if she made her views on tax reform clearer, and matched John Edwards’s focus on corporate reform.

The tax reform bit was in reference to Democrats inability to just come out and say they will reform the hedge fund tax loophole mentioned earlier in the column.

If Hillary wants to be the leader of the Democratic Party going forward, she needs to realize where Democrats, and the nation are.  We are sick and tired of losing our government and country to corrupt corporate America.  We are ready for a little economic populism.  We want change and we are ready to start being vocal and then active about it.  Where will she stand?!!  I'm rooting for her to make the right call here.

Tags: Paul Krugman, Hillary Clinton, corruption (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 6 comments

  •  I talked to a number of Clinton supporters... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    DJShay

    this weekend.  I am not necessarily opossed to her being our candidate if not for this monumentally huge issue.  I need some reassurance here.

    Your ad could be here.

    by TheC on Mon Nov 05, 2007 at 07:08:31 AM PDT

  •  Sorry, can't give you reassurance (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    TheC

    I REALLY like the idea of Hillary, but the reality doesn't come close. She's already admitted she will not refuse lobbyist money saying that the lobbyists "represent real americans". I guess not all lobbyists are bad, but the ones with the most money represent large corporations and industries and are only concerned with their bottom line.

    •  Some lobbyists are not malevolent but... (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      TheC

      there are distinctly different levels or types of lobbyists. Some are simply advocates volunteering time for a cause but have to register just like the pros. The real problem is how legislators react to them.

  •  My list. (5+ / 0-)

    Not necessarily in this order, but I'm sure that it wouldn't take too much digging to set it in the right order:

    1.  Defense Contractors

    e.g.:

    Lockheed Martin
    Boeing
    Northrop Grumman
    Raytheon
    General Dynamics
    United Technologies    
    Honeywell
    Blackwater (DOD, State, whatever)

    2.  Pharma

    3.  Big Insurance.

    4.  Big Oil & Coal.

    5.  Banking/Credit Card Robber Barons.

    6.  HMO Industry.

    7.  U.S. Automakers (aka, the Anti-CAFE Standards Lobby).

    These are the ones pulling the strings of the Washington pols, with few exceptions (alas).

    Certainly, "the trial lawyers" have a lobby/ies, but those exist to fight for consumers.  AARP is a force to be reckoned with when it's not backstabbing the very people it's supposed to be lobbying for (Bush/GOP Pharma Bill from a few years ago anybody???).  AIPAC's also too influential in driving U.S. Middle East policy to the "War First, Ask Questions Later" side of things, imo, (and AIPAC represents Israeli interests like The Heritage Foundation or John Burch Society represents America's best interests...); but I don't lump AIPAC with those Top Six groups as it's not "corporate".

    When these influences can be curbed, if not neutralized, non-hyperwealthy Americans will have some semblance of a "voice" in Washington.  But not until, I'm afraid.

    BenGoshi
    __________________________________________________

    "We in the gloam, old buddy," he said, "We definitely right in the middle of it." -Larry Brown

    by BenGoshi on Mon Nov 05, 2007 at 07:32:38 AM PDT

  •  I fear that HRC has more skeletons (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    TheC

    that will be dragged out. I think this will be the dirtiest election in history.
    Just a feeling. No data. But Rove said this election will be about corruption. What was he talking about?

    fouls, excesses and immoderate behavior are scored ZERO at Over the Line, Smokey!

    by seesdifferent on Mon Nov 05, 2007 at 07:49:59 AM PDT

  •  Who predicted a plane as a missile. These people. (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    TheC

    I just want to expand on how pundits, and Condi Rice, got calls wrong, yet still get paid to sound all plum-mouthed in their wrongness.

    Hello. Why are you always wrong?

    WW2, Condi. Come ON. The Japanese? Kamikaze pilots? Yes? No?

    OK, maybe that's not mirroring what happened on 9-11-2001 well enough. Who could have forecast that someone with a gripe about the US system would take a commercial jetliner that wasn't theirs, and fly it right into a building?

    Tom Clancy. Debt Of Honor. New York Times bestseller on September 11th. 1994.

    How does the book end?

    ...the book ends with an embittered Japanese airline pilot crashing his Boeing 747 into the U.S. Capitol building during a joint session of Congress with the President attending.

    OK, OK. APART from it being a historical method used against America, and APART from a best-selling author putting it in a book that was top of the NY Times Bestseller List for September 11, 1994, and still at #4 at Christmas... APART from that. Who could have known?

    How about the Federal Aviation Administration?

    In 1998 and 1999, the FAA intelligence unit produced reports about the hijacking threat posed by al Qaeda, including the possibility that the terrorist group might try to hijack a commercial jet and slam it into a U.S. landmark.

    And the people still have an approval rating above zero? I just think some people aren't paying attention (or have their fingers in their ears because they don't want to hear how wrong they were).

    The nation can be made to produce a far higher standard of living for the masses of the people if only government is intelligent and energetic... (FDR, '37)

    by ShawnGBR on Mon Nov 05, 2007 at 08:02:31 AM PDT

Permalink | 6 comments