Daily Kos

Throwing Stones

Wed Dec 12, 2007 at 02:20:05 PM PDT

I was just looking through the news reports of the death of 16 year old Aqsa Parvez. Her death is sending waves through a lot of communities in Canada. Muslim, Christian, secular.

Handcuffed and wearing a prison-orange jumpsuit, he mumbled the single word "yes" when asked if he understood a court order not to communicate with his son, Waqas Parvez.

The two men were charged after Aqsa Parvez, 16, was found critically injured Monday morning in the family’s Mississauga home. She died in hospital late Monday night.

This was in all likelihood an "Honour killing"
Muslim teen was abused, friends say

The reactions are mostly horror. The form they take can be disturbing. THEY SHOULD ALL ACT like CANADIANS! some spew. With the largest population of immigrants in 75 years, from many countries, "Canadian" is hard to pin down. If they mean white and  Christian?  That is not the face and the soul of Canada. Some may need some education on  cultural awareness.  

The pictures that Aqsa Parvez posted on Facebook, are so removed and different from the reality that this young woman was living. Allegations of abuse at home, a cultural clash over traditional dress. We should all weep for such a bright star that has been so cruelly taken. We should weep for them all.  

But what I would like to talk about today are cultural norms and expectations that are placed on Women and girls, all over the world. Subjugation, pain, suffering, all foisted on them from the prevailing culture.

In Cameroon, girls suffer through what is called "breast ironing."

Breast ironing is a form of body modification practiced in parts of Cameroon. Pubescent girls' breasts are flattened, usually by their mother,in an attempt to make them less sexually attractive to men. This practice is believed to help prevent rape and early marriage. Grinding stones, pestles, belts, heated objects and breast bands are used to press or beat down the forming breasts. Local non-governmental organizations are trying to call attention to this practice and stop it.

Its pretty easy to react in horror, as it is a shameful cruel thing. Just know that many mothers do this to protect their daughters in their own misguided, twisted way. I read of one case where a girl in Cameroon asked to have her breasts pounded, the tissues destroyed. She decided to suffer the Horrific pain and suffering, so that she could continue to go to school. That story still makes me gasp.  

Why these mothers and girls do it, is a reaction to the prevailing culture of men.

In many other countries of the world,FGM is still practiced.

Female genital mutilation (FGM), often referred to as 'female circumcision', comprises all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs whether for cultural, religious or other non-therapeutic reasons. There are different types of female genital mutilation known to be practised today.

This practice has no noble intentions. WHO lists the reasons given by families for practicing this barbaric mutilation.

The reasons given by families for having FGM performed include:

psychosexual reasons: reduction or elimination of the sensitive tissue of
the outer genitalia, particularly the clitoris, in order to attenuate sexual desire in the female, maintain chastity and virginity before marriage and fidelity during marriage, and increase male sexual pleasure;

sociological reasons: identification with the cultural heritage, initiation of girls into womanhood, social integration and the maintenance of social cohesion;

hygiene and aesthetic reasons: the external female genitalia are considered dirty and unsightly and are to be removed to promote hygiene and provide aesthetic appeal;

myths: enhancement of fertility and promotion of child survival;

religious reasons: Some Muslim communities, however, practise FGM in the
belief that it is demanded by the Islamic faith. The practice, however, predates Islam.

See that part I highlighted? It is not a religious practice, it is a practice demanded by the prevailing culture of men. it is a deadly practice to women themselves who die of infections or during childbirth, it can also can kill babes that cannot be born in time because the mothers body is so mutilated and deformed.

In other countries mostly still under the shadow of Sharia rule, women are stoned to death if they have been found to have committed adultery. That also includes being raped. Raped by one, raped by many. No matter, women are always to blame. Men are weak, and cannot be held accountable.  

Stoning is typically a punishment for adultery, although it can also be used for cases of incest and other sexual or "moral" crimes. Typically, a stoning victim is first wrapped in cloth and buried up to the waist for men, or up to
the chest for females. Then the crowd is to throw stones at the victim. However, it is very important that, "... no stone should be thrown that should kill with the first or second blow, or so small as a pebble to do no injury to the condemned." (Hulagu's Web, 64) Stoning is a unique form of punishment in that there is no single executioner. The simplistic act of gathering the victim’s peers around him creates killers out of everyone.
Today, stoning is only practiced in Islamic culture in order to maintain the submission of its women and those in the lower cast. Only those impoverished or socially unimportant are punished by stoning. This barbaric act parallels those of the 4th century Theodosius who punished those who did not share his religious views. He ordered all non-Christian temples be destroyed and that all heathens be executed unless they convert. His decree now lives on in the hands of religious Islamic tyrants that now employ the brutal act of stoning. These acts of barbarism and violence far outweigh the moral transgression of those condemned

This practice, is demanded by the prevailing culture of men and the religious doctrines, written by men.

The Saudi Justice Ministry announced that a girl gang raped by seven men and then sentenced to six months prison and 200 lashes for adultery had confessed to cheating on her husband, in its latest response to the negative international reaction to the incident. The statement, which was carried by the Saudi Press Agency late on Saturday, confirmed that the flogging sentence against the rape victim would be carried out and condemned foreign interference.
Saudis: Rape victim deserved flogging for adultery

Women in many countries are raped and used as part of "war strategies".
Sexual violence as a weapon of war

Sorry, I can't read that one. It's up you to go to the link if you choose. Rape during war or occupation can be from several things; badly trained and rogue soldiers, and also to cause a shift in morale, and to shame a whole culture.

For Iraqi women, Abu Ghraib's taint

Again, based on the prevailing culture of men.

I could continue this list, but I won't. We all know that these stories are truth and that this list could go on for days.

But before we feel all smug and superior in our "free" Western society?  

Living in a sex-saturated society we are used to seeing the image of women cheapened. But baby dolls who know how to "flaunt" their sexuality? Provocative underwear for little girls, and "pole dancing" kits for them to entertain their families and friends with suggestive moves - and be paid in play dollars for it? If we care about children the time has come to put a stop to this ugly trend, says Melinda Tankard Reist, founding director of Women's Forum Australia and editor of its new report on women's magazines, Faking It. In this interview with MercatorNet she calls for a new global movement of women and girl advocacy.  

We, as a society are bombarded with sexual images, young girls and women starve themselves to death in a deluded attempt for control over any aspect of their lives, we hear loudmouths constantly telling us that some women who are raped, asked for it.

Some would hold lifesaving information and attend disgusting "purity balls" so that their daughters can be handed directly from their father's to their new owner,the husband.

The majority of the girls here are, as purity ball guidelines suggest, "just old enough...to have begun menstruating...." But a couple dozen fathers have also brought girls under 10. "This evening is more about spending time with her than her purity at this point," says one seven-year-old’s dad, a trifle sheepishly. The event is seemingly innocent—not once do I hear "sex" or "virgin" cross anyone’s lips. Still, every one of the girls here, even the four-year-old, will sign that purity covenant.

Are we equal financially?

Census 2001 average income figures

Average for all Canadian men: $36,865

Visible minority men: $28,929

Men with disabilities: $26,890

Average for all Canadian women: $22,885

Aboriginal men: $21,958

Visible minority women: $20,043

Women with disabilities: $17,230

Aboriginal women: $16,519

We still are fighting the battle for control over our own bodies, uphill because there are those that would also not let women and girls know how to not get pregnant.

Boys will be boys, after all. Girls will be quiet and docile. "Girl Power" often is portrayed in such a way as to make damned sure that it includes lots of cleavage and butt shots.

And before anyone goes all crazy on me here, I am not condemning all men. I know there are many enlightened souls of the masculine gender. And I am grateful that although change is slow, there is change. My Tar brush is not all encompassing.

So.

Aqsa Parvez was probably murdered by her father because of some "cultural" battle. (the 911 tape has a man saying he had killed his daughter)

Culture? Yes. The prevailing culture of men. The only way to change this? Is to change the prevailing culture Worldwide to a culture of humanity.

I have three beautiful daughters, I won't accept anything less for them.

Light a candle for  Aqsa Parvez, and all the women of the world.

We are not even close to done yet.

Crossposted at A Creative Revolution

Tags: Canada, Womens rights, Sharia law, FGM, Cameroon, Breast ironing, Iraq, WHO, Rescued (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 30 comments

  •  And it really bothers me when I learn (9+ / 0-)

    that one impact of our invasion of Iraq has been the increasing oppression of women at the hands of our "allies."  This is so not what this country should be accomplishing in the world.

    Damn, it's frustrating!

    "But as post-apocalypse splendor goes, I've done wonders with the place." -- Riley, BTVS

    by prodigal on Wed Dec 12, 2007 at 02:52:51 PM PDT

  •  There's no evidence to indicate (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    BlackSheep1, debedb, flumptytail

    that sexual images in the media lead to increased sexual or physical assaults against women. Now the issue of whether those images cheapens women's sexuality is up for debate, but increased visibility of women, in particular sexual images in the media, don't lead to greater sexual violence against them. Camille Paglia argues this point in her book Sexual Personae.

    And anyone that buys a pole-dancing kit for a little kid should receive a psychiatric examination. That's entirely inappropriate.

    •  No evidence. (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      pale cold, kimoconnor

      Just the normalization of and desensitization to sexual violence against women.  That's all.  

      •  That's completely incorrect (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        debedb

        and also very sex negative.

        How do images of sex lead to desensitization to sexual violence against women? There's a difference between the two you know. Sex = GOOD. Sexual violence = BAD.

        This is old-line, outmoded Andrea Dworkin-style thinking.

        •  Please. (0+ / 0-)

          See below. There's sexy images, and there's what is easily available and prolific in today's internet market.  

        •  You've got the formula wrong (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          fiddlingnero, pale cold

          Whatever turns men on = GOOD. No matter what it is. And anyone who doesn't agree = SEX NEGATIVE. That's Camille Paglia's true message. I don't know how you missed it.

          •  As I said (0+ / 0-)

            It appears Andrea Dworkin has come back from the dead in another form but still preaching the same tired line of bullshit.

            •  I think the thing is (1+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              fiddlingnero

              that not everybody is buying into the Camille Paglia arguments, and as a matter of fact she had a lot of interesting criticisms aimed at her....Molly Ivin's is the bestest!.

              There is one area in which I think Paglia and I would agree that politically correct feminism has produced a noticeable inequity. Nowadays, when a woman behaves in a hysterical and disagreeable fashion, we say, "Poor dear, it's probably PMS." Whereas, if a man behaves in a hysterical and disagreeable fashion, we say, "What an asshole." Let me leap to correct this unfairness by saying of Paglia, Sheesh, what an asshole.

              If that is your take on the world? whatever floats your boat. But the world has changed significantly in the intervening years, and so has porn and its accessibility.
              She is not seen or considered as the be all end all final word on this topic, indeed, even on feminism.

              •  How interesting (0+ / 0-)

                The original argument against porn was that it subjugated and sexually victimized women through sexualized representation. Then the argument went that porn encouraged violence against women. Now it's not that porn is not really the problem but that the "availability" of porn is the problem. Countries with little-to-no restrictions on porn actually have lower rates of sexual assault than those that do not. Take the example of Sweden for one.

                Each argument has been proven incorrect. It's sad that those in the feminist movement who adopted the anti-sex language of women like Dworkin refuse to face facts and elaborate a more inclusive vision of feminism. One which sheds its restrictionist, anti-sex language instead of continually searching for archetypes which are nothing more than coded language for the same, tired old arguments that sex is bad and dirty.

                Leaving Camille Paglia out of this there are numerous modern feminist writers and movements who refuse to adopt the old dogma I'm reading here. The Riot Grrrll movement is one. Post-feminism is not perfect, no movement ever is, but a discussion of the shortcomings of old feminist thought is necessary and important if feminism is to remain relevant to women's lives.

                Disclosure- My mom is a well-known and recognized writer in the feminist movement. I should prolly let that be known.

                •  Ohhhhhhhhhh. (1+ / 0-)

                  Recommended by:
                  fiddlingnero

                  Anyone who disagrees gets tossed a "Dworkin" reference.

                  You need to bring your arguments, and your examples into this century, with the current state of technology and the actual content that is available online. Quite easily......

                  And I really don't care who your mom is? Thats kind of an odd disclosure really. As if it somehow places your  "opinions" above the rest.

                  But until then. Carry on! No point in arguing with someone stuck in 1981. Really. lol.

    •  Just to clarify (0+ / 0-)

      I'm not talking the T&A that you find in Vogue or in any music video.  I'm talking about the fact that very young kids are increasingly exposed to hardcore porn, free and easy to access.  You can't tell me that viewing bukkake or rape movies during your sexually formative years wouldn't desensitize one to those things.  When Camille Paglia wrote that book all those years ago, it was before the days that you'd innocently open an email and see an image of double penetration.

      •  Who watches that? (0+ / 0-)

        bukkake or rape movies during your sexually formative years wouldn't desensitize one to those things.

        Sounds like a complete lack of parental control to me.

        •  Are you kidding? (0+ / 0-)

          This stuff is so easy to view, and it's everywhere.  And you know how kids are - if it's there, they'll find it..  You don't even have to try to find it, with spam, it finds you. Now, rather than argue with someone all night who thinks I'm a prude, why don't you read "Pornified" by Pamela Paul.  If you're wondering "who watches that?", it might open your eyes.

          Lack of parental control?  Sure.  But that doesn't change the fact that younger kids are looking at explicit images of sexual violence and degradation, and I don't think that there's any magical way that it won't affect them.  Even if they say it doesn't disturb them outright.  Not being disturbed is one thing - forming your sexual preferences is another.  When you are conditioned from a young age to think that women enjoy rape because they act like it on the internet, well, can you honestly say that might not have an effect?  

          •  I don't agree with your central point. (0+ / 0-)

            Which is that rape is motivated by images of sexualized violence against women - nothing indicates this is true. Indeed this is the same line the Meese Commission used without backing it up with any statistically viable information other than the same old anti-porn shibboleth peddled by Catherine McMillan.

            Secondly - I completely disagree that kids look for rape films and enjoy them. Our society absolutely condemns rape in every form and fashion. Any kid that would look for a rape porn film is probably disturbed to begin with. And any responsible parent should have monitoring software on any PC with Internet access.

            FYI - group sex is not rape. What does teenagers engaging in group sex have to do with rape?

            •  Where exactly did I say I was anti porn? (0+ / 0-)

              And I didn't say kids enjoyed rape films. I'm saying that they do end up seeing them, whether they are looking for them or not.  The recent study done for the book Pornified, where hundreds of people who look at internet porn were extensively interviewed, pretty much came to the conclusion that it's like an addiction - start with tame stuff and eventually they move on to harder and more abusive images to get off.  I'm not making this up - read the research.  And I NEVER said porn should be illegal or anything like that, just that it is definitely affecting people in different ways now because of the ubiquity of it, and the severity.  And we need to deal with that.  HIV infection in teens is up, as are other STDs and teen pregnancy.  This ain't your dad's Hustler magazine stash.  

              And - I never said that group sex was rape - but gang rape is.  And the very popular bukkake videos simulate that, where a woman is ejaculated on by mulitple men, usually while she is crying.  Very wholesome sexual image, no need to worry about whether or not the 12 year old boy who sees it needs to have it explained that that's not usually how normal women like to have sex, hey?

              Do you honestly think that 14 year olds engaging in group sex is normal and appropriate?  

              I'm done, we've fucked up the thread on this excellent diary enough.  

      •  yup (0+ / 0-)

        You can't tell me that viewing bukkake or rape movies during your sexually formative years wouldn't desensitize one to those things.  

        That stuff's got nothing on the Good Book, though, you gotta admit.

        •  Desensitize is the wrong word (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          fiddlingnero

          If watching rape porn desensitizes, we should make sex offenders watch rape porn all day.

          Desensitize technically would mean that the mind does not get aroused by the images. Like exposure therapy for phobias, you watch enough spiders in ever increasing doses and you are no longer fearful of spiders.

          The problem is that the images arouse as offenders are too sensitive. The images activate the neurophysiology, but the body then craves the release of the chemicals to complete the cycle.

          •  Actually I did mean desensitize (0+ / 0-)

            because I think that people become somewhat numb to sexual violence, just like regular violence.  Look at how much more graphic violence is on film (horror movies etc.), because people are used to seeing it.  It needs to be more and more extreme to get a reaction.  I  have NEVER said that viewing pornographic violence incites people to rape.  But I can't help but believe, after reading the latest research, that there is widespread desensitization to sexual violence, or at the very least, more extreme sexual acts.  

            But thank you for the clarification.  

  •  What I do not understand is why it takes so... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    fiddlingnero

    ...long for men to agree to give up dangerous 'traditions' against women that sometimes include murdering them.

    The only common thread I find in many of these cultural actions(outside of the US) is that men seem unable to control their sexual desires, thus the women need to be mutilated, covered or punished in order to 'protect' them, and hide the bad actions of the men.

    All men are not animals, but there are too many that refuse to control themselves, and refuse to admit their crimes.

    Until more women gain power, I don't see this changing, and I think that is exactly what many men are trying to prevent.

    Look at Saudi Arabia, the women still cannot drive or vote. Not that they have a democracy anyway, but the point is, if they keep women powerless, they do not have to control themselves.

    01-20-09: THE END OF AN ERROR

    by kimoconnor on Thu Dec 13, 2007 at 07:57:14 AM PDT

Permalink | 30 comments