I recall that Osama bin Laden had some key demands over the years.
The party that abandoned thousands of MIAs in Vietnam to suck up to the Chinese and then sent Ollie North to grovel before the Ayatollah and then sent Donnie Rumsfeld to grovel before Saddam Hussein, seems to have caved into the key demands of a man who is responsible for the deaths of thosuands of Americans.
- We cut and ran from Saudia Arabia. (I think this was demand #1 and the one that really mattered to bin Laden. And why he hit NYC and DC in the first place).
- Seeing as how he got his way with demand #1, Bin Laden then demanded (in 2005) $100 a barrel for oil. Looks like we've gone that route also.
The Kunduz Airlift (better called the Al Qaeda Dunkirk) was just a 'sweetner' (as we say in the M/A world) to the killer of Americans from the party of Dan Burton and Dana Rohrbacher.
In return we've imprisoned and tortured numerous small fry so an AWOL drunk and his serial draft dodger VP can look 'manly' to the 30 year old male virgin and the obese draft dodger crowd.
The slogans of American history
"Give me Liberty or Give me Death"
"Millions for defense, not a penny for tribute"
"On Wisconsin"
"Damn the torpedos, full speed ahead"
"Remember the Maine"
"Lafayette we are here"
"I have returned"
"Nuts"
have been replaced with "Right away, Mr. bin Laden, sir"
Next time the serial draft dodger's wife says that there have been no terrorist attacks since 9/11 (actually there were no attack on the US afer 12/7/41 either), we should point out that surrender was not how this country was built.
Perhaps a question for the next GOP debate, "If you were President, to which of bin Laden's demand would you cave in first?"