Daily Kos

Indonesia: trouble in paradise

Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 06:45:06 AM PDT

This diary is another story about human rights getting overlooked in the Global War on Terror.

This isn’t breaking news: the aim is to give a little background and context to an often-overlooked country, one of the most fascinatingly diverse and beautiful countries on earth, whose strategic importance is increasing almost daily.  Apart from its control of important shipping routes, Indonesia has the largest Muslim population of any nation, is a young democracy that (so far) protects religious freedom, and it is rich in natural resources including oil and gas.

The back story

It's fair to say that Indonesia was born in bloodshed, escaping from its Dutch colonial past at the end of the Second World War and then suffering almost 30 years of military dictatorship under the rule of General Suharto.

In the sixties and seventies, the Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon administrations all saw General Suharto as an important ally in the fight against the spread of Communism. The CIA helped to suggest a few names for Suharto’s 1965 chaotic post-coup purge of the Communist Party that killed somewhere between 150,000 and 2 million people.

A few years later, Ford and Kissinger gave the go-ahead for the 1975 invasion of East Timor, after claims by Suharto that the East Timorese political party FRETILIN was a communist organization.  You all know what happened after that: over the next five years, the invasion and occupation by the TNI would cost East Timor around 200,000 lives, or one third of its population.

You might also know that the litany of of extrajudicial executions, torture, and arbitrary detention in East Timor has been repeated in other conflict areas such as Aceh and West Papua, and throughout the country.

Throughout all this, throughout Indonesia’s 25-year occupation of East Timor, the US continued to provide military support, transferring over $1 billion of weaponry to Jakarta.

The Indonesian Armed Forces: built for brutality?

In the US, in case you didn’t notice, the military gets a massive chunk of taxpayers’ cash to spend and this money finds its way back into the economy via private contracts: Eisenhower’s so-called military-industrial complex.

The Indonesian model is different.  The Indonesian army (TNI) is part funded by the state, but it also funds itself privately through various shadowy military businesses.  This financial arrangement gives the TNI an uneasy level of autonomy and independence from its civil government.  To a significant degree, the TNI is unaccountable, beyond the law, and it’s not just the activists who are worried:

Last November [2006], in a Country Briefing on Indonesia, Jane's Defence Weekly [...] highlighted concerns about the business interests of the TNI, including illegal activities such as illegal logging, brothels, entertainment venues and gambling.

According to Human Rights Watch , US companies are getting mixed up in this whole dirty business; such as mining giant Freeport McMoRan who have put over $60 million in the pockets of local military commanders and units for their security services.

The internal structure of the TNI is also unusual – it mirrors that of the civil government, with representatives going all the way down to village level.  Each village, or kampung, is assigned a local army representative – even if it’s just a solitary officer keeping an eye on things.  The reason for this structure becomes clear when you remember that of all the 17,000 islands, it’s the Javanese who mainly provide the ruling class in Indonesia.  The provinces must be pacified.

So, you have privately-funded armed forces, built for civilian control, with weak civilian oversight.  Little wonder that the TNI have
"long been responsible for grave abuses", are essentially "above the law", and acting with impunity.

And, thanks to a certain Ms Rice, we are encouraging this impunity.

Encouraging impunity: bringing us up to date...

After a TNI massacre of civilians in East Timor in 1991, Congress cut off military aid.  It was re-introduced in 1995, but with conditions attached – Indonesia had to improve its human rights record.  This started to have an impact, and the conditions were renewed in October 2005.

Then, just a few weeks later, Condoleezzer Rice overruled Congress, waiving the conditions on the basis of National Security concerns, and re-establishing unconditional military support.

The motivation for this is not clear.  However, in the wake of the Bali bombs and recent trends in Indonesia to more fundamental interpretations of Islam, the US is concerned about Al Qaeda getting a foothold in the most populous Muslim nation.

Even though Indonesian police, not the military, brought the Bali bombers to justice, the US administration seems to have made the decision that the TNI need to be let off the leash a little.  Let them do what they’re good at: keeping order.

The freedoms and rights of Indonesians can come second.

Tags: Indonesia, human rights, Condoleezza Rice, Rescued (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 11 comments

  •  Tips or not-tips (7+ / 0-)

    Yes, I know the UK has been selling arms to Jakarta too.  But that story's for another audience.

    Cheers

    •  I'm not sure (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      truong son traveler, ignatz uk

      what is the basis for your claims about rising Muslim fundamentalism in Indonesia.  The Bali bombings were by most accounts more of an abberration than part of a trend.  

      I just returned from two weeks in Indonesia, both in Jakarta and in Sumatra, and I met and spoke with numerous nationals as well as ex-pats who know the country.  The nationals are very disturbed that their country is being lumped together with places like Afghanistan and Pakistan as a haven of Islamic fundamentalists.  On the contrary, what I observed was a very open and progressive society, especially among younger people, who are mainly interested in getting an education and finding opportunities to better their lives.  Also, the political system has become dramatically more open since Suharto's departure.  Even the disaster of the Jakarta floods, which I witnessed first-hand, was an opportunity to witness the new openness, as the local newspapers didn't hesitate to crticize government officials (a-la New Orleans) for poor preparedness and disaster response.

      Of course Indonesia still has many problems, and I would agree that we should be wary of their military in particular, given the track record.  But I believe this is one of the more encouraging examples in the developing (and Muslim) world.

      One other point, the local papers were very amused about the whole Obama Madrassa "scandal", as they claimed that everyone in the city knew that this particular Madrassa was secular.  But they were thrilled with the idea that Obama, "one of our own", could become President of the U.S.  If he were elected, he'd have a huge head start in positive relations with the world's largest Muslim country.

      Yet it is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set... -- Gandalf

      by dnta on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 07:50:27 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Aye, thanks for the comment. (3+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Eddie C, dnta

        at the moment it's only a trend, but I know that people are keeping a close eye on religious freedom.

        There's Sharia law now in a region just outside Jakarta, I think also somewhere in Sumatra and in Aceh (which is different, though).  You already found Zapatista's comment below, too.

        Other than those examples, my experience of Indonesia is exactly the same as yours, and as a nation it should certainly not be lumped in with Pakistan, Afghanistan or anywhere like that.

        This is the underlying point of the diary I guess, that these days we view the world through the lens of anti-fundamentalism, and make bad choices as a consequence.

  •  Interesting how in the vast and dismal history... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    truong son traveler, ignatz uk

    of colonialism, you find little nuggets of good such as the religious freedom you say still exists in Indonesia.

    I know it's not the point of your diary, but it struck me that the Dutch have for centuries been the most religiously tolerant country in Europe, and I wonder if that good quality was somehow transmitted to Indonesia along with the nasty influences of rapacious commercialism, especially the cultuurstelsel.

    Just an irrelevant observation/question!

    •  It's a good point (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Eddie C, truong son traveler

      And not sure I can shed any more light on it, although I suspect that religious diversity and tolerance have been a part of the culture over there since before the Dutch arrived.

      The culture is already diverse - 700 languages spoken apart from Bahasa etc.  I think they realized pretty quickly that "Unity in Diversity" - as the national motto goes - was their only option.

      Cheers

  •  Thanks for posting this. (5+ / 0-)

    US policy on Indonesia is an issue that should be getting more attention. I was recently in DC meeting with members of Congress to discuss the issue and was told that even with the Democrats as majority they don't have the votes to reinstate a ban on selling weapons to Indonesia.

    I work with indigenous peoples organzations from West Papua and Maluku. The military seems to be working hand in hand with the radical muslims who are moving to the islands and preparing for bloodshed. The violence and destruction that happened in East Timor after they voted for independenced could begin at any moment in West Papua and Maluku.

    I got a little taste of TNI a few months ago. I was invited to a meeting of the Papua Customary Council and after being in West Papua less than 24 hours was picked up, questioned for two days, then sent to a cell in Jakarta for a few more days before being deported and banned. Lucky for me, a group of indigenous West Papuans occupied the building where I was being questioned and wouldn't leave until I was sent to Jakarta.

    •  This is terrible (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      truong son traveler, ignatz uk

      Sorry to hear this nasty story.  As mentioned above, I had only positive experiences in Jakarta and Sumatra, but no direct contact in Papua or Maluku.

      Yet it is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set... -- Gandalf

      by dnta on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 07:53:06 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Wow, sounds like you had a narrow escape... (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Eddie C, truong son traveler

      W Papua's not looking good, is it?  Human Rights Watch report came out on Weds, let's hope that helps to raise the profile.

      Didn't know that Maluku was still a problem.  Do you have links or anything?

      •  As you probably know, (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        ignatz uk

        a few years ago there was a lot of violence in Maluku. Young radical muslim men were transported to the islands by the shipload, and a well organized massacre took place. Still there are groups like Laskar Jihad training in Maluku and West Papua, more and more are arriving in West Papua nearly every day. Villages get attacked by these people regularly.

        No links, just info that I get from people there.

        •  When you say "shipload" do you mean (3+ / 0-)

          military ships?  I'm very curious about these ties.  I came across Papua and Aceh from another route-when I started watching the gold market and commodities in general several years ago.  Every time I hear about "ethnic" violence I suspect there's a high priced commodity involved. It's not only that locals want a cut of the pie but that extraction of the commodity causes such environmental damage that it ruins peoples lives.  After the tsunami I was afraid that any government aid to these areas could be used as bait.  Also I remember reading a story about a rash of violent attacks against Chinese merchants.  Turned out that these attacks were on video and they were being carried out by military.  Are you familiar with what I'm referring to here?

          "Yes dear. Conspiracy theories really do come true." (tuck, tuck)

          by tribalecho on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 09:06:17 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  I'm not sure if they are military ships, (2+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            truong son traveler, ignatz uk

            but they are ships. Ethnic violence is the term most often used, but it's not the right way to describe what's going on there. It's all about resources: wood, minerals, oil, etc... The military is making lots of money on all of these resources. Generals are wealthy. Any talk about the locals having rights is quickly snuffed out. Forests are cut, minerals are mined, the land that the locals depend upon is destroyed....

            Don't know about the attacks on Chinese merchants.

Permalink | 11 comments