Daily Kos

Why isn't Bush Hate Syndrome a Republican phenomenon?

Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:04:21 AM PDT

So we were sitting there with Friday night pizza and cheap wine and listening to the Dixie Chicks' award-winning CD, The Long Way Home.

If the Right Wing Nutters hadn't politicized this group during the invasion of Iraq, I probably wouldn't ever have purchased and enjoyed a Dixie Chick album, since I rarely listen to country. Probably without their intense anger and sorrow over the reaction to Natalie's 2003 remark, the Dixie Chicks wouldn't have been inspired to write these fine songs. Apparently millions of other people have had an experience similar to mine.

But what I want to know is, why aren't rightwingers/Republicans/conservatives all over America jerking in stiff-limbed little dances around their living rooms, quivering in an ecstasy of Bush Hate?  

In 2000 they had it all. The Republicans owned Congress. Despite his meager personal gifts, Bush was handed the presidency by the Supreme Court. (Perhaps they relied on de-petaling a daisy or chanting Eeny, meeny, miny, moe to make their choice. Maybe the fix was in. At any rate, they decided for Dubya.)

Republicans and their ilk rejoiced at the prospect of lower taxes for the wealthy, thereby gaining richer rich folks, whose lifestyles they could admire on television. The economy would thrive so much from tax cuts and deregulation that everybody would get richer, as the incomes of the richest approached infinity with the speed of light. Certainly government would shrink under the regime of the party against Big Government. The fiscally responsible Republicans would cut government spending and cut it again. America would talk tough to the world, and back it up with bombs and guns. The Bush administration wouldn't indulge in namby-pamby diplomacy. Everybody would cower before our mighty military. The president would be noted for his straightforward, truth-telling speech.

Well, the rich did get richer. Even 9/11 could be spun as a painful wake up call, offering an opportunity to swagger into the theater of war with guns blazing. The Republicans had a War President! You could almost see the dozens of lines of dominoes, just waiting for a nudge to knock them into a pattern of endless Republican political domination. It was the perfect set-up. Instead, Bush tore into the room like a beered-up, belligerent frat boy, and scattered the dominoes in every direction. The War President proceeded to piss away all the power, good will and moral capital America had built up since Vietnam and the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

Why aren't the rightwingers/Republicans/conservatives simply insane with rage at Bush and Cheney?

Something shiny in Iraq distracted the War President from Afghanistan. Osama disappeared to devote himself to a life of snarking and planning terrorist attacks. At best, the decision to invade Iraq could be attributed to gross incompetence. Most people believe it was an emotional and ideological decision backed up by lies. The implementation of the decision was bungled spectacularly in every possible way. Now the armed forces, including the National Guards and reserves are being destroyed there.

Bush didn't confine himself to failure in outright war. The administration was caught engaged in illegal spying on Americans and lying about it. All pretence at honoring human rights and the Constitution was dropped when dealing with those accused of terrorism. Yet terrorist acts have become more prevalent around the globe.

Bush persistently indulged his lazy approach to government and appointed incompetent cronies to important jobs. His vacation couldn't be interrupted. Thus the Katrina debacle.

The middle-class and poor are not faring well in this economy. More Americans are poor, and more middle-class Americans are going without health insurance than ever before. Bush responded by trying to whip up a fake "emergency" involving Social Security. Even Republicans saw through the lies. Now he proposes taxes on health insurance lucky Americans currently enjoy instead of tackling the real emergency of unsustainable growth in health care bureaucracy. The national debt has soared. China owns us, credit-wise.  

Bush's vacuous saber-rattling resulted in North Korea developing the plutonium bomb. Bush has responded with an attempt to reinstate an agreement with Korea that he had previously trashed as appeasement, because the Clinton administration negotiated it. In the interval, North Korea got plutonium bombs. Iran is heading down the same path as North Korea, inspired by the Bush record of illegally invading non-nuclear powers--UNLESS maybe the Bush administration attends diplomatic talks with Iran and Syria without those countries first meeting all the U.S. demands. (You can see the point of Iran and Syria. What would there be to talk about if all U.S. demands were met before the talks began?) So Bush is being forced to back down from tough talk rhetoric and negotiate, AND he has also weakened our power at the negotiating table.

The Democrats won big in November, and even if the war is stopped before 2008, will win even bigger in that year.

Now the appointees of this administration have been proven negligent in caring for the wounded soldiers they claim to support. They tried to cover up that neglect rather than fix it.

It is almost unbelievable how much of a Miserable Failure BushCo is, except from the perspective of people so rich they are independent of the laws of economics and nations.

Bush fucked up the wet dream of right wing Americans everywhere. Now the Dixie Dicks are in the faces of rightwingers/Republicans/conservatives all over America. They have come back from rejection and threats with the power to say "We told you so. We young, female country singers had more perception and judgment than the Republicans running this country."

Why aren't the rightwingers/Republicans/conservatives in the streets of Washington D.C. by the tens of thousands, screaming in inarticulate rage? Why aren't they protesting in the offices of their Republican representatives, to demand that they stop enabling the executive branch in its destruction of America?

I took this screen shot yesterday. By a happy chance it describes the continuing path of the Bush administration. The rightwingers/Republicans/conservatives still are not afflicted with Bush Hate Syndrome. They are such forgiving and understanding people.

Prez heading south

Tags: George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Failure, dixie chicks (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 19 comments

  •  Such an excellent question! (8+ / 0-)

    Goes to the heart of our national malaise: Party before country.

    Congratulations!

    •  Thanks for the kind words! n/t (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Autarkh

      John McCain says women shouldn't have the right to choose.

      by Cowalker on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:06:10 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  The reason they aren't dancing around (4+ / 0-)

      is as easy as saying why they are still not hatin' Bushie.

      They don't have any money to use beyond the weekly bills they pay.  They just don't like "illegals, brown people and gays."

      These people are usually dirt poor; in most cases seriosly predjudiced against anyone that is not just like them.

      Why, you ask?  Why would they not be for real change?  Because they don't NEED change.  They still need to hate what they don't understand.
      Republicans give them that opportunity, gladly.

      That's why they aren't dancing.

      Another day, another devalued Dollar. -6.00, -6.21

      by funluvn1 on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:17:13 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I agree with your assessment (3+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        rapala, vigilant meerkat, ellen

        that hate is necessary to them.

        When I spoke of dancing, I wasn't thinking about celebratory movement. I was thinking of the kind of involuntary physical reaction to extreme emotion that makes you hit the wall, or lurch around the room looking for something to kill.

        John McCain says women shouldn't have the right to choose.

        by Cowalker on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:33:20 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Hate or apathy (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Cowalker

          I'll disagree about dirt poor.  I think its the opposite.  A lot of people who benefitted from government programs, public scholls/universities, and parents with the right connections or $ have simply declared themselves self-made people.  And they see no reason to share an ounce of kindness or opportunity with anyone else since they "did it all on their own."  Just like their boy W- self-made.

          Also a lot of people are just selfish- don't want to answer for anything they'ev done while holding everyone else accountable for the most miniscule transgression.

          I think the hate may be taking the form of apathy- as in just giving up and not caring about him any longer.  A lot of people who don't rage against Bush and his policies have simply resigned themselves to the fact he's screwed us all and is around another two years regardless.

  •  re (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Cowalker, rapala, Autarkh

    They fear everything in their life so they let Authoritarians rule them to sauve their fear.

    "Obama / Steve Holt '08!" - Steve Holt

    by cookiesandmilk on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:06:54 AM PDT

  •  Why? (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Cowalker, cookiesandmilk

    Why aren't the rightwingers/Republicans/conservatives in the streets of Washington D.C. by the tens of thousands, screaming in inarticulate rage? Why aren't they protesting in the offices of their Republican representatives, to demand that they stop enabling the executive branch in its destruction of America?

    R.W.A.

    "The opposite of a triviality is plainly false; the opposite of a great truth is another great truth." - Niels Bohr

    by Autarkh on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:11:36 AM PDT

    •  Very interesting link (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Autarkh

      The author writes about the existence of "psychological right-wing authoritarians" who could be politically left-wing, Stalinists for example.

      I guess we have to presume that about 30% of the American population are psychological right-wing authoritarians.

      John McCain says women shouldn't have the right to choose.

      by Cowalker on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:21:52 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  We don't have to presume. (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Cowalker, Judge Moonbox

        These are empirical constructs backed up by tens of thousands or surveys.

        I believe John Dean (in "Conservatives Without Conscience") identifies 23% of the population as possessing the High RWA personality type.  

        "The opposite of a triviality is plainly false; the opposite of a great truth is another great truth." - Niels Bohr

        by Autarkh on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:31:59 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  repugs are followers, (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Cowalker, rapala, ellen

    not leaders - demonstrated by their lack of oversight when they had power in the last congress. repugs like slogans and do not like counter arguments. for example, you hear time and time again on the news how repugs hate people who speakout or have differing views - repugs are more like communist than you think

    •  I guess I attribute too much vision (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      ellen

      to rightwingers/Republicans/conservatives. How can they miss the fact that a perfect setup to propagate their beliefs for generations was totally bungled by their guy? He couldn't have done a better job if he had been a deep undercover liberal plant.

      Given the extremist penchant for conspiracy, I'm surprised Bush hasn't been suspected of trying to discredit conservatism.

      John McCain says women shouldn't have the right to choose.

      by Cowalker on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:30:40 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Mostly 'cause they disagree (0+ / 0-)

    with assertions' such as yours, I expect, so they feel no reason to.

  •  I was tempted (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Cowalker

    At a march on Washington a couple of years ago, I saw lots of marchers against Bush's war in Iraq, and some countermarchers supporting Bush. I didn't see, and was very tempted to ask, "Where are the people who want Bush to get off his fat ass and start fighting to win?" IF these people actually believed in our war objectives, how many years can they go without questioning whether Bush is putting his war effort second to keeping taxes low for the Paris Hiltons?

    I'm not asking you to take the country back, I'm asking you to take it forward-Van Jones.

    by Judge Moonbox on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 10:13:44 AM PDT

  •  seems their starting to (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Cowalker

    Read NYT article today about how his ratings in the GOP have slipped in the last two months from 78% to 65%. My rabid right wing son is totally depressed and will soon be hopping mad. When the right turns they not only hate Bush for what he's doing but feel they were duped, nobody likes being a sucker.

    "And if my thought-dreams could be seen They'd probably put my head in a guillotine" Bob Dylan

    by shaharazade on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 10:32:14 AM PDT

  •  2 words: Cognitive Dissonance. [NT] (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Cowalker

Permalink | 19 comments