Daily Kos

Specter offers amendment restoring habeas rights!

Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:10:22 AM PDT

I was visiting Senator Arlen Specter's (R-PA) website this morning.  I had planned to send him an e-mail regarding Alberto Gonzales and his perjury before the Senate Judiciary Committee, of which Specter is the ranking minority member.

I was distracted, but pleasantly surprised to find this:

March 6th, 2007  
 
SPECTER OFFERS HABEAS AMENDMENT TO 9-11 BILL  
 
Washington, D.C. - Today, Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member, Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) for himself, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Ct.) called up S.A 286, to restore habeas corpus to those detained by the United States. The amendment is to modify S. 4, Improving America's Security Act of 2007.

The intent and summary of the amendment follows:

The amendment strikes the federal habeas corpus limitation imposed by the Military Commissions Act and the Detainee Treatment Act by restoring the rights of aliens detained within U.S. territorial jurisdiction to challenge their detention by filing writs of habeas corpus.

The effect of the legislation will ensure that the federal courts of jurisdiction will have the opportunity to hear the nearly 200 habeas corpus applications currently pending on behalf of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The legislation restores jurisdiction and allows those cases to be decided on their merits. It also allows habeas corpus challenges to military commission procedures.

Here is the text of the amendment:

At the appropriate place, insert the following:

SEC. __. RESTORATION OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR THOSE DETAINED BY THE UNITED STATES.

(a) In General.--Section 2241 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (e).

(b) Title 10.--Section 950j of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:

``(b) Limited Review of Military Commission Procedures and Actions.--Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or in section 2241 of title 28 or any other habeas corpus provision, and notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause of action whatsoever, including any action pending on or filed after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, relating to the prosecution, trial, or judgment of a military commission under this chapter, including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures of military commissions under this chapter.''.

(c) Effective Date and Applicability.--The amendments made by this section shall--

(1) take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; and

(2) apply to any case that is pending on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

This is an important opportunity to turn back a significant abuse perpetrated by the Bush administration.  We must make our voices heard on this critical issue!

Here is your lunch break project for today:

Contact your Senators and insist that they support this important amendment!

And while you're there, please also contact members of the Judiciary Committee, and encourage them to investigate the firing of the US Attorneys, and remind the Senators that our dear Attorney General LIED TO THE COMMITTEE:

"I would never, ever make a change in a United States attorney for political reasons or if it would in any way jeopardize an ongoing serious investigation. I just would not do it."

This is a serious matter that must be addressed.  When the nation's top law enforcement official commits such an unethical act, then perjures himself denying his complicity, he needs to be held to account for his criminal actions.

Occams Hatchet had an excellent diary Saturday that provides details on the applicable laws.

Please take the time to fire off a quick e-mail to the Senators on both of these important issues!

Tags: habeas corpus, Arlen Specter, Senate, Judiciary Committee, perjury, action (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 62 comments

  •  Keep the pressure on! (28+ / 0-)

    Tips for keeping the ball rolling!

    We can rid ourselves of these criminals, one at a time!

    It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds - Samuel Adams

    by Red no more on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:08:19 AM PDT

  •  Hate to say it,,,, (10+ / 0-)

    but good on Spector for this.  

    Although I hesitate to take this on it's face.  What's the main bill it's attached to?  Any reason we wouldn't want to vote for this?  

    I don't trust these people, and Spector has been a skunk in rat's clothing too many times in the past.

    "But your flag decal won't get you into heaven anymore"--Prine 4130+ dead Americans. Bring them home.

    by Miss Blue on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:09:48 AM PDT

    •  It's attached to... (5+ / 0-)

      the bill implementing the balance of the 9-11 commission recommendations.  I think the port and cargo security changes are a big part of the bill.

      I believe this is the same bill that allows the TSA workers to bargain collectively, too.

      It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds - Samuel Adams

      by Red no more on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:12:50 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Yes but the amendment will be voted on (3+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Miss Blue, Ellicatt, Albatross

        separately in the process of getting the bill passed.  It still has to get into the larger bill.

      •  Just so people have link and info on amendment (7+ / 0-)

        S.AMDT.286
        Amends: S.4 , S.AMDT.275
        Sponsor: Sen Specter, Arlen [PA] (submitted 2/28/2007) (proposed 3/6/2007)

        AMENDMENT PURPOSE:
        To restore habeas corpus for those detained by the United States.

        TEXT OF AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: CR S2432

        STATUS:

        3/6/2007:
        Amendment SA 286 proposed by Senator Specter to Amendment SA 275. (consideration: CR S2663; text: CR S2663)

        COSPONSORS(3):

        Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT] - 2/28/2007
        Sen Dodd, Christopher J. [CT] - 2/28/2007
        Sen Obama, Barack [IL] - 3/6/2007

        http://thomas.loc.gov/...

        •  Also here is the link to the MCA that was (4+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Miss Blue, joanneleon, Ellicatt, Lashe

          passed and the text that the amendment seeks to alter:

          http://thomas.loc.gov/...

          Sec. 950j. Finality or proceedings, findings, and sentences

          `(a) Finality- The appellate review of records of trial provided by this chapter, and the proceedings, findings, and sentences of military commissions as approved, reviewed, or affirmed as required by this chapter, are final and conclusive. Orders publishing the proceedings of military commissions under this chapter are binding upon all departments, courts, agencies, and officers of the United States, except as otherwise provided by the President.

          `(b) Provisions of Chapter Sole Basis for Review of Military Commission Procedures and Actions- Except as otherwise provided in this chapter and notwithstanding any other provision of law (including section 2241 of title 28 or any other habeas corpus provision), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause of action whatsoever, including any action pending on or filed after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, relating to the prosecution, trial, or judgment of a military commission under this chapter, including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures of military commissions under this chapter.

          This amendment does not address the issue of the President's power to summarily accuse and incarcerate anyone he pleases although it does help people who have been wrongly detained to be able to defend themselves - if they can get a lawyer and we know what lengths BushCo has gone to to subvert detainee's legal counsel.

    •  Exactly (11+ / 0-)

      Wasn't he going to go after Bush for the illegal NSA spying scandal and for torturing alleged terrorists?  He only ended up giving Bush a pass on both of these.

      I hope he comes through since he will have bipartisan support for this, but my cynical side says otherwise (especially since Bush will veto it).

      BTW, no relation to the Senator.

      •  Specter17 (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Specter17

        Would you be an expert on our honorable friend, the senator from Pennsylvania?  In any case, you're brave to use the name :)

        "The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." --Samuel Johnson

        by joanneleon on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:18:47 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  No, (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          joanneleon, lines of flight

          my handle is a hat tip to the book by Derrida, Specters of Marx, a post-structural critique of Marxism after the fall of the Eastern bloc.

          It is just an unfortunate coincidence that the senator has the same name.

          I did have a drop of respect for him when he said he would hold Bush accountable for the NSA spying and torturing, but as I stated above, these fell by the wayside rather quickly as did my respect.

          •  I know what you mean (8+ / 0-)

            I've gotten my hopes up about Specter before too, only to be bitterly disappointed.  I crafted a phrase for Specter:  

            Often says the right thing
            Rarely does the right thing

            "The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." --Samuel Johnson

            by joanneleon on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:31:16 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  That's our pal, Arlen... (2+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              joanneleon, Ellicatt

              I'm hoping that by holding his feet to the fire, he will follow his better instincts and stop being a party-line patsy.

              I think he wants to stay in the Senate - and he sees the writing on the wall after lil' Ricky's trouncing.

              It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds - Samuel Adams

              by Red no more on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:37:27 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

            •  Remember this poem? (3+ / 0-)

              Your line about Arlen Spector reminded me of this.

              Here lies our soverign lord and king,
              Whose word no man relies on,
              Who never said a foolish thing
              Nor ever did a wise one.

              I believe somebody wrote that about a king of England, and got banned from the court (but nothing worse) for it.

              We're all pretty strange one way or another; some of us just hide it better. "Normal" is a dryer setting.

              by david78209 on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:41:05 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  John Wilmot, 2nd Earl of Rochester (1+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                Ellicatt

                Ha, thanks for that one.  I'm going to save this wiki link because that verse will really come in handy these days!

                It sounds like he was quite the character.  The wiki article is a hoot.  It says he was "Banished from court for a scurrilous lampoon on Charles II," but it doesn't say whether it was this one or not.

                John Wilmot, 2nd Earl of Rochester (April 1, 1647–July 26, 1680) was an English libertine, a friend of King Charles II, and the writer of much satirical and bawdy poetry.

                ...

                Rochester's poetry was greatly influenced by John Donne's works, his metaphysical predecessor, and whilst lacking the poetic skills of his contemporaries, he more than made up for this with his sharp tongue and acerbic wit. His most famous verse is a teasing epigram of his great friend King Charles II:

                   We have a pretty witty king,
                   Whose word no man relies on;
                   He never said a foolish thing,
                   Nor ever did a wise one.

                Charles is reputed to have replied:

                   "That is true; for my words are my own, but my actions are those of my ministers."

                http://en.wikipedia.org/...

                "The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." --Samuel Johnson

                by joanneleon on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:55:31 AM PDT

                [ Parent ]

      •  funny coincidence (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Miss Blue, Ellicatt

        and you're absolutely right - Specter's shown time and time again that his conviction to rule of law is about as deep as a dog and pony show. Had he once followed through on any threat about reigning in Bush et al then I'd be more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt. But as it stands, his last - and only - moment of conviction was the Clarence Thomas hearings, and that was in the wrong direction.

    •  I still like Jack Cafferty's name for Spector (5+ / 0-)

      "Arlen Spector is a Gutless Republican Worm!"

      Carry the battle to them. Don't let them bring it to you. Put them on the defensive and don't ever apologize for anything. Harry S. Truman

      by deepsouthdoug on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:31:18 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  What is wrong with Leahy's amendment (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      draftchrisheinz, Ellicatt

      that he has to put his own forth?

      More smoke and mirrors from Specter.

      My new bumper sticker: Cheney-Satan '08

      by adigal on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:32:22 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  If they let a Republican sponsor it (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        adigal, Ellicatt

        maybe they figure this will help get more Republican votes.  I'm guessing that they insisted on taking credit for it.

        "The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." --Samuel Johnson

        by joanneleon on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:40:06 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Spector... (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Miss Blue, kd texan, joanneleon

      has given a bad name to folding, cheap suits.  

      He will probably vote against his own amendment if Rove says "boo."

      "We're all working for the Pharaoh" - Richard Thompson

      by mayan on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:45:39 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  I agree with you.... (0+ / 0-)

      Where there's Spector looking good, there's a weasle hidden agenda, for sure.  Dodd and Leahy have stood behind these things before in a spineless manner, knowing there's a hidden agenda.  Leahy more than Dodd, but I agree.  Something could be rotten in Denmark.

      Never grow a wishbone, daughter, where your backbone ought to be. Clementine Paddeford

      by blubryeyes on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:46:13 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  How did Specter vote (4+ / 0-)

    on the bill that authorizes the government to ignore our habeas rights?

    I'm curious and I don't recall.

    We still have those rights, they belong to us and come from us, that's why I say it just authorizes the government to ignore them...

    As far as I'm concerned, no matter how he voted on that particular bill though, Specter has a lot to atone for...

    I'm kind of stalling for time here...They told me what to say. George W Bush, 03-21-2006 10:00 EST Press Conference

    by Tamifah on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:10:48 AM PDT

  •  And how about the attorneys? (5+ / 0-)

    Will Specter also work quickly to amend his "mistake" that resulted in the firing of the federal prosecutors? Holding my breath!

    When I skimmed the diary and read "...commits such an unethical act, then perjures himself denying his complicity..." I first thought of Specter.

  •  Should have been Democrats leading the way (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Albatross, ignatz uk

    all the way, but this is a great start.

    But, Specter is a turncoat who will stab them in the back at the moment the votes come down -even if he did offer the piece up.

    Our... constitutional heritage rebels at the thought of giving government the power to control men's minds. Thurgood Marshall

    by bronte17 on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:14:55 AM PDT

    •  I think Senator Dodd (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Albatross, Joelarama

      did something similar earlier this year didn't he?

    •  Specter has flipped his position before... (7+ / 0-)

      He spoke out against the MCA, then caved and voted for it.  He (or his staff)also allegedly inserted the language into the Patriot Act that eliminated Senate review of US Attorney appointments.

      When I grilled him on that, he responded:

      It is my expectation this provision will be used to fill vacancies for a short time only. It is important that every U.S. Attorney vacancy is ultimately filled with a Senate-confirmed nominee. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales shares my view. In sworn testimony before the Judiciary Committee on January 19, 2007, he stated: "I am fully committed, as the administration is fully committed, to ensure that, with respect to every United States Attorney position in this country, we will have a presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed United States Attorney."

      Despite the Attorney General's assurances, questions remain regarding the use of the interim appointment authority. The Judiciary Committee is currently considering legislation to change the interim appointment authority, and is scheduled to hold a hearing to address legislative proposals on February 6, 2007. I remain open to changing the interim appointment authority and remain committed to ensuring vacancies are filled with Senate confirmed nominees in a timely manner.

      He is a turncoat weasel - that's why we have to keep the pressure on and let him know the public is paying attention!

      It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds - Samuel Adams

      by Red no more on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:19:38 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Please note that Leahy and Dodd are (6+ / 0-)

      attached to this bill.  

      The Democrats are leading the way.  Two to one I might add.

  •  Fool me once shame on ... (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    RichM, ablington, adigal, Albatross, Joelarama
    well we can't be fooled again ....

    Don't trust him.

    Obama Rocks!! Da Rock for Obama!!

    by Da Rock on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:18:11 AM PDT

  •  Spector's fault in the first place? (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    draftchrisheinz, adigal, Ellicatt

    I thought it was one of Spector's aides that slipped the provision into the HLS bill at the last moment on a rec from the White House?

    It is also my understanding that many Senators did not even know the language had been inserted?  Why would Spector do an about face at this time?  My Specdar is at Code Orange.

    "Man's life's a vapor Full of woe. He cuts a caper, Down he goes. Down de down de down he goes.

    by JFinNe on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:19:01 AM PDT

  •  S.AMDT.286 (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Ellicatt, Albatross

    Here's a link to the amendment:  S.AMDT.286

    S.AMDT.286
    Amends: S.4 , S.AMDT.275
    Sponsor: Sen Specter, Arlen (PA) (submitted 2/28/2007) (proposed 3/6/2007)

    STATUS:

         3/6/2007:
             Amendment SA 286 proposed by Senator Specter to Amendment SA 275. (consideration: CR S2663; text: CR S2663)

    COSPONSORS(3):

         Sen Leahy, Patrick J. (VT) - 2/28/2007
         Sen Dodd, Christopher J. (CT) - 2/28/2007
         Sen Obama, Barack (IL) - 3/6/2007

    TEXT OF AMENDMENTS Page: S2432

    SA 286. Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. DODD) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 4, to make the United States more secure by implementing unfinished recommendations of the 9/11 Commission to fight the war on terror more effectively, to improve homeland security, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

       At the appropriate place, insert the following:

      SEC. __. RESTORATION OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR THOSE DETAINED BY THE UNITED STATES.

       (a) In General.--Section 2241 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (e).

       (b) Title 10.--Section 950j of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:

       ``(b) Limited Review of Military Commission Procedures and Actions.--Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or in section 2241 of title 28 or any other habeas corpus provision, and notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause of action whatsoever, including any action pending on or filed after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, relating to the prosecution, trial, or judgment of a military commission under this chapter, including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures of military commissions under this chapter.''.

       (c) Effective Date and Applicability.--The amendments made by this section shall--

       (1) take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; and

       (2) apply to any case that is pending on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

    "The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." --Samuel Johnson

    by joanneleon on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 07:28:51 AM PDT

  •  Holy $@#%!!! (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    joanneleon

    A Republic acting as if he has a conscience?!?

    Maybe hell really did freeze over...

  •  Great Catch. Just contacted Salazar's office. As (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Ellicatt

    I recall, he opposed the HC provision in the MCA but voted for the bill with the belief that it would be overturned or corrected at a later date. Now he has his chance. Please contact your Senators on this. Attaching it to S. 4 seems a very good move.

  •  Great opportunity for Democrats to get it done. (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Ellicatt

    They can get back at lot of the goodwill they've lost over fumbling the Iraq withdrawal legislation by getting behind Specter's bill to restore habeas corpus.

    It will look bi-partisan with Specter leading the charge and it's all-American.

    Maybe sneak a rider restoring Congressional oversight on Federal Prosecutors using the Bush Jr firing scandal...but first and foremost...restore the Habeas Corpus of the American founders.

  •  He requested one hour of floor time today (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Dreaming of Better Days

    to speak about this.  His request was approved and it is scheduled for when the Senate comes back after the King Abdullah speech to the joint session (approximately noon EST).

    If you would like, we could use your diary for a live blog.  Perhaps at the time, add "live thread" to the title.  I'll check back around that time and participate if you'd like to go that route.

    GOP = Graveyard of Progress (Dick Durbin, Senate Floor, 4/15/08)

    by Ellicatt on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 08:22:08 AM PDT

  •  He's one of the few tolerable Repugs (0+ / 0-)

    but I sure wouldn't vote for him.  PN needs to put another Democrat in the Senate.

    If the Republicans promise to stop telling lies about us, maybe we'll stop telling the truth about them..

    by Romaniac on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 08:30:52 AM PDT

  •  Restoring Our Consitution (0+ / 0-)

    This could make a good Action Diary addition to the Restoring Our Constitution series.

    If you're game, rename your title to "Restoring Our Constitution: [Your Title]" and add the tag "Restoring Our Constitution" to the diary's list of tags.

    Been wiretapped lately?

    by m00nchild on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 08:37:54 AM PDT

  •  Be a good thread for KOS to campaign on (0+ / 0-)

    a netroots campaign to push the restoration of Habeas Corpus would be a real accomplishment. As much fun as it is to get revenge on Ann Coulter, restoring habeas corpus is the real deal.

  •  Necessary but not sufficient (0+ / 0-)

    This is just a breadcrumb.  The MCS needs to be revoked, the Patriot Act, and the AUMF likewise.  That would be a good start.

    How many wrongs does it take to make a right?

    by pdknz on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 09:41:52 AM PDT

Permalink | 62 comments