Daily Kos

Abramoff and AIPAC-spies defense attorney in position in Delaware US Attorney office

Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 01:08:36 PM PDT

As was first noted here in my diary earlier this week, an attorney resigned from defending the two former AIPAC officials in their spying case to move into the US Attorney office in Delaware. Currently, Mr Keith M. Rosen is the head of the Criminal Division in the District of Delaware, and I anticipate that the current US Attorney in that office, Colm Connolly, will either resign--and, as has been rumored, run for the Biden Senate seat--or be fired so that Rosen can be moved into the head position, on an 'interim basis' to avoid the scrutiny of a Senate confirmation. I can not imagine a scenario where Rosen would be confirmed.

This diary introduces you to our new assistant, and, I predict, your new US Attorney for the District of Delaware.

I. Relation with Jack Abramoff

Mr Rosen defended Jack Abramoff, and appeared with Abramoff in his 2004 Senate testimony.

One of Abramoff's many felonies involved Abramoff's receiving money from one group, misrepresenting what the money would be used for, and then Abramoff using the money to fund another of his nefarious schemes.

A pet project that both Tom Delay and Jack Abramoff enjoyed funneling illegal funds into was Abramoff's Capital Athletic Foundation, a foundation whose marketed goal was a source of funds to enhance the lives of 'inner-city youths' with social programs. In actuality, the funds were diverted to other interests. This from Newsweek in an article titled, Fund-Raising: Take It to the (West) Bank: Money meant for the inner city went to fight the intifada. What donors to Jack Abramoff's charity didn't know:

The pitch worked especially well among a group of Indian tribes who, having opened up lucrative gaming casinos, had hired Abramoff to protect their interests in Washington. In 2002 alone, records show, three Indian tribes donated nearly $1.1 million to the Capital Athletic Foundation. But now, NEWSWEEK has learned, investigators probing Abramoff's finances have found some of the money meant for inner-city kids went instead to fight the Palestinian intifada. More than $140,000 of foundation funds were actually sent to the Israeli West Bank where they were used by a Jewish settler to mobilize against the Palestinian uprising. Among the expenditures: purchases of camouflage suits, sniper scopes, night-vision binoculars, a thermal imager and other material described in foundation records as "security" equipment. The FBI, sources tell NEWSWEEK, is now examining these payments as part of a larger investigation to determine if Abramoff defrauded his Indian tribe clients. The tribal donors are outraged. "This is almost like outer-limits bizarre," says Henry Buffalo, a lawyer for the Saginaw Chippewa Indians who contributed $25,000 to the Capital Athletic Foundation at Abramoff's urging. "The tribe would never have given money for this."

Abramoff, a legendary lobbyist particularly close to DeLay, is also a fierce supporter of Israel—"a super-Zionist," one associate says. That may explain why Abramoff's paramilitary gear ended up in the town of Beitar Illit, a sprawling ultra-Orthodox outpost whose residents have occasionally tangled with their Palestinian neighbors. Yitzhak Pindrus, the settlement's mayor, says that several years ago the town was confronting mounting security problems. "They [the Palestinians] were throwing stones, they were throwing Molotov cocktails," Pindrus says. Abramoff's connection to the town was Schmuel Ben-Zvi, an American emigre who, the lobbyist told associates, was an old friend he knew from Los Angeles. Capital Athletic Foundation public tax records make no mention of Ben-Zvi. But they do show payments to "Kollel Ohel Tiferet" in Israel, a group for which there is no public listing and which the town's mayor said he never heard of.

II. Relations with AIPAC

Please see my previous diary, Gonzales and dropping the charges in US v Rosen? The impact of not doing so on the Bush Crime Family, to read about some of the relevant details of that case.

III. The link between Rosen, Abramoff, and AIPAC

Unfortunately, I do not believe that the extent of the links between Rosen, his client, Abramoff, and AIPAC will be uncovered in the near future. Though Abramoff and his minions in Congress are either in prison, or indicted, it is doubtful that the any overlapping of those crimes and the powerful AIPAC lobby will be touched by a Democratic Congress--or, by a Democratic Administration (especially if Senator Clinton is victorious). AIPAC is simply too powerful a source of funding for Presidential candidates to be ruffled by either side. Although the organization is considered to be ...."controlled by right-wing, rich Jewish neo-conservatives", our Democratic candidates attend and speak at their functions.

IV. Abramoff and the US Attorney scandals, generally.

It remains to be seen to what extent, if any, Rosen may play in future investigations of his former client in other offices throughout the country. Abramoff's filthy slime is covering the 'transfer' of the US Attorney in Guam, as documented in a previous diary.

A future diary will discuss the impact Abramoff had in having a Justice Department Special Report on the security situation in Guam and the Marinas Islands, made at the request of then US Attorney Black, after 9.11.

Suffice it to say, the slime generally collects at the bottom of the barrel, and with any luck, the past and future crimes of this filthy miscreant will, for the most part, be uncovered.

NOTE: This is not an I/P diary, and I do not desire it be hijacked as one by either side of that debate. This is a political diary that describes the machinations of the Bush Crime Family and its Justice Department, and nothing more. Therefore, there will be no responses available to anyone trying to hijack this diary as an I/P issue.

Tags: Jack Abramoff, Tom Delay, Keith M. Rosen, AIPAC, Organized Crime, US Attorney Scandal

Tags: Jack Abramoff, Tom Delay, Keith Rosen, AIPAC, Organized Crime, U.S. Attorneys (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 58 comments

  •  The quality of your work has increased (9+ / 0-)

    exponentially recently.

    Kudos.

    "[R]ather high-minded, if not a bit self-referential"--The Washington Post.

    by Geekesque on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 01:05:10 PM PDT

  •  Good diary...and I'm glad it's not an I/P (6+ / 0-)

    flamer...

    I still don't want Rosen involved in our governmental affairs in the least bit, though...anyone who defends (even temporarily) AIPAC spies and assholes like Abramoff doesn't belong in a position of power in our government...talk about political motivation and potential conflicts of interest...

    Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

    by darthstar on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 01:14:32 PM PDT

  •  I read all of your diaries, (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    walkshills, james risser

    and I agree with Geekesque.

    A minor request: please alter your 'US Attorney Scandal' Tag to 'U.S. attorneys', which is the correct form for the Daily Kos Tag system. Thanks.

  •  Opposed Impeachment (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    walkshills, james risser

    I was opposed to impeachment but the more this kind of underhanded chicanery goes on to undermine our Country the more I am inclined to agree with Kucinich. Start with Cheney. Unfortunately, I live in a district whose House Rep. Vito Fossella, is in Bush's pocket. He voted 96% party line. And this just adds to the outrage.
    Thanks for the fine diary.

    "By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes" Wm. Shakespeare, "Macbeth"

    by TheMomCat on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 01:19:50 PM PDT

  •  So. . . ? (0+ / 0-)

    I really don't see the scandal here.  A defense attorney for Abramoff and Rosen resigns and becomes an AUSA.  Based on this fact, you speculate on some scheme to remove the Delaware US attorney and vaguely hint at some sinister connection with AIPAC.  There may be a scandal there somewhere, but the mere job change is a pretty thin piece of evidence.

    Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?

    by johnny rotten on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 01:21:04 PM PDT

    •  i could have been clearer... (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      KansasLiberal

      ...to those not following the firings as closely as others: abramoff is related to the firing and transfer, to greater and lesser degrees, in, off the top of my head, three of the eight firings.

      if, as i anticipate, rosen is to get 'transferred' into the USA spot in delaware, the impact he may have on several other investigations is unknown, but, may become quite relevant.

  •  When does Feinstein's bill repealing the PATRIOT (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    theran, walkshills, count, james risser

    Act provision on U.S. Attorneys that was passed by vetoproof majorities in both Houses of Congress become law?  Has it gone to the president for his signature yet?

    The influence of the [executive] has increased, is increasing, and ought to be diminished.

    by lysias on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 01:28:30 PM PDT

  •  You need Mr. Rosen's full name (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    james risser

    in the lead graph. Yes, you can find it on the citations, but for future reference - or those unfamiliar - you need the ID.

    "But their gift is an empty snake, Carrying hypocrisy in its mouth like venom" - Sami Al Hajj

    by walkshills on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 01:33:32 PM PDT

  •  Resume? (0+ / 0-)

    Where did he go to school, what firms has he worked for, what other clients has he represented, etc. All of this ought to be relevant to the subject, not just his representation of two clients in particular.

    In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

    by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 01:57:23 PM PDT

    •  Good questions (3+ / 0-)

      feel up to doing the research?

      You would agree, wouldn't you, that progressives have a reason to be interested in the two particular clients the diary discusses?

      •  I have zero time (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        brittain33

        way too busy with work.  But the hallmarks of our criminal justice system are two key principles which progressives have a reason to hold dear:

        1. Every person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and
        1. Every defendant has the right to competent counsel

        So if someone around here just trots around saying how guilty Abramoff and the two guys from AIPAC are, they are violating the first principle. Why bother with a trial?  We can just convict based on criteria of convenience -- for example, the defendant worked for a lobbying organization we don't like, or is a Republican operative. Or is a nigra.

        And as for the second principle, the ranks of our public defenders are composed of dedicated, hardworking, underpaid people who regularly defend people accused of the most heinous crimes -- rape, child molestation, and murder.  And many of those defendants are convicted of those crimes. Others are exonerated. Are you going to condemn our public defenders because they defend rapists, murderers and child molesters? And if not, why is this guy given different treatment?

        In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

        by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 05:53:44 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  thank you so much for... (0+ / 0-)

          ...taking time out of your day for the excellent dissertation on the american legal system; i began to nearly tear up a bit at the end...

          oh, for the record, mr abramoff is currently in a federal prison in maryland; if the aipac case goes to trial without the government forcing the judge to dismiss the charges, i do not know what federal prison rosen and his compatriot will serve their time in... perhaps they can all be together again?  i do not know where franklin is serving his sentence for leaking to these two fine defendants...  with any luck, the new ausa in delaware can help get them all in the same federal prison for the appeals!

          it is a wonderful justice system when it is not corrupted by lobbyists and criminal co-conspirators in the whitehouse.

          •  The lecture was for litho (0+ / 0-)

            but if you came away from it knowing something about the legal system, as opposed to just mouthing knee-jerk slogans, then my work is done for the day.

            In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

            by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 08:29:28 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  i would suggest that... (0+ / 1-)

              Hidden by:
              Paul in Berkeley

              ...i know more about the american legal system than you will ever know; unless you are at boalt hall, and not in some cybercafe killing time.  and, since your comment suggests the legal acumen of judge judy, and went on-and-on about 'public defenders' when the issue is completely irrelevant to anything remotely related to this diary.

              and you berate me for pre-judging abramoff, one of the scummiest fucking felons since al capone!  who, oh, by the way is ALREADY IN PRISON!  as for the spies for aipac, since the leaker from the d.o.d. is soon to be in his own prison cell, it is more likely than not that the two people who received the leak and passed it on, just may be found guilty after their trial, should it actually occur.

              finally, you are only here because i dare use the word 'israel' and 'aipac' and 'abramoff' and 'illegal activity' in the same diary...  if you had made it to the bottom of the diary---yes, by actually READING it---you would have seen that i have no interest to entertain standard 'i/p' bullshit on this diary.

              •  Heh (1+ / 1-)

                Recommended by:
                Bouwerie Boy
                Hidden by:
                james risser

                be careful what you wish for...

                J.D., Boston University School of Law, 1986
                Law Review, 1984-86

                And if you didn't want to bring in any I/P bullshit, why did your diary focus on the AIPAC and Abramoff aspects of this guy's background, as opposed to other cases he's handled? Seems to me, you brought all the I/P bullshit into the diary in the first place, so put on your big-girl panties and stop your fucking whining.

                In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

                by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 09:07:33 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

                •  *yawn* (0+ / 1-)

                  Hidden by:
                  Paul in Berkeley

                  ...hey, panty sniffer, abramoff is involved in at least three of the us attorney scandals. his former lawyer just quit the aipac litigation to join as ausa in delaware. that is called NEWS.

                  i am writing almost daily on the attorney scandal.  the fact that this filthy swine abramoff is involved is not my doing.  the fact that his lawyer just walked out on an aipac spy case to get positioned to be the us a in delaware is significant.  

                  deal with it!  your 'side' got caught, this time...better luck next time.  as i have diaried, the case against the aipac spies will probably be dismissed next week anyway...

                  so YOU DEAL WITH IT.  abramoff is a filthy fucking felon, and, if there is justice he will share his cell with his two compatriots from aipac.

                  the fact that israel is involved is the only fucking reason you are here, and you could at least be honest enough to say you don't give two shits about the us attorney scandal, you are only here defending your pro-israel turf.

                  well, head on over to another diary, because no one cares about your silly little biases here.

                  •  Jeez, stop acting like a baby (1+ / 1-)

                    Recommended by:
                    Bouwerie Boy
                    Hidden by:
                    james risser

                    I can't believe Kos gives accounts to 11 year olds, but you are living proof. Grow up, act like an adult for a change. You are an embarrassment to the left, but don't worry, we'll get over it.  

                    In the meantime, we all really think your winnie-the-pooh little-girl panties are cute.

                    In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

                    by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 09:44:29 PM PDT

                    [ Parent ]

    •  If nothing else (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      count, james risser

      I'll go out on a limb and predict he's not a Regent Law School grad.

      •  Rosen (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        james risser

        worked in the C&P Washington D.C. office, AIPAC case is in Virginia, Eastern District.

      •  Well (1+ / 1-)

        Recommended by:
        Bouwerie Boy
        Hidden by:
        james risser

        The guy is clearly unqualified to be a US Attorney, even though he already has been a US Attorney.

        This is sounding more and more like a witchhunt based on ideology, rather than a sober assessment of someone's qualifications.

        In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

        by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 09:49:23 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  isn't there a REAL i/p diary around... (0+ / 1-)

          Hidden by:
          Paul in Berkeley

          ...tonight so you can do this silly bullshit with all of your friends?

          •  They're playing your song! (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Bouwerie Boy

            Chorus:
            *It's my party, and I'll cry if I want to
            Cry if I want to, cry if I want to
            You would cry too if it happened to you*

            Nobody knows where my Johnny has gone
            But Judy left the same time
            Why was he holding her hand
            When he's supposed to be mine?

            *It's my party, and I'll cry if I want to
            Cry if I want to, cry if I want to
            You would cry too if it happened to you*

            Play all my records, keep dancing all night
            But leave me alone for a while
            'Til Johnny's dancing with me,
            I've got no reason to smile

            *It's my party, and I'll cry if I want to
            Cry if I want to, cry if I want to
            You would cry too if it happened to you*

            Judy and Johnny just walked through the door
            Like a queen with her king
            Oh, what a birthday surprise
            Judy's wearing his ring

            *It's my party, and I'll cry if I want to
            Cry if I want to, cry if I want to
            You would cry too if it happened to you*

            In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

            by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 10:18:59 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  dear readers... (0+ / 0-)

              ...here we see the idiots post song lyrics.  another one of his friends post recipes....  that idiot posted 57 of them on one diary.  and, another of the group posts pictures.

              they are a multi-layered group of noise makers...  

              pathetic, sadly pathetic...

              •  Lol (1+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                Bouwerie Boy

                want some cheese with your whine?

                I love the phrase "retaliatory tr'ings" -- that indicates that you troll-rated first, but are your troll ratings valid? Do they comply with the FAQ's that you slavishly fellate? Oh right, the rules of the diary say we can't go there.

                And the entire substance of this diary is Rosen's defense of (1) AIPAC, and (2) Abramoff, who as you point out diverted funds to West Bank settler nutcases, but again, rules of your diary state we can't discuss the very same I/P issues that are the entire substance of your diary.

                I don't have any incentive to defend Rosen at all. If he's unqualified to hold the job, then he shouldn't hold it.  But you really gotta bring more to this than pure ideology, or you are no better than the Rethugs.

                In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

                by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 10:29:14 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

                •  dear readers... (0+ / 0-)

                  ...this is another tried and trued method found in the i/p diary...the 'you are a republican' canard.  

                  this is especially ironic since he is defending aipac from any negative comment, and as the link i provide in the diary shows, they are run by right-wing extremist crazies!

                  and, look at how the diary is summarized in paragraph two...  completely misses the entire point, but, manages to get his special-interest pet peeves in...

                  fascinating!  

                  his mates haven't shown up yet...that is surprising...

                  •  Deranged (0+ / 0-)

                    The later it gets, the more unglued your comments. If you bothered to read any I/P diaries, you'd discover that the people accusing others of being "republican" or "neocon" are always those who are, how shall we politely say it? ah yes...not on my side. But hey, internal consistency shouldn't be a requirement for you, should it?

                    Anyway, are you going to continue to suck up to your "dear readers," or will you just promise to send them a dollar if they say nice things about you? (hint: the dollar thing works)

                    In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

                    by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 10:37:47 PM PDT

                    [ Parent ]

  •  my apologies to my normal readers... (0+ / 0-)

    ... this diary has been hijacked by a pro-israel zealot who is only here to cause trouble. despite my note in the diary, it is impossible for the israel zealots to not besmirch any diary that includes the words 'israel' 'aipac' 'abramoff' and 'illegal'.

    to these zealots, the us attorney crisis is irrelevant. actually, there are several who only comment on i/p diaries and have it made it there reason for being at dailykos.

    they are not 'here to elect democrats' or to analyze the scandals of the bush crime family; no, they are only here to protect israel from having a word spoken against it, even if it is a tiny variable in a much more significant story.

    it is a sad existence for them, i suppose---and, a dishonest one; the person who has ruined the comments to this diary will not even admit that he is only here to do his job of protecting the words 'israel' 'aipac' and 'abramoff'.

    again, i apologize---i should no better than to expect these zealots to act any differently.  

    •  Poor baby (0+ / 0-)

      Like I said, time for you to put on your big-girl panties. Can we get a big communal "waahhhhhhh" for James? I'm sure you'll respond in a mature fashion by troll-rating this big BAD Zionist ZEALOT, but fear not, I'll return the favor.

      In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

      by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 10:12:16 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  this is what i mean, readers... (0+ / 0-)

        ...they can't help themselves.  they are driven by an irrational need to act like complete morons---usually, non-i/p folks do not see their childishness, but, here it is...

        and, as you can see the faq does not apply either.  retaliatory tr'ings are just fine...  

        it is fascinating to watch...  soon his friends will arrive...lets make this diary a petrie dish to analyze this fool and his friends, shall we?  they should be here any minute now...its thirty minutes after the hour...  keep your eye on who comes along and uprates this idiot...

        •  LOL (0+ / 0-)

          want some cheese with your whine?

          I love the phrase "retaliatory tr'ings" -- that indicates that you troll-rated first, but are your troll ratings valid? Do they comply with the FAQ's that you slavishly fellate? Oh right, the rules of the diary say we can't go there.

          And the entire substance of this diary is Rosen's defense of (1) AIPAC, and (2) Abramoff, who as you point out diverted funds to West Bank settler nutcases, but again, rules of your diary state we can't discuss the very same I/P issues that are the entire substance of your diary.

          I don't have any incentive to defend Rosen at all. If he's unqualified to hold the job, then he shouldn't hold it.  But you really gotta bring more to this than pure ideology, or you are no better than the Rethugs.

          In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

          by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 10:31:13 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  well, dear readers... (0+ / 0-)

      ...i am getting out of here for the evening. would love to play with our little troll a bit more so you can see how they act, but, that will have to wait until next time...

      enjoy the reading...his friends, the third-shift, ought to be clocking in shortly to uprate his comments and troll-rate mine.  it is what they do for a living, afterall...

      night night little troll...hope you find an i/p diary later tonight so you can get some action for your 'condition', your sick little rash...

      •  hehehhe (0+ / 0-)

        You really are coming unglued (actually, that happened 8 comments ago). But hey, AIPAC is tapping your phone, and my Zionist Zealot buddies are controlling the media, so aren't you a little girl-panty-wearing trooper for getting glimmers of the truth here and there!  

        You go tuck yourself in now, and guess what? I was going to say that I'm going to do the same! So wow, great minds think alike.  

        As for sick little rashes, you can have that to fantasize about tonight, if you like.

        In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

        by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 10:42:02 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Permalink | 58 comments