Daily Kos

McConnell: Hagel's Right, I'm Wrong

Sun May 20, 2007 at 07:08:46 PM PDT

Crossposted from UNO Dems

While we were bringing in a Presidential candidate to Omaha, Nebraska, another potential candidate was holding a fundraiser on Friday - Senator Chuck Hagel. Ostensibly for a Senate reelection bid, Hagel brought in some prominent Republicans from around the country, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. McConnell had some interesting comments to the Lincoln Journal Star’s Don Walton:

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell lavished praise Friday on Sen. Chuck Hagel and said many of his warnings about the Iraq war have been validated. "Many of the predictions Chuck Hagel made about the war came true," the Kentucky senator said in a brief interview after his remarks at a fundraising reception. "They have proven to be accurate."

Hagel’s views on the war "have not diminished his effectiveness," McConnell said, and may, in fact, increase his effectiveness over time.

What McConnell fails to acknowledge is that while Hagel was giving those warnings, McConnell was a gung-ho supporter of the war effort. In fact, he still is. It was McConnell who prevented any sort of debate on the escalation in Iraq. It’s been McConnell who has tried to save the White House from embarrassment at the cost of his own party’s electoral success.

Mitch McConnell, October 2002:

   Let me say to my colleagues who suggest that diplomatic initiatives and weapon inspections can prevent the coming conflict with Iraq to look at recent history. Saddam Hussein has violated each and every one of the 16 U.N. Security Council Resolutions pertaining to Iraq. His armed forces continue to fire on American and coalition aircraft in the no-fly zone. Al-Qaida terrorists continue to leave footprints on Iraqi soil. And Saddam Hussein and his henchmen continue to make billions of dollars by exploiting the U.N.’s oil for food program and through other illicit activities.

   Although the regime recently proved that it can fool some embarrassingly naive visiting American lawmakers into believing its empty assurances of cooperation and compliance, they are not duping this Senator–or the President.

   More importantly, the American people will not follow the lead of these modern-day Neville Chamberlains and allow the United States to be played for a fool. For it is only a fool who does not learn from past mistakes, and the world has ten years of Iraqi lies from which to learn. Speaking before the United Nations General Assembly a day after the anniversary of the September 11th attacks, President Bush challenged the United Nations to maintain its relevancy in a world challenged by terror:

   Iraq has answered a decade of U.N. demands with a decade of defiance. . . . [America] will work with the U.N. Security Council to meet our common challenge. If Iraq’s regime defies us again, the world must move deliberately, decisively to hold Iraq to account. We will work with the U.N. Security Council for the necessary resolutions.

   The fact is that President Bush is giving the United Nations and the international community a final chance to disarm Saddam Hussein through diplomatic means. But under no illusions of Saddam Hussein’s violent and irrational character, the President has made clear that if reason fails, force will prevail. I am reminded of President Franklin Roosevelt insights into Nazi Germany and Adolph Hitler: "No man can tame a tiger into a kitten by stroking it. There can be no appeasement with ruthlessness. There can be no reasoning with an incendiary bomb."

Ah, the "Hitler" comparison. The last refuge of a man with no reasonable arguments. Many of Hagel’s warnings were correct, but the implication of that remark from McConnell is that he, and the vast majority of Republicans, were and still are completely wrong.

At least they’re ready to finally admit it. But don’t expect them to do anything about it.

Tags: Nebraska, NE-Sen, Chuck Hagel, Kentucky, KY-Sen, Mitch McConnell (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 20 comments

  •  Tips (20+ / 0-)

    Chuck Hagel's dominated my postings over the last several months. I doubt that will change any time soon.

  •  Kinda Hagel was right... (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    sfgb, ek hornbeck, Ky DEM, Persiflage, Mary2002

    but what was I supposed to do?  Oppose the enormously (at the time) popular president?  After all, we wanted the oil ummm...WMDs to be found that everybody except Scott Ritter, et al knew were there.

    McConnell's a hypocrite.  Hagel should be ashamed for appearing on the same stage with him.

    Don't blame me, I support Dennis! http://kucinich.us

    by rjones2818 on Sun May 20, 2007 at 07:04:32 PM PDT

  •  well, it's interesting, (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    willb48

    innit?

  •  There are two things to dislike about McConnell (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Mary2002, Iowa Boy

    HIS FACE!

    The people in this country who can walk and chew gum at the same time know the war in Iraq was foisted upon us with lies and propaganda.  I assume this includes McConnell.

    McConnell, regardless of Bush's lies and inept management of this debacle continues to unconditionally support our Moron-in -Chief and his stubborn refusal to respond to the will of the people.  

    McConnell doesn't care about the men and women fighting and dying in Iraq because he himself is a cowardly pussy who will never have the faintest idea of what these people and their families are enduring.  

    The longer I live, the clearer I perceive how unmatchable a compliment one pays when he says of a man "he has the courage to utter his convictions." Mark Twain

    by Persiflage on Sun May 20, 2007 at 07:16:49 PM PDT

  •  This is what gets to me (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    dirtfarmer, Persiflage, Mary2002

    "No man can tame a tiger into a kitten by stroking it. There can be no appeasement with ruthlessness. There can be no reasoning with an incendiary bomb."

    No one was talking about appeasement. We weren't about to let Saddam off the hook. We were trying to avoid a disastrous war by taking action short of it. There was plenty of room to put him in a cage and never let him go again. It would have taken a few years of concerted effort, but it would have been much less than the invasion and occupation that has since occurred.

    Do Pavlov's dogs chase Schroedinger's cat?

    by corwin on Sun May 20, 2007 at 07:21:35 PM PDT

  •  McConnell. (5+ / 0-)

    A shameless scoundrel then.  A self admitted hypocrite.  And we're supposed to accept his blockage of reasonable attempts to end this mess why?

    I see, rules of law and the Senate.

    Nice if they honored them once in a while.

    Still, their unprincipled conduct is no excuse for our behavior.

    We will prevail anyway.

    I hope this admission gets thrown in his face the next time he is held accountable to his constituents.

  •  WTF does this mean? (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    ptmflbcs, Zapp Branigan

    [...] "Many of the predictions Chuck Hagel made about the war came true," the Kentucky senator said in a brief interview after his remarks at a fundraising reception. "They have proven to be accurate."

    Hagel’s views on the war "have not diminished his effectiveness," McConnell said, and may, in fact, increase his effectiveness over time.

    is he saying that being wrong usually makes for a more effective Senator?

  •  Go Hagel! (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    shpilk, willb48

    Run third party! We'll win bigger than we won in '92.

    Real beauty is seldom appreciated by popular culture

    by Mikesco on Sun May 20, 2007 at 07:31:12 PM PDT

    •  we're gonna win bigger anyway (0+ / 0-)

      we're looking at a historic realignment here

      if the repuglicans impeached george tommorrow, we'd STILL gain at least 5 Senate seats and 20 House seats

      it's gonna be THAT BAD for the repuglicans

      Hagel is welcome to split the 30% of the vote that repuglican candidates are gonna receive

      •  With Hagel running in a 3rd party (0+ / 0-)

        and if he gets any significant numbers, it will suppress dyed in the wool Thugs as well as fundies from going to the polls.

        Democrats should be able to veto proof the House and come damn close in the Senate; at least break 60.

        "You know what the real fight is? The real fight is the definition of what is reality." Bernie Sanders

        by shpilk on Sun May 20, 2007 at 10:31:21 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  He's making noises like he's considering (0+ / 0-)

      doing just that. It's getting traction in the MSM.

      "You know what the real fight is? The real fight is the definition of what is reality." Bernie Sanders

      by shpilk on Sun May 20, 2007 at 10:29:06 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Chuck Hagel: least nonviable Republican for 2008? (0+ / 0-)

     Is Chuck Hagel the least nonviable Republican presidential candidate for 2008? I swear Armando could run against the best the Republicans have to offer and mop the ballot box floor with them. Has the minority party ever just stayed home out of embarrassment before this election?

    "Soon we must all face the choice between what is right and what is easy." - Albus Dumbledore

    by Iowa Boy on Sun May 20, 2007 at 07:52:23 PM PDT

    •  The Federalist Party, 1820 (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      willb48

      Has the minority party ever just stayed home out of embarrassment before this election?

      James Monroe, unopposed in 1820 because the federalist Party was destroyed by a scandal involving treason

      if the repuglican congresscritters don't do something about george soon, the Democratic candidate in 2020 may enjoy the same advantage

      nothing destroys a political party like treason

  •  Subtle message to Bush (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    corwin, Mary2002, willb48

    I think that McConnell is speaking to Bush that the GOP Senate caucus is privately tiring of what is going in Iraq. Maybe I am wrong, but I think that that is what McConnell was trying to say.

    •  Certainly plausible (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      willb48

      Although with Bush, even a blunt "We want this war over so we might have a chance of winning in '08" spoken through a 130 db bullhorn would likely not make it through his thick skull.

      Do Pavlov's dogs chase Schroedinger's cat?

      by corwin on Sun May 20, 2007 at 08:15:05 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Permalink | 20 comments