Daily Kos

Sheryl, Now Wake Up the Dead (Sheryl Crow vs. Karl Rove) update

Mon May 07, 2007 at 02:36:20 PM PDT

First Karl Rove got ugly with Sheryl Crow :

In his attempt to dismiss us [about the environment], Mr. Rove turned to head toward his table, but as soon as he did so, Sheryl reached out to touch his arm. Karl swung around and spat, "Don't touch me." How hardened and removed from reality must a person be to refuse to be touched by Sheryl Crow?

And the media spin afterward blew up in her face...

...to where Crow now wonders:  

I have seen ranting political pundits work their spin before but, like most people, I have always tuned it out until it involved my reputation. It feels pretty scary to watch credible news outlets run with a story that is clearly not true, debate my patriotism over my alleged desire to have toilet paper legislated, and be the joke of late night TV monologues, all as a result of a 2 week old blog and nightly comedy routine that was spun as truth, instead of the joke it clearly was. What terrifies me the most is that we not only accept this of our journalists today but we are oblivious to it, and thus, oblivious to the damage it causes. When "news stories" are broken, do we not expect a certain amount of fact-checking or source-checking?  One has to ask if this falls under the guise of sloppy reporting or deception as a source of spin.

Imagine someone going up to Karl Rove... after the media manipulation, all the lies, the corruption, the bogus war, the torture, the thefts, the utter rape of the planet by the administration he has helped to orchestrate... and saying tenderly:  "uh, Mr. Rove, about the environment...."  Can you imagine any Kossack so demurely attempting the conversation, minus any mention of all the rest?

But Sheryl Crow did just that.  And got the ugliest side of Rove right back in her face followed by an undying mass media echo.

[Update  Because of some of the interminable misunderstandings in comments below, I feel the need to state the obvious:  Sheryl Crow is wearing a new hat as a blogger.  The blog I write about was frontpaged on Huffington Post.

This diary is a critique of her blog, not her environmental work.  I would seek the same in her as anyone else in DKos, wanting good analysis.  In her blog, she writes about a) Karl Rove, and b) the media (eg, spins, distortions).  Even her title tells you what she is doing:  On Deception, Spin, and Losing Our Way.  She is not blogging about the environment.  

In this diary I am making points about her work as a blogger and her anaylsis. I am not in any way treating of her work as an environmentalist. /rant/update]

To me, what is surprising and even ugly is that she was totally surprised.  She has become both GOP scapegoat and an index for us all as to how out-of-touch our fringe media figures just might be.

What disturbs me more is what she does not mention in her blog:  Iraq (at all), Halliburton, Blackstone, Chertoff, Katrina, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, the Patriot Act(s), the Plame outing... where do I start?  Just her own case of media slander, and she’s worried?  

Missed the whole deal with Jeffrey Gannon, did she?

I would tell her that no, one does not have to ask anymore about the media.  The jig's up, as they say, and we know the lies are intentional.  Then I would like to know where she and the rest have been hiding from the news all this time.  

How did Sheryl Crow expect heartfelt conversation from the master of prevaricators?  Or, with all her media pull, how about accepting this moment as her reasonable clue about her part in keeping the public better informed?

She also dealt Rove a hard jab to the ego.  Rove, who is so invested in his self-image as mean, despicable, the king of mendacity...  and we evidently are to understand that she came up to him clueless as to the kind of guy Rove is?  Top that with her ironic astonishment at the disinformation campaign now aimed at her.  Surprised at disinformation after a brush with Karl Rove, is she?  Must have hurt Karl a lot, to know his menacing persona had escaped someone of Crow’s stature?

Your Mission, Sheryl, Should You Accept It:  Wake Up the Dead
What we have in Crow is a portrait of a person with tons of pull in the media who is kind-hearted and earnest in her passion for the environment.  I have no problem with her zeal there.

But she is surprised to learn what a breed of liars have taken over the MSM.  Really?  Who is "removed from reality" here?  I would not pick on Ms. Crow, but instead entreat her to share her rude awakening with her peers among the media.  Study up.  If the carnage of the past six years all slipped by her, then how many more of her pals were too busy at their karma retreats to notice it all?

I almost felt sorry for her, reading her blog, that she even could be so "removed from reality" and thus serve herself up to Rove as such a fine, shining scapegoat supposedly representative of the misinformed evil "left" (Heaven help us).  I played the geek in grade school, and I know the sting of being elected scapegoat.  But unfortunately she is the perfect grist for the Rove mill.  Read her blog:  painfully reminiscent of Jane Fonda in cowboy boots, the kind of "liberal" voice which the hate pundits could easily drag across the lying face of the media in a tirade about sedition.  Crow becomes their perfect scapegoat.  Startled, she writes:  

The planet will live on in whatever state it is in, however, it is humanity that will suffer. And as I sit and wonder, like so many other people in this country, where are the marchers in the streets, where are the voices screaming for injustices to cease, for greed and apathy to let go of it's hold, I can only come up with one supposition: Perhaps we have lost our sense of who we were born to be and instead, are numbed out beyond recognition by the ceaseless chatter that is the soundtrack to our lives.

Ahem.  I would tell her:  Sheryl, we’ve been waiting.  Here at Dkos for one, we’ve been doing your job for you, minding the sober drudgery of the media.  Where have YOU been?  Remember Rather?  Brokaw?  There isn’t anyone covering anything anymore.  It’s netroots or nothing.

Sure, sure, we’re talking about the fringe media here.  I have concern that most of them live their pampered lives in the delectable zones surrounding LA, getting massages, facials, meetings with producers, deal-signings, brainstorming sessions with peers, jam sessions, parties... and live in ignorant bliss on their islands.  It is a wonder that Crow or any others ever did get excited about the environment.

But yet because of my circumstance of being born/raised in south central Montana where the Hollywood fringe took over after Redford’s Horse Whisperer and A Realtor Runs Through It transformed the place into the perfect seasonal hideaway for the great and famous (eg Ted Turner, Bill Gates, Henry Kissinger, Tom Brokaw, Micheal Keaton, More-Movie-Stars-Than-I’m-Going-To-Namedrop), I’ve watched fringe media figures collect in the Livingston area in particular... only to steadily sit on their barstools butt-slapping each other over their latest fishing/outdoor tales, their "how Hollywood came to Livingston" hagiographies dimming in the smoky air among them... never venturing forth to decry the administration’s predations upon the planet with the sole lone exceptions of Walter Kirn and Margot Kidder.  It’s my hometown, I know it well, there are hundreds of people with media pull who do NOTHING about our situation.

How?  Easy.  Don’t watch TV, don’t dig among the netroots communities for information, and cluster among your own quasi-celebrities doing absolutely nothing but perhaps engaging in a little drunken mockery at your favorite watering hole.  I’ve been watching these peripheral media figures do/say NOTHING to educate their broader community or the rest of the US as to what is really going on.

In the patriotic post-9/11 bravura, during the nationally televised patriotic whoop-up of the fourth of July 2002, Sheryl Crow played to the world from the little bandstand at the park in Livingston (population roughly 8,000 not including legions of second home owners).  It is fair to say the community was adversely affected by the real estate deluge that followed.  But such are not the concerns of media figures who "fatten [their] hearts in a day of slaughter."

I say, the blood of the US people be on the media’s collective head for their silence about what has become of our government..

"...all I wanna do is have some fun..."

I would tell her I think those days are over, at least for now.

Tags: MSM, disinformation, scapegoat, Karl Rove, Sheryl Crow, Montana, environment, Iraq War (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 46 comments

  •  Sheryl (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    stonemason

    Sheryl reached out to touch his arm. Karl swung around and spat, "Don't touch me."

    Sheryl messed around with the wrong asshole that night.

    "Some men see things as they are and say 'Why?' I dream things that never were and say, 'I need to quit drinking!'" - Greasy Grant

    by Greasy Grant on Mon May 07, 2007 at 02:31:40 PM PDT

    •  It's the other way around, actually. (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      stonemason, Greasy Grant

      It just exposes Rove for even more sheeple to see the real ugly side of evil!  Cheryl will be fine, once she is over the shock of the schlock that passes for our MSM these days.  

      Any "honest" reactions you can elicit from these criminal traitors that infest our government, like Rove, Bush, Cheney, Rice, etc. is a good thing!!  These cockroaches cannot hide forever.  Theire day is coming, I suspect, sooner than later.  So, keep poking the worms!

      You don't negotiate with fascists, you defeat them in the name of democracy. --Ambr. Joe Wilson

      by FightTheFuture on Mon May 07, 2007 at 04:39:26 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  as Karl's head hits the pillow on the first night (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    stonemason

    of the rest of his life in prison he finds himself confused and wistful as his cellmate, Butch, lullabyes him to sleep with a soulful rendition of You Are My Special Angel.

    Barbara Jordan = the anti Pelosi

    by Ghost of Frank Zappa on Mon May 07, 2007 at 02:35:29 PM PDT

  •  unnecessary roughness, methinks (9+ / 0-)

    I'm happy Sheryl is speaking out now.  I hope she continues to do so.  She was treated badly and undeservedly.  I'm not mad at her because she didn't speak up sooner (do we really know she hasn't?).  I'm just happy she's making her voice heard now, and I'll be grateful for whatever she feels she can do, in her position, to call attention to some of the many things that are wrong with this administration.

  •  I think you're a little hard on Ms Crow (11+ / 0-)

    She's a singer and songwriter who volunteers on progressive causes and with progressive candidates.  She's not a political campaign consultant or a staff person to an elected official.  

    Let's not blame the victim here.  She's a nice person who is trying to help.

    •  I can't (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      khereva, skohayes

      call media figures victims with ease, having grown up in the very community she and the others helped to popularize while giving (in her case) NOTHING back.  The place got used for a backdrop to enhance their fame, and that the great detriment of those who had not the money to play the peripheral Hollywood game.  People born there have literally had to move from the town, the state, for the sheer economic impact of it all.  And the stars?  Not on school boards, not running for office, most having nothing to do with the (poor) community.  Montana hovers around 48-50 on the states' economic index, vying for bottom with Mississippi.  And almost all I see of the new influx is self-absorption.

      I think the fact we're stuck with an emerging fascist state has everything to do with media figures turning their backs for years on end, partying away as I've watched them do over the years.  Credit where credit's due.

      I'll give you that she's at least forming a nascent sense of outrage.  For that she gets a star.  But we need to wake so many more up.

      And it's frustrating for me, being from a VERY small town with sooooooo many celebrities (fondas meg ryan and on and on and on) because I see the way they go about their carefree lives.  I would have to namedrop five hundred words before I could convey to the reader just how swollen the area is with their ranks, while next to none of them lift a voice to preserve the people of our nation.  You would have to just live there and look at it, an image in time beyond the scope of this comment.  But I say, give them a wake-up call.  We need all the awareness we can get.

      •  You caused me to google Ms. Crow & check my (4+ / 0-)

        impressions.  I don't know her and feel rather foolish defending a stranger but her Wikipedia story shows a fair amount of work on behalf of charities and progressive causes.  I don't know where she lives or what she has or hasn't done there.  

        The elite class in every society throughout history has harbored self-absorbed ne'er do wells and we're certainly no exception.  But I don't put her or many other artists I admire in the class of say, George Bush, who was born to money and spent his life doing nothing to help anybody who wasn't blessed with the same circumstances.

  •  Excellent diary. thanks. n/t (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    stonemason
  •  After that incident, and the media fray (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    stonemason, JVolvo

    afterwards-I knew it was classic Rove dirty media tricks. But to jump at her for a touch on the arm-shows how much he's insulated himself from the real world, how touchy Rove is to criticism...Think we can expect more. Especially as the wagons circle Gonzo and come closer to Rove-think you'll see some real nastiness from him. Looks like Keith O. is getting it too. To both of them (Sheryl & Keith)I say-don't worry we're smarter than that.
    We can call a spade a spade.

    Turdblossom is fitting.

    •  it made me (0+ / 0-)

      go a little tinfoil and wonder if it wasn't a set-up for Crow.  Bambi meets Godzilla.

      I looked and could not google a faint memory of her name emerging in the media earlier under some kind of right wing ridicule maybe a couple months ago.  I ignored it at the time, and don't recall what it was about.  But these guys are professional scapegoat hunters, and Crow is just too gullible.

      Karl Rove is way crazy, and dangerous indeed.

      Much as I wish Crow and all would do more, I'm also a little concerned for her being one of the first "sedition" heretics hung out for public ridicule.  That is surely coming for someone.

      •  Nah (1+ / 0-)

        Due to the fact that she's a woman and not even holding a political office-makes Rove beating up on her to the press just an underhanded bully.

        I think she's tougher than that-but caught offguard about how fast and vicious it got. Can't blame her.

        •  yeah but (0+ / 0-)

          she should have showed up informed.  She simply doesn't recognize Rove for who he is and what he has done.  

          Again, I don't want to shame her, but motivate her.  Learn up, would she.

          •  Show up informed? -I don't follow. (0+ / 0-)

            •  if one is invited (0+ / 0-)

              to a dinner where Karl Rove is present, one might want to know who his is, really... and what he has done to manipulate the media.

              •  She is on a global-warming (0+ / 0-)

                tour with Laurie David. She approached him to discuss global warming...    That's when he got snippy with her. Why would she need to have a complete background bio on him to discuss Global warming issues? Still not following what you are trying to say.

                •  because (0+ / 0-)

                  I find her blog to reveal narrowness and arrogance, and if I were her, I would sure want someone to clue me in.

                  You're right in that I need to clarify:  I'm not objecting so much to the original indicident as to her incredibly under-informed, self-focussed blog retelling it all.  I have the identical problems with her citizenship that I have with most in the US.  People just are not digging for information, or paying attention... until it's them doing the hurting.  Just exactly what we have here:

                  I have seen ranting political pundits work their spin before but, like most people, I have always tuned it out until it involved my reputation.

                  She frames up her own issues with Rove without ever grasping the irony of it all... she has brushed up against a consummate spin doctor who has cost over half a million Iraqis their lives thanks to running all things Bush, and all she can do yet is whine about her own reputation?  She dares betray her ignorance in her surprise that the chief spin-master would spin her too?  How does she think Iraqis feel about his spins that have brought about such US public support for their slaughter?

                  I wrote:

                  she should have showed up informed.  She simply doesn't recognize Rove for who he is and what he has done.

                  Well I want everyone to recognize Rove for who he is and what he has done.  And I don't think I'm asking too much.  This is elementary citizenship.

                  She writes:

                  Unfazed, Sheryl abruptly responded, "You can't speak to us like that, you work for us." Karl then quipped, "I don't work for you, I work for the American people." To which Sheryl promptly reminded him, "We are the American people."

                  She sees herself as representing me too with her statement.  

                  I have a problem with celebrities' sense of entitlement, believing their success as entertainers certifies them as spokespeople for the US public.  I don't care how many albums they sell, it's not enough to power oneself on sheer persona.  One needs to know the facts.  You want to represent me?  I require an informed perspective on your part.

                  I see Rove

                  • as the puppeteer with the hand up the back of the presidency.
                  • as the mastermind of dividing/conquering the US public with 'religious right' issues, a man in whom I see no spiritual virtue who uses religion nonetheless for every evil purpose
                  • as the engineer of two fouled elections
                  • as the guardian of the lying atmosphere that drives the carnage in Iraq

                  and much much more.  I would have Crow or anyone else watch the film Bush's Brain.

                  She missed all of that.  She clearly has not been watching Rove or she never would have expected to make straight talk with this king of falsehood.  You don't go up to OJ Simpson for a heart to heart about womens' rights, do you?

                  This diary, really, is more about Karl Rove than Sheryl Crow, and I'm thinking about rewriting it as such.  

                  •  I went back to read your blog again (0+ / 0-)

                    I still don't understand the issues you have with S.Crow. You wrote in the story questions about why does she not mention 911,the Iraq war, abu Ghraib...but I don't think she has to take on all of these cause because "you" think she should as a good Democrat. Gobla issues are her thing-she shouldn't have to prove herself across the board on all of the other issues. I'm sure you yourself may have some subjects which interest you more. She's one person trying to do her part to create change and I'm all for that. Just because of celebrity status does not mean she has to jump through hoops on all these other issues because they are Democratic causes. Wish that you would think about and maybe cut her a little slack.
                    We are all individuals with our own individual brains who do what we can with our abilities.

                    •  why we can't agree (0+ / 0-)

                      is because you don't take my point... I am critiquing her frontpaged blog in the Huffington Post which I found truly ignorant.

                      I am not critiquing her as an environmental activist but as a front page blogger.

                      Because I found the blog one very ignorant rant.  To me it read almost as a joke, because the biggest story untold in the world is how Rove spins everything towards destruction, manipulates the media, kills over half a million people doing so, and all she can lament is her own reputation?  I say that's painfully ignorant of her.

                      I didn't have the least interest in critiquing anything else about Crow.  Only her ignorance of her own predicament in the media, and her incomprehension of what has happened to our nation BECAUSE of the mastermind spinning the media.

                      For that matter, failure for ANYONE in the US to know who Rove is and what he does, is failure to comprehend where we are at as a nation.  I want everyone in the country, and the world, to know who Rove is and what he does.

                      Yes, I'm going to rewrite the diary because, as I said above, this is a response to her blog.

                      And I still don't see how with all the death and destruction caused by Rove, with all the blood on his hands, any writer could not be embarassed to merely complain about a brush with him ruining their own reputation.  That is selfish and ignorant, sorry.

                      •  From her own perspective (0+ / 0-)

                        she is blogging about how the media jumped all over this story to distort it. Had it happened to me- I'm sure I'd be left thinkin' "wtf" too.
                          I think bloggin is about rants too, because it's an expression of your true feelings at that moment.
                        I always read blogs that are rants and some that are informative. Some can be both. It's freedom of expression.

                        I think the blog was an honest effort on her part just to give her side of it-so that it could not further be manipulated.

                        Recall how quickly the media distorted the "1 square per person toilet paper rule". She never said it. That's just one of the things.

                        I'd much rather hear from Sheryl Crow than hear about Paris Hilton. As a Democrat, I choose to support other Dems-not critique. I'm just glad she's promoting global warming.

  •  Oh dear... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    stonemason, JVolvo

    How hardened and removed from reality must a person be to refuse to be touched by Sheryl Crow?

    Has he gone that long without getting any? No wonder he's so F'd up. ;)

    (1) D.I.E.B.O.L.D.: Decisive In Elections By Ousting Liberal Democrats.
    (2) R.A.T.S.: Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Scalia.
    (3) -8.75, -8.10

    by Archangel on Mon May 07, 2007 at 03:58:39 PM PDT

    •  I had trouble (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      khereva

      with that phrase appearing on a site she co-authors.  

      I mean to give her points for her kindness in the environmental campaign, but there are some things wrong here.  If those words don't reek of conceit, I've never seen it.

      •  ding ding (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        stonemason

        And as I said in a previous diary, touching people without their permission isn't done. If it had been Karl grabbing Sheryl by the arm, the entirety of DKos would have been screaming for his head. And I said, and say, that as someone who would clap and dance to hear of Rove's downfall, disgrace, or demise.

        Yes, he's your employee. And bosses don't get to handle their employees. They get sued for that.

        As Arianna Huffington noted, she and her friend went scurrying back to their table immediately to blog on it as soon as it happened-- so the set-up took place on both sides. Sheryl just found out she wasn't dealing with an easy mark. Or at any rate, not as easy a mark as her sympathizers have been.

        Sheryl, if you're going to play in the playground you've chosen, you'd fucking well better get tough and get savvy. Because the people you're picking on, rather than helping with the environment, play for keeps.

        So long as men die, Liberty will never perish. -- Charlie Chaplin, "The Great Dictator"

        by khereva on Mon May 07, 2007 at 04:13:38 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Great diary (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    stonemason

    You hit the nail on the head. So many Hollywood people think that giving money to certain causes or speaking up for such causes gives them a certain type of legitimacy, for which they are treated well, feted at parties,TV appearances, etc.
    It's about time some of these "Hollywood Liberals" woke up to how the rest of us live.
    And honestly, I'm a huge fan of hers, have been one forever, and she could be a great voice for us.
    But she needs to educate herself.

  •  Strange post-Reactionary, concern-troll-like-Why? (0+ / 0-)

    Venceremos! (We shall overcome!)

    by Redfire on Mon May 07, 2007 at 04:22:37 PM PDT

    •  really? (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      TtexwiTyler

      anyone who says this

      where are the marchers in the streets, where are the voices screaming for injustices to cease, for greed and apathy to let go of it's hold

      is not getting enough oxygen.  We're out here.  She's not paying attention.  Because she hasn't noticed until now that the MSM is profoundly diseased, all but dead in the water.  We have public support for Iraq because of it.

      And "know your opponent."  If you get to go to dinner with Karl Rove, know what it means.

      I don't mean to shame her.  Just see her wake up to more responsible handling of her media privilege.

      Because I'm flat afraid for this country, especially because of that great abyss in the Treasury due to this "war."  And the MSM is dead, lying its decaying face off about everything.  How dare those who enrich themselves via the media be too important to notice.  If demanding that more media figures a) become well-informed, and b) use their access to make the public informed makes me a concern troll, then I'll gladly wear the title.

  •  Great diary stonemason (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    stonemason

    Just a little nudge to Sheryl, et.al. that this has been going on for quite awhile. We all know that they were doing what the rest of us do, trying to make a living. But, hey! We noticed.

    Nonetheless, welcome to the real world, one and all. We've been waiting...patiently.

    Common Sense is not Common

    by RustyBrown on Mon May 07, 2007 at 05:14:46 PM PDT

  •  Screwy Diary (0+ / 0-)

    Anyone who wants to spend time criticizing Cheryl Crow in a Diary on Daily Kos ought to get their head examined.

    •  congratulations (0+ / 0-)

      you are the first person I have intentionally troll-rated on DKos.

      •  unwarranted troll rating (0+ / 0-)

        You must apparently have a thin skin.  Your troll of my criticism of your diary is unwarranted.

        So Cheryl Crow, in her own way, wants to participate.  Who are you to criticize her voluntarism?

        Your problem, her problem, my problem...our problem is a biased media.  Perhaps you should be re-adjusting your targeting on that instead of trashing Crow's initiative.

        •  look what you wrote in January (0+ / 0-)

          You troll-rate me because I thought your diary against Cheryl Crow was misguided....then I found what you wrote back in January....

          What does it mean to write here?  I hope more will realize the responsibility and privilege we have here. Because it is now very much under fire. I would counter the gratutitous troll-rating games with this:  our times have changed.  We all take a risk for even writing in a public forum.  More info below.

          I don't know if someone's taken exception to information I share here, or someone else's, but there's a lot of troll-rating going on.  I have seen people molested with troll ratings just because someone differs with an opinion.

          We often do not agree with one another, but my strategy is to lend knowledge in a positive way.  I don't hang out to malign diarists whose work doesn't interest me.  And I can't help wondering about people who have seemingly limitless time to deride diarists with smirks and snark.  Why even be there?  Or who's paying you for your wasted time?

          We are, for the most part, collectively engaged in the task of raising the awareness level of the public.  

          I suggest we all become a little more concerned about the threats to our rights as citizens, and have more respect for others' participation to this forum.

          ....physician, heal thy self....

  •  Troll Rated because I disagree with you.... (0+ / 0-)

    You won't admit that you troll rated me merely because  I disagree with you...

    Moreover, you criticize my comment as "ad hominem" even as you use that and stereotype against Cheryl Crow:

    To me, what is surprising and even ugly is that she was totally surprised.  She has become both GOP scapegoat and an index for us all as to how out-of-touch our fringe media figures just might be.

    Or, with all her media pull, how about accepting this moment as her reasonable clue about her part in keeping the public better informed?

    I have concern that most of them live their pampered lives in the delectable zones surrounding LA, getting massages, facials, meetings with producers, deal-signings, brainstorming sessions with peers, jam sessions, parties... and live in ignorant bliss on their islands.  It is a wonder that Crow or any others ever did get excited about the environment.

    I say again to you, Stonemason, who troll-rates those who disagree with you even as you decry that yourself in prior diaries....physician, heal thy self....

  •  you are intolerant of any criticism (0+ / 0-)

  •  and.. (0+ / 0-)

    ...even as you post diaries decrying "gratuitous troll rating games," you engage that very practice against me merely for criticizing your priorities in your diary on Cheryl Crow.

Permalink | 46 comments