Daily Kos

Honeybee dieoff: Round Species in a square Box

Wed May 09, 2007 at 09:24:14 AM PDT

As anyone knows from watching Winnie the Pooh, Beehives are round. One theory that is going around is that the Langstroth Box commonly used by beekeepers in their Apiaries is essentially counter to this roundness. The box is square. A guy named Rudolf Steiner predicted the demise of bees in boxes long ago, in 1923, and now there is a new generation of beekeepers who are rethinking the whole process. This is just one of the problems with modern industrial beekeping and the agribusiness mega-farm, and there are many serious problems. I've reposted below a wonderful article to read, in its entirety, that lays out many of these problems, and also solutions More below the buzz-line.

This is an article meant for re-distribution. It came to me from the Growers' association where I live.

A Case of Hives
By Jonathan King

The steady om of 30,000 bees filled the air as Chris Harp pried the roof
Off of the Langstroth box in his backyard. Harp used a metal spackling tool To get the frames out of the box; they had been sealed in place with
propolis,the sticky glue bees gather from plants. Worker bees crawled over the frames called "supers" that Harp removed From the hive as he cooed and petted the bees with a bare hand. As bees Poured out of every orifice in the hive and flew in wide chaotic patterns, Harp pointed out the spiraling patterns of eggs in the honeycomb surrounded By chambers filled with pollen that would eventually be used to feed the Brood in the center. The amber honeycomb cast a radiant glow in the afternoon light and the sweet smell of smoldering sumac filled the air as Harp puffed the bellows on the smoker used to calm the bees.

Chris Harp is an organic beekeeper based in New Paltz who lectures to
Raise awareness about a species most people don't know is rapidly
declining: the honeybee. The Langstroth hive is one reason for the
bee's endangerment.

The box hive, introduced over 150 years ago by a Massachusetts minister,
Lorenzo Lorraine Langstroth, has been the industry standard used by
commercial beekeepers since the early 20th century. While it has
optimized the beekeepers' management of the bees, Harp theorized, this hive is one of the principal sources of the species' precipitous decline. "The Langstroth hive, now used in most of the world, took away the bees' circular spirit. And now, as Rudolph Steiner predicted back in 1923, we are in trouble."

Humans have raised bees for over 10,000 years, since the earliest
Recorded civilizations. Beeswax created the first candles. Honey is the
Original sweetener. Bees are responsible for pollinating a high percentage
of plants. In the web of life on earth the honeybee exists somewhere near
The center as it has changed little over hundreds of millions of years.
Bees are an indicator species, much like frogs, for the overall health of
the planet. And the planet, according to Harp, is telling us something is
wrong. "In the last 14 years, the world has lost 80 to 90 percent of
its bees, both domesticated and natural. Bees are responsible for
pollinating up to 80 percent of human food crops."

The European honeybee exists in a self-sustaining and highly complex
socialist matriarchal society. A hive can been seen as a single living
organism and the queen, the workers, and the drones as organs of the
greater whole. A hive is composed of about 95 percent female workers. Born
of fertilized eggs, they are responsible for raising the young, making wax, building the honeycomb, gathering pollen and nectar, making honey,
defending the hive, and general housekeeping. They live about six weeks on
average and longer in the winter, when they cluster in the hive. Workers
are the only type of honeybee that can sting, but because stinging is also a death sentence, they will only do so when threatened.

Drones are male, born of unfertilized eggs, not given a stinger, and
Kept around in meager numbers for one task: to compete to impregnate the
queen on her virgin flight. The queen's virgin flight is the only time in
her life that she mates, although she can lay millions of eggs over the
course of her life. She mates with several drones and keeps all of the
sperm in a pouch for later. The drones who are strong and fast enough to
mate with the powerful queen high up in the air then have their genitalia
ripped off in the sex act and die. Late in fall the number of drones drops from three to five percent of a Hive to zero percent as the workers slaughter all of their brothers to Conserve food for the winter.

The queen is responsible for egg production and does this at the
Prodigious rate of 1,000 to 1,500 a day in her prime. When a hive is left
to its own accord, a queen will live for around four to six years before the hive chooses a successor. Unfortunately, in this age of industrial
apiaries, the queen is often a complete stranger to the hive as new queens
are introduced each year to keep the hive out of sync and prevent swarms. A swarm is a natural event that occurs when a hive has been particularly
successful. When a new queen is prepared to ascend the throne, the older
queen will take an army of about 25,000 bees and set off to find a new home. This amazing migration is commercial apiary's worst nightmare, so to prevent it, new queens are replaced in existing hives. This is good for honey production, but bad for the strength of the species.

So why are honeybees dying? The experts postulate several reasons for
It and yet there is no single answer. Organic beekeeping guru Gunther Hauk, one of the founders of the Pfeiffer Center, a biodynamic farming research center in Chestnut Ridge, Rockland County, said, "I look for the causes why the honeybee is so weak and the immune system is low, why the vitality is low, and it is because we have now for almost 200 years, more and more, been exploiting her shamelessly without looking at her own needs and her own organism."

In the past 20 years it is estimated that the number of honeybee
colonies in the US has shrunk from seven million to around two million.
This is largely attributed to the spread of parasites and diseases. The
varroa mite and the tracheal mite are two pests that have wreaked havoc on
the beekeeping industry, as has the highly contagious bacterium foulbrood.
The varroa mite is about the size of a pinhead and sucks the juice out of
bee larvae. Tracheal mites live in the bees' throats and suffocate them.
And now beekeepers have a brand new pest for which they have no answer yet: the African hive beetle, which showed up in Florida in 1998. In less than six years it has spread to over 38 states and counting, arriving in New York just this past year. Harp was able to show me some dead beetles
scattered across the base of his hive. Organic beekeeping theory holds that the real reason behind the decline of the species is due to the
industrialization of agriculture. As Hauk said, "We have made an industry
out of exploiting the animals. And the industrial paradigm is always you
try to squeeze the last bit out of everything to make it profitable. And so we have changed everything."

Huge commercial apiaries exist in the southern states where bees are
raised for honey and trucked around the country to pollinate megafields of
genetically modified monocultures of crops. In the past, farmers had
diverse fields of crops that they would rotate, and beehives were just
another necessary part of the farm. Now the trucking of bees to
pollinate miles of soybeans or oranges has not only weakened the species,
but also has aided in the rapid spread of mites and, lately, the African
hive beetle.

When asked how industrial farming has affected the honeybee, Hauk said,
"We are taking all the honey, we are feeding them sugar, we are artificially preventing the swarms, we are shipping the bees around from one monoculture to another, from one insecticide and pesticide to another.
Basically, we are the cause. Not only the beekeepers, but the modern
agriculture. We've lost most of the weeds the bees would feed on. We spray
them away. It's the poisons, it's the decrease of clean water and air, all
of that goes into the picture." He continued, "Using all the chemicals is a dead end. Even conventional beekeepers know this. They use one chemical, the mites become resistant, they go to the next chemical that's more powerful."

Robert Mungari, the director of Agriculture and Markets for New York
state, offered a different perspctive. New York state runs a seasonal
Apiary Inspection Program from April through November to monitor the
detection of infectious and contagious honeybee diseases. Mungari said that using chemicals in beekeeping is a relatively new development. "In the fruit and vegetable industry, chemicals have long played an important role in the suppression and management of pests. The beekeepers never had to deal with these issues before, so they had to enter a new realm."

Commenting on the costs associated with pest management, Mungari said,
"Taken in context of the world economics at play here with the price of
honey, the US commercial beekeeper has to ask himself: 'Is this a viable
industry to maintain a presence in when you are competing against honey
from South America, honey from China, honey from Mexico?'"

In addition to the mites killing the honeybees, Mungari said that the
industry is suffering from beekeeper attrition as many aging beekeepers
retire who are not being replaced by new blood. Mungari had no concrete
numbers to share as New York's inspection program is voluntary, he
estimates that in the early '80s New York state had about 120,000 colonies
of bees, which subsequently dropped to about 60,000 colonies in the '90s.
Mungari said that recent data had shown that the number of managed bees is
Starting to recover slightly due to more diligent pest management, but that the feral bee population has been decimated.

When asked how he viewed the role of the migratory commercial Pollination circuit in the rampant spreading of pests, Mungari said, "My Professional opinion is that the migratory commercial beekeepers are far too great of an asset to the agriculture of the state to restrict them or prevent them from coming, in spite of any pest we've had to take."

In 1923, Rudolph Steiner predicted that commercial beekeeping would wipe
out bees within 100 years; depending upon whom you talk to, we may be right on schedule.

If you have any bee questions or want to learn about organic beekeeping,
You can call Chris Harp at (845) 255-6113. The Pfeiffer Center holds
Classes and conferences about organic farming and beekeeping for all ages at Their two-and-a-half acre educational garden. You can learn more about them at www.pfeiffercenter. org or (845) 352-5020

Tags: colony collapse disorder, bees, agriculture (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 22 comments

  •  Tips for organic beekepers n/t (16+ / 0-)

    You can't get away with the crunch, 'cuz the crunch always gives you away

    by dnamj on Wed May 09, 2007 at 09:21:50 AM PDT

  •  native bees (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    bittergirl, Overseas, ilyana, MI Sooner

    I've been hiking up and down the lower-Hudson river valley and NYC in the last month, birdwatching spring migration.

    I have seen good numbers of honeybees, bumblebees, and at least 4 species of solitary bees.

    Natural hives are recovering, artificial hives aren't.

  •  There may be good science behind these theories.. (6+ / 0-)

    ...but if you want it to be recognized as good science you would do better by not quoting Rudolf Steiner.  

    Steiner had numerous unsubstantiated - some downright crackpot - theories about life, death, child development, the natural world, and racial supremacy.  I wouldn't view him as a honeybee expert - even if his prediction seems relevent today.  Hey, even Nostradamus got a few predictions right!  

    •  For those who want to know about Steiner (0+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      john culpepper

      http://en.wikipedia.org/...

      He was a product of his time. A lot of those crackpot ideas seem crazy, even mean-spirited today, and we know them to be wrong. But thinkers in every age are also products of their time, even though the help move the thought process and society forward, and in many cases (including Steiner's founding of biodynamic agriculture) well ahead of their time.

      I don't need to defend Steiner, he's dead and some if his ideas are wrong, others pretty good. I am no expert, either.

      Galileo published astrology, after all. OK, so Galileo is an amazing tower of thought, but I think maybe you see what I mean. It's a signal/noise problem looking at science history.

      You can't get away with the crunch, 'cuz the crunch always gives you away

      by dnamj on Wed May 09, 2007 at 09:53:54 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Thanks for the link (1+ / 0-)

        I've read some about Steiner...though I've never had the fortitude to tackle his actual writings.  

        Much of my knowledge comes from family stories... I had a grandfather in Germany who practiced Anthroposophy (the Steiner religion/world view) starting the in the mid-1940s.  Even at that time, as family legend tells it, his wife and those of his children who were subjected to Waldorf schools viewed much of what they were exposed to as rather fringe.  The funeral service had all the ritual and ceremony of a Catholic service with some naturalistic (almost nature worship) type elements thrown in.  It was all a little surreal to me

        Like with many successful sales pitches, my view is that Steiner starts with some reasonable ideas and goals, but takes some issues to non-logical (and non-demonstrated) conclusions.

  •  My wild honeybees are doing very well, (0+ / 0-)

    thank you very much.  They are working hard every day pollinating my plants and flowers.
    It seems most times Man interferes with Mother Nature, Man ends up the loser.  Don't mess with Mother Nature is a lesson we have not yet learned and maybe no longer have the time left to learn.

    The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all - JFK- 5/18/63-Vanderbilt Univ.

    by oibme on Wed May 09, 2007 at 09:50:31 AM PDT

    •  Yes, and the lesson is painfully clear (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Overseas, oibme

      I think that there is some kind of pathological thought process that allows people to disconnect from their common sense when they try to make money. This is magnified when they form corporations. Some people have the strength and forethought to resist and be conscious of natural processes even in the context of capitalism, others keep drilling for oil.

      You can't get away with the crunch, 'cuz the crunch always gives you away

      by dnamj on Wed May 09, 2007 at 09:55:37 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Do you know what bees I have? (0+ / 0-)

    I have bees in my yard (in southern Wisconsin) that look much like honeybees, maybe with less yellow.  They crawl out of little holes in the ground and never seem to swarm.  We've never had a sting, either.

    Do you know what they are?  Do Mason bees nest in the ground?  (I've heard of putting up little straws in a bundle to encourage them to stay near your trees.)

    We have three apple trees, two cherry trees, and a peach tree, so I'd like to encourage these guys. . .

    Universal Health Care - it's coming, but not soon enough!

    by DrFood on Wed May 09, 2007 at 10:19:22 AM PDT

  •  human dieoff (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    peaceloveandkucinich

    See, the sweet, sticky ontological truth is nature doesn't really give a damn whether our species lives or dies. It is very possible that we are not nearly as essential or significant as we like to believe. Though I imagine if nature had her druthers, she might very well choose to eliminate us like a bad dream and let the honeybees and the ants and the trees and the whales take over.

    http://www.sfgate.com/...

    My Karma just ran over your Dogma

    by FoundingFatherDAR on Wed May 09, 2007 at 10:23:04 AM PDT

  •  This article is full of inaccura (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    badger, dnamj, HiBob

    .. and untestable hypothesis stated as facts. Here is a partial list:

    "The Langstroth hive is one reason for the bee's endangerment."

    Prove it.

    "Bees are an indicator species, much like frogs, for the overall health of the planet."

    What's 'the overall health of the planet?' How do we know this is true?

    "[Swarming] is commercial apiary's worst nightmare"

    No it isn't.

    "[Replacing queens to prevent swarming] is good for honey production, but bad for the strength of the species."

    How do you know?

    (quote) "it is because we have now for almost 200 years, more and more, been exploiting [the bee] shamelessly without looking at her own needs and her own organism."

    This is simply not true, at least with respect to the Langsford hive. The Langsford hive was engineered specifically with the needs of the bee in mind. A hive which was not designed for the needs and organism of the bee would not be as efficient.

    "the trucking of bees to pollinate miles of soybeans or oranges has...weakened the species"

    How? (Other than contributing to the spread of pests, which is separately addressed.)

    "In 1923, Rudolph Steiner predicted that commercial beekeeping would wipe out bees within 100 years; depending upon whom you talk to, we may be right on schedule."

    Baseless speculation. No more credible than quoting Nostradamus.

    •  So how do you explain (0+ / 0-)

      the disappearance of so many of the bees in hives?

      The Justice Department is no longer a credible defender of the rule of law or the Constitution.

      by Overseas on Wed May 09, 2007 at 12:11:04 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Agreed on all points, but right now... (0+ / 0-)

      Everyone is purely speculating. It's a complex problem, and we're merely trying to cast a light into the darkness. There is just not enough evidence to prove any of those things one way or the other right now. Maybe we'll know in a few years. Maybe not.
      Nobody in the article or anywhere else is claiming that there is one right answer here. Nobody is trying to PROVE anything, just take a look at all the possible factors.

      You can't get away with the crunch, 'cuz the crunch always gives you away

      by dnamj on Wed May 09, 2007 at 05:27:31 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Round beehives (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    SarahLee, badger, DrFood

    Before the invention of the Langstroth hive, the most common device used by beekeepers was a round straw basket called a skep. The problem with a round beehive is that the honey can't be removed while keeping the beehive intact. So the beekeepers of old would harvest the hive by killing the bees with honey, then crushing the skep in a vice and collecting the honey that dripped out.

    The Langstroth hive was a huge advance because it was the first hive that allowed keepers to extract the honey without destroying the nest and killing the colony (or driving it away). I just can't see how this isn't better in every way. The tangible advantages go way beyond any demonstrable advantages from enabling the bees' "circular spirit." (Aren't the wild bees that, as you say, are dying off allowed to express themselves circularly? Why aren't they doing better than commercial bees?)

    •  Circular vs rectangular bees (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      DrFood

      The last time I saw a wild beehive it was inside a 2x4 stud wall of an unoccupied house down the road, as rectangular as you can get with studs on two sides, plaster lath on another and wood siding on the other. At least until a bear ripped off the siding to get at the honey.

      I have my fears, but they do not have me - Peter Gabriel

      by badger on Wed May 09, 2007 at 12:32:59 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Maybe a better, and new design, is warranted (0+ / 0-)

      Out of all this colony collapse crisis management, I guess that overall better beekeeping practices will develop. People have been keeping bees for a very long time, and they have been doing agriculture for a very ling time. Still, the industrialization of the past century has brought along some negative consequences (along with way lower prices), and some of them are only now starting to show up, like topsoil erosion, contamination of the food supply with other industrial waste streams, and the disease risk associated with monoculture. I truly appreciate that the article is skewed, and I didn't write it. I think that it's an interesting piece of the puzzle, that's all. There are no easy answers here, and it's clear that something isn't working. Maybe agribusiness didn't cause this, but adaptation is necessary.

      You can't get away with the crunch, 'cuz the crunch always gives you away

      by dnamj on Wed May 09, 2007 at 05:33:55 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  We've weakened system after system with agribiz (0+ / 0-)

        Your reply is very kind in response to the other concepts mentioned.

        However, if you look at what monoculture has done to forest tracts, the giant pig farms, huge swaths of mono-cropping, etc. -- all have huge environmental effects.

        The idea that we can erase the bio-diversity of nature and bear no consequences... really doesn't make sense. The idea that there will be a cost for mono-cropping, whether of crops or bees, does seem natural.

        Be good to each other. It matters.

        by AllisonInSeattle on Thu May 10, 2007 at 10:42:46 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Yes, it all makes sense (0+ / 0-)

          after the fact. I think that agribusiness was a perfectly reasonable experiment to try, but we must recognize failure when we see it.

          You can't get away with the crunch, 'cuz the crunch always gives you away

          by dnamj on Fri May 11, 2007 at 02:11:55 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  My wild bees are being very (0+ / 0-)

    temperature conscious. We had unseasonably warm weather and they were out by the thousands. The Jet Stream moved and now it is quite cool, windy and rainy, and the bees, except for the Bumble, have disappeared again. So now my blueberries are blooming and I hope they get pollinated.
    The Swallows returned here 3 weeks late this year, but they came back. I had been worried.

    The Justice Department is no longer a credible defender of the rule of law or the Constitution.

    by Overseas on Wed May 09, 2007 at 12:09:09 PM PDT

  •  So part of honey is doused with chemicals now? (0+ / 0-)

    That's swell to know. Wonder when they were going to start talking to us about it.

    Be good to each other. It matters.

    by AllisonInSeattle on Thu May 10, 2007 at 10:34:38 PM PDT

  •  I Haven't Seen a Honeybee Since January (0+ / 0-)

    And I was disturbed to see them then! Then the weather cooled off and I haven't seen one since.

    Every day I check the clover patches in my yard and every day I've been disappointed. I miss the bees.

    I'm the person your mother warned you about.

    by Unique Material on Mon May 14, 2007 at 03:56:18 AM PDT

Permalink | 22 comments