According to Michael Moore anyway, but heck--who is he to comment on Dean's Iowa performance? He voted for Nader for crying out loud!
Regardless of what people thought of Michael Moore's recent article it's now been demonstrated that Dean's campaign has not shown itself capable of turning its money, message, and momentum into big primary wins.
Dean should have had this nomination locked up with all those endorsements and individual contributions, but he's far from it. Why? If you ask Clark supporters (especially those of us who used to be for Dean), the answer is simple: Dean isn't the right person to lead America--and the voters and pundits know it.
Of course, Dean could win New Hampshire tomorrow and Clark couldn't even place, and I could be eating my words. But as of now, my gut tells me Clark will be in the top three, and when you consider the three regional candidates in this year's NH race, that ain't bad--especially if you want the big winner on Feb. 3rd to be someone who opposed the Iraq invasion.
Just another $.02 thrown into the Kossack fountain...