Daily Kos

IL-14: Stein(D) – “Pollute Less? Pay Less.”

Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:17:45 AM PDT

"If we don’t fix global warming now, there may not be any America as we know it left.  There may not be hospitable places left for our children and our grandchildren to live." – Jotham Stein (D-IL).

Americans have come to the consensus that pollution is the cause of global warming. Such changes to our atmosphere will be catastrophic if we do nothing about them. Rising temperatures cause ice caps in the Arctic to melt making sea levels rise and strengthening the size of hurricanes. At its worst, global warming could eventually lead to drought, flooding, famine, mass migration and eventually war. I don’t know about you, but that’s not exactly how I’d imagined living out my retirement.

Politicians in D.C. seem to have caught on to the fact that Americans are aware of what’s happening to our environment and what’s causing it. They’ve met our concern and awareness with a lot of talk, but very little action. Jotham Stein wants to change that and as the next congressman of Illinois’ 14th district, he will. To see how, join me below the fold.

Jotham Stein is a business and employment attorney from St. Charles, IL who negotiates fast-paced business deals for high-tech industries. He is running for the U.S. Congress in the 14th district of Illinois, the seat currently occupied by former Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert. He will face possibly four challengers in the Democratic primary next February. Jotham believes that global warming presents our nation with an opportunity to regain our moral authority in the world while creating jobs, ending our oil addiction and cleaning up our environment. Jotham Stein has a 10-point plan to stop global warming and one of his priorities is to make it easier for people to buy fuel-efficient vehicles:

The prices consumers pay for gas guzzling cars do not reflect the extra damage these high pollution vehicles are doing to our air, to our climate and to our children’s lives. It’s only fair that if people damage something, they should pay to clean it up."

On the other hand, people who drive low polluting cars pay too much because low polluting cars cause much less damage compared to gas guzzlers. We all benefit from the less-than-average damage, but the value of the benefit is not reflected in lower sticker prices.

Jotham’s Vehicle Tax & Rebate Plan will add a "gas-guzzling tax" onto vehicles that get low-mileage. The tax will not go to the government. The tax will instead be used to reward people who buy climate-friendly vehicles with a rebate. But how will this plan help stop global warming?

• Right now, buying a hybrid car, for example, is more expensive than buying a traditional car because the technology is new. A rebate on these cars would make them more affordable. As more people buy them, the manufacturers will increase production and design new models, causing the price to go down without the help of a rebate.
• The higher price tag on gas guzzlers will compel more Americans to opt for a climate friendly car and the auto industry will have an incentive to increase fuel-efficiency in large cars and SUVs to maintain sales of popular models.
• America will set an example for the world to follow, especially countries with a lot of pollution like China and India. In order to compete with our economy, they will have to follow our lead.

In the past few years, the auto industry has made baby-steps towards higher fuel-efficiency in new vehicles, but progress is slow and the clock is ticking. Jotham Stein believes the U.S. can lead the fight against global warming and strengthen the economy in the process, and a vehicle tax and rebate plan is just one step in making our environment safe for future generations. Jotham has a 10-point plan to stop global warming and create jobs in America which you can read at his website. You can also find his positions on immediately bringing our troops home and guaranteeing health care and nourishment for every American child.

If you live in or nearby IL-14 and would like to join Jotham and his family at their BBQ for Democracy, email Andrew@votestein.com for time and directions.

Tags: 2008 Elections, IL-14, Jotham Stein, Dennis Hastert, Environment, global warming, House (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 28 comments

  •  Tips for Less Pollution! (8+ / 0-)

    Take a look at Jotham Stein's website. He's a got a ton of great ideas to take to Washington with him in 2009.

    At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollup, you c*nt. - Sen. John McCain

    by Potus2020 on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:18:41 AM PDT

  •  I like the plan (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    aimeeinkc, Potus2020, Randall Sherman

    I like that it keeps the money in a closed system.

    Is Laesch going to run against Hastert again, too?

    "A problem facing any American is a problem facing all Americans." Obama

    by otto on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:21:01 AM PDT

  •  Don't see it. (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    musing85, aimeeinkc, Potus2020

    Jotham’s Vehicle Tax & Rebate Plan will add a "gas-guzzling tax" onto vehicles that get low-mileage. The tax will not go to the government. The tax will instead be used to reward people who buy climate-friendly vehicles with a rebate. But how will this plan help stop global warming?

    Well as someone going to college, I can't exactly afford the most fuel efficient car in the world. Now your telling me this guy wants to add a tax on me for that?

    I don't really see how this endorsement would help him.

    Truth will often set you free, remember though. Freedom is never free, and the costs are often steep depending on the truth.

    by ThinkingAmerican on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:21:19 AM PDT

    •  I'm a college student too. (0+ / 0-)

      As a college student are you planning on buying a brand new car? And if so, were you going to buy a gas guzzling SUV?

      If you're a college student who can afford a brand new SUV, I bet you could afford the tax too. On the other hand, if you're looking into buying a new hybrid, Jotham's plan will save YOU money.

      At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollup, you c*nt. - Sen. John McCain

      by Potus2020 on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:34:27 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  What I can afford. (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Potus2020

        Is not a hybrid, I live in a rural state and hybrids are not as common as you'd think. I will probably end up with a car made ten years ago, and not very fuel efficient.

        Truth will often set you free, remember though. Freedom is never free, and the costs are often steep depending on the truth.

        by ThinkingAmerican on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:37:12 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I believe (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          otto

          the tax AND the rebate will apply to new cars only.

          If you got a brand new Hummer or a brand new Suburban or a brand new Jeep Grand Cherokee, you'll pay extra.

          If you got say a brand new Honda Civic or a brand new Toyota Prius Hybrid, you'd get a rebate.

          If you buy a used car, you won't be affected.

          At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollup, you c*nt. - Sen. John McCain

          by Potus2020 on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:42:33 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Look. (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Potus2020

            I love the idea of tax breaks, trust me I jump for joy whenever their proposed. I figure the government can spend millions of a bridge for 30 people in Alaska, then they can have less of my money.

            That being said.

            You have to make it economically healthy for the Auto makers to want to make hybrids, capitalism works far better then any government program.

            What I would like to see is a sit down between the government, unions, and major automakers so they can hammer out a series of tax breaks that would be most effective for both.

            Truth will often set you free, remember though. Freedom is never free, and the costs are often steep depending on the truth.

            by ThinkingAmerican on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:47:56 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Well, I'll have to disagree (0+ / 0-)

              The problem with conservatism is that it's based on the premise that government can not be used as a tool for us to move our nation forward. As a result we've seen major incompetence from D.C. -- think Katrina.

              Jotham Stein's plan is simple. If you buy a Hummer, you pay a pollution tax. If you buy a fuel efficient car (not necessarily a hybrid) you get a tax break.

              This will encourage people to buy the fuel-efficient cars and encourage auto makers to make gas guzzlers fuel efficient so they can keep selling them.

              Now if you have a problem with government programs, I don't think you're going to like any Democratic candidate running for any office. Chances are there will be a government plan or two in their platforms.

              At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollup, you c*nt. - Sen. John McCain

              by Potus2020 on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 10:01:14 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  Consider it this way. (1+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                Potus2020

                I like a small, lean, government. Under the President we've seen the Federal Government gone wild, and this worries me.

                I don't want the government turning into a fifty-foot leviathan, I'm with the founders on this issue. They distrusted government, and for good reason.

                Now as long as the government can learn a semblance of fiscal responsibility, and can be clear as to what the purpose of the program is.

                I would be less hostile.

                As for Democratic candidates, I like Obama because of his JFK sounding foreign policy, and general fact the man is an orator.

                I'm not sure if he said something about changing affirmative action or not, I will have to look that up.

                That being said, if the government could trim it's belt, I might be more receptive to some programs.

                Truth will often set you free, remember though. Freedom is never free, and the costs are often steep depending on the truth.

                by ThinkingAmerican on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 10:06:13 AM PDT

                [ Parent ]

                •  Nobody likes waste and fraud (0+ / 0-)

                  And you're right, the Bush Republicans have grown the size of the government and the size of our deficit to epic proportions. It has to stop.

                  That being said, keep in mind that the gas-guzzler tax doesn't go to the government. They don't get to spend it. The tax goes directly to the rebates. There's no growing the government involved.

                  Eventually, auto makers will improve the efficiency of their vehicles and the need for the tax as well as the rebate will be eliminated.

                  At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollup, you c*nt. - Sen. John McCain

                  by Potus2020 on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 10:12:58 AM PDT

                  [ Parent ]

                  •  Perhaps. (1+ / 0-)

                    Recommended by:
                    Potus2020

                    Then again it's not really average joe blow buying SUV's. Still I would like to know how much this tax would be exactly.

                    Truth will often set you free, remember though. Freedom is never free, and the costs are often steep depending on the truth.

                    by ThinkingAmerican on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 10:18:42 AM PDT

                    [ Parent ]

                    •  You should check out Jotham's website (0+ / 0-)

                      I don't know if there are any specific numbers, but you'll get a more in-depth explanation of how the plan works and some other ideas he has for fighting global warming.

                      At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollup, you c*nt. - Sen. John McCain

                      by Potus2020 on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 10:23:34 AM PDT

                      [ Parent ]

  •  A bad program to run on (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    aimeeinkc

    in this district. And, frankly, a bad plan anywhere. Yes, we need to move away from the SUV craze (although I should point out that my mother drives a small one, which actually does get decent mileage, because it's easier for her to get into and out of, and to carry groceries and other things. Given that her mobility isn't quite what it used to be, I can't really find it in me to suggest she should have to pay higher taxes because someone else thinks she should have chosen a different vehicle.

    Moreover, it's going to be hard for consumers to choose better options until the auto makers start building them. Hybrids are not only expensive, they're not exactly growing on trees--and most of them are not made in this country--which means they have a very expensive carbon debt attached to them for getting them here from Asia.

    This is a simplistic solution for a very complex problem, and I would strongly recommend Mr. Stein refine it further--a lot--before going public with it.

  •  Group Homes / Foster Families (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Potus2020

    Of course I like the idea but what about the people who have to buy less fuel-efficient cars - people that run group homes or larger families who are foster parents?  They have to buy the larger van just to cart everyone around.  They shouldn't be penalized because they are providing a service to their community.

    Now if you taxed Hummers that have W stickers on them - well now I am on board completely.

    Cheers!

    John McCain doesn't want healthy children.

    by aimeeinkc on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:29:21 AM PDT

  •  Any taxes related to pollution (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Potus2020

    should be tied to actual gasoline usage. My husband and I share a car, I drive him to the train in the morning and then go another mile to my own job. Normally, we use less than 10 gallons per week combined. Just like the cost of operating the train is included in his ticket, the cost of dealing with pollution should be a tax per gallon of gasoline used.

    My opinion, fwiw.

    People with hatred in their hearts never live up to their full potential. It's very sad.

    by Nelsons on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:37:21 AM PDT

    •  So a gasoline tax? (0+ / 0-)

      An increase in the gas tax is something to consider. Jotham's plan will encourage people to buy fuel-efficient vehicles and encourage the auto industry to make gas-guzzlers more climate friendly.

      Plus if you and your husband share a climate friendly car, you'll get a rebate! :)

      At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollup, you c*nt. - Sen. John McCain

      by Potus2020 on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:45:20 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Pay-as-you-drive insurance. nt (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Potus2020

Permalink | 28 comments