Daily Kos

Sympathy for the Jailbait  (w/poll)

Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 03:14:02 PM PDT

Virtually everybody in the virtual world has been enjoying a vast collective orgasm of schadenfreude at Paris Hilton's tearful court appearance and subsequent return to the County Jail. I know it's hard to have sympathy for someone like Paris, a twit whose twat makes so many public appearances that it has its own hairdresser. I think she should serve out her time in a jail cell, not in her living room. But I do have sympathy in the most visceral way for anyone who spent even one day in any kind of involuntary confinement by the state--I've been in jail--have you?

Yes, I've been in jail--twice, as a matter of fact. No, I am not a convicted felon. Nor was I arrested during a protest agitating for a noble cause. Traffic violations were my downfall. The first time I was arrested for reckless driving. I was twenty years old. An undiagnosed Manic Depressive, I often self medicated myself by driving very fast. There's nothing like a shot of adrenlin that comes from putting yourself in a situation in which the wrong twitch could kill you. I don't have those kind of reflexes anymore, and besides, I'm on meds, so the world is a safer place. In this particular case, I was doing 110 miles an hour when I went through an intersection of two major avenues, past three cops pulled up in the parking lot of the corner gas station. I knew I couldn't outrun the police radio, so I pulled over as soon as was feasible at that speed, and surrendered, with my hands up. I got to wear handcuffs.

I spent the night in the drunk tank of the old city jail, at the time a completely unmodernized facility dating from the 1930s. I never drank when I drove like that, so I was the only sober person in the cage--and the drunk tank was a literal cage, steel bars on all sides with walking space between the bars and the walls, hard smooth benches probably made of concrete of some sort, and an exposed, dirty toilet like a throne at the back. I had plenty of company, all in various stages of intoxication, but all were reasonably kind to the first timer, considering the circumstance.

That remains, nevertheless, one of the most memorably unpleasant nights of my life. As well it should be. I had to call my dad--much scarier than getting arrested in the first place--and he came downtown to the jail and put down several hundred dollars in cash (The sheriff doesn't take checks.) to bail my sorry ass out of the slammer. The ride home was far worse than the ride downtown in the back of the police car. When I had my court appearance, my dad's lawyer got three or four charges reduced to one, for that I paid a fine of 50 dollars, plus points against my driver's license, and I was very, very grateful that I didn't get what I deserved.

The second time I was arrested on a bench warrant for a speeding ticket I got while riding a friend's motorcycle which I had honestly completely forgotten about. I was in my late twenties. I spent one day and one night in another city's jail, and two days and one night in the county jail. I won't go into great detail on this one, but the kicker is that had I pled guilty on the speeding ticket, at my turn in front of the traffic judge during the afternoon cattle call, he would have ordered me released, and I would have spent even one night in jail. But, I didn't know that, I didn't remember the ticket, pled not guilty, and thus was held until bail was posted.

This jail was more modern, so there weren't any bars like there are in the tv shows, just sliding doors a couple of inches thick, with little peek-a-boo squares of glass imbedded with wire mesh. That night at the city jail I had the singing, raving, and wailing of some Hispanic gentlemen in the cell to the right to entertain me, when I tired of reading the King James Bible thoughtfully provided by the Gideons.

I spent a good deal of time in holding cells. In one I had for company a rather distracted young man wearing nothing but a hospital gown, the kind that ties at the back, and sporting various bruises. For the ride from the city jail to the county jail, I was cuffed right hand to right hand to another man. The bus was just like in the movies. The holding tank at the county jail was SRO, and that was the stop on the intenerary that I like least. The body cavity search wasn't much fun, for me, anyway. Clothes, wallet, and whatnot were stored away, and I got to wear the pajamas and sneakers--just like on tv.

I could go on, but I won't. I was very, very, very grateful when a friend (bless her heart) had mercy on me, and posted my bail. The speeding ticket was dismissed because the traffic cop didn't show up for the court date. But you'll never know what it's like to breath free air until you've been locked up in a cage under the thumb of the Man, even for a few days. So have a dab, a smidgen, a microdot of sympathy for the jailbait.

Poll

Ever been in jail?

20%3 votes
26%4 votes
6%1 votes
20%3 votes
6%1 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
6%1 votes
0%0 votes
6%1 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
6%1 votes

| 15 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Paris Hilton, jail, crime, sentencing, arrest warrant, police (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 18 comments

  •  while your attempt at alliteration might (6+ / 0-)

    amuse some, please consider editting your diary - it is unnecessary and cruel.  no woman shouldendure this type of offensive comment.

    it really undermines your diary... and certainly does NOT show the empathy i think you were trying to convey.

    •  Edrie.... (0+ / 0-)

      how about an 'editt' of your own.
      MrM/sfe

    •  There are many, many (0+ / 0-)

      slang words that refer to the vagina, not to mention the patch of fur that covers it, and I have to say that twat is probably the least offensive I can think of, besides going with twit the way tock goes with tick.

      Mrs. Dr. Omed read and passed it before I posted it, and I would have removed it if she pointed it out as offensive.

      Because I know who's the boss of me, you betcha.

      •  i have no problem with the word... just that (2+ / 0-)

        the use of the phrase is patently unfair to a young woman who had her private life put (WITHOUT her permission) on the web.

        the degradation of women by many - those who berate her, belittle her, ridicule her are all attacking a young person about whom they know absolutely nothing except what the pruient media portrays.

        that is why i object to the use of your phraseology - you are implying that she condoned and approved of the use of the video made without her knowledge.

        the exploitation of ANY woman is offensive but to insinuate that she was a willing participant, as your phrase does, is inappropriate.

        your phrase implies she is a porn star who sells sex - not a young woman who is "packaged" by the media and hollywood to be a symbol of the rich and famous.  i've watched (on the rare occassion) her show, the simple life - it is not about sex - it is not about her "grooming" habits - her "brand" is a young rich girl who lives in the stratosphere far beyond the mere mortals that are the rest of us - and that is what landed her in the trouble she is now in - she bought her own packaging.

        please rethink the implication of your statement.  that people on the interrnet found "amusement" in seeing the privacy of an individual violated and packaged and sold without that individual's permission doesn NOT mean that person is worthy of derision.

        •  I find pornography not (0+ / 0-)

          so much offensive as uninteresting. The women who participate in it are generally exploited in ways that are downright evil. I'm not an expert on Paris Hilton, but she seems to have been, until her current Golgatha, quite willing and happy to exploit her exploitation. As you point out, she bought her own packaging.

          However, I was not refering to the infamous viral video that launched Paris Hilton as a celebrity. I was referring to her habit of wearing short skirts and no panties. I know this because I wrote a letter to Senator Inhofe ccing Senator Coburn (The Solons of my unfortunate state) on the subject of something I referred to as the "Paris Hilton Tax Relief Act." I did an image search on Paris looking for a suitable illustration for the letter to the Senators, and I found a plethora of pics in which she is flashing her blond you-know-what for the cameras, usually while getting out of a car. She usually has her down market Mona Lisa smile on her face whilst she was striking the pose, so I conclude it wasn't just that she forgot to put her panties on, or left them somewhere.

          •  thanks for the explanation (2+ / 0-)

            i understand your reasoning better now, but i am still uncomfortable with simply defining ANY woman by her genital area even if she is a victim of that exploitation herself by herself.

            men are rarely referred to in similar tone - this seems to be a peculiarly degrading technique for the female of the species.

            the objectifying of women (by both men AND women) is returning in this society (if, indeed,it ever left) and that saddens me greatly having seen the beginning of change during the 60's.

            i never in my wildest imagination realized that those changes were so tenuous and could so easily be thrown away - much of the throwing done by women!

            thanks again for the explanation, but i am still very uncomfortable with the phrase.  hope this post explains why.

            •  You're welcome. (0+ / 0-)

              I'm all about dialogue (except when I'm not). This particular linguistic territory is rife with pitfalls, boobytraps, and one can get lost in no man's land, particularly if one is male. However, my general attitude towards language is if I can't use it, what good is it? From slang to cant to high falutin' big ass words, I will use any word that seems germane or pertinant to the matter at hand. This gets me in trouble sometimes, and sometimes offends people more than I want to offend them.

              William Gass has some interesting things to say about 'blue' language; I'll have to paraphrase because I don't have the book to hand, but Gass says that there are a number of problems with dirty words--for one thing they are most often employed by louts and cretins; for another, nobody loves them enough; and third, there aren't nearly enough of them. He also says that we must give up the blue things of the world for the words that say them.

              If I may give a second hand testimonial for myself, Mrs. Dr. Omed says I am unusual in that, unlike most men, I actually like women. She's making me write atheist feminist liturgy as penance for my other sins of maleness.

              •  Here's a quote from William Gass: (0+ / 0-)

                "It is not simple, not a matter for amateurs, making sentences sexual; it is not easy to structure the consciousness of the reader with the real thing, to use one wonder to speak of another, until in the place of the voyeur who reads we have fashioned the reader who sings... the secret lies in seeing sentences as containers of consciousness.  Fiction becomes visual by becoming verbal.  The camera understands its enemy, and shuts its eye.

                There’s one body only whose request for your caresses is not vulgar, is not unchaste, untoward, or impolite: The body of your work itself; for you must remember that your intentions will not merely celebrate a beauty but create one; that yours is a love that brings its own birth with it, just as Plato has declared, and that you should therefore give up the blue things of this world in favor of the words which say them."

                William Gass, On Being Blue

  •  I feel sorry (2+ / 0-)

    Yes, I do feel sorry for Paris Hilton, and I am not even sure who or what she is. I do not understand why she is a celebrity. What has she done that anyone would notice?
      She must be a wilful, arrogant, spoiled brat.
    I doubt that she belong in jail. A swiss clinic for treatment of emotional cases might be the right place for this woman, or that residential psychiatric clinic in Massachusetts, Austen Riggs, a fine treatment center, put her there Mom and Dad and see if she can be coached into growing up. Her parents obviously have not got the job done.
       Good luck to all.
    MrM/sfe

  •  Complicity (3+ / 0-)

    I wonder, for the first time - as I have generally viewed all of her antics, as well as her peers, with disgust - if we are not also complicit in who and what she has become. Certainly, we're not responsible for the bulk of it, whether it was nature or nurture that led her to become the woman she is, but we - collectively - paid her the attention that fueled her "development", and imitated her and googled her and talked about her and fantasized about her and gossiped about her and told each other nasty, disapproving stories about her. Even now, especially now, we can't look away, we can't BEAR to look away, as she suffers her legal indignities. Even NPR was talking about her Thursday and Friday this week.

    I'm not arguing for approval. I'm not arguing for sympathy. But if we as a society can't give our attention to the things that matter (see The Assault on Reason...?) but have to turn to the next tawdry opiate of the week... who can be surprised?

    I've done my turn in jail, as well. More than a handful of days. You can count the time in months. So I have a general empathy for the conditions she's experiencing, but I wouldn't call it sympathy...

    -6.63,-5.90 | What kind of world are you leaving your children? You might be reborn as your children's children.

    by partikl on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 04:07:07 PM PDT

  •  I didn't feel sorry for her until they (4+ / 0-)

    let her out on home detention. When they took her back I did and do feel sorry. Its just wrong to use any person as a political pawn. After all she is a human being and has feelings too.

    "Though the Mills of the Gods grind slowly,Yet they grind exceeding small."

    by Owllwoman on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 04:07:09 PM PDT

  •  she's symbolic of our ills (2+ / 0-)

    and that's enough for some people to rejoice at her comeuppance.  We wouldn't be liberals if we didn't have compassion -- whether built on experience or imagination (although I have a feeling her jail experience differs slightly in the details, the humiliation is probably still a factor).

    But we live in an age where we are unlistened too, whether by senator, representative, president, corporate master, health insurance, mortgage broker, school board, etc.  We have little say and lots of work to do to keep solvent in our single parent or two working parent households, bombarded by senseless and manipulated media tidbits about the war we turn to crap, the easy stuff, like why would a beautiful, rich person like ___ (whoever) drown themselves in alcohol or flash their crotch in public or waste to emaciation for the cameras?

    A rich young woman like Hilton comes along, one that symbolizes the expanding class division in this country, and it doesn't matter that she has a mental illness or leprosy or some god awful disease that may be real and may actually prevent her from serving time, we want to see the bitch and all her vacuousness thrown in the clink.  We want to see her make a fool of herself.  We want that satisfaction of knowing that even if the world as we knew it, the country as we knew it, is heading to hell in a greased handbasket, that rich girl is a loser for however small a time.

    I admit to some sort of satisfaction cozying up to my compassion on this one.

    NetrootNews coming soon!

    by ksh01 on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 04:25:11 PM PDT

  •  I spent a night in the pokey (0+ / 0-)

    "Disturbing the Peace"   (my 25th birthday party was a loud one and I got mouthy with the cops...apparently they don't like that.)

    By Paris's reaction you'd think she was facing 45 YEARS rather than a few weeks.

    -------------------------------------------------------
    Take your protein pills and put your helmet on

    by SFOrange on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 05:43:39 PM PDT

Permalink | 18 comments