Daily Kos

Secret Service to Hire 103 New Agents To Protect Bush

Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 11:18:06 AM PDT

If this doesn't fall into the "I am not surprised" category, then nothing does.........

The Secret Service, charged with protecting presidents and their families, ex-presidents and their families, as well as candidates running for the office and their families, are also responsible for other areas of our nation's security, like anti-counterfeiting efforts.

The Secret Service is now a part of the Department of Homeland Security, so its departmental efforts have been linked to all of the other agencies under the DHS umbrella.

More on this, after the fold....

In a fairly graphic representation of the national and international loathing most people (sans those 25% of unshakable authoritarian fascists, ultra-wealthy, and die-hard Repuglians) have for the Bush cabal, not only is Bush planning on hiring 103 new Secret Service agents to protect him, but over the last six years Bush has nearly doubled the amount (from 26 to 54) the amount of people in his junta who qualify for SS protection!

This looks like a sign a desperation and fear to me. These people know that there is deep seated animosity, if not hate, on the part of tens of millions in this nation towards their administration. Add in the billions in other parts of the world, and one has to wonder if 103 new SS agents, or even dozens of fully armored military regiments, would be enough.

What a sad commentary on the state of our nation on its birthday. We have a government so corrupt, so craven, and so evil, that they feel the need to pull out all the stops to protect themselves from the very people they are supposed to be serving. Of course, it's always been so with this bunch. Look at Bush and Cheney's refusal to speak in front of anything but hand-picked and fully screened crowds. Hell, they won't even allow protesters, or those publicly expressing contrary views, within a half-mile of their events. This is democracy?

Even when speaking to the media, they fully control the process. When was the last time Dick made the rounds of all the networks? Remember when our politicians used to do this? They used to give every major network some time, on a regular basis. But now, Bush and Dick almost always, when not speaking in front of some right-wing neocon group like the fascist AEI, go to FOX to spread their lies and propaganda. And worse yet, they order their minions to do the same. FOX ='s Pravda. Bush Regime ='s fascism. The sky is blue.

Back to the Secret Service, their budget requests are nearly doubling as well. It takes a lot of money to protect criminals like those occupying our White House right now. Of course, they lay part of the blame for their 100 million dollar budget requests, on the many presidential candidates now running, and the need to provide them protection, yet only HRC and Sen. Obama are receiving protection.

In the past, people like Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz received SS protection too. Can't have the architects of the illegal Iraq invasion and occupation left unprotected can we? After all, one of the relatives of the over half-million (est.) Iraqis killed thus far, might want to come after them for a little revenge. And any bets that Joe LIEberman is also receiving "protection" from the SS? Can't have Bush's best traitor/propagandist feeling any angst now, can we?

As far as the 103 new agents being hired to protect Bush, do you realize the cost for this? I would wager to say that it will cost more to protect Bush after he's out of office, than any other two or three ex-presidents combined. 103!! Bush must be one scared little puppy.

It really might be best for him to go to Paraguay, but his staff are saying that he plans on being a "very active ex-president", and "will be regularly attending various functions around the country, after he leaves office". Oh really? What group of forking idiots would want Bush to attend their gathering? What would he lend to the event? This will be very telling...

Now the big question is, how many agents are they planning on hiring to protect Dick? 200? 300? The entire U.S. Army?

I think the Dems need to pass a law pulling any and all SS protection for anyone who is impeached or convicted of a crime,... and then convict and impeach the bastards!

Link to McClatchy article referenced above: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/...

**Edited to remove inflammatory sentence.

Poll

Do you think Bush and Dick should receive Secret Service protection once they leave, and/or, are removed from office?

16%14 votes
1%1 votes
9%8 votes
23%20 votes
14%12 votes
34%29 votes

| 84 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Secret Service, DHS, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, criminals, fascism (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 30 comments

  •  Who are the other (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Hornito

    56 getting this protection?

    "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." ~ Diderot

    by Bouwerie Boy on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 11:22:11 AM PDT

    •  Mentioned in the article, are... (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Bouwerie Boy

      the usual group, but they've added the "chief of staff (for the V.P. too?), and various "national security advisers".

      I would imagine who is protected, is a closely held secret, as it should be, for security reasons.

      ..better that money be spent in the U.S. building windmills than squandered in the ME for Bush-McCain to tilt at them. -andydoubtless

      by Hornito on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 11:34:29 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Yes they should get SS coverage but with dickie (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Hornito

    Boy and his errant targetting, chimpie must be extra careful.

  •  honestly, this doesn't bother me (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    FriendlyNeighbor

    The world is a more dangerous place and I do not want anyone in our government to lose his or her life because people in the US have become terrorist targets.  No, this is not only because of what Bush has done or a grab at an imperial presidency.  Like we need more police, we need more Secret Service working to protect people.  

    •  Even if they are impeached, and/or convicted of (0+ / 0-)

      crimes? If so, we disagree.

      ..better that money be spent in the U.S. building windmills than squandered in the ME for Bush-McCain to tilt at them. -andydoubtless

      by Hornito on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 11:36:22 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  no (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Hornito, FriendlyNeighbor

        But people serving in the government should be able to go about their lives without worrying about their personal safety.  That is all I am saying.

        •  I agree, but criminals should receive no.... (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          david78209

          protection. As far as I am concerned, they forfeited their right to that protection, when they lied this nation into an illegal war, not to mention all the other crimes they have committed.

          That said, we cannot become a country of anarchy or lawless retribution. To do so, would greatly take away from our democracy.

          Though I, at times, would love to see these people strung up in the courtyard, I know the better way would be for them to face the full force of American justice, ala Patrick Fritzgerald. Problem is, how do we get them in court to face justice for their crimes?

          ..better that money be spent in the U.S. building windmills than squandered in the ME for Bush-McCain to tilt at them. -andydoubtless

          by Hornito on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 11:46:45 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Gee, even convicts on life sentences (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            annetteboardman

            ought to be protected from a lynch mob that wants to break into the jail and string them up, shouldn't they?  I think we should do that if only as a nod to preserving the rule of law.  

            One of the Nazis convicted at Nuremberg and sentenced to hang got somebody to smuggle him some poison and committed suicide.  He basically was just carrying out the sentence himself, a few days early, but even that was a miscarriage of justice.  I think there was an investigation; it never turned up enough evidence for anyone to be charged, but the prime suspect, a U.S. Army captain, had his military career stunted by the suspicion.

            We're all pretty strange one way or another; some of us just hide it better. "Normal" is a dryer setting.

            by david78209 on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 01:52:58 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

  •  Outsource It (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Hornito, tikkun, betsyross, Owllwoman

    Please have a contractor protect Bush, one that will hire Iraqis.

  •  Didn't Saddam have 16,000 in his bodyguard? (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Hornito

    Georgie boy has a way to go yet.

    "And if you vant a second opinion -- you are ugly too!"

    by sagesource on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 11:46:29 AM PDT

  •  I half expected (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Hornito

    you to report that the job had been sub contracted out to Blackwater.

    The tens of thousands of tags used once or - for that matter - only a handful of times, are not sticky enough to be searchable. Using this handy search tool to identify sticky tags, I fixed a few of yours: United States Secret Service is now Secret Service, Richard B. Cheney is now Dick Cheney, criminal cabals is now criminals.

    Many Kossacks bookmark tag links so it's easy to find new diaries on favorite or hot issues. Some even add them to their blog rolls to make them easy to find regardless of what computer they are using.  That is an excellent reason to learn to use standard tags in your diaries.

    Thanks!

    ==============
    Resources for the tag enamored
    Learn more about tagging and other aspects of Daily Kos etiquette in these diaries.
    Check out the latest diary on tags on tags (complete with C-Span video mentioning the use of Tags at Daily Kos)
    Tag guidelines
    Tips on Creating Good Diary Tags
    Try to use tags from this Listof the most used standard tags.
    Find good tags (those used over 30 times) and their diaries by using this Great Tag Search Tool

    TUs, the tag cloud librarians could use your help. Consider giving the DKos community an hour a week helping with these Tag Clean Up Jobs

    •  Thanks for the tag tips.... n/t (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      CalifSherry

      ..better that money be spent in the U.S. building windmills than squandered in the ME for Bush-McCain to tilt at them. -andydoubtless

      by Hornito on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 12:09:31 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  about the notion of Blackwater (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      CalifSherry, Hornito

      being in charge of the protection of the President, et al...

      It is one of the biggest worries to my mind...the destruction and overuse of the military with the resulting upsurge of privately contracted armies.

      Privately contracted armies swear no oath to the Constitution or country and have no need to protect either from a criminal government...

      I believe that one of Bush's (and Cheney's) bigger crimes is the destruction of the military and subverting the safety of the country while increasing their own protection and power with a private army paid for by tax payers.

      Fear is the mind killer

      by trinityfly on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 01:00:19 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  OK Hornito (0+ / 0-)

    This is seriously disturbed.

    Much as I detest and revile the Bush administration, I can't countenance the idea of turning them over to mob justice. Something that's being forgotten a lot these days is the idea that justice is supposed to treat everyone equally, not just the people we like. That's the grand idea of America, that even criminals have the protection of the law to aid them against arbitrary exercises of power (either by the state or by the mob). In this case, the law states that the president has the protection of the Secret Service.

    Maybe brush up on that high school civics a bit before floating another "let's lynch the bastards" diary.

    •  Please read my post upthread, posted well before (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      david78209

      you posted, where I wrote:

      That said, we cannot become a country of anarchy or lawless retribution. To do so, would greatly take away from our democracy.

      Though I, at times, would love to see these people strung up in the courtyard, I know the better way would be for them to face the full force of American justice, ala Patrick Fritzgerald. Problem is, how do we get them in court to face justice for their crimes?

      ..better that money be spent in the U.S. building windmills than squandered in the ME for Bush-McCain to tilt at them. -andydoubtless

      by Hornito on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 12:36:41 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I was responding to your diary (0+ / 0-)

        in which you wrote,

        they would then be handed over to their victims when the trials are finished, so that they may extract justice as they see fit.

        Mob justice is still mob justice, even if there has been a "trial" beforehand (cf. lynching in the American South up through the 1930s).

        Eww, I can't believe you're making me defend the Bush administration. I have to go take a shower now.

        •  Well, perhaps my comment was a little over the... (0+ / 0-)

          top. How about this: Their victims should be allowed to have a say with regards to their eventual punishment. If the victims feel an "eye for an eye" is appropriate, then so be it, or, if they feel they should rot in prison for all eternity, well, just as good.

          Our timing is off on comments here. Anyway, I understand what you're saying....Pax.

          ..better that money be spent in the U.S. building windmills than squandered in the ME for Bush-McCain to tilt at them. -andydoubtless

          by Hornito on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 12:58:22 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  P.S. note, that I have now removed that sentence. (0+ / 0-)

          ..better that money be spent in the U.S. building windmills than squandered in the ME for Bush-McCain to tilt at them. -andydoubtless

          by Hornito on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 01:06:44 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  Just noticed that this is your first comment in (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      tikkun

      six months, and you have no diaries. Ever. As a suggestion, you might try reading the diary, and the poster's comments, BEFORE firing words like "seriously disturbed".

      And to reiterate, I do not advocate "mob justice" with regards to the Bush regime. I simply want good ol' American justice for them. Given that, they'll either hang, or serve the rest of their lives in prison. Problem is, how and when can we bring them to justice?

      ..better that money be spent in the U.S. building windmills than squandered in the ME for Bush-McCain to tilt at them. -andydoubtless

      by Hornito on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 12:52:19 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I can say "seriously disturbed" if I want to (0+ / 0-)

        What, you think there's some kind of entry fee for participating in American discourse? In Kossian discourse? Are you implying I'm some kind of troll?

        Perhaps you thought I was speaking ad hominem and decided to reply with a little ad hominem of your own. If you don't like the message, attack the messenger. OK, if that's what you want to believe.

  •  Who are the 54? (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Hornito

    I'd be very curious to see who is on the list of those so highly valuable to our nation (er, sorry, I mean to the Bush family) that they need SS protection.

    Betcha there is not a single non-rabid "Bushie" on the list.

  •  Obviously they need it. n/t (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Hornito
  •  At least the Secret Service would arrest Bush (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Hornito

    and bring him in if he were indicted.  A private/mercenary security service would likely continue guarding his hideout in Paraguay, if only to perserve their own paychecks.

    We're all pretty strange one way or another; some of us just hide it better. "Normal" is a dryer setting.

    by david78209 on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 01:58:27 PM PDT

  •  A scary thought: protection from Congress? (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Hornito

    Members of the administration face the possibility of being arrested by the Sergeant at Arms of the Senate or House under their power of inherent contempt for failing to comply with committee subpoenas.

    Will these officials go willingly? How will Secret Service agents see their role? What training are Secret Service agents receiving in this regard?

    Democrats: Members of the Democratic Party working to advance democracy; Republicons: Members of the Republicanist Party working to advance Republicanism

    by word is bond on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 02:04:04 PM PDT

Permalink | 30 comments