Daily Kos

Seven Years of Excessive Punishment

Tue Jul 03, 2007 at 10:27:21 PM PDT

Democrats, when are you going to commute this excessive sentence we've been serving ever since January 20, 2001?  This bought and paid for travesty of justice known as the Bush presidency was imposed on America by five black-robed hypocrites on what used to be the Supreme Court, and must be commuted through Impeachment.  

This country has suffered enough.  

For seven years, we've been imploring you to restore justice, Democrats.  We've implored you by phone.  By email.  By fax.  On blogs, and face to face in Congressional offices coast to coast.  We've begged you with tears in our eyes, we've begged you with barely restrained fury, we've begged you to defend the Constitution in every pleading, imploring, respectful form of communication imaginable.  We've jumped through all the hoops, time and time again.

But all we've gotten from you are patronizing platitudes, empty promises, and futile hearings.
     

Meanwhile, a jabbering moron with the blood of half-a-million innocent people on his hands keeps smirking, his sneering war criminal accomplice keeps telling us to go fuck ourselves, you keep humiliating us in creative new ways, and we're heading into Codependence Day 2007 bracing ourselves for the rocket's red glare and bombs bursting in air all over that great big oilfield otherwise known as Iran.

A corporate plutocracy reeking of greed, exploitation, and war profiteering is not the kind of future the Founding Fathers had in mind for America when they declared independence from a delusional decider named George back on July 4, 1776.  

Oh say, can you see that, Democrats?  

World War III may very well greet us by the dawn's early light one fine Commander Guy morning if you don't begin Impeachment hearings.  So it's time you opened your enabling eyes and starting behaving like American patriots instead of like bleating sheep.  

Our star-spangled banner is splattered with the blood of half a million innocent men, women, and children, but His Imperial Neocon Majesty Dick Cheney doesn't give a damn.  Half a million dead dark-skinned people is just a little collateral damage, no big deal.  

Iran is next on his list and the clock is ticking . . .  

You don't seem to be aware of this, Democrats, so here's a clue for you: if Iran is attacked there will be a chain reaction of lethal consequences no one will be able to control.  We may well see the twilight's last gleaming all over the world.  

But hey, progressives, let's be polite while we wait for Democrats to sort out this slight misunderstanding with the White House about this rule of law thing.  Let's be polite while World War III is staring us in the face, these politicians in Washington deserve our respect and must be addressed politely, don't you know.  Especially Democrats.  They're sensitive.   Half a million human beings are dead, the survival of American democracy is at stake, but we have to remember that "name-calling" is inappropriate and counterproductive.

If you ask me, not defending the Constitution has been somewhat inappropriate and counterproductive, in a national suicide sort of way, but may God damn me to Hell in a heartbeat if I forget we're supposed to be polite to Beltway criminals and enablers while we're bending over, grabbing our ankles, and kissing our asses goodbye.      

Yes.  Call me an unsophisticated profanity peddler, but it seems to me that since the Constitution is off the table, Impeachment is off the table, withdrawal from Iraq is off the table, and attacking Iran is the stampeding elephant in the room no one in Congress wants to look at, then perhaps it's time to ponder what our polite pleas for sanity have accomplished.

How much longer are we supposed to be polite?  How much longer do we have to beg these politicians to just do their jobs?  How much longer are we supposed to endure this degrading spectacle of a president and vice-president who shit on everything America has ever stood for?  

They have dragged us all into the gutter.  But we don't have to stay there.  

Let's not kid ourselves.  One woman is standing in the way of Impeachment hearings. Pelosi has to be the primary target of Impeachment activism.  She has tolerated for far too long hypocritical lectures about patriotism and pervasive abuses of power from a White House infested with traitors who aren't even fit to look upon our flag, much less wave it around with such chickenhawk squawking righteousness.
 
If Democrats will not Impeach, they are not part of the solution we so desperately need, they are part of the problem.  In my view, the only Democrats in Congress who deserve respect from us are the co-sponsors of the Impeachment Resolution against Dick Cheney.  The rest of them need the riot act read to them, on the phone, face to face, by fax and email and letters and newspaper LTE's.

I have two words of advice for progressives hoping to influence these "Democrats":

Unleash.

Hell.

I cannot be polite while the worst clusterfuck collection of lying, scheming, lethally incompetent idiotic shitheads in the history of American politics continue to pollute Washington D.C.  They make me ashamed with every breath I take that I am an American.

Being polite to these people is absolutely useless, yet far too many people here on Daily Kos will never admit it.  I'm tired of the endless arguing about something that is so glaringly obvious, so I won't be posting any more diaries for awhile.

I have nothing more to say here at this point, other than good luck everyone, we're going to need it.

 

Tags: Impeachment, Daily Kos, Democrats, Congress, Dick Cheney, Nancy Pelosi (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 61 comments

  •  Silence is golden (1+ / 1-)

    Recommended by:
    musing85
    Hidden by:
    Karma for All

    Particularly yours. Looking forward to your absence.

  •  The "Political Class" (Democrats) (12+ / 0-)

    I really cannot believe that the Democratic Party as a whole is not up in arms trying to save and protect the future of the Republic...

    I really cannnot understand it.

    •  They haven't heard enough insults. (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      musing85, TeresaInPa, RaulVB, Elise

      That's the reason.

    •  We were right then, we're right now: (5+ / 0-)

      The War Democrats
      by JOHN NICHOLS

      [from the April 28, 2003 issue]

      ... An early-April memo from its Washington command-and-control center sternly warned that "antiwar Democrats do not have the right to claim, as [former Vermont Governor Howard] Dean often does, that opposing the war is a matter of fidelity to Democratic tradition, or that antiwar Democrats represent 'the democratic wing of the Democratic Party.'"

      To hear the corporate-friendly, right-leaning DLC tell it, "there's an enduring tradition of Democratic support for the principled use of force," which includes support for the United Nations but that also preserves "America's right to enforce international law against Iraq alone if necessary."

      ...complains that antiwar Democrats suffer from a "tendency to interpret any military conflict through the nostalgic lens of the political struggle against the war in Vietnam." The campaign of the most outspoken war foe among the Democratic contenders, Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chair Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, is dismissed as the "Unclaimed Freight Outlet of Democratic politics, retailing every failed or outdated lefty idea with a fierce and touching passion."

      ... The quivering crowd of Washington insiders who maneuvered their party out of contention in last fall's Congressional contests continues to preach a caution-over-conscience line ...

      ...Frost and others who cling to the tired fantasy that Democrats will find a road to the White House that leads through the prowar states of the Old South may actually believe the DLC spin that says candidates who make antiwar statements speak only to "a persistent if small faction in the party." But Democrats who are spending time with the people who will decide the party's nomination know that there's nothing "small" about the antiwar faction...

      http://www.thenation.com/...

      There's nothing small about the impeachment movement either.  It's just the same old hand-wringers that will keep the wall between the people and their representatives up, only to jump on board later on.

    •  The Democratic Party... (4+ / 0-)

      as a whole is.

      DC Leadership... not so much.

      Impeachment is favored by overwhelming numbers of self-identified Democrats in polls and by pluralities of Independents.

      Only Republicans don't like it and they will never vote for us anyway.

      Oh and those K Street lobbyists and Beltway pundit types.

    •  Give Ralph Nader a Call (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      YellowDogBlue, Elise

      see what he can do for you.

    •  RaulVB -- you are not alone! ALL of us, (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      bleeding heart

      are appalled at the acquiesence of the Dems thus far -- it is something that none of us understand.

      Come visit our activist site and get involved! SoapBox4Truth.org

      by tahoebasha2 on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 05:59:09 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Maybe if Pelosi was forced to watch... (8+ / 0-)

    ...films of our troops being blown up, the way Alex was forced to watch the Nazis in A Clockwork Orange -- she'd wake the fuck up.

  •  Congress has become more dangerous than Bush. (4+ / 0-)

    Because it is they who make him and his destruction of our troops and our Constitution possible.

  •  We can still be polite to each other (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Alma, RaulVB, Ekaterin, wolverine 06, MBNYC

    I used to do martial arts and even when we kicked the shit out of each other, we were always polite.

    Rusty - Mu Duk Kwon - never give up!

    The problem is money! Individuals are giving the Democrats nearly unconditional support because Bush has been so horrible.  This is a problem, but...

    Corporate America doesn't want any drastic change that could cause spending to slow for even a few days - impeachment might cause some "insecurity" or "confusion" and would certainly lead to a dip in the stock market.  The possibility that weapons manufacturers might soon need to slow production, or the possibility that our oil companies might not have cheap access to Iraqi oil (after all that investment) - those are a real problems too!!  These folks donate to both parties for a reason!  Congress is listening to them, not to us, because they don't have to listen to us - there will be no impact on their fundraising if they ignore us!

    This is what we are up against.  It's business, not personal.    

    Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it - Thomas Paine

    by Bikemom on Tue Jul 03, 2007 at 10:50:13 PM PDT

    •  This is (0+ / 0-)

      just another excuse to not do the right thing.

      I would hope that people will realize that the traitor and liar Scooter Libby has just been recycled back into the Office of the Vice President to continue with his traitorous behavior. How can you have justice or "drain the swamp" when these people are recycled faster then you can make them quit or resign.

      The only solution is PERMANENT removal. How do you obtain PERMANENT rremoval? It's called impeachment. BTW, impeachment also lays null and void the presidential power of the pardon.

      Perhaps it is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to provisions against danger, real or pretended from abroad. ~J. Madison

      by wolverine 06 on Tue Jul 03, 2007 at 11:30:42 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  However (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Bikemom

        I do believe their reasoning.

        These folks donate to both parties for a reason!  Congress is listening to them, not to us, because they don't have to listen to us - there will be no impact on their fundraising if they ignore us!

        Perhaps it is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to provisions against danger, real or pretended from abroad. ~J. Madison

        by wolverine 06 on Tue Jul 03, 2007 at 11:37:41 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  You misunderstand - I am not making excuses (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Alma, tahoebasha2

        I have been touting impeachment for years now as the only solution. Why would I encourage Rusty not to give up if I were against impeachment?

        I am just saying that I believe the reason that Pelosi (who I have called ever day since last Thursday) hasn't supported impeachment is because of money.  Not because she is a wimp, not because she thinks impeachment will prevent a win in '08 (which it won't), but because of funding. What I am saying is that our money will speak louder than our words and is the only way to get them to listen to us.

        Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it - Thomas Paine

        by Bikemom on Tue Jul 03, 2007 at 11:45:09 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  You are right (3+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          tony the American Mutt, Bikemom

          I originally misunderstood your meaning.

          Yet, I still think that it is not an insurmountable obstacle for a leader with the moral courage to do the right thing and not take "the easy" way out.  

          Perhaps it is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to provisions against danger, real or pretended from abroad. ~J. Madison

          by wolverine 06 on Tue Jul 03, 2007 at 11:56:52 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  Do you mean (0+ / 0-)

          She's against Impeachment because it will cut off corporate donations to Dems, or increase corporate donations to Repubs, or both?

          And that we need to give more to make her change her mind, or give less to clarify her thinking?

          Sorry if I'm being a dolt.

          We are not exempt from history.

          by MrJayTee on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 02:18:22 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  Rusty, call it like you see it (9+ / 0-)

    we hear you

    Hey, how 'bout we impeach the people who are supposed to do the impeaching and get some other impeachers who are more impeachy?

    by ronny mermaid on Tue Jul 03, 2007 at 10:57:40 PM PDT

  •  "...while the Democrats did nothing." (8+ / 0-)

    Do we really want the history books to read this way?

    Our party's leaders seem to think so, along with a number of others--especially the Republican criminals who are evacuating themselves on what's left of our democracy.

    All because it serves their personal electoral arithmetic.

    Just whose bidding are our Democratic leaders doing, theirs, or ours?

    The Constitution, Madame Speaker, is worth it whether you win or lose.  What are you there for, if not your oath to protect the Constitution?

    Do your duty or resign.

    Impeachment now.

    We are not exempt from history.

    by MrJayTee on Tue Jul 03, 2007 at 11:03:35 PM PDT

  •  Well said, Rusty (11+ / 0-)

    ...On an impulse I reached for the Bible in the pew in front of me. It fell open to the Gospel of Matthew where the life of Jesus unfolds chapter by chapter. Glancing at the headings I was reminded of the central events of that brief but intense life and of the great themes of his ministry: There was Jesus being baptized; Jesus tempted in the Wilderness; Jesus delivering the Sermon on the Mount; speaking in parables; healing the leper, the blind, the cripple; feeding the hungry; choosing his disciples; turning his face to Jerusalem to be greeted by a cheering multitude. And then—in the 21st chapter—a change. Something I had missed in my many early readings of this story, even in my seminary studies. Jesus becomes angry. We are told that he "went into the temple and drove out all who were buying and selling in the temple precincts; he upset the tables of the money-changers...and said to them, ‘Scripture says—My house shall be called a house of prayer, but you are making it a den of robbers.’"

    Jesus—angry!

    I sat there, thinking about this change in the narrative’s tone, in the manner of the man himself: Jesus the healer; Jesus the teacher; Jesus the preacher of forgiveness and love—angry.

    I realized: There is a place for anger in this world. It is important to be reminded that some things are worth getting angry about.

    • Bill Moyers

    I think we're all a little bit dazed still from yesterday's mugging, and it's good that we're angry. We should be angry.

    It bothers me that if the Dems are angry, I see little real evidence. It's not my job to be angry; I just am because I care. I thought for a while that they'd become so accustomed to losing that they just stopped caring, but even the new congress is showing to be remarkably spineless. If they don't stand up to this criminal administration, nothing else that they do will endear them to the people.

    This is the central issue facing America right now, today: Does the rule of law apply, or does it not? is America a democratic republic, or is it a de facto fascist dictatorship? Is The Party more important than The State?

  •  This truly is the queastion (10+ / 0-)

    How much longer are we supposed to be polite?  How much longer do we have to beg these politicians to just do their jobs?  How much longer are we supposed to endure this degrading spectacle of a president and vice-president who shit on everything America has ever stood for?

    If not now, when? If not for this, then for what? How long before the only answer is a new revolution?

    Perhaps it is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to provisions against danger, real or pretended from abroad. ~J. Madison

    by wolverine 06 on Tue Jul 03, 2007 at 11:06:11 PM PDT

  •  Yep ... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    peace voter, tahoebasha2

    Being polite to these people is absolutely useless, yet far too many people here on Daily Kos will never admit it.

    Uh-huh. Phone, fax, e-mail, snail-mail the Democrats who have not signed onto H Res 333 and unleash your string of invective. This will be incredibly persuasive at getting more to do so, just as I should be able to persuade you of something you disagree with but I find "glaringly obvious" by calling you a "fucktarded cowardly sell-out."

    I am an anti-imperialist. I am opposed to having the eagle put its talons on any other land. -- Mark Twain

    by Meteor Blades on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 06:05:34 PM PDT

    •  I have found over time that one way to avoid (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      bleeding heart

      "action" is by poo-pooing it's feasibility or simply, to regard it in a defeatist slant -- neither of which helps or alleviates the REAL necessity of action!

      Come visit our activist site and get involved! SoapBox4Truth.org

      by tahoebasha2 on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 06:36:08 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  As I have made clear for nearly two years ... (0+ / 0-)

        ...and from the Front Page of Daily Kos this week, I favor impeachment. And I favor grassroots action to make it happen. I am not saying that my preference for grassroots action is the only way to get impeachment proceedings underway. And I'm happy to hear of others' choices.

        But Rusty1776's technique (and that of large numbers of pro-impeachment progressives) has been for months and months to attack Nancy Pelosi. Now he recommends we continue those attacks on her AND that we attack those Democrats - including those on the Judiciary Committee - who haven't signed onto H Res 333. Yet, after all these months of calling Pelosi a coward, sell-out, et cetera, she still hasn't come around to seeing things Rusty's way.

        Let me suggest (again) that the best way to persuade Democrats (and a few Republicans) to favor impeachment is to know thoroughly why they oppose it and build arguments that will defeat theirs. Rusty and others think that insults will work to do this. I think insults will stiffen their rejection of impeachment.

        This doesn't mean we shouldn't do OTHER things as well as phone-fax-email-snail mail Congresspeople. Demonstrations of various sorts, including those designed to convince those Americans who aren't yet  convinced about impeachment would also be a good idea.

        Nor, to make one final point, do I think anger isn't appropriate. I've been angry since five years ago when the Senate gave Mister Bush authority to invade Iraq. We progressives are justified in our anger, no doubt about that. But screaming at and insulting the very people you seek to become your ally is counterproductive.  

        I am an anti-imperialist. I am opposed to having the eagle put its talons on any other land. -- Mark Twain

        by Meteor Blades on Wed Jul 04, 2007 at 07:09:43 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Permalink | 61 comments