Daily Kos

An Impeachment Roundup for Nancy Pelosi: Updated

Mon Aug 13, 2007 at 08:58:15 PM PDT

I have done roundups on impeachment twice before, this past Saturday and on Friday, July 27th, and will continue to do so as a series on a regular basis. In those diaries, I basically pull together a collection of recent impeachment diaries, while specially focusing on diaries covering the Enough protest campaign. This roundup is a different nature.

On Tuesday morning, I have a meeting with Nancy Pelosi's Deputy District Director. I diaried about requesting this meeting here and here. I am now preparing for that meeting, reviewing diaries and other articles that I have bookmarked since at least December of last year. Funny how a change in Congressional power dynamics can give one funny thoughts about the practicality of impeachment, but I digress. Anyway, I thought I'd share with you the diaries and news articles I used to help organize my thoughts. I've also added the letter I'll be leaving for Speaker Pelosi.

In the meeting request, I highlighted three things I wanted to discuss:

 1. efforts to enforce congressional oversight prerogatives and seek administration accountability. I am especially interested in getting Speaker Pelosi's thoughts on the Administration's Unitary Executive theory and Vice-President Cheney's unprecedented power and secrecy.
 2. the status of energy legislation, especially improved CAFE standards.
 3. the status of ethics & lobbying reform (hopefully to express congratulations).

After the FISA fiasco, I'm going to switch it up a bit. As minor issues, I'll bring up CAFE standards and health care reform (linked in their importance to the U.S. auto industry), and give my congratulations for success on ethics reform. My primary focus will be oversight of the Executive branch, the need for bold leadership, and losing the faith of her constituency. I will be more forceful in my presentation than I had originally planned and will directly address impeachment. Originally, I had planned on a cordial and diplomatic presentation. Now I am shooting for a diplomatic, but blunt tone.


On to the diaries
.
Rev. Dr. King shows us the way on impeachment? by Pondite July 7th
Impeachment by Frog-Marching Congressional Oversight by Patriot Daily News
Clearinghouse July 9th
Down at the Gun Shop: Impeach both the bastards by Kenevan McConnon July 13th
If you want public support for impeachment... by clammyc July 6th
Impeachment Doesn't Have to Succeed to Succeed by The Baculum King July 6th
NOBODY Marched To Impeach Bill Clinton! by Linda Milazzo July 8th
. . . there will be no choice but impeachment by teacherken June 29th
Impeachment Without A Conviction? Hell Yes! Updated by buhdydharma June 16th
Bipartisan Impeachment & Resignation: A Retrospective by BentLiberal December 6th
Reagan’s NSA Chief: Impeachment May Be Necessary by The Angry Rakkasan July 5th
DOJ Attorney Blisters Bush Administration in Today's Denver Post by jcatcher July 8th
Unhinged and unfit for office by clammyc February 15th
Why I now support impeachment of Bush, and Olbermann's Special Comment by Eric Hopp July 4th
Is Bush Trying to Provoke Impeachment? by bluebrain July 11th
Why Impeachment is a Political Winner by srkp23 July 13th
Conservative Calling for Impeachment [Updated] by PoliticAl2008 July 16th

Demanding Accountability by Senator Russ Feingold July 22nd
We Don't Have The Votes by Rusty1776 July 24th
"Don't Have the Votes" nonsense by LWelsch July 26th

Post-FISA Fiasco - Problem of Leadership and Losing Faith
Pain by Nightprowlkitty August 4th

What exactly did the Democrats gain? by TheBlaz August 4th
Madame Speaker, what game is this? by Executive Odor August 5th
The radicalization of an apolitical person by walkingdeer August 6th
New Bush statement reveals next steps on FISA by TakeBackTheHouse August 6th
There is something fundamentally wrong here. by Kagro X August 4th

Another Justice Department Leaker Persecuted... by  Jesselyn Radack August 6th
Payback Time: FBI Raids Home of Suspected NSA Leaker by Avenging Angel August 5th

For The Representatives Who Don't Seem To Get It by jmkiru August 4th
Letter from my Rep and why it makes me so ANGRY! by DaveBear August 9th
Homage to the 4th Amendment by FreeFallin August 10th
How about a bill called "Restoring our Constitution"? by clammyc August 8th
"Because he can" by clammyc August 9th

Outside of DailyKos
Slate, June 27th
Impeach Cheney by Bruce Fein

Bill Moyers Journal Tough Talk on Impeachment July 13th

Keith Olbermann's Special Comment

The Washinton Note, May 24th
Cheney Attempting to Constrain Bush's Choices on Iran Conflict by Steven C. Clemons

FT.com - Financial Times, August 9th
America’s illusory strategy in Iraq by David Gardner

The Denver Post, July 5th
Bush justice is a national disgrace by John S. Koppel

Neiman Watchdog, July 5th
'Supporting the troops' means withdrawing them by General William E. Odom

The Washiington Post Special Reports
Angler: The Cheney Vice Presidency
Walter Reed - The Wounded Warrior at Home

The Progressive, August 2007
Cheney's Fingerprints by Matthew Rothschild

note: New York Times articles & editorials will be behind an archived firewall
New York Times, June 2nd
Rice Plays Down Hawkish Talk About Iran by Helene Cooper
New York Times, July 11th
EDITORIAL; Overprivileged Executive
The New York Times, July 23rd
Just What the Founders Feared: An Imperial President Goes to War by Adam Cohen

Newsweek, May 17th, 2004
Memos Reveal War Crimes Warnings by Michael Isikoff

Editorial Cartoons
(originally cited in White House Watch by Dan Froomkin of the Washington Post Online)
John Sherffius on Executive Privilege July 10th
Paul Conrad on the Constitution July 5th
Tom Toles on Republicans and Bush July 6th
John Sherffius on the Rule of Law July 3rd
John Sherffius on Chertoff's Gut July 13th
Stuart Carlson on Accountability for Plame Outing July 14th
Mike Lukovich on a Bad Gift July 16th
Steve Benson Bush Plants a Seed July 17th
Rex Babin on Caveland Security July 18th
Mike Lukovich Location is Everything July 18th
John Sherffius with A Message from the Founding Fathers July 23rd
Glen McCoy on Bush's Exam July 24th
Tom Toles on Cheney's Defibrillator July 31st
Tom Toles on the FISA update August 3rd
Ann Telnaes and "I don't recall" August 3rd
Rex Babin Door mat August 7th
Pat Oliphant They're Watching August 6th
Ann Telnaes Weenie Boarding August 7th
Mike Lukovich Bush and his dog August 8th

Update [2007-8-14 11:48:56 by forbodyandmind]: I nearly forgot: Resolutions Supporting Impeachment - List of Those Introduced and Passed @ ImpeachPAC

I had hoped to have the letter drafted in order to get some last minute feedback from the DailyKos community, but it looks like I'm still a few hours away from having it completed. I may update this diary later with that draft later, but in the meantime I welcome any thoughts this evening regarding information I should or could use or approaches I should take. I also welcome any comments on the diaries and news stories I included in this roundup.

By the way, for anyone curious about this past Sunday's edition of Enough SF, I'll be posting that later Tuesday. Wednesday or Thursday, I'll diary about my meeting with the Speaker's Deputy District Director.

[Update 2] Here's the letter I'm taking. I still have a couple of hours if you see any errors.

August 14, 2007
Dear Speaker Pelosi,

I am a grad student studying Chinese medicine in San Francisco. I have been your constituent for just over four years. I have appreciated and want to thank you for your leadership in the first 100 hours of the 110th congress and in passing legitimate ethics and lobbying reform.

Having said that, as I'm sure you are perfectly aware, our nation is in the midst a new long, national nightmare. When I initially set up a meeting with your Deputy District Director, I had a relaxed view of the meeting opportunity. While there were concerns I wanted to address, I also wanted to express my gratitude and pride in having you represent me in the House as Speaker. With the passage of the FISA update and the ensuing Republican celebration, my hopes for the meeting are no longer relaxed.

From the very beginning of the Bush/Cheney administration, congressional oversight of the executive and the Constitutional checks and balances have been under attack. Under the Republicans, Congress gave the President whatever he wanted unless Democrats were able to pull together enough strength to act as the adult in the room. Along with the rest of the country, I hoped that would change with the 2006 elections and Democrats back in the leadership of both chambers.

Unfortunately, in spite of some modest legislative successes, what the public sees are failures to reign in the administration on Iraq, failure to hold anyone in the administration accountable, and not just failure but capitulation on the FISA update.

I've been in favor of impeachment almost since Bush stepped into office. Iraq and Katrina pushed me further that direction. For me the last straw was the commutation of Scooter Libby's prison sentence. That pushed me from merely supporting impeachment to being an advocate and an activist for impeachment.

As an activist, I participate in the DailyKos online community. I have attended meetings for the World Can't Wait here in San Francisco and one with an Impeach Bush-Cheney Meetup group in the East Bay. I have joined a national protest campaign called Enough, and started a group here in San Francisco to support that campaign. In the very brief time since July 3rd, I've seen a lot of people frightened and in pain for our country. I've been reading DailyKos since the 2004 election. In the past year, I've watched as the fear and pain have grown. Along side those are growing frustration and alienation.

The fear is not about terrorism or the war on terror. Instead, we are afraid of a hyper-secretive administration determined to expand its power. We are afraid the leaders we elected to stand up and represent us and reign in the abuses of the administration are too timid. We’re shouting at the tops our lungs for bold and decisive leadership. We’re holding our collective breath for leaders who will confront Bush and Cheney and say NO! Instead, we see political calculation and miscalculation. We see Dick Cheney in an interview with Larry King, when asked if there are any plans to attack Iran, respond, "Now what reason would I have to do that Larry?" and then smirk.

In Chinese medicine, we talk about treating the root rather than the branch. Our goal is to treat the cause and not the symptoms. The Democratic attempts to focus on passing meaningful legislation are admirable. However, between Republican obstructionism and Bush's aversion to compromise, real gains are small bandages treating chronic symptoms. The public sees that the root is not being treated in favor of a fancy cast all the popular kids can sign. Whatever legislative progress you are able to make, your constituents lose faith because we see the glaring cancer being left untreated. It is time for truly forceful oversight. It is time to allow impeachment back on the table. If you choose not to act because you don't have the votes to win, you will find, because no one would stand up for the principles of our country which we hold so dear, you will lose the support that put Democrats back in leadership.

Sincerely,
forbodyandmind

Tags: impeachment, nancy pelosi, leadership, oversight (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 52 comments

  •  appreciate all your work (10+ / 0-)

    best of luck with Pelosi.

    IMPEACH CHENEY

    If we cannot elect this man, we don't deserve him.

    by lisastar on Mon Aug 13, 2007 at 09:01:24 PM PDT

  •  Thanks (7+ / 0-)

    That was a lot of work.  Now I will be lazy and bookmark this for later ;)

    First Gore, then Edwards, now Obama. But that's it!!!

    by EvilPaula on Mon Aug 13, 2007 at 09:04:18 PM PDT

  •  Wow! (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    bablhous, forbodyandmind, Tanya, NonnyO

    Great diary.  Is there any way we can make sure NP reads it?

  •  Great diary!!! Important to keep hitting (5+ / 0-)

    on the level of disappointment among a lot of us on here and by extension throughout the country with the lack of strong leardership. the constant capitulation on important issues.  

    Highly rec'ed

    To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men~~ Abraham Lincoln

    by Tanya on Mon Aug 13, 2007 at 09:14:35 PM PDT

  •  since you asked!!! (6+ / 0-)

    Two diaries.....that have links to many others!

    Restore the Constitution

    http://www.dailykos.com/...

    Early Impeachment

    http://www.dailykos.com/...

  •  FOCUS! ONE topic only - impeachment. (5+ / 0-)

    If you must make three separate appointments to talk about your three separate topics, do so. But focus this meeting on your top priority, which seems to be impeachment.  

    Your audience's attention span is limited - get your most powerful arguments for impeachment lined up (pick the three most egregious sins rather than a laundry list) and hammer it home.

    For inspiration, pick some lines out of the Moyers impeachment show transcript...  there were some great ones. Tell the rep she MUST watch the show herself if she has any questions.

    Next week or next month come back about CAFE standards, whatever.

    Good luck!

    PS  I just wrote Pelosi about putting impeachment back on the table after seeing the Moyers show.

    -7.38, -4.72 Progressive Toastmasters - Learning to speak persuasively about things that matter.

    by JoieDe on Mon Aug 13, 2007 at 09:35:30 PM PDT

  •  Dear Nancy (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    bablhous, forbodyandmind, NonnyO

    On the table

    We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.

    by dconrad on Mon Aug 13, 2007 at 09:51:42 PM PDT

  •  Elect Cindy Sheehan. (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    forbodyandmind, ormondotvos

    It's not a "lack of understanding" on the part of Pelosi. She's obviously in on it, because nobody could be dumb enough to let the Bush team dismantle our Constitution, then pass those executive powers on to future administrations.
    The way to "educate" Pelosi is to elect somebody else, even if it's Cindy Sheehan.

  •  Impeachment (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    forbodyandmind, NonnyO

    I once thought that impeachment would be a mistake. Now I wonder is it a mistake to let them continue running this country in the ground.

  •  Please tell Ms. Pelosi for ALL of US that..... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    forbodyandmind, NonnyO

    if Impeachment does not mysteriosly appear back on the table, that she and all of her ilk will not have anything to worry about in the next Congress because they will be looking for new careers, I for one and I don't think I'm alone on this, will never vote for any incumbant again. I have been a staunch Democrat all my life, and if no Impeach articles make it to the floor, I'm outta the Democratic party for life!! The Ball is in your court Ms. Speaker, let's see if your a team player cause your about to be cut!

    Fed Up With Rightwing Criminals and Leftwing Pussies!

    by fed up with rightwing criminals and leftwing pussi on Mon Aug 13, 2007 at 10:38:59 PM PDT

  •  Sweeping Iran-Contra under the rug (8+ / 0-)

    set the stage for the current goings ons, although the current batch of executive abuses is on 'roids compared with Iran-Contra.  She should consult with John Dean and Bruce Fein about impeachment, and then put it back on the table - because it is the best cure we know of for the ongoing abuses.

    "You don't make peace with friends. You make it with very unsavory enemies." -Yitzhak Rabin

    by sailmaker on Mon Aug 13, 2007 at 10:42:45 PM PDT

  •  I agree she should be impeached. (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    forbodyandmind

    She's violated her oath to defend the Constitution repeatedly - not least in keeping the warrantless spying absolutely secret - and was exposed by the NY Times - and is still working against the people every day to hide her role.

    Instead of pointing out that the latest warrantless wiretapping directives are declared unconstitutional violations of the 4th Amendment by a federal judge, Pelosi scheduled them for a vote.

    She's an advocate of the Cheney oil law in Iraq, which robs 25M Iraqis not just of their safety and security, but of their money.  While it's not unconstitutional, it's collusion in a war crime.

    And of course, she's obstructing justice by failing to prosecute at least three war criminals.

    The great thing about impeaching her is, no one can accuse us of doing it for partisan reasons!  They'll just have to consider the merits of this case, and then move on to the next one with the new Speaker.

    Gee, I hope I read this diary carefully enough...

    levity defies gravity

    by Levity on Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 12:11:42 AM PDT

  •  especially improved CAFE standards. (0+ / 0-)

    Sure, have her take on Dingell but leave the Nelson twins and Landrieu out there to do their thing. Dingell needs to be challenged because then the Democrats could give Lieberman his committee, too.

    Is there a reason you think auto pollution is worse than say smoke stack pollution, or dumping ballasts full of oceans species into the Great Lakes?  Oh yeah, lets zero in on the autos again and ignore all the other destruction that is going on.  A few more hits, and maybe we can put GM right out of business and give Michigan to Canada.  Second thought, Canada might be a better deal than anything we are currently getting from this country.

    ...once you're willing to say whatever it takes to win, you lose. ~~Dean

    by dkmich on Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 03:21:35 AM PDT

    •  I am not advocating ignoring other problems (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      highacidity

      Auto mileage standards haven't changed since Carter. The technology is available. American car companies have not been competing with Honda and Toyota. They've been building and Americans have been buying fuel-inefficient vehicles. I believe increasing fuel economy and investing in alternative fuels are part of increasing our national security. I do not believe we are doing the American auto industry any favors by "letting the market decide".

      The CAFE standards are a point of difference between the Senate and the House versions of the energy bills that passed. I would like to know how the Speaker anticipates that will be resolved in conference.

      To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. Abraham Lincoln

      by forbodyandmind on Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 04:04:54 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  GM has taken back #1 from Honda. (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        forbodyandmind

        My point is that CAFE standards are secondary to a whole host of things related to the environment, clean air specifically, and reducing dependency on oil - both of which I whole heartedly support.  The goal has to be technology that produces different fuels and new industries instead of the tired and useless demand for "more mileage out of the same ol' shit".  The auto industry is asking (begging) for a concerted and committed policy of alternative fuels. Why do you think Dingell put all of that in his bill?  For example:  Why ethanol from corn (driving up food costs)instead of legalizing and using hemp?  This taboo on hemp is stupid, irrational, and totally incomprehensible.  How about much, much more use of solar power in the sun belts?  Why are you forcing SW industries into reducing their energy consumption and pollution instead of the autos?  There are other solutions besides CAFE, but all of the environmentalist don't seem to be able to get out of their boxes.   You need to look at different and bigger and varied solutions and get off and out of the CAFE rut.  There is a gold mine and a future to be had in protecting the environment, if you guys would just reach for it.  You should talk to Dingell.  You might find an environmental ally in him IF you open your mind to other solutions besides CAFE.

        ...once you're willing to say whatever it takes to win, you lose. ~~Dean

        by dkmich on Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 04:42:38 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Thought you might find this interesting. (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          forbodyandmind

          Source:  Chrysler

          Loren Beard stirred things up at the end of a weeklong industry conference.
          The Chrysler Senior Manager of Energy Planning and Policy named the five groups that he says are trying to stop the growth of alternative fuels.
          Speaking at the annual Management Briefing Seminars conference, held outside Traverse City, Mich., Beard said the groups have their own interests to protect. What might be a surprise to some is the inclusion of "Big Agriculture", some environmental groups and some automakers.
          The five groups are:

          1. Big Oil

          – Alternative Fuels eat into their market share, complicate distribution operations and may require special components and unique additives at refineries.

          1. Big Agriculture

          – They support feedstock-specific biofuels such as soybeans and corn and want to maintain current tax incentives that support their crops. The Renewable Fuels Association supports mid-level blends of ethanol, which will effectively kill the E85 program.

          1. "Silver Bullet" Carmakers
          • They believe that their technology is the only answer to improving fuel economy.
          • Look to parochial interests rather than national and global interests
          1. Fringe Environmental Groups
          • They need "crisis" PR to attract donations
          • Focus on imaginary "silver bullet" long-term technologies without respect to real world economics.
          1. OPEC
          • Need to support high production rates at high prices
          • Use their market position to influence political positions

          Beard also listed the five reasons they can't succeed:

          • Finite petroleum resources
          • Petroleum held by hostile regimes
          • Greenhouse gases
          • Alternative fuels create jobs on American farms, in American processing plants and in American transportation
          • U.S. balance of trade

          ...once you're willing to say whatever it takes to win, you lose. ~~Dean

          by dkmich on Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 04:58:02 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  thanks for this response (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          highacidity

          I've read a couple of your diaries on alternative fuels (Focus on Alternative Energy and Automotive X PRIZE, I think), so I know you have a lot more info on this subject than I do. It just seems to me that 30 years without updated mileage standards is irresponsible, and that they should be one component of a multi-faceted, reinvigorated, environmentally sound energy policy. I fully agree that there are alternative solutions that should be great business investments.

          To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. Abraham Lincoln

          by forbodyandmind on Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 05:26:00 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  I do agree with increased CAFE on one level. (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            forbodyandmind

            I think the autos would benefit as a result.  However, Michigan and autos are having huge problems right now.  Part of it is due to poor management/design, and a good half of it is about unions, benefits, and legacies. Let me know how you meeting goes.

            ...once you're willing to say whatever it takes to win, you lose. ~~Dean

            by dkmich on Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 07:47:14 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  full diary on the meeting tomorrow (1+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              dkmich

              For right now, I focussed mainly on impeachment. Since I did bring up CAFE standards in my original meeting request, Melanie (Speaker Pelosi's Deputy District Director) did hand me an info sheet and talked a bit about that.

              Bottom line for me, with different versions of the energy bill in the House and Senate, it's going to come down to the conference committee. Melanie said that Pelosi is strongly in favor of the Senate version, while Dingell is a strong opponent. I hope that they'll be able to arrive at a compromise that can pass both the Senate and the House, but I'm concerned that conflicting interests could torpedo the whole thing.

              To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. Abraham Lincoln

              by forbodyandmind on Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 08:12:14 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

  •  I'm IMPRESSED! (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    forbodyandmind

    I'm impressed with your extensive research!  Way to go!  :-)

    What I want from Nancy Pelosi:  IMPEACHMENT!

    I would like Nancy Pelosi to abide by her oath of office and put the Constitution and this country before partisan politics, before corporations.  No more lame excuses as to why she's taken impeachment 'off the table.'  Excuses are not valid reasons.

    I saw a video a while back where Pelosi said "You don't know the half of it." (I don't have a link, but I remember the suit she was wearing, her tone of voice, and I've seen other authors quote that sound byte, so I know it's not my imagination.  I just haven't been able to find the link again.)  Well, she better start talking and tell us the more than half of it she's talking about!  We are supposed to have a representative republic, and right now most everything in government is considered ultra-secret.  That's no way to govern this country.

    The lies, the war crimes, the high crimes and misdemeanors, the gross ineptitude of Cheney and Bush are well known, even documented via sound bytes in Lamestream Media, and you have an extremely impressive list of references for Pelosi (and/or her staff) to read and find out the opinions of a good representative sample of progressive Democrats' opinions at Daily Kos, among others.  In particular, Pelosi needs to take an hour of her valuable time to watch the Moyers show on impeachment and take heed of what John Nichols and Bruce Fein had to say.

    I don't buy the "more important things to accomplish" line of baloney.  Congress can't get any decent domestic legislation passed as long as our money is being frittered away in that illegal war crime in Iraq.  What's more important than our Constitution...?

    I'm convinced that impeachment is the shortest route to ending the illegal war in Iraq, ending torture, closing Gitmo, repealing the so-called Patriot Acts, MCA '06, the unnecessary FISA fixes (If it ain't broke, don't fix it!), repealing or rendering null and void executive orders and signing statements executed since January '01 (the one funding religious charities clearly violates the First Amendment's separation of church and state, and I find that one particularly egregious), and the beginning of righting our ship of state.  We have a difficult journey ahead of us and we don't have time to waste.

    Impeachment for Clinton took only a few months (Congress got other things accomplished during that time; they were adept at multi-tasking).  The impeachment process for both Cheney and Bush could be accomplished in less than a year with time left over to then concentrate on political campaigns for the '08 election.

    What Pelosi and others should be concentrating on is finding a suitable interim president and vice president who aren't going to claim 'unitary executive' powers and get busy and impeach Cheney and Bush (Cheney first, since we don't want to be stuck with him as president).

    So, Speaker Pelosi:  What's the hold-up?  Why are you still refusing to consider impeachment?  Are you being blackmailed?  We know Cheney and Bush and virtually all of the members of their administration are criminals.  Why are you refusing to hold them accountable for their lies, war crimes, and high crimes and misdemeanors?  If you refuse to impeach, you are not abiding by your oath of office to the Constitution to protect it 'from all enemies, foreign and domestic.'  We know Cheney and Bush are 'domestic enemies' by the way they've governed.  Why don't you see that as clearly as we do?

    IMPEACH!

    (Rec, tipped, and Hotlisted - I am very, very impressed with all your work!  Thank you, and Good Luck at your meeting!  :-)  I will be SO looking forward to the results and hope the diary report is front paged so I can't miss it.)

    Oh, and PS:  I posted these links on someone else's diary, but if Pelosi needs reminding about what's at stake, these are some of the things Cheney and Bush have violated to the point that our republic is now almost FUBAR:

    The Nuremberg Judgment
    http://www.yale.edu/...

    The Geneva Conventions (based on the Nuremberg Judgment, incorporated into our Constitution)
    http://en.wikisource.org/...
    http://en.wikisource.org/...
    http://en.wikisource.org/...
    http://en.wikisource.org/...

    Military Commissions Act of 2006 (takes away habeas corpus; that's unconstitutional; this should never have been approved by Congress, and needs instant repealing)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/...

    US Code, Title 18, War Crimes
    http://www4.law.cornell.edu/...

    US Constitution
    http://www.archives.gov/...

    The Bill of Rights
    http://www.archives.gov/...

    If Speaker Pelosi can't lead or follow, she should at least get out of the way and let our Representatives do their Constitutional duty and IMPEACH the criminals "leading" this country.

    (¯`*._(¯`*._(-IMPEACH-)_.*´¯)_.*´¯)

    by NonnyO on Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 06:58:14 AM PDT

  •  Great letter! (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    forbodyandmind

    Very well done!

    Only thing I'd want to say to Pelosi is that as Speaker, she is required to hold the Dem caucus in unity, and that's something she has failed to do when it comes to what's really important - opposing Bush - and the FISA debacle is a great example of that.

    As much as I am strongly for impeachment, I am equally desirous of seeing some real unity from our Dem reps.  And I have seen that only once, and that was the first Iraq Supplemental vote.  Since then, nada.

    That's her job ... she needs to show that the Dems can be united against this misAdministration, whether it be impeachment or anything else.

Permalink | 52 comments