Daily Kos

Black Helicopters

Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:28:06 PM PDT

Black helicopters are everywhere.  There are at least a billion of them available across the United States right now if Gonzo decides to conduct illegal surveillance on any one of us.  They don't look like black helicopters, but that's what they are.

I'm looking at a black helicopter right now.  So are you.  Mine was made by Dell and comes with a handy keyboard.  It doesn't hover above my neighborhood, but it doesn't have to.  It just sits here on my desk, ready and waiting to spy on me if Gonzo decides I'm not sufficiently loyal to the Commander Guy.  There's another black helicopter right next to it.  It's made by Panasonic.  It rings several times a day, just like the black helicopters in my living room and bedroom.  

Bush's criminal government doesn't even have to pay for these black helicopters, we buy them ourselves.  We pay for them and we pay to use them.  We pay again with our tax dollars, which are used to pay the salaries of the NSA spies who will spy on us with these black helicopters if Gonzo tells them to.

Welcome to Orwell Incorporated, formerly known as the United States of America.            

 

Larisa Alexandrovna has lived in a police state, she knows what they look like and how they function:

Make NO mistake, we are in serious peril when an Attorney General who has subverted the Constitution per request of his boss, lied, obstructed justice, and defended torture, is now in full authority to declare who is going to be a target of warrant-less surveillance.

Six months from now, dozens of Democrats will cave again and vote to extend this FISA atrocity against the 4th Amendment.  By then, the 2008 election will be less than a year away and their fear of being slandered as weak on terrorism will be even greater.  

These same Democrats will vote for another surge this fall when General Petraeus confidently reports that another surge will enable us to "keep making progress" towards defeating the "terrorists". Their fear of being slandered for not supporting the troops will be even greater than it is now.  And if another 9/11 happens, they will support whatever "emergency powers" the Commander Guy invests himself with in the aftermath, including martial law, internment camps, even suspending the 2008 elections.

Congress would never stand for that?

Guess what?  

If there's another horrific attack on America and Bush suspends the 2008 elections, every incumbent senator and representative would stay in power.

Gosh.  That would disappoint them, wouldn't it?

The mutual benefits to Bush and Congress of such a "regrettable" but "necessary" and of course "temporary" suspension of elections would require some rationalizing on the part of the beneficiaries, but rationalizing their endless bullshit is what politicians do best.

We'd hear rationalizations.  We'd hear martial law being called Enhanced Security Conditions.  We'd hear Internment camps being called Protective Custody Facilities. We'd see suspended elections being supported by incumbents in Congress "in a spirit of bipartisan unity during this national emergency" that would bring tears of patriotic pride to the eyes of every corporate media talking head from coast to coast.    

Half the electorate never votes anyway, they wouldn't give a shit.  And what would those of us who do give a shit do about it?  Call our unlimited incumbency senators and representative who would no longer even have to pretend they care what we think?  

Markos has expressed an opinion on suspended elections:

And no, Bush won't cancel the next round of elections to remain in power. That's about the most ridiculous conspiracy theory I've seen in a long time. Some people on our side can be just as "out there" as the "black helicopter" crowd.

I hope that Markos, whom I have the greatest respect for, never has to update that statement with a clarification.

Bush is the one who is "out there". The people wearing the tinfoil hats are the people running the federal government. Their "war on terror" is the conspiracy theory of all conspiracy theories.  There is no war on terror.  The only real war being waged right now is the war being waged by economic elites and their bought and paid for politicians against the middle class and the poor.

Another 9/11 is coming.  It's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when.  If there's another 9/11 while Bush is still in power, he will exploit the inevitable national trauma and fear even more ruthlessly than he did the first time.

If we let him.    

If the past 7 years are any indication, we'll let him.  We've been retreating and retreating and then retreating some more for longer than any of us care to remember.  The wealthiest 1 percent of Americans owns 40 percent of the country, but that isn't enough for them.  They want ALL of it.  Too many working Americans don't even know they're being relentlessly attacked. The culture wars perpetrated by Republicans have blinded them to who their real enemy is.  

In The Art of War, Sun Tzu advised:

If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.

We'd better start heeding this advice.  

The economic elites are our enemy.  Globalization, media consolidation, massive telecommunications spying, and Bush's unitary executive powers are their weapons.    

But we have weapons too.  Our greatest weapon is numbers. It's time to use that weapon.  500,000 progressives read Daily Kos regularly, but less then 1,500 of them have committed to taking a stand for American democracy on Iraq Moratorium Day.

Congress isn't standing up to Bush in any meaningful way, but neither are we.  More Democrats will stand up for us in Congress if we stand up for ourselves in every town and city across this lied to, spied on, robbed blind, soldier burying, working two jobs and going broke anyway country.  

Stand up to Bush on September 21, 2007!  Use his black helicopters against him.  Call your friends.  Email them.  Bring them to a Moratorium event with you.  Bring your children.  Bring your parents.  Bring your neighbors.  Bring a flag.  Bring your hope. Bring your courage.  Bring an end to this orgy of crimes against our Constitution, our country, and our world.

Give America a day it will never forget.

Then go home and watch O'Reilly have a meltdown and go ballistic at the same time.

Motivated yet?

SIGN THE PLEDGE

Thank you.
 

 

Tags: NSA, domestic Spying, FISA, Iraq Moratorium, Congress, Democrats, George W. Bush, Daily Kos (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 44 comments

  •  Glad you brought it up!!! (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Joy Busey, Rusty1776

    Not that I disagree with you (I don't, I think you're spot-on here, and am rec'ing and tipping), but "purity" would suggest that you remember that kos thinks the "suspended elections" notion is bogus to the point of incredulity.

    And you know what? Now that Congress will roll over every time BushCo says "roll over!", why would BushCo need to suspend the elections? So, in a way, kos is quite right :)

    On second thought , let's not go to Camelot. 'Tis a silly place

    by o the umanity on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:21:55 PM PDT

    •  Well, considering that the "Blue Dogs"... (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      sheddhead, o the umanity

      ...just rolled over and got us all kicked in the nads by Mr. 25%, how can Bush cancelling the 2008 election be that far out of the realm of possibility?

      •  I don't think it is (0+ / 0-)

        out of that realm at all (and further, feel like a real dimwit for glossing over Rusty's actual reference to kos' statement). I'm just saying they don't have to worry about it now.

        Actually, sometimes I wondered if it was a necessity since the vote can be more-easily fixed by computerized voting, but still, I agree with you, and Rusty, and was not at all enamored of kos' position on that.

        On second thought , let's not go to Camelot. 'Tis a silly place

        by o the umanity on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:28:21 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  I read somewhere that Bush considered (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        oxon, o the umanity

        suspending the 2004 elections, but I'm not sure how credible that report was.  

        I think he'd try suspending the 2008 elections if he thought he could get away with it.

        •  Yes. A committee was struck (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Arsenic

          either in advance of 2004 or 2006 to investigate the legal angles involved in cancelling or postponing an election in the event of a massive terrorist event.  That's one reason I half-expected something to happen in '06.

          Significant (to my untrained eye) executive orders have been issued since regarding emergency powers.

          Remember, vis a vis, knowing the enemy -- it ain't Bush.  It's Dick.  If he could get onto the ticket for '08, regardless of the political Common Wisdom that would suggest that as a bad idea for a GOP who wish to win, and engineer an electoral victory, or feel that he could engineer one, then the declaration of state of emergency wouldn't be necessary.

          When employees and stock-holders aren't different people, I'll find something else to do.

          by oxon on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:51:51 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  now how the hell (0+ / 0-)

      did I miss that part of your diary that points out what I just posted.

      Color me DUH...or D'OH!

      On second thought , let's not go to Camelot. 'Tis a silly place

      by o the umanity on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:25:13 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Well, it's a long diary. It's easy to (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        o the umanity

        miss something.

        •  Yeah, but (0+ / 0-)

          I did it to one of pico's posts this morning! Shouldn'ta oughta done that, but we worked it out.

          SO, I think I need to 'fess up...this morning, it was 'cuz I wasn't awake yet. Now it's because I've been online too damned long (and trying to triple multi-task 'cuz I cannot keep away from DK, it's become rather an addiction for me....).

          No--really and truly, it's because of speed-reading and my fingers engaging the keyboard before my brain catches up. Heh. Thanks for your forgiveness :)

          On second thought , let's not go to Camelot. 'Tis a silly place

          by o the umanity on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:40:30 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  You make a good point. I just hope we (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      sheddhead, o the umanity

      don't have to find out if Bush would suspend elections if we get hit by another 9/11.

  •  Suspended elections would not shock me, (9+ / 0-)

    although I think it is more likely that an attempt would be made to control the outcome through fraud and other means.  But if the prospects of someone like an Edwards being elected seem high, then frankly a trumped-up emergency with elections "postponed" would not even shock me at this point.  I understand that Markos does not want to fan the flames of panic that considering such a prospect might cause, but I can't imagine why he thinks it is really all that crazy given everything we have witnessed in the last 6 years.

    •  It's like walking through a haunted house... (8+ / 0-)

      ...on Halloween.  At first it's all scary and shit, but by the time you get to the end, nothing shocks you any more...

      •  Worst case scenarios should be given some (4+ / 0-)

        thought.  And the potential of them happening should be debated.

        •  Perhaps at your own weblog but (0+ / 0-)

          the owner has made his postion quite clear on this kind of debate at his site. Maybe you should re-read his recent diary and the Daily Kos FAQ concerning conspiracy theory.

          "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." ~ Diderot

          by Bouwerie Boy on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:53:19 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  I'm a lot more worried about the election... (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          oxon

          being quietly rigged for Giuliani than I am about it being suspended.  This WH clearly does not want to see a successor come in that will start nosing around in the dark corners.  It needs a successor that will come in and reassure us that we still have the forms of Constitutional govt while the substance of it continues to be shipped to an undisclosed location.

          The scary thing about this WH is that they've been able to do it all under color of law.  The American-Idol watching public essentially believes that they live in the same country now that they lived in in 2000.  Yes, they have to take their shoes off in airports, but, otherwise, they don't suspect what's going on b/c things haven't really changed on the surface.

          Suspending elections that weren't suspended when a Civil War was going on would be a different kettle of fish.

          Some men see things as they are and ask why. I see things that never were and ask why not?

          by RFK Lives on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 02:03:02 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  RePugs are trying to pull some electoral votes (0+ / 0-)

            crap in CA to snag 20+ electoral votes there by changing the law from winner take all.  They'll probably try that in other blue states too.

            Dems have to stop that.

            The Dem nominee is going to need a solid 8-10 lead in the polls going into election day, or the Repugs will
            try to steal the presidency in 2008 too.  

    •  I think suspended elections is a possibility we (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      o the umanity

      should not dismiss out of hand.  An Edwards presidency would scare the hell out of the political and economic establishment.

    •  There's also the very real danger (0+ / 0-)

      that paranoia saps the will to fight.  That, more than concerns over credibility, would be a valid reason to dissuade such discussions.  To an extent.

      It's why I don't think Rusty's diary with its call to explicit action and involvment in the Iraq moratorium day counters that objection.

      When employees and stock-holders aren't different people, I'll find something else to do.

      by oxon on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:55:43 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Oh goody. Another cancelled elections / (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Alma

    black helicopter diary. Looks like someone didn't get the memo. BTW, my pootie loves you Rusty.

    "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." ~ Diderot

    by Bouwerie Boy on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:31:49 PM PDT

  •  Rusty, huh? (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    campskunk

    Your full name isn't Rusty Shackleford, is it?

    Founder of the Committee to Save asdf

    by droogie6655321 on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:34:03 PM PDT

  •  Great metaphor -- (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    kredwyn, sheddhead, Rusty1776

    black helicopter with a keyboard.

    I share the concern that you've oulined a possible, even plausible scenario.  I don't agree that any of it's a given.  I was equally firmly, if subconsciously, convinced that an October surprise or ballot-rigging would prevent the 2006 elections from occuring, or at least prevent a democratic victory.

    That didn't happen, and when I heard the next morning that Tester had won, I broke down in manly tears.  Only then did I realize that for all the work, I hadn't really credited the possibility that these guys could be beaten.

    We need some perspective, here.  Most Democrats did NOT vote to extend Abu carte blanche.  Some did.  Every time Bush calls wolf, it is less convincing to the public at large, not more.  

    More people are realizing that they've been had, and our job is to increase that number.

    Apart from that, yes, we do need to know who we are up against, and to preclude no options.  To assume that someone will fight our battles for us is also unrealistic.  We are activists, and you are dead on to argue that we must work for an activists' solution.

    Spot on.

    When employees and stock-holders aren't different people, I'll find something else to do.

    by oxon on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:35:11 PM PDT

    •  I agree that it's a great metaphor (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      oxon

      and made me think...  

      I'm really tired of being worried about what might happen next.

      "2009" The end of an error

      by sheddhead on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:37:39 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Thank you, oxon. I think we have a (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      oxon

      responsibility to consider all the possibilities, even if they seem remote and unlikely.

      What has happened this past 7 years seemed damn remote and unlikely in 2000.  If we would have been prepared for the worst, we might have been able to prevent this BushCo crime spree.

      •  Agreed. (0+ / 0-)

        Though in hindsight I'm not sure what we'd have done.  Storm the Supreme Court in 2000?  I don't know.  And I don't pretend to know what we'd do in the face of any of the possible future challenges, either.  

        All I can see is that we have to work to convince, not the reps, but their constituents, that we have a rogue administration on our hands, who MUST be confronted at every step, optics be damned.

        In terms of trying to foresee all possibilities, see my comment below.

        When employees and stock-holders aren't different people, I'll find something else to do.

        by oxon on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:44:48 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  There are no term limits on V.P. (0+ / 0-)

    So, here's another scenario.  Cheney stays on the ticket, and the GOP try to engineer another dramatic, last minute, come from behind victory for the W.H.

    They could concede Senate and House seats, so long as they retain the executive, which Cheney could continue to run, provided we don't garner 2/3 in either house of the legislature.  Holding the executive and the judiciary trumps congress, as we're seeing.

    When employees and stock-holders aren't different people, I'll find something else to do.

    by oxon on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:38:34 PM PDT

  •  My Black Helicopter was down yesterday (8+ / 0-)

    and they didn't even send a repairman to make sure I was okay.

  •  Strange timing (0+ / 0-)

    Our tech guy stopped by to add more RAM to my laptop. I started powering down, when he asked me "Your (MacBook's) camera is on? Why is your camera on?"

    I joked back, "I don't know - the government is watching?"

    I'd like to think my use of an Apple computer, not a Wintel, will protect me. Maybe Al Gore can do an endrun around this, straight to Steve Jobs!

    In the meantime, I'll sign the pledge.

    -6.63,-5.90 | What kind of world are you leaving your children? You might be reborn as your children's children.

    by partikl on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 01:53:58 PM PDT

  •  Have to disagree on the inevitability (4+ / 0-)

    of another 9/11.

    The 'terrorists" just aren't that fucking together.

    I believe more in a 'they got lucky and Bushco has milked it to install tyranny' scenario more than anything else.

    There were SO many holes in the system to exploit back then...I have a hard time believing they are capable of pulling off something really big these days....thoguh of course I don't discount it completetely.

    To me the GWOT is a big bag of BS.....and a law enforcement issue.

    If they were really worried, they would be doing something about Pakistan and the AG Khan network....and they aren't.

    You could call that complicity...I call it incompetence, on BOTH sides.

  •  Know your enemies (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    oxon

    Which corporations are behind and benefit from neo-con policies? Antonia Juhasz believes they are
    Bechtel, Chevron, Halliburton and Lockheed Martin.

    http://www.thebushagenda.net

    With our Democratic reps. rolling over for Bush economic boycotts may be our only leverage.

    http://www.buyblue.org

    Abolish the Homeland Scrutiny Department.

    by hoplite9 on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 02:12:30 PM PDT

  •  I figure... (0+ / 0-)

    ...that if they want to spy on me that bad, THEY can pay the ISP and satellite cable bills. 'Til then, if they've hired somebody to spy on me full time, they'd be better off just paying me directly. I'm cheap... §;o)

  •  No cancelled elections...Civil War (0+ / 0-)

    The power-players of either party aren't putting a halt to this executive.

    Methinks its because they like the idea.  Both sides are thinking they'll win the next election...and the new power that goes with it.

    That makes the stakes HUGE in '08.

    The means the winner will have a constant target on his/her back, especially our minority candidates.  I had the displeasure of spending part of my childhood in panhandle Texas...let there be a black president...or another Clinton...two epitomes of ultimate evil to the redneck wingnuts.

    That means the '08 election may become a bloody mess.

    Or America might just yawn...change channel.

  •  Are there any white helicopters? (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Bouwerie Boy

    Or brown ones?

    uh, you know, just sayin' watch the metaphors

    A day without sunshine is like, you know, night.

    by Doodad on Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 03:00:32 PM PDT

Permalink | 44 comments