Frameshop: How Rt-Wing Lie About MoveOn Ad Became The Story (update)
Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 05:34:41 AM PDT
Weekly Standard Lies About MoveOn Ad, Media Falls For It
Pay attention, America: this is how the right-wing uses the media to manipulate the truth and silence dissent against the Iraq war.
Even before MoveOn.org's ran it's controversial ad about General Petraeus in the New York Times, The Weekly Standard published an article by Peter Hegseth, Executive Director of the organization Vets for Freedom. The headline of the article accused the MoveOn.org ad of calling Petreaus a 'traitor' ("MoveOn.org Calls Petraeus a Traitor"). The only problem: the word 'traitor' appears nowhere in the MoveOn.org ad nor anywhere on the MoveOn.org page about the ad. It is Hegseth's article that introduced the word 'traitor' into the story--an outright lie intended to silence dissent against the war. Less than 24 hours after the Hegseth piece ran and the MoveOn.org ad appeared, the mainstream media picked up the Weekly Standard's lie and repeated it until it became the story.
The word 'betray' used by MoveOn in the ad, is commonly used and does not imply 'traitor' unless someone introduces that definition.
Voilà! Another effort by U.S. citizens to question Bush's policy in Iraq has been silenced by right-wing, coordinated accusations that critics of the war seek to harm the country, this time by slandering the U.S. military.
And it is not just overt right-wing sources influenced by the Weekly Standard.
During an interview of MoveOn.org's Eli Pariser, last night (Sep 10, 2007), Hardball's Chris Matthew's repeated the false accusation several times, asking if it was acceptable to accuse Patraeus of being a 'traitor,' as if the MoveOn.org ad had done so--thereby repeating Hegseth's false spin.
In the 48 hours since it was posted Hegseth's lie about the MoveOn.org ad has been repeated all over the media, from Hugh Hewitt in the Los Angeles Times (Sep 10, 2007) to lesser-known sources such as Wake Up America.
Hewitt also repeated the Hegseth lie in a Townhall.com post, posting a statement to the widely-read conservative blog that is outright false when he stated that the Senate had used "MoveOn.org as their party’s attack dog to call David Petraeus a traitor"--despite the fact that the MoveOn.org ad did not call Petraeus a liar (full post here).
The problem, of course, is not just that a false statement in the original Hegseth article was published as if it was news on The Weekly Standard, but the uncritical way other media outlets picked up and repeated the lie.
To date, not one major media outlet has denounced the Hegseth pieces for lying about the text of the MoveOn.org ad.
Update [2007-9-11 11:42:49 by Jeffrey Feldman]:
I have to say, I am a bit surprised by the reaction to this diary. The prevailing argument of critics seems to be that if the MoveOn ad had been worded slightly better, then the right would not have had such an easy time branding MoveOn as harmful to the military and the country. All I can say to that is: wake the heck up, let's find some backbone, folks!
The right wing has been slandering MoveOn as anti-military and in bed with murderous terrorists for years--building on the effort by reactionary right wingers to brand every anti-War group treasonous, an effort that's been ongoing since the Vietnam war. There is no such thing as a perfect act of progressive communications in an environment poisoned by right-wing PR. The MoveOn ad did a brilliant job at driving the anti-War message, yesterday. And now our job is not to judge it as perfect or imperfect,but to step up and have their back when they get slimed by right-wingers paid top dollar to do nothing else but accuse the left of being anti-American.
(cross posted from Frameshop)
