Many of us were dismissed when we thought Clinton's third place finish in Iowa was a predictor of things to come, but it seems like recent history will repeat itself. With the Clinton and Edwards campaigns bleeding supporters over to the Obama side, CNN just reported that a new poll has Obama up 10 points in New Hampshire.
Obama 39%
Clinton 29%
Edwards 16%
http://www.cnn.com/...
ARG has Obama up 12 points!
ARG has Obama up 12 points!
Change can't just be a slogan - it has to mean something. To be a leader, you can't simply pull strings from behind the scenes to accomplish your goals, you need to be able to stand out in front and lead people. For the types of problems our country faces, we can't afford to be gridlocked by partisan bickering that existed long before George W. Bush came to Washington. There was a reason Al Gore didn't use Bill Clinton on the campaign trail in 2000 - he was damaged goods. One of only two presidents in U.S. history to actually be impeached, Clinton was at best a mediocre president who failed create any lasting change beyond his own presidency (if someone mentions welfare reform and a balanced budget again I think I'll puke).
How would electing Hillary Clinton constitute change?