Skip to main content

cross posted in my blog.

In virtually every speech since Iowa, Hillary has accused Obama of being against the Patriot Act, then voting to re-authorize it as soon as he was a Senator.

And while that is one of the things in Obama's record that I am less than content about, it is important to note that her accusations are not 100% accurate.

The Patriot Act was passed on October 25, 2001, a month after September 11. Only one Senator had the cahones to vote against it, and it wasn’t Hillary; it was Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin (D). Sen. Mary Landrieu was the next closest thing to a Nay vote by refusing to vote on the bill.

What Hillary, who voted for the initial Patriot Act in 2001 and for its reauthorization in March 2006, is doing is intentionally neglecting the lengths to which Obama, jointly with Sen. Feingold, went to to improve the Patriot Act and restore some of the rights violated by the first bill. The 2006 bill was called the "USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act."

Unlike Hillary, who voted yes to both instances, Obama was not content to reauthorize the Patriot Act without condition. Below is his floor statement on why he ended up voting for the second version of the bill and what was different about it.

"Mr. President, four years ago, following one of the most devastating attacks in our nation’s history, Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act to give our nation’s law enforcement the tools they needed to track down terrorists who plot and lurk within our own borders and all over the world - terrorists who, right now, are looking to exploit weaknesses in our laws and our security to carry out even deadlier attacks than we saw on September 11th.

We all agreed that we needed legislation to make it harder for suspected terrorists to go undetected in this country. Americans everywhere wanted that.

But soon after the PATRIOT Act passed, a few years before I ever arrived in the Senate, I began hearing concerns from people of every background and political leaning that this law didn’t just provide law enforcement the powers it needed to keep us safe, but powers it didn’t need to invade our privacy without cause or suspicion.

Now, at times this issue has tended to degenerate into an "either-or" type of debate. Either we protect our people from terror or we protect our most cherished principles. But that is a false choice. It asks too little of us and assumes too little about America.

Fortunately, last year, the Senate recognized that this was a false choice. We put patriotism before partisanship and engaged in a real, open, and substantive debate about how to fix the PATRIOT Act. And Republicans and Democrats came together to propose sensible improvements to the Act. Unfortunately, the House was resistant to these changes, and that’s why we’re voting on the compromise before us.

Let me be clear: this compromise is not as good as the Senate version of the bill, nor is it as good as the SAFE Act that I have cosponsored. I suspect the vast majority of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle feel the same way. But, it’s still better than what the House originally proposed.

This compromise does modestly improve the PATRIOT Act by strengthening civil liberties protections without sacrificing the tools that law enforcement needs to keep us safe. In this compromise:

We strengthened judicial review of both National Security Letters, the administrative subpoenas used by the FBI, and Section 215 orders, which can be used to obtain medical, financial and other personal records.
We established hard time limits on sneak-and-peak searches and limits on roving wiretaps.
We protected most libraries from being subject to National Security Letters.
We preserved an individual’s right to seek counsel and hire an attorney without fearing the FBI’s wrath.
And we allowed judicial review of the gag orders that accompany Section 215 searches.
The compromise is far from perfect. I would have liked to see stronger judicial review of National Security Letters and shorter time limits on sneak and peak searches, among other things.

Sen. Feingold has proposed several sensible amendments - that I support - to address these issues. Unfortunately, the Majority Leader is preventing Sen. Feingold from offering these amendments through procedural tactics. That is regrettable because it flies in the face of the bipartisan cooperation that allowed the Senate to pass unanimously its version of the Patriot Act - a version that balanced security and civil liberties, partisanship and patriotism.

The Majority Leader’s tactics are even more troubling because we will need to work on a bipartisan basis to address national security challenges in the weeks and months to come. In particular, members on both sides of the aisle will need to take a careful look at President Bush’s use of warrantless wiretaps and determine the right balance between protecting our security and safeguarding our civil liberties. This is a complex issue. But only by working together and avoiding election-year politicking will we be able to give our government the necessary tools to wage the war on terror without sacrificing the rule of law.

So, I will be supporting the Patriot Act compromise. But I urge my colleagues to continue working on ways to improve the civil liberties protections in the Patriot Act after it is reauthorized.

I thank the chair and yield the floor." - February 16, 2006

It should be noted that like Obama, even Feingold voted in favor of the reauthorization, given the acceptance of his and Obama's suggested amendments.

I have looked everywhere to find a floor statement by Hillary Clinton about the need to improve the Patriot Act and cannot find one. Go figure. She criticizes Obama’s record on the Patriot Act, which he sought to improve before reauthorizing, when as far as I can find, she didn’t even have the gumption to speak out against its initial inception on the Senate floor (and if someone can find me evidence otherwise, please, provide a link).

She’s made it clear that she wants our candidates and their voting records vetted, but apparently that doesn't apply to her this time around.

---

UPDATE: If you like this diary, please Recommend it, I don't want this information to disappear from people who need it to make an informed decision.

Originally posted to GirlZero on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 10:24 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tips for clarity (11+ / 0-)

    "You can't at once argue that you're the master of a broken system in Washington and offer yourself as the person to change it." - Barack Obama

    by GirlZero on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 10:24:58 AM PST

  •  It needs to be scrapped totally, but... (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    serrano, Norm DePlume, GirlZero, broui

    I have much more respect for Barack's attempt to change it for the better than Hillary's rubber stamping it in its most odious form. She probably didn't even read it.

    [RED/GLARE]

    For business reasons, I must preserve the outward sign of sanity.

    --Mark Twain

    by redglare on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 10:29:52 AM PST

  •  Bill is lying again (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    broui

    When do people stand up and say enough already.  What is it going to take for Americans to wake up?

  •  Tags Fixed (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    GirlZero

    Tag guidelines instruct that when names are used both the first and last names should be included ) (with no titles like Rep. or Senator), and in cases like the George Bushes - the middle initials are essential.

    Standard election diary tags added

    2008 elections, president, primaries, Democrats

    Since tags are an indexing system, (and many people bookmark tags or add them to their blog rolls)  it makes sense to use the tags used by the majority of the community for the same subject.  Please save for reuse and help check the tags in other diaries for your candidate.

    ====================
    Tagging Tips
    ====================
    Review standard election related tags here.  
    Tips on Creating Good Diary Tags
    Get more readers by using tags from this list of the most used tags.
    Find other tags and their diaries by using this Tag Search Tool (the higher the number the better the tag since it means more people are using it.)

  •  Vetting (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    GirlZero

    If the Clintons want vetting ... let's have it.  Obama's actions juxtaposed with Hillary's actions. Let the chips fall where they may.

    I think much of NH was about Obama reading the polls and playing it safe.  He needs to accentuate Hillary's voting record of rolling over on Bush's foreign policy agenda.

    Instead we're talking about a misogynistic media.

    •  I so completely agree with you. (0+ / 0-)

      I think the insane amount of hype surrounding her voice cracking and her eyes welling up is disgusting. Whether or not they were genuine (and I have my doubts, based on her staff urging her to appear softer in New Hampshire), the media gobbled it up like Thanksgiving turkey.

      "You can't at once argue that you're the master of a broken system in Washington and offer yourself as the person to change it." - Barack Obama

      by GirlZero on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 10:58:35 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  But he didn't, in the end, (0+ / 0-)

    stand with Feingolds on opposing theunacceptable version which was up for a vote.
    I'll be generous, and give him a "D".

    Democratic Candidate for US Senate (Wisconsin 2012)
    Court certified Marijuana Expert

    by ben masel on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 10:57:40 AM PST

    •  Neither did Hillary, so how is it fair for her to (0+ / 0-)

      paint him as some Patriot Act superfan?

      "You can't at once argue that you're the master of a broken system in Washington and offer yourself as the person to change it." - Barack Obama

      by GirlZero on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 10:59:20 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I don't intend to vote for either in the Primary (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        GirlZero

        wavering between Gravel and a write-in for Feingold.

        Democratic Candidate for US Senate (Wisconsin 2012)
        Court certified Marijuana Expert

        by ben masel on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 11:40:50 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Respect for Feingold. (0+ / 0-)

          I'm fairly certain that he'll endorse Obama, however, as his state's governor has already done.

          I sincerely hope he's on Obama's VP shortlist; they do great work together.

          I must confess, I don't know so much about Gravel. I'd be interested to learn more.

          "You can't at once argue that you're the master of a broken system in Washington and offer yourself as the person to change it." - Barack Obama

          by GirlZero on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 01:16:00 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  Feingold's endorsement (0+ / 0-)

            I suspect he'll remain neutral, rather than burning any bridges for his work in the Senate in the meantime.

            Pressed by a constituent at his listening session just before Thanksgiving as to who he'd be voting for, said he was considering Clinton and Obama. No link, I was in the room.

            Democratic Candidate for US Senate (Wisconsin 2012)
            Court certified Marijuana Expert

            by ben masel on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 01:21:21 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  We'll just have to see, I suppose. (0+ / 0-)

              It must be amazing to be in one of those listening sessions. What a guy.

              "You can't at once argue that you're the master of a broken system in Washington and offer yourself as the person to change it." - Barack Obama

              by GirlZero on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 01:22:32 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

              •  Seeing him again this weekend. (1+ / 0-)
                Recommended by:
                GirlZero

                My agenda: Privacy rights in the location tracking of cellphones. That was my question in November, he expressed interest in preparing legislation, time for followup.

                I don't expect passage this year, but would like to get a bill introuced, and banged around the Hill, so we can hit the ground running next year.

                Democratic Candidate for US Senate (Wisconsin 2012)
                Court certified Marijuana Expert

                by ben masel on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 01:45:24 PM PST

                [ Parent ]

  •  Rec'd. I now have Clinton fatigue (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    GirlZero

    I am exhausted from listening to both of them attempt to finesse and blur and distort the truth about the records of the other candidates.

    •  Do you also feel kind of like you're losing (0+ / 0-)

      respect for Bill? It's a major letdown, especially given the nostalgia with which I looked back on his two terms over the past seven years.

      "You can't at once argue that you're the master of a broken system in Washington and offer yourself as the person to change it." - Barack Obama

      by GirlZero on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 11:19:33 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Very much so. (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        GirlZero

        I not only voted for him twice but I volunteered for his campaign as a student. Now I am ashamed of the things that come out of his mouth. And he should be as well.

        •  I was too young to vote for him. (0+ / 0-)

          In fact, even more depressingly, the only elections I've ever voted for were "won" by Dubbya.

          At least I helped vote Obama into the Senate.

          Speaking of Alan Keyes, wonder how he fared in NH? =P

          "You can't at once argue that you're the master of a broken system in Washington and offer yourself as the person to change it." - Barack Obama

          by GirlZero on Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 01:21:03 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site