Why not? Nobody else is.
I'm not going to comment on this breakdown, because I'm not certain what it means: all I know is that nobody is really discussing it, preferring to focus on "identities."
Why discuss class, anyway: play-pretend "debates" about nebulous, unverifiable feelings and motives are much more fun.
But, certainly, class means something to our party, which, let's face it, is supposed to be the party of the working class. Nobody else is talking about it: Let's do.
Vote by Income Clinton Obama Edwards
<$15,000 49% 37% 13 <br>$15-30,000 50% 29% 15
$30-50,000 44% 32% 17
$50-75,000 32% 37% 18
$75-100,000 36% 42% 18
$100-150,000 33% 43% 17
$150-200,000 48% 33% 15
>$200,000 33% 44% 13
I'm making no judgments here. Really just interested to see how people interpret this class breakdown, which, really, is much more important than how "women" "men" or "minorities" view candidates. Isn't it?
The Same Subject, Continued.