One passage from the NYT Endorsement of Hillary Clinton stood out to me.
Mr. Obama talks more about the damage Mr. Bush has done to civil liberties, the rule of law and the balance of powers. Mrs. Clinton is equally dedicated to those issues, and more prepared for the Herculean task of figuring out exactly where, how and how often the government's powers have been misused —— and what must now be done to set things right.
Really??? He taught constitutional law for a decade. Is that worth anything?
University of Chicago Professor Cass Sunstein disagrees
"It certainly is an advantage that he really knows the Constitution of the United States," said Professor Cass Sunstein. "I don't know if we have had a president that knows as much about the founding document as he does."
What experience does Hillary have that makes her more prepared for understanding the misuse of the government's powers?