Very simple point - I support based on candidates. I will not donate a dime to Hillary's campaign if she wins based on super delegates. I will not donate a dime to a super delegate from Colorado who votes against Obama (he won here). I would not donate to a New York super delegate who voted against Hillary (sorry, Obama fans, I don't go proportional on super delegates).
Ok, I will make an exception - if a House member super delegate's congressional district went one way versus the state vote I can see that alignment (they represent their voters). But that is the exception.
Why?
Because the national level groups bundle that money for power. The ability of the DNC or DSCC to allocate funds gives them the ability to push legislators. That's fine as long as I agree with how they push.
The reality is that the pushing this Congress has been against what I believe in. Therefore, they already have one strike against them. To ignore the voters in the primaries (or caucuses - after all, they set the rules) is one strike too many.
Simple, the DNC and DSCC live on money. Fine, you want to survive - play fair.