crossposted from unbossed
This is not the first time unbossed has reported on problems with security clearances when work is privatized. Year after year, government work of various sorts is subcontracted to private vendors. And year after year, this means a lot of people to investigate. In short, privatization and private contractors create the conditions for serious risk and vulnerability. The more there are, the more efforts that must be made to keep with with security clearances. This is certainly the case at the Department of Defense. And yet . . .
Last week, GAO issued two reports on DOD security clearances. Here, I think is the money quote from the main report:
Our assessments of data on the numbers and costs of investigations and adjudications for industry personnel for fiscal years 2000 through 2004 showed that DOD-provided information was not sufficiently reliable for us to report.
The report summary states:
Although DOD’s first annual report responded to the issues specified in the mandate, it did not include certain important information that was available on funding, processing times, and quality. DOD’s report limited the funding requirements information for its industry security clearance program to 2007 and 2008, even though the department asserted before Congress in May 2007 that it would need tens of millions of dollars in the future to maintain the infrastructure supporting the program and to cover operating costs. While DOD reported the average total time for DOD industry clearances and the average time to complete all clearance investigations, it did not include information on the time to complete any of the other phases (e.g., adjudication). GAO’s September 2006 report suggested that longer delays are found in some phases of the process than in others and that quantifying those delays would be useful. The DOD report was largely silent on measures of quality in the clearance process, which is crucial if agencies are to accept the validity of clearances from other agencies. By not including these types of information, DOD limited the information available to Congress as it oversees the effectiveness of DOD’s industry personnel security clearance program.
GAO was unable to report the number and unit cost of investigations and adjudications for fiscal years 2000 through 2004 because data were either unavailable or insufficiently reliable. However, DOD reported that OPM conducted 81,495 and 138,769 investigations of industry personnel in fiscal years 2005 and 2006, respectively, and DOD granted clearance eligibility to 113,408 and 144,608 industry personnel in fiscal years 2005 and 2006, respectively. In estimating unit costs, DOD and OPM did not account for all factors affecting the cost of a clearance — factors that would have made the DOD-provided estimates higher. These factors included (1) the cost of special interviews that are sometimes necessary to resolve discrepancies in information and (2) that top secret clearance adjudications normally take about twice as long as those for secret/confidential clearances.
DOD’s procedures and plans are evolving, including procedures for projecting the number of future investigations it will need and plans to reduce backlogs and delays, as well as steps to fund the industry clearance program. In ongoing efforts to address the continued inaccuracy of its projections of future clearance needs, DOD has taken several steps. For example, DOD made its voluntary annual survey of contractors performing classified government work accessible through the Internet in 2006 and began encouraging industry staff to complete it. The response rate increased to 86 percent of industry personnel in 2007. Further, while DOD does not have its own plan to address the funding of its clearance program and its delays in processing clearances, it is currently participating in a governmentwide effort to make clearance processes more efficient and cost-effective. Streamlining and improving the efficiency of its clearance process is also one of DOD’s top transformation priorities. In its 2004 report, GAO recommended that DOD implement a comprehensive plan and improve its estimates of future investigation needs.
You can read the full reports here:
DOD Personnel Clearances: Improved Annual Reporting Would Enable More Informed Congressional Oversight GAO-08-350, February 13, 2008
DOD Personnel Clearances: DOD Faces Multiple Challenges in Its Efforts to Improve Clearance Processes for Industry Personnel GAO-08-470T, February 13, 2008