Skip to main content

UPDATE:  NEW INFO ON A SLAM AT REP KING OF IOWA!!!

I think that Mr. King has it backwards. The fact that the continuation of a presence in Iraq as Senator McCain has suggested is exactly what, I think, will fan the flames of anti-American sentiment and make it more difficult for us to create a long-term and sustainable peace in the world. But I have to say that Mr. King and individuals like him thrive on offensive or controversial statements as a way to get in the papers, so I don’t take it too seriously. I would hope Senator McCain would want to distance himself from that kind of inflammatory and offensive remarks.”

Way to lay the controversy at McCain's Feet!  END UPDATE

About the Veep Game:

Full Transcript

TRANSCRIPT-Barack Obama at Columbus, MS Town Hall [3/10/08]

I respect Senator Clinton. She was a friend of mine before this campaign. She”ll be a friend of mine after this campaign. Because we’re gonna have to unify together to win in November. But I do have to say I was listening to some of the things Senator Clinton said down here in Mississippi over the last couple of days.

So I am gonna have to say a little bit about it.

You know as I understand it. Both Senator Clinton and President Clinton repeatedly talked about how I would be a great Vice President.  They kept on saying well you know he would be a fine Vice President. It would be a formidable team with Clinton at the top and Obama in second place.

Now first of all..with all due respect..with all due respect. I have won twice as many states as Senator Clinton. I have won more of the popular vote than Senator Clinton. I have more delegates than Senator Clinton. So I don’t know how somebody who is in second place is offering the Vice Presidency to the person who is in first place. I mean. I am just wondering. I am just wondering. If I was in second place I could understand it, but I am in first place right now. So that is point number one.

But there is another. There is a second point. This is an interesting point. I want you guys to follow me on this. President Bill Clinton back in 1992 when he was being asked about his selection for Vice President. He said the only criteria, the most important criteria for Vice President is that that person is ready if I fell out in the first week that he or she would be ready to be the Commander in Chief. That was his criteria.

Now they have been spending the last two, three weeks. Remember with that advertisement with the phone call. Telling everyone.. Getting all of Generals to say well we are not sure he is ready. “I am ready on day one”, “He may not be ready yet” But I don’t understand it. If I’m not ready how is it that you think I should be such a great Vice President. Do you understand that?

See I was trying to explain to somebody a while back.the okidoke. You all know the okidoke. When somebody is trying to bamboozle you, when they are trying to hoodwink you.
You.They are trying to hoodwink you.

You can’t say that he is not ready on day one unless he is willing to be your Vice President then he is ready on day one.

So look I just want everybody to be absolutely clear here, okay. I want everyone to be absolutely clear. We are in a tough battle and I don’t presume that I have won this election. Senator Clinton is fighting hard. She is tenacious. I respect her for that. She is working hard to win the nomination. But I want everybody to be absolutely clear.

I am not running for Vice President. I am running for President of the United States of America. I am running for President of the United States of America. I am running to be Commander in Chief. And the reason I am running to be Commander in Chief is because I believe that the most important thing when you answer that phone call at three in the morning is what kind of judgment do you have, not how long you have been in Washington, but what kind of judgment do you have when you are answering that phone.

And I believe that I have shown better judgment than Senator Clinton. I believe I offer a clean break from the policies of George Bush. Because Senator Clinton went along with George Bush on the war in Iraq. Senator Clinton went along with George Bush on her willingness to try to saber rattle when it came to Iran. She has gone along with many of the conventional ways of thinking about foreign policy that have gotten us into trouble. That is what I intend to change when I am President of the United States.

So I don’t want anybody here thinking that I that somehow well you know maybe I can get both. Don’t think that way. You have to make a choice in this election.

Are you gonna go along with the past or are you gonna go towards the future?

Are you gonna do the same old thing or are you gonna try something new?

I am not running for Vice President. I do not believe Senator Clinton is about change because in fact this kind of gamesmanship, talking about me as Vice President, but he maybe he’s not ready for Commander in Chief. That is exactly the kind of double speak, double talk that Washington is very good at. That people who spend a lot of time in Washington have a lot of experience at, but is not gonna solve the problems of the country.

Compare this to the Joke that has become Howard Wolfson directly contradicting both Bill and Hillary on Veep Material:

He said that the possibility of Obama as veep is not something that she is "prepared to rule out at this point," adding: "At the same time we continued to believe that Senator Obama has not passed the key commander-in-chief test at least at this point."

A bit later in the call, Wolfson was pressed on this question, and said:

"Senator Clinton will not choose any candidate who has not at the time of choosing passed the national security threshold. But we have a long way to go until Denver, and it's not something she's prepared to rule out at this point."

I think they know they've dropped the ball on this one bigtime...   Obama calls them out and now the media will eat it up....

Will this end the Commander in Chief Threshold B/S?

UPDATE:  Photos from the Event

UPDATE II:  Obama's Math in Big States by Popular Vote; Hillary's Construct Du Jour

Consider the top 9 "big" states that have voted so far
State . . . . . . . Obama . . . . . . . .Clinton
California . .  .2,126,000 . . . . . . .2,553,000
Texas . . . . . 1,358,000 . . . . . . .1,459,000
New York. . . . . 698,000 . . . . . . .1,003,000
Illinois. . . . 1,302,000 . . . . . . . .662,000
Ohio  . . . . . . 982,000. . . . . . . 1,212,000
Georgia . . . . . 704,000 . . . . . . . .330,000
New Jersey. . . . 492,000 . . . . . . . .603,000
Virginia  . . . . 627,000 . . . . . . . .350,000
Washington  . . . 354,000 . . . . . . . .316,000

Total . . . . . 8,643,000 . . . . . . .8,487,000

AP Update:  AP Runs the story characterizing it as a Mocking Rebutal

The Illinois senator used his first public appearance of the week to knock down the notion that he might accept the party's vice presidential nomination. He noted that he has won more states, votes and delegates than Clinton so far.

Obama aides said Clinton's recent hints that she might welcome him as her vice presidential candidate appeared meant to diminish him and to attract undecided voters in the remaining primary states by suggesting they can have a "dream ticket."

Obama had never suggested he might accept a second spot on the ticket. But until Monday he had not ridiculed the notion so directly, even if he did completely rule it out in Shermanesque terms.

I'd like to make a concluding comment regarding the way the media may or may not portray this comment by Obama in light of the Elliot Spitzer Story and its now dominance of the news cycle.

1) It doesn't matter!

The damage that was slowly accumulating over the weekend with the way the Clintons were cleverly using the Veep discussion to try and sway soft support was likely either insulting the campaign or becoming a problem. I'd argue however that in total, it didn't help the Clintons at all. The public didn't need Obama to remind them that Hillary was in 2nd place, most accounts are fair in that regard, they just differ in respect to where emphasis is placed on closeness.  Obama here came out and clearly addressed the notion that he could somehow become the Veep and flatly renounced and rejected such a notion, and did it in a way that will only make him look better for it.

2) Folding in the Commander in Chief Objections

This was a bit of brilliant posturing, something we'll hear again as it becomes part of the refrain.  Not only in the future when responding to readiness to be Commander in Chief will Obama point towards Iraqi Judgement, but he can also now stand on this ground, namely, if he's Veep Material, then surely, he passes whatever standard Hillary Clinton holds herself too.  This is a good way to win that arguement as it may be settled in weeks to come and on this point specifically, expect to see more in the future, especially on Bill's Veep Frame mentioned half way through.

3) This will calm the Supporters

Questions rose this weekend on whether or not Obama could Throw a Punch, how would his team and he specifically respond.  I don't know how a response could have been better executed honestly.  The tone and content was perfect, it was contextualized historically and hang on a Clinton Past refrain from the '90's.  It showed that rather than running immediately to a microphone to denounce the claims, Obama and his team crafted a new message and managed a Two-Fer with the Commander in Chief discussion wrapped in.  So Not Only has he reminded the listening audience he's the front runner, but he's also addressed the Commander in Chief Threshold, a Clinton Contruct, one he burst through with this excellent Logic.

So regardless of whether this gets heavy play this day or not, this response will hold water.  This is not how one goes about winning any new votes, but it does reinforce the Obama supporters notion of Obama's readiness to be a General Election candidate and it does go a long way to ending this silly topic and moving the discussion forward.

Originally posted to Billary Redux on Mon Mar 10, 2008 at 10:44 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

ethan, JUSIPER, ClaudeB, Paolo, nitpicker, anna, RobertInWisconsin, MichaelPH, JWC, Danny Boy, copithorne, Katydid, kid oakland, PLS, pb, Sean Robertson, howmartin, Chi, filkertom, tankej, nolalily, Jaime Schulte, hester, Sally in SF, murphy, copymark, dalemac, teacherken, slinkerwink, bluecayuga, kate mckinnon, jennybravo, askew, Dounia, Better Days, bball, PoliticGeek Pro, glitterscale, neonplaq, JustWinBaby, moon in the house of moe, Steven R, daninoah, dbratl, abarefootboy, lrhoke, Delaware Dem, mikeb42, Gooserock, gaspare, Unstable Isotope, nicolemm, existenz, Winger, psychprof, thesill, docdls, Avila, Emerson, Diane Chambers, dengre, Yoshimi, tommurphy, ParaHammer, musicalhair, Titian, Jambro, Tsarrio, Sherri in TX, LynChi, donna in evanston, m maddog, CaptUnderpants, Hesiod, kpardue, Victor, Jim in Chicago, cookiesandmilk, bawbie, lns1122, bsmcneil, eeff, Mnemosyne, LauraC, djinniya, the awful truth, TX Unmuzzled, Pompatus, xynz, polecat, acuppajo, frisco, Don MacDonald, blogswarm, theran, SallyCat, FyodorFish, object16, amitxjoshi, patagonia, expatjourno, Nonie3234, Ruth in OR, strengthANDwisdom, Heart of the Rockies, Plan9, jeepdad, PBCliberal, kissfan, Eternal Hope, dpc, RubDMC, Morgana, timmyc, bara, eyeswideopen, jackspace, victoryforUS, opinionated, Troutnut, fabacube, tyler93023, bronte17, Dazy, ashleyGA, zoopnfunk, mentaldebris, Wee Mama, SamSinister, petercjack, throwlikeagirl, C Mac, DAVE DIAL, Prairie Logic, brown girl in the ring, peace voter, NoMore, Rupert, SlowNomad, timeflier, CalvinV, Cool Blue Reason, fishhead, Scoopster, ra in ca, Patricia Taylor, mkfarkus, scimitar, Katzy, rickpickett, xopher, MisterOpus1, nomes, farmerhunt, calistan, chechecule, PocketNines, anoodle, dmsdbo, sgilman, vmckimmey, jbeach, k2winters, superba, DiMe, CrawfordMan, itskevin, Calprof, josephk, Thaxter, librarianman, Jesterfox, nupstateny, Yomberto, antirove, Alna Dem, CocoaLove, BrianSeattle, nitetalker, OutOfManyOne, Brit, wader, Janeo, LawStudent, jdmorg, iowabosox, byebyeblinkie, SneakySnu, webweaver, mayan, annan, danthrax, Subversive, businessdem, casperr, Nancy in LA, elmo, gmb, RedStateDem, madame defarge, jaywillie, Kidspeak, Dale Read, mnguitar, niteskolar, GN1927, chap, Scarce, mem, lizah, joliberal, renaissance grrrl, btyarbro, eartha, Anna Luc, Democratic Hawk, TheJohnny, walkshills, bwintx, Bendra, Mark Warner is God, Matt Esler, Donna in Rome, larrybutch, WV Democrat, Curt Matlock, lee1954, KellyB, randallt, smartgo, bobnbob, paisa, KayCeSF, SanDiegoDem, jre2k8, Paul Hogarth, Boalt, edavis, kmbo, valadon, dss, vivadissent, snowbird42, eyeball, bibble, Timroff, faithfull, jim bow, Blueiz, Sol Fed Joe, sawgrass727, Gowrie Gal, awater, davidkc, Big Tex, brendanm98, frostyinPA, soros, davidincleveland, chumley, humphrey, bloomer 101, Bluesee, radarlady, Harkov311, IamtheReason, 3ML, Annie Maim, Chimpy von Chimpibush, Sparkalepsy, MasonLee, subtropolis, mjd in florida, Bodean, Twilightsol, PBen, DoGooderLawyer, citizenx, huckleberry, snacksandpop, dynamicstand, TigerMom, thefos, brocktunestudios, boofdah, NeuvoLiberal, Lidane, Bill White, zombie, Viceroy, majcmb1, Pam from Calif, Frank Palmer, jenesq, chicagovigilante, Mr X, jorndorff, EvilPaula, aaraujo, LABobsterofAnaheim, Inland, Barcelona, sofia, sheddhead, Phil S 33, jabbausaf, Omen, blue jersey mom, libbie, davidslane, janew2, dmfox, aj4runner, el zilcho, rts, cerulean, Gottayo, serrano, sodalis, rustybias, Tex Kosmaniac Dem Lady, Rogneid, bookwoman, LisainNYC, Ekaterin, ZinZen, janis, Land of Enchantment, simplicio, fhcec, noweasels, golden star, begone, Reality Bites Back, kubla000, forbodyandmind, Prof Dave, ThaliaR, martini, dannyinla, gwilson, dsteele2, Uncle Bug, Do Tell, tarheelblue, Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse, highfive, cas2, sherlyle, RustyBrown, sambar, BlueInARedState, OH 09 Dem, andydoubtless, SciFiGuy, mr crabby, cookseytalbott, njhoo, watch out for snakes, rhetoricus, Shakludanto, poichick, Wary, play jurist, Lefty Coaster, goodasgold, Imipolex, phillyPete, SherriG, bren, birdbrain64, Joefdb, Tanya, Marshall Collins, ekruegr, DJShay, looty, condoleaser, Doctor Frog, NC Dem, real world chick, JVolvo, redglare, NewAmericanLeft, el cid, Potus2020, Dinclusin, mangusta, middleagedhousewife, Lord Humongous, blitz boy, lifelong, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, va dare, Grant Caesar Peters, frankzappatista, RantNRaven, blueness, liberaldawg, AmySmith, imorroy, PoxOnYou, Mary2002, bstotts, Picot verde, duha, coolsub, pseudopod, henna218, Callandor, Oothoon, theark, illusionmajik, Sapere aude, Reagan Smash, Donkey Underpants, mcwafflestix, malik5470, s marie, bvljac, Fredly, Duke S, Loudoun County Dem, oklacoma dem, oscarsmom, JohnMac, dmh44, Cottagerose, Purplepeople, ksp, kaptanoglu, uniongal, Dartagnan, WeBetterWinThisTime, Searching for Truth, vets74, EdSF, threegoal, 0wn, Outrider, stitifier, power2truth, tbirchard, profmom, David Jarman, shruticounseling, Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle, londubh, mystic, St Louis Woman, Canyon Lefty, Templar, jedennis, ubertar, second gen, DukieDem, jamesia, ayawisgi, fstlicho, TheCorkBoard, Coolwateroverstones, Junglered1, RokkiBlueboa, SeaTurtle, mamafooce, MadAsHellMaddie, leonard145b, kubrick2008, Puffin, JML9999, BasharH, TexasTwister, Clipper, sable, LoLoLaLa, aebudde, roycej, Empower Ink, extradish, cville townie, chicago minx, jules4sail, Phish Food, webphantom, kafkananda, GANJA, Dem in the heart of Texas, poblano, First Amendment, bigpappa10834, SicPlurisPoenaPrestantia, JeffW, TX Freethinker, ratador, Tally, planetclaire4, pollwatch, DraftChickenHawks, Captain C, RickMassimo, oolali, dotster, MikePhoenix, soulonaroll, ScottyUrb, Cordwainer, DocD, Foundmyvoice, shadetree mortician, marchtoimpeach, rikyrah, SMWalt, Marinesquire, Cat Servant, wscrews, speck tater, Mother of Zeus, rkt, EducationforAll, Ask 4 Questions, Mardish, pamelabrown, smartdemmg, icebergslim, Jake Williams, DanK Is Back, Quicksilver2723, Punditcrat, Thought Crime, noddem, codairem, dagnabbit, Horsefeathers, American Phoenix, mommaK, jalenth, karanja, LCA, shigeru, mikeymike68, joy sinha, a night owl, haruki, RoscoeOfAlabama, omegajew, nklein, allie123, George Gould, oscarfrye, psilocynic, TravelerBill, Simply Agrestic, lgcap, catchaz, princess k, ggwoman55, oldliberal, 4km, BrockAun, ryangoesboom, wv voice of reason, RedMask, NetRootsDaily, hardtoport, Bule Betawi, J Ash Bowie, cybrestrike, El Yoss, Mr Tentacle, Fonsia, justiceleague, rudewarrior, Unseen majority, lenzkrafterz, Tim in CA, mjkellett, timhisu, Boycott for Peace, 2632, not a cent, pinhighin2, broui, Madeleine Crowd, rockwilder, clambake, eroded47095, DaNorr, Dopeman, hope4achange, Hope08, Baldur, DemocraticOz, Helenann, Don Enrique, Partisan Progressive, Superposition, Danny Daemonic, SDuvall, SciVo, joshlyman, demgolfer, vertexoflife, BlueInRedCincy, panamaniaco, MingPicket, thoughtfulquestioning, Yalin, Reckoner, kps104, erin r, jhwvertigo, TFH, 4Honesty, Meng Bomin, MaqOuzo, Fawkes, mississippi boatrat, Ab2kgj, Daily Activist, eddie233, davepez, TinFoilMan, smartheart, Aerials, dcprof, supsupsup, SystemAnomaly, Curious Onlooker, Shep001, petral, Janeite, novaseeker, followyourbliss, Texas Fish, Alter, dansmith17, Peace4All, Buck Power, heliosfootball, coffee talk, LYFE, jazzence, RationalThoughtProcess, rdxtion, funmerlin, Zachariahs Blood, open sky, Into The Stars, Keith Slater, yuppers, XNeeOhCon, Calev, SpringFever, 1 20 2009, Lava20, Mule at Rossem, SheLawyer, reesespcs

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site